Faculty Bibliography

A neoadjuvant immunotherapy platform clinical trial allows for rapid evaluation of treatment-related changes in tumors and identifying targets to optimize treatment responses. We enrolled patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma into such a platform trial (NCT02451982) to receive pancreatic cancer GVAX vaccine with low-dose cyclophosphamide alone (Arm A; n = 16), with anti-PD-1 antibody nivolumab (Arm B; n = 14), and with both nivolumab and anti-CD137 agonist antibody urelumab (Arm C; n = 10), respectively. The primary endpoint for Arms A/B - treatment-related change in IL17A expression in vaccine-induced lymphoid aggregates - was previously published. Here, we report the primary endpoint for Arms B/C: treatment-related change in intratumoral CD8+ CD137+ cells and the secondary outcomes including safety, disease-free and overall survivals for all Arms. Treatment with GVAX+nivolumab+urelumab meets the primary endpoint by significantly increasing intratumoral CD8+ CD137+ cells (p = 0.003) compared to GVAX+Nivolumab. All treatments are well-tolerated. Median disease-free and overall survivals, respectively, are 13.90/14.98/33.51 and 23.59/27.01/35.55 months for Arms A/B/C. GVAX+nivolumab+urelumab demonstrates numerically-improved disease-free survival (HR = 0.55, p = 0.242; HR = 0.51, p = 0.173) and overall survival (HR = 0.59, p = 0.377; HR = 0.53, p = 0.279) compared to GVAX and GVAX+nivolumab, respectively, although not statistically significant due to small sample size. Therefore, neoadjuvant and adjuvant GVAX with PD-1 blockade and CD137 agonist antibody therapy is safe, increases intratumoral activated, cytotoxic T cells, and demonstrates a potentially promising efficacy signal in resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma that warrants further study.

