Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: Optimization of prostate biopsy requires addressing the shortcomings of standard systematic transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy including false negative rates, incorrect risk stratification, detection of clinically insignificant disease, and the need for repetitive biopsy. MRI is an evolving noninvasive imaging modality that increases the accurate localization of prostate cancer (PCa) at the time of biopsy, thereby enhancing clinical risk assessment, and improving the ability to appropriately counsel patients regarding therapy. The purpose of this review is to 1) summarize the various sequences that comprise a prostate multiparametric MRI exam along with its performance characteristics in cancer detection, localization and reporting standards, 2) evaluate potential applications of MRI targeting in prostate biopsy among men with no previous biopsy, a negative previous biopsy, and those with low stage cancer and 3) describe the techniques of MRI-targeted biopsy and their comparative study outcomes MATERIALS AND METHODS: A bibliographic search covering the period up to October, 2013 was conducted using MEDLINE(R)/PubMed(R). Articles were reviewed and categorized based on which of the three objectives of this review was addressed. Data was extracted, analyzed, and summarized. RESULTS: Mp-MRI consists of anatomic T2-weighted imaging coupled with at least 2 functional imaging techniques and has demonstrated improved PCa detection sensitivity up to 80% in the peripheral zone and 81% in the transition zone. A PCa MRI suspicion score has been developed and is depicted using the Likert or PI-RADS scale for better standardization of MRI interpretation and reporting. Among men with no previous biopsy, MRI increases the frequency of significant cancer detection to 50% in low risk and 71% in high risk patients. In low risk men, the negative predictive valve of a combination of negative MRI with prostate volume parameters is nearly 98%, suggesting a potential role in avoiding a biopsy and reducing overdetection/overtreatment. Among men with previous negative biopsy, 72-87% of cancers detected by MRI guidance are clinically significant. Among men with known low risk cancer, repeat biopsy by MR-targeting demonstrates a high likelihood of confirming low risk disease in low suspicion score lesions and for upgrading in high suspicion score lesions. Techniques of MRI-targeted biopsy include visual estimation TRUS-guided biopsy, software co-registered MRI-US TRUS-guided biopsy, and in-bore MRI-guided biopsy. Although the improvement in accuracy and efficiency of visual estimation biopsy compared to systematic appears limited, both co-registered MRI-US biopsy and in-bore MRI-guided biopsy appears to increase cancer detection rates in conjunction with increasing suspicion score. CONCLUSIONS: Use of MRI for targeting prostate biopsies has potential to reduce the sampling error associate with conventional biopsy by providing better disease localization and sampling. More accurate risk stratification through improved cancer sampling may impact upon therapeutic decision-making. Optimal clinical application of MRI-targeted biopsy remains under investigation.

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence supports the use of magnetic resonance (MR)-targeted prostate biopsy. The optimal method for such biopsy remains undefined, however. OBJECTIVE: To prospectively compare targeted biopsy outcomes between MR imaging (MRI)-ultrasound fusion and visual targeting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: From June 2012 to March 2013, prospective targeted biopsy was performed in 125 consecutive men with suspicious regions identified on prebiopsy 3-T MRI consisting of T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted, and dynamic-contrast enhanced sequences. INTERVENTION: Two MRI-ultrasound fusion targeted cores per target were performed by one operator using the ei-Nav|Artemis system. Targets were then blinded, and a second operator took two visually targeted cores and a 12-core biopsy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Biopsy information yield was compared between targeting techniques and to 12-core biopsy. Results were analyzed using the McNemar test. Multivariate analysis was performed using binomial logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Among 172 targets, fusion biopsy detected 55 (32.0%) cancers and 35 (20.3%) Gleason sum >/=7 cancers compared with 46 (26.7%) and 26 (15.1%), respectively, using visual targeting (p=0.1374, p=0.0523). Fusion biopsy provided informative nonbenign histology in 77 targets compared with 60 by visual (p=0.0104). Targeted biopsy detected 75.0% of all clinically significant cancers and 86.4% of Gleason sum >/=7 cancers detected on standard biopsy. On multivariate analysis, fusion performed best among smaller targets. The study is limited by lack of comparison with whole-gland specimens and sample size. Furthermore, cancer detection