Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE OF REVIEW:Uterine sarcomas are rare and are often challenging to differentiate on imaging from benign mimics, such as leiomyoma. As functional MRI techniques have improved and new adjuncts, such as machine learning and texture analysis, are now being investigated, it is helpful to be aware of the current literature on imaging features that may sometimes allow for preoperative distinction. RECENT FINDINGS:MRI, with both conventional and functional imaging, is the modality of choice for evaluating uterine mesenchymal tumors, especially in differentiating uterine leiomyosarcoma from leiomyoma through validated diagnostic algorithms. MRI is sometimes helpful in differentiating high-grade stromal sarcoma from low-grade stromal sarcoma or differentiating endometrial stromal sarcoma from endometrial carcinoma. However, imaging remains nonspecific for evaluating rarer neoplasms, such as uterine tumor resembling ovarian sex cord tumor or perivascular epithelioid cell tumor, primarily because of the small number and power of relevant studies. SUMMARY:Through advances in MRI techniques and novel investigational imaging adjuncts, such as machine learning and texture analysis, imaging differentiation of malignant from benign uterine mesenchymal tumors has improved and could help reduce morbidity relating to misdiagnosis or diagnostic delays.

BACKGROUND:To assess the spectrum and frequency of modalities used for emergency room (ER) imaging and their findings in pediatric cancer patients and assess their relationship with survival. METHODS:Consecutive pediatric cancer patients that underwent imaging during an ER visit at our tertiary cancer center over a 5-year period were retrospectively analyzed. Imaging findings were considered positive when they were relevant to the ER presenting complaint. Imaging positivity was correlated with inpatient admission. Overall survival (OS) was assessed with Kaplan-Meier curves and uni- and multi-variate Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify significant factors associated with OS. RESULTS:Two hundred sixty-one patients (135 males and 126 females; median age 11 years [interquartile range 5-16 years] with 348 visits and a total of 406 imaging studies were included. Common chief complaints were related to the chest (100 [28.7 %]) and fever (99 [28.4 %]). ER imaging was positive in 207 visits (59.5 %), commonly revealing increased metastases (50 [14.4 %]), pneumonia (47 [13.5 %]), and other lung problems (12 [2.9 %]). Positive ER imaging was associated with inpatient admission (69.3 % [133/192] vs. 40.4 % [63/156], p < 0.01). Multivariate survival analysis showed that positive ER imaging (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.35 [95% CI 1.44-3.83, p < 0.01), admission (HR = 1.86 [95% CI 1.17-3.00], p < 0.01), number of ER visits (HR = 3.08 [95% CI 1.62-5.83], p < 0.01 for ≥ 3 visits) were associated with poorer survival. CONCLUSIONS:Imaging was able to delineate the cause for ER visits in children with cancer in over half of the cases. Positive ER imaging was associated with admission and worse survival.

PURPOSE:To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis using individual patient data to investigate the diagnostic performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response (TR) algorithm for detecting incomplete necrosis on pathology. METHODS:PubMed and EMBASE were searched from Jan 1, 2017 until October 14, 2020. Studies reporting diagnostic accuracy of LI-RADS TR algorithm on CT or MRI for detecting incomplete necrosis on pathology as a reference standard were included. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled using random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed for locoregional treatment (LRT) type and imaging modality. RESULTS:Six studies (393 patients, 534 lesions) were included. Pooled sensitivity was 0.56 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.43-0.69) and specificity was 0.91 (95%CI 0.84-0.96). Pooled sensitivity was highest using arterial phase hyperenhancement (APHE) (0.67 [95%CI 0.51-0.81]), followed by washout (0.43 [95%CI 0.26-0.62]) and enhancement similar to pretreatment (0.24 [95%CI 0.15-0.36]). Among lesions with incomplete necrosis, 2% (95%CI 0.00-0.05) manifested as washout but no APHE; 0% (95% CI 0.00-0.02) as enhancement similar to pretreatment without both APHE and washout. Pooled sensitivity was lower after ablation than embolization (0.42 [95%CI, 0.28-0.57] vs. 0.65 [95%CI, 0.53-0.77], p = 0.033). MRI and CT were comparable (p = 0.783 and 0.290 for sensitivity and specificity). CONCLUSIONS:LI-RADS TR algorithm shows moderate sensitivity and high specificity for detecting incomplete necrosis after LRT. APHE is the dominant criterion, a washout contributes to small but meaningful extent, while the contribution of enhancement similar to pretreatment may be negligible. LRT type may affect performance of the algorithm.