OBJECTIVE:The aim of the study was to assess the association between persistent CTCs and subsequent recurrence in patients who were clinically recurrence free approximately 12 months postoperatively. BACKGROUND:Circulating tumor cells have been proposed as biomarkers to predict survival in pancreatic cancer. Some patients demonstrate persistent CTCs postoperatively which could represent minimal residual disease. METHODS:Patients from previously published prospective CLUSTER trial without clinical evidence of recurrence 12 months postoperatively and CTC testing performed 9-15 months postoperatively were included. Presence of epithelial (eCTCs) and transitional CTCs (trCTCs) was evaluated as predictor of recurrence. Kaplan-Meier curve, log-rank test, and Cox model were used for survival analysis. RESULTS:Thirty-three of 129 eligible patients (CLUSTER trial) were included. The trCTC positive and negative patients were well-balanced in clinicopathological features. Patients with trCTCs had a recurrence rate per-person-month of 10.3% compared to 3.1% in trCTCs negative patients with a median time to recurrence of 3.9 versus 27.1 months, respectively. On multivariable analysis trCTCs positivity was associated with higher risk of late recurrence (HR:4.7,95%CI:1.2-18.3, P=0.024). Fourteen (42.4%) patients recurred during the second postoperative year. 1-year postoperative trCTCs positivity was associated with a higher rate of recurrence during the second year (OR:13.1,95%CI:1.6-1953.4,P=0.028, AUC=0.72). Integrating clinicopathological features with trCTCs increased the AUC to 0.80. A majority of trCTCs positive patients (N=5, 62.5%) had multi-site recurrence, followed by local-only (N=2, 25.0%) and liver-only (N=1, 12.5%) recurrence. This was in striking contrast to trCTCs negative patients, where a majority (N=6, 66.7%) had a local-only recurrence, followed by liver-only (N=2, 22.2%) and multi-site (N=1, 11.1%) recurrence. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:In patients deemed to be clinically disease free 12 months postoperatively, trCTCs positivity is associated with higher rates of subsequent recurrence with distinct patterns of recurrence. CTCs could be used a putative biomarker to guide patient prognostication and management in pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To identify factors associated with concordance between World Health Organization (WHO) grade on cytological analysis (c-grade) and histopathological analysis (h-grade) of surgical specimen in patients with PanNETs and examine trends in utilization and accuracy of EUS-FNA in preoperatively predicting grade. BACKGROUND:WHO grading system is prognostic in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs). The concordance between c-grade and h-grade is reported to be between 60% and 80%. METHODS:A multicenter retrospective study was performed on patients undergoing resection for PanNETs at four high-volume centers. Patients with functional or syndrome-associated tumors, and those receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. Factors associated with concordance between c-grade and h-grade and trends of utilization of EUS-FNA were assessed. RESULTS:Of 1,336 patients included, 682 (51.1%) underwent EUS-FNA; 567 (83.1%) were diagnostic of PanNETs and WHO-grade was reported for 293 (51.7%) patients. The concordance between c-grade and h-grade was 78.2% with moderate inter-rater agreement (Kc=0.48,p<0.001). Significantly higher rates of concordance were observed in patients with smaller tumors (<2 vs. ≥2 cm, 88.9% vs. 72.7%,p=0.001). Highest concordance (97.9%) was observed in patients with small tumors undergoing assessment between 2015-2019 with near-perfect inter-rater agreement (Kc=0.88,p<0.001)An increase in the utilization of EUS-FNA (46.7% to 62.1%) was observed over the last 2 decades (p<0.001). EUS-FNA was more frequently diagnostic of PanNETs (p<0.001), and WHO-grade was more frequently reported (<0.001). However, concordance between c-grade and h-grade did not change significantly (p=0.056). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Recently, a trend towards increasing utilization and improved diagnostic accuracy of EUS-FNA has been observed in PanNETs. Concordance between c-grade and h-grade is associated with tumor size with near-perfect agreement when assessing PanNETs >2 cm in size.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The aim of the study was to assess the association of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) with survival as a biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) within the context of a delay in initiation of adjuvant therapy. BACKGROUND:Outcomes in patients with PDAC remain poor and are driven by aggressive systemic disease. While systemic therapies improve survival in resected patients, factors such as a delay in initiation of adjuvant therapy are associated with worse outcomes. CTCs have previously been shown to be predictive of survival. METHODS:A retrospective study was performed on PDAC patients enrolled in the prospective CLUSTER trial (NCT02974764) on CTC-dynamics at the Johns Hopkins Hospital. CTCs were isolated based on size (ISET; Rarecells) and counted and characterized by subtype using immunofluorescence. The preoperative and postoperative blood samples were used to identify two CTC types: epithelial CTCs (eCTCs), expressing pan-cytokeratin, and transitional CTCs (trCTCs), expressing both pan-cytokeratin and vimentin. Patients who received adjuvant therapy were compared with those who did not. A delay in receipt of adjuvant therapy was defined as initiation of therapy ≥8 weeks after surgical resection. Clinicopathological features, CTCs characteristics, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS:Of 101 patients included in the study, 43 (42.5%) experienced a delay in initiation and 20 (19.8%) did not receive adjuvant therapy. On multivariable analysis, presence of transitional CTCs (trCTCs, P=0.002) and absence of adjuvant therapy (P=0.032) were associated with worse recurrence-free survival (RFS). Postoperative trCTC were associated with poorer RFS, both in patients with a delay in initiation (12.4 vs. 17.9 mo, P=0.004) or no administration of adjuvant chemotherapy (3.4 vs. NR, P=0.016). However, it was not associated with RFS in patients with timely initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.293). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Postoperative trCTCs positivity is associated with poorer RFS only in patients who either experience a delay in initiation or no receipt of adjuvant therapy. This study suggests that a delay in initiation of adjuvant therapy could potentially provide residual systemic disease (trCTCs) a window of opportunity to recover from the surgical insult. Future studies are required to validate these findings and explore the underlying mechanisms involved.

OBJECTIVE:To validate the 7th and 8th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for patients with invasive carcinomas arising in association with IPMN (IPMN-associated PDAC). BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Although several studies have validated AJCC systems in patients with conventional PDAC, their applicability to IPMN-associated PDAC has not been assessed. METHODS:275 patients who underwent resection for IPMN-associated PDAC between 1996 and 2015 at three tertiary centers and had data on the size of the invasive component and lymph node status were identified. Concordance probability estimates (CPE) were calculated and recursive partitioning analysis was employed to identify optimal prognostic cutoffs for T and N. RESULTS:The CPE for both the 7th and 8th editions of the AJCC schema was relatively good (0.64 in both) and similar for colloid and tubular subtypes (0.64 in both). The 8th edition introduced T1a sub-staging and a new distinction between N1 and N2. The utility of the former was confirmed, although the latter did not improve prognostic discrimination. The successful validation of the 8th edition of the AJCC criteria in patients with tubular and colloid subtypes allowed us to compare these patients in early vs late T and N stages which showed that when there is advanced disease, the prognostic superiority of colloid tumors over their tubular counterparts diminishes. CONCLUSIONS:Our findings support the use of the AJCC 8th edition in the IPMN-associated PDAC population, but suggest that certain cutoffs may need to be revisited. In advanced AJCC stages, patients with colloid vs tubular subtype have comparable prognosis.