on visual targeting is likely higher than in community settings, where experience with this technique may be limited. CONCLUSIONS: Fusion biopsy was more often histologically informative than visual targeting but did not increase cancer detection. A trend toward increased detection with fusion biopsy was observed across all study subsets, suggesting a need for a larger study size. Fusion targeting improved accuracy for smaller lesions. Its use may reduce the learning curve necessary for visual targeting and improve community adoption of MR-targeted biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare renal functional outcomes in robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) with selective arterial clamping guided by near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging to a matched cohort of patients who underwent RPN without selective arterial clamping and NIRF imaging. METHODS: From April 2011 to December 2012, NIRF imaging-enhanced RPN with selective clamping was used in 42 cases. Functional outcomes of successful cases were compared with a cohort of patients, matched by tumor size, preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), functional kidney status, age, sex, body mass index, and American Society of Anesthesiologists score, who underwent RPN without selective clamping and NIRF imaging. RESULTS: In matched-pair analysis, selective clamping with NIRF was associated with superior kidney function at discharge, as demonstrated by postoperative eGFR (78.2 vs 68.5 mL/min/1.73 m2; P = .04), absolute reduction of eGFR (-2.5 vs -14.0 mL/min/1.73 m2; P <.01), and percent change in eGFR (-1.9% vs -16.8%; P <.01). Similar trends were noted at 3 month follow-up, but these differences became nonsignificant (P[eGFR] = .07; P[absolute reduction of eGFR] = .10; and P[percent change in eGFR] = .07). In the selective clamping group, a total of 4 perioperative complications occurred in 3 patients, all of which were Clavien grade I-III. CONCLUSION: Use of NIRF imaging was associated with improved short-term renal functional outcomes when compared with RPN without selective arterial clamping and NIRF imaging. With this effect attenuated at later follow-up, randomized prospective studies and long-term assessment of kidney-specific functional outcomes are needed to further assess the benefits of this technology.

A 12-core systematic biopsy that incorporates apical and far-lateral cores in the template distribution allows maximal cancer detection and avoidance of a repeat biopsy while minimizing the detection of insignificant prostate cancers. Magnetic resonance imaging-guided prostate biopsy has an evolving role in both initial and repeat prostate biopsy strategies, potentially improving sampling efficiency, increasing the detection of clinically significant cancers, and reducing the detection of insignificant cancers. Hematuria, hematospermia, and rectal bleeding are common complications of prostate needle biopsy, but are generally self-limiting and well tolerated. All men should receive antimicrobial prophylaxis before biopsy.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of the American Urological Association (AUA) guidelines advocating partial nephrectomy for T1 tumors guidelines on the likelihood of undergoing partial nephrectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS), a dataset encompassing 20% of all United States inpatient hospitalizations, from 2007 through 2010. Our dependent variable was receipt of radical vs partial nephrectomy (55.50, 55.51, 55.52, and 55.54 vs 55.4) for a renal mass (International Classification of Disease, 9th Revision [ICD-9] code 189.0). The independent variable of interest was time of surgery (before or after the establishment of AUA guidelines); covariates included a diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD), overall comorbidity, age, race, gender, geographic region, income, and hospital characteristics. Bivariate and multivariable adjusted logistic regression was used to determine the association between receipt of partial nephrectomy and time of guideline establishment. RESULTS: We identified 26,165 patients with renal tumors who underwent surgery. Before the guidelines, 4031 patients (27%) underwent partial nephrectomy compared to 3559 (32%) after. On multivariable analysis, undergoing surgery after the establishment of guidelines (odds ratio [OR] 1.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.08-1.32, P <.01) was an independent predictor of partial nephrectomy. Other factors associated with partial nephrectomy were urban location, surgery at a teaching hospital, large hospital bed size, Northeast location, and Black race. Female gender and CKD were not associated with partial nephrectomy. CONCLUSION: Although adoption of partial nephrectomy increased after establishment of new guidelines on renal masses, partial nephrectomy remains an underutilized procedure. Future research must focus on barriers to adoption of partial nephrectomy and how to overcome them.