Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Plexiform neurofibromas can transform into atypical neurofibromas (ANF) and then further progress to aggressive malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (MPNST). ANF have been described to harbor distinct histological features and frequent loss of CDKN2A/B. However, histological evaluation may be rater-dependent, and detailed knowledge about the molecular mechanisms of malignant transformation is scarce. In general, malignant transformation can be accompanied by significant epigenetic changes, and global DNA methylation profiling is able to differentiate relevant tumor subgroups. Therefore, epigenetic profiling might provide a valuable tool to distinguish and characterize ANF with differing extent of histopathological atypia from neurofibromas and MPNST. METHODS:We investigated 40 tumors histologically diagnosed as ANF and compared their global methylation profile to other peripheral nerve sheath tumors. RESULTS:Unsupervised class discovery and t-SNE analysis indicated that 36/40 ANF cluster with benign peripheral nerve sheath tumors with clear separation from MPNST. 21 ANF formed a molecularly distinct cluster in proximity to schwannomas. Tumors in this cluster had a frequent heterozygous or homozygous loss of CDKN2A/B and significantly more lymphocyte infiltration than MPNST, schwannomas, and NF. Few ANF clustered closely with neurofibromas, schwannomas, or MPNST, raising the question, whether diagnosis based on histological features alone might pose a risk to both over- and underestimate the aggressiveness of these lesions. CONCLUSIONS:Our data suggest that ANF with varying histological morphology show distinct epigenetic similarities and cluster in proximity to benign peripheral nerve sheath tumor entities. Future investigations should pay special respect to correlating this methylation pattern to clinical outcomes.

Pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) poses a diagnostic challenge. The present study relies on methylation-based predictions and focuses on copy number variations (CNV) in PXA. We identified 551 tumors from patients having received the histologic diagnosis or differential diagnosis pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma (PXA) uploaded to the web page www.molecularneuropathology.org. Of these 551 tumors, 165 received the prediction "methylation class (anaplastic) pleomorphic xanthoastrocytoma" with a calibrated score >=0.9 by the brain tumor classifier version v12.8 and, therefore, were defined the PXA reference set designated mcPXAref. In addition to these 165 mcPXAref, 767 other tumors received the prediction mcPXA with a calibrated score >=0.9 but without a histological PXA diagnosis. The total number of individual tumors predicted by histology and/or by methylome based classification as PXA, mcPXA or both was 1318, and these were designated the study cohort. The selection of a control cohort was guided by methylation-based predictions recurrently observed for the other 386/551 tumors diagnosed as histologic PXA. 131/386 received predictions for another entity besides PXA with a score >=0.9. Control tumors corresponding to the 11 most common other predictions were selected, adding up to 1100 reference cases. CNV profiles were calculated from all methylation datasets of the study and control cohorts. Special attention was given to the 7/10 signature, gene amplifications and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B. Comparison of CNV in the subsets of the study cohort and the control cohort were used to establish relations independent of histological diagnoses. Tumors in mcPXA were highly homogenous in regard to CNV alterations, irrespective of the histological diagnoses. The 7/10 signature commonly present in glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, was present in 15-20% of mcPXA, whereas amplification of oncogenes (likewise common in glioblastoma) was very rare in mcPXA (<1%). In contrast, the histology-based PXA group exhibited high variance in regard to methylation classes as well as to CNVs. Our data add to the notion, that histologically defined PXA likely only represent a subset of the biological disease.