BACKGROUND:Early-onset pancreatic cancer (EOPC), defined as age ≤ 45 years at diagnosis, accounts for 3% of all pancreatic cancer cases. Although differences in tumor biology have been suggested, available data are sparse and specific treatment recommendations are lacking. This study explores the clinicopathological features and oncologic outcomes of resected EOPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:Patients with EOPC undergoing resection between 2002 and 2018 were identified from the Heidelberg University Hospital and Johns Hopkins University registries. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed, and prognostic factors were identified. RESULTS:The final cohort included 164 patients, most of whom had pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC, n = 136; 82.9%) or IPMN-associated pancreatic cancer (n = 17; 10.4%). Twenty (12.1%) patients presented with stage 1 disease, 42 (25.6%) with stage 2, 75 (45.7%) with stage 3, and 22 (13.4%) with oligometastatic stage 4 disease. Most patients underwent upfront resection (n = 113, 68.9%), whereas 51 (31.1%) individuals received preoperative treatment. Median OS and RFS were 26.0 and 12.4 months, respectively. Stage-specific median survival was 70.6, 41.8, 23.8, and 16.9 months for stage 1, 2, 3, and 4 tumors, respectively. Factors independently associated with shorter OS and RFS were R1 resections and AJCC stages 3 and 4. Notably, AJCC 3-N2 and AJCC 3-T4 tumors had a median OS of 20 months versus 29.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Despite frequently presenting with advanced disease, oncologic outcomes in EOPC patients are satisfactory even in locally advanced cancers, justifying aggressive surgical approaches. Further research is needed to tailor current guidelines to this rare population.

BACKGROUND:The ideal surveillance strategy after partial pancreatectomy for non-invasive IPMN remains undefined and existing guidelines provide conflicting recommendations. The present study was developed in anticipation of the joint meeting of the International Association of Pancreatology (IAP) and the Japan Pancreas Society (JPS) held in Kyoto in July 2022. METHODS:An international team of experts developed the four clinical questions (CQ) to operationalize issues pertaining to surveillance of patients in this context. A systematic review was designed following the PRISMA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO. The search strategy was executed in PubMed/Medline (Ovid), Embase, the Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases. Four investigators individually extracted data from the selected studies and drafted recommendations for each CQ. These were subsequently discussed and agreed upon that the IAP/JPS meeting. RESULTS:From a total of 1098 studies identified through the initial search, 41 studies were included in the review and informed the recommendations. No studies providing level one data were identified in this systematic review, all studies included were cohort or case-control studies. CONCLUSIONS:There is a lack of level 1 data addressing the issue of surveillance of patients following partial pancreatectomy for non-invasive IPMN. The definition of remnant pancreatic lesion in this setting is largely heterogeneous across all studies evaluated. Herein we propose an inclusive definition of remnant pancreatic lesions to guide future prospective efforts for reporting the natural history and long-term outcomes of these patients.

BACKGROUND:The role of postoperative chemotherapy in patients with resected pancreatic cancer who receive neoadjuvant treatment is unknown. Clinicians use changes in CA19-9 and histopathologic scores to assess treatment response. We sought to investigate if CA19-9 normalization in response to NAT can help guide the need for postoperative treatment. METHODS:Patients with elevated baseline CA19-9 (CA19-9 > 37U/mL) who received NAT followed by surgery between 2011 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Treatment response was determined by CA19-9 normalization following NAT and histopathologic scoring. The role of postoperative chemotherapy was analyzed in light of CA19-9 normalization and histopathologic response. RESULTS:We identified and included 345 patients. Following NAT, CA19-9 normalization was observed in 125 patients (36.2%). CA19-9 normalization was associated with a favorable histopathologic response (41.6% vs 23.2%, p < 0.001) and a lower ypT (p < 0.001) and ypN stage (p = 0.003). Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in patients in whom CA19-9 did not normalize following NAT (26.8 vs 16.4 months, p = 0.008). In patients who received 5FU-based NAT and in whom CA19-9 did not normalize, receipt of 5FU-based adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved OS (p = 0.014). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:CA19-9 normalization in response to NAT was associated with favorable outcomes and can serve as a biomarker for treatment response. In patients where CA19-9 did not normalize, receipt of postoperative chemotherapy was associated with improved OS. These patients also benefited from additional 5FU-based postoperative chemotherapy following 5FU-based NAT.