Prostate MRI is reported in clinical practice using the Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System (PI-RADS). PI-RADS aims to standardize, as much as possible, the acquisition, interpretation, reporting, and ultimately the performance of prostate MRI. PI-RADS relies upon mainly subjective analysis of MR imaging findings, with very few incorporated quantitative features. The shortcomings of PI-RADS are mainly: low-to-moderate interobserver agreement and modest accuracy for detection of clinically significant tumors in the transition zone. The use of a more quantitative analysis of prostate MR imaging findings is therefore of interest. Quantitative MR imaging features including: tumor size and volume, tumor length of capsular contact, tumor apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) metrics, tumor T₁ and T₂ relaxation times, tumor shape, and texture analyses have all shown value for improving characterization of observations detected on prostate MRI and for differentiating between tumors by their pathological grade and stage. Quantitative analysis may therefore improve diagnostic accuracy for detection of cancer and could be a noninvasive means to predict patient prognosis and guide management. Since quantitative analysis of prostate MRI is less dependent on an individual users' assessment, it could also improve interobserver agreement. Semi- and fully automated analysis of quantitative (radiomic) MRI features using artificial neural networks represent the next step in quantitative prostate MRI and are now being actively studied. Validation, through high-quality multicenter studies assessing diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer detection, in the domain of quantitative prostate MRI is needed. This article reviews advances in quantitative prostate MRI, highlighting the strengths and limitations of existing and emerging techniques, as well as discussing opportunities and challenges for evaluation of prostate MRI in clinical practice when using quantitative assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 5 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) has recently gained interest as a promising tool for treatment response evaluation in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the concordance between response evaluation using PSMA PET and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level after systemic treatment and the association between PSMA PET and overall survival in metastatic CRPC patients. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were searched until August 2020. Studies that reported the concordance between PSMA PET and PSA response were included. PSMA PET and PSA response evaluation were dichotomized into response vs. non-response to construct two-by-two contingency tables; an ≥30% increase in PSMA PET according to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0 and as an increase in serum PSA level of ≥25% as per Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 guidelines were defined as non-response. The percent agreement rates were pooled using random-effect model. Ten studies (268 patients) were included. The concordance rates ranged 0.50-0.84 with a pooled proportion of 0.73 (95% confidence interval 0.67-0.79). Patients were treated with ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy in five, chemotherapy in three, ²²³Ra in one, and more than one type in one study. Various PET parameters were used: the most widely evaluated was PSMA tumor volume (PSMA-TV). Similar proportions were found across different therapeutic agents, PET response parameters, and regarding directionality of discordance (PSA response/PSMA non-response vs. PSMA response/PSA non-response). Two studies reported that a decrease in PSMA-TV was associated with better overall survival. PSMA PET and PSA response assessments were discordant in nearly a fourth of metastatic CRPC patients. Further studies are warranted to establish the clinical meaning of this discordance and define appropriate management for such clinical situation.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:F-FDG PET in patients with esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. METHODS:F-FDG PET for predicting a pathologic response, progression-free survival (PFS), or overall survival (OS) in patients with esophageal cancer. The sensitivity and specificity for predicting a pathologic response were pooled using bivariate and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) models. Meta-analytic pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived using a random-effects model. RESULTS:A total of 11 studies (695 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. For nine studies assessing predictive accuracy, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of an early metabolic response for predicting a pathologic response were 0.80 (95% CI 0.61-0.91) and 0.54 (95% CI 0.45-0.63), respectively. The area under the HSROC curve was 0.64 (95% CI 0.60-0.68). Across the nine studies assessing prognostic value, an early metabolic response determined by interim PET showed pooled HRs for predicting PFS and OS of 0.44 (95% CI, 0.30-0.63) and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.31-0.56), respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:F-FDG PET may help prognostic stratification and guide treatment planning in oncologic practice.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:F-FDG PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS:F-FDG PET in patients with newly diagnosed MM, with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) included as outcomes. Hazard ratios (HRs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were meta-analytically pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS:Fifteen studies (1670 patients) were included for qualitative synthesis. Among multiple PET parameters, the presence of extramedullary disease (EMD), more than three focal lesions (FLs), and high FDG uptake were widely evaluated and significantly associated with shorter OS and PFS in most of the included studies. Among 11 studies included in quantitative synthesis, the overall HRs of EMD, more than three FLs, and high FDG uptake on PFS were 2.12 (95% CI, 1.52-2.96), 2.38 (95% CI, 1.84-3.07), and 2.02 (95% CI, 1.51-2.68), respectively. The pooled HRs of those three parameters on OS were 2.37 (95% CI, 1.77-3.16), 3.29 (95% CI, 2.38-4.56), and 2.28 (95% CI, 1.67-3.13). No statistical differences were found across parameters for either PFS (p = 0.6822) or OS (p = 0.2147). CONCLUSIONS:F-FDG PET/CT is a significant predictor for disease progression and survival in patients with MM. It may be a useful prognostic biomarker capable of accurate risk stratification and application in clinical decision-making for newly diagnosed MM. KEY POINTS/CONCLUSIONS:F-FDG PET are significant prognostic factors. • These imaging biomarkers might help the accurate stratification of patient prognosis which is required for choosing an appropriate therapeutic strategy in clinical practice.

[This corrects the article PMC7293940.].

Background Gadoxetic acid is classified by the American College of Radiology as a group III gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), which indicates that there are limited data regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) risk, but there are few if any unconfounded cases of NSF. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of gadoxetic acid adverse events, including immediate hypersensitivity reactions, NSF, and intracranial gadolinium retention. Materials and Methods Original research studies, case series, and case reports that reported adverse events in patients undergoing gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were searched in MEDLINE (1946-2019), Embase (1947-2019), CENTRAL (March 2019), and Scopus (1946-2019). The study protocol was registered at Prospero (number 162811). Risk of bias was evaluated by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2, or QUADAS-2. Meta-analysis of proportions was performed by using random-effects modeling. Upper bound of 95% confidence interval (CI) for risk of NSF was determined. Results Seventy-one studies underwent full-text review. From 17 studies reporting 14 850 administrations, hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 0.3% (31 of 14 850; 95% CI: 0.2%, 0.4%) with zero deaths. From four studies reporting 106 administrations in patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing dialysis, the upper bound 95% CI for the risk of NSF was 2.8%. Five studies evaluating intracranial retention of gadolinium after gadoxetic acid administration were at high risk of bias. Conclusion Gadoxetic acid had a similar safety profile to American College of Radiology group 2 gadolinium-based contrast agents for hypersensitivity reactions and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) but had lower confidence for risk of NSF because of fewer administrations in patients with severe kidney impairment. There is incomplete information documenting intracranial gadolinium retention in patients administered gadoxetic acid. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.