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies have demonstrated that co-occurring sporadic endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC) and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma (EOC) are clonally related, suggesting that they originate from a single primary tumor. Despite clonality, synchronous EEC and EOC when diagnosed at early stage behave indolently, similar to isolated primary EEC or isolated primary EOC. In the present study, we compared the DNA methylation signatures of co-occurring EEC and EOC with those of isolated primary EEC and isolated primary EOC. We also performed targeted NGS to assess the clonal relatedness of 7 co-occurring EEC and EOC (4 synchronous EEC and EOC and 3 metastatic EEC based on pathologic criteria). NGS confirmed a clonal relationship in all co-occurring EEC and EOC. DNA methylation profiling showed distinct epigenetic signatures of isolated primary EEC and isolated primary EOC. Endometrial tumors from co-occurring EEC and EOC clustered with isolated primary EEC while their ovarian counterparts clustered with isolated primary EOC. Three co-occurring EEC and EOC cases with peritoneal lesions showed a closer epigenetic signature and copy number variation profile between the peritoneal lesion and EOC than EEC. In conclusion, synchronous sporadic EEC and EOC are clonally related but demonstrate a shift in DNA methylation signatures between ovarian and endometrial tumors as well as epigenetic overlap between ovarian and peritoneal tumors. Our results suggest that tumor microenvironment in the ovary may play a role in epigenetic modulation of metastatic EEC.

MGMT promoter methylation testing is required for prognosis and predicting temozolomide response in gliomas. Accurate results depend on sufficient tumor cellularity, but histologic estimates of cellularity are subjective. We sought to determine whether driver mutation variant allelic frequency (VAF) could serve as a more objective metric for cellularity and identify possible false-negative MGMT samples. Among 691 adult-type diffuse gliomas, MGMT promoter methylation was assessed by pyrosequencing (N = 445) or DNA methylation array (N = 246); VAFs of TERT and IDH driver mutations were assessed by next generation sequencing. MGMT results were analyzed in relation to VAF. By pyrosequencing, 56% of all gliomas with driver mutation VAF ≥ 0.325 had MGMT promoter methylation, versus only 37% with VAF < 0.325 (p < 0.0001). The mean MGMT promoter pyrosequencing score was 19.3% for samples with VAF VAF ≥ 0.325, versus 12.7% for samples with VAF < 0.325 (p < 0.0001). Optimal VAF cutoffs differed among glioma subtypes (IDH wildtype glioblastoma: 0.12-0.18, IDH mutant astrocytoma: ~0.33, IDH mutant and 1p/19q co-deleted oligodendroglioma: 0.3-0.4). Methylation array was more sensitive for MGMT promoter methylation at lower VAFs than pyrosequencing. Microscopic examination tended to overestimate tumor cellularity when VAF was low. Re-testing low-VAF cases with methylation array and droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) confirmed that a subset of them had originally been false-negative. We conclude that driver mutation VAF is a useful quality assurance metric when evaluating MGMT promoter methylation tests, as it can help identify possible false-negative cases.

Endometrial/endometrioid stromal tumors are rare and morphologically heterogenous, and their diagnosis may be challenging. We identified 3 endometrial/endometrioid stromal tumors with identical and previously undescribed histologic features and herein report their morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular profiles. Patients were 53, 62, and 79 years. Tumors were well-circumscribed, tan-yellow solid masses measuring 10.0, 11.0, and 18.7 cm, and were intramyometrial (n=2) or in the broad ligament (n=1). All showed small, tight whorls of epithelioid to slightly spindled tumor cells with minimal cytoplasm and negligible mitoses, multifocally associated with hyalinization and myxoid change set in a loose fibroblastic background with small, delicate vessels. This morphology was seen throughout in 1 tumor and in ∼20% and 70% of the 2 others with the remaining areas showing sex cord-like differentiation. Tumor cells expressed CD10 (3/3, 1 focal), calretinin (3/3 diffuse), WT1 (3/3 diffuse), estrogen receptor (1/1, diffuse). RNA-sequencing was successful in 1 tumor and revealed a GREB1-CTNNB1 in-frame fusion. All 3 tumors harbored a CTNNB1 translocation by fluorescence in situ hybridization correlating with nuclear β-catenin expression. Whole-genome DNA methylation analysis classified all 3 tumors within the low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma reference class with flat copy number profiles. One patient (79-y-old) died of unrelated causes 2 months after surgery and the other 2 were alive without disease after 13 and 75 months. We have described a rare subset of endometrial/endometrioid stromal tumors with extensive whorling and a CTNNB1 translocation, expanding the morphologic and molecular spectrum of these neoplasms.

Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) include diverse carcinomas with heterogeneous clinical behavior. DNA methylation is a useful tool in classifying a variety of cancers. In this study, we analyzed TNBC using DNA methylation profiling and compared the results to those of mutational analysis. DNA methylation profiling (Infinium MethylationEPIC array, Illumina) and 50-gene panel-targeted DNA sequencing were performed in 44 treatment-naïve TNBC. We identified 3 distinct DNA methylation clusters with specific clinicopathologic and molecular features. Cluster 1 (phosphoinositide 3-kinase/protein kinase B-enriched cluster; n = 9) patients were significantly older (mean age, 71 years; P = .008) with tumors that were more likely to exhibit apocrine differentiation (78%; P < .001), a lower grade (44% were grade 2), a lower proliferation index (median Ki-67, 15%; P = .002), and lower tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte fractions (median, 15%; P = .0142). Tumors carried recurrent PIK3CA and AKT1 mutations and a higher percentage of low HER-2 expression (89%; P = .033). Cluster 3 (chromosomal instability cluster; n = 28) patients were significantly younger (median age, 57 years). Tumors were of higher grade (grade 3, 93%), had a higher proliferation index (median Ki-67, 75%), and were with a high fraction of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (median, 30%). Ninety-one percent of the germline BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were in cluster 3, and these tumors showed the highest level of copy number alterations. Cluster 2 represented cases with intermediate clinicopathologic characteristics and no specific molecular profile (no specific molecular profile cluster; n = 7). There were no differences in relation to stage, recurrence, and survival. In conclusion, DNA methylation profiling is a promising tool to classify patients with TNBC into biologically relevant groups, which may result in better disease characterization and reveal potential targets for emerging therapies.

Approximately 30% of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma patients present with disease progression after successful surgical resection. Despite efforts of mapping the genetic landscape, there has been limited success in discovering predictive biomarkers of disease outcomes. Here we performed a systematic multi-omic assessment of 143 tumors and matched tumor-adjacent, histologically-normal lung tissue with long-term patient follow-up. Through histologic, mutational, and transcriptomic profiling of tumor and adjacent-normal tissue, we identified an inflammatory gene signature in tumor-adjacent tissue as the strongest clinical predictor of disease progression. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis demonstrated the progression-associated inflammatory signature was expressed in both immune and non-immune cells, and cell type-specific profiling in monocytes further improved outcome predictions. Additional analyses of tumor-adjacent transcriptomic data from The Cancer Genome Atlas validated the association of the inflammatory signature with worse outcomes across cancers. Collectively, our study suggests that molecular profiling of tumor-adjacent tissue can identify patients at high risk for disease progression.

Pilocytic astrocytomas are the most common pediatric brain tumors, typically presenting as low-grade neoplasms. We report two cases of pilocytic astrocytoma with atypical tumor progression. Case 1 involves a 12-year-old boy with an unresectable suprasellar tumor, negative for BRAF rearrangement but harboring a BRAF p.V600E mutation. He experienced tumor size reduction and stable disease following dabrafenib treatment. Case 2 describes a 6-year-old boy with a thalamic tumor that underwent multiple resections, with no actionable driver detected using targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS). Whole-genome and RNAseq analysis identified an internal tandem duplication in FGFR1 and RAS pathway activation. Future management options include FGFR1 inhibitors. These cases demonstrate the importance of escalating molecular diagnostics for pediatric brain cancer, advocating for early reflexing to integrative whole-genome sequencing and transcriptomic profiling when targeted panels are uninformative. Identifying molecular drivers can significantly impact treatment decisions and improve patient outcomes.