Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is routinely used to assess for thrombus in the left atrium (LA) and left atrial appendage (LAA) in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. However, little is known about the outcome of AF ablation in patients with documented LAA sludge. We hypothesize that AF ablation can be performed safely in a proportion of patients with sludge in the LAA and may have a significant benefit for these patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients undergoing AF ablation at New York University Langone Medical Center (NYULMC) from January 1st 2011 to June 30, 2013. Patients with sludge found on their TEE immediately prior to AF ablation were identified and followed for stroke, AF recurrence, procedural complications, major bleeding, or death. RESULTS: Among 1,076 patients who underwent AF ablation, 8 patients (mean age 69 +/- 13 years; 75 % men) with sludge were identified. Patients with sludge in their LAA had no incidence of early or late occurrence of stroke during mean follow-up of 10 months. One patient had a left groin hematoma, and two patients had atrial tachycardias that needed a repeat ablation. TEE at the time of repeat ablation demonstrated the presence of spontaneous echo contrast (smoke) and resolution of sludge. There were no deaths. CONCLUSION: In a cohort of eight patients with LAA sludge who underwent AF ablation, no significant thromboembolic events occurred during or after the procedure. AF ablation can be performed safely and may be beneficial in these patients. Larger studies are warranted to better determine the most appropriate management route.

BACKGROUND: Venous occlusion is not uncommon and total venous obstruction with more proximal patency may occur in as many as 10% of previous implants. Many techniques are available to obtain ipsilateral access; however, most require special equipment or skills. We describe a technique of infraclavicular cannulation of the brachiocephalic vein ipsilateral to the occlusion that is safe and feasible for most implanters. METHODS: Fourteen patients with subclavian/axillary occlusions ipsilateral to the implanted device and requiring revision or upgrade of their system or venous occlusion with contraindication to implant on the contralateral side underwent lead addition/placement via a brachiocephalic approach. Following venography, an 18-gauge needle was used to gain brachiocephalic access. The needle was initially positioned in a lateral infraclavicular location. The needle was then advanced under the clavicle in a horizontal plane and advanced toward the sternal notch under fluoroscopic guidance. RESULTS: Fourteen patients underwent an attempt at brachiocephalic access. Cannulation of the brachiocephalic was possible in all 14 and lead(s) were successfully implanted in all. There were no complications with the procedure, specifically no pneumothoraces. In follow-up (mean 36 months, range 1-86 months), all implanted leads function well, with no evidence of lead failure or impedance changes. CONCLUSION: A lateral infraclavicular approach is a safe and effective technique for obtaining brachiocephalic access when the subclavian/axillary vein is occluded. This technique is easy to learn and may be useful for implanters without the equipment or skills needed for lead extraction or microdissection or in cases where patients refuse these procedures.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), the most common cardiac arrhythmia, is a significant cause of embolic stroke. Although systemic anticoagulation is the primary strategy for preventing the thromboembolic complications of AF, anticoagulants carry major bleeding risks, and many patients have contraindications to their use. Because thromboembolism typically arises from a clot in the left atrial appendage (LAA), local therapeutic alternatives to systemic anticoagulation involving surgical or percutaneous exclusion of the LAA have been developed. Surgical exclusion of the LAA is typically performed only as an adjunct to other cardiac surgeries, thus limiting the number of eligible patients. Furthermore, surgical exclusion of the LAA is frequently incomplete, and thromboembolism may still occur. Percutaneous LAA exclusion includes two approaches: transseptal delivery of an occlusion device to the LAA and epicardial suture ligation of the LAA, the LARIAT procedure. In the LARIAT procedure, a pretied snare is placed around the epicardial surface of the LAA orifice via pericardial access. Proper snare placement is achieved with epicardial and endocardial magnet-tipped guidewires. The endocardial wire is advanced transvenously to the LAA apex after transseptal puncture. The epicardial wire, introduced into the pericardial space, achieves end-to-end union with the endocardial wire at the LAA apex. The snare is then placed over the LAA, tightened, and sutured. On the basis of early clinical experience, the LARIAT procedure has a high success rate of LAA exclusion with low risk for complications. The authors describe the indispensable role of real-time transesophageal echocardiography in the guidance of LAA epicardial suture ligation with the LARIAT device.

Introduction: The safe use of antitachycardia pacing (ATP) to terminate rapid ventricular tachycardias (VTs) (cycle length 240-320 ms) is predicated on the ability of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) to distinguish rapid VT from ventricular fibrillation (VF). We set out to compare the time to device charging following the induction of VF of various ICD multizone detection algorithms for rapid VT/VF discrimination. Methods and Results: Data on the time to device charging following the induction of VF at the time to device implantation were collected on 62 consecutive patients in a nonrandomized prospective cohort fashion. Multizone programming for the Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and St. Jude Medical devices was based on prior clinically validated data. Sixty-two subjects were studied (Boston Scientific = 16, Medtronic = 27, St. Jude Medical = 19) and 124 tests for VF detection were performed (Boston Scientific = 32, Medtronic = 54, St. Jude Medical = 38). Mean time to charging was significantly prolonged in the Boston Scientific group as was the percentage of tests where charge initiation occurred >5 seconds from VF-induction: 4.24, 3.99, and 3.00 seconds and 19%, 4%, and 0% for the Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and St. Jude Medical groups, respectively, P < 0.05. ATP was the first therapy administered in 9.4% of tests in the Boston Scientific group. Conclusion: The Boston Scientific multizone VT/VF discrimination algorithm results in a prolonged time to VF detection, and consequently, prolonged time to appropriate initiation of device charging. Further studies are needed to determine whether prolonged detection times lead to clinically significant events. (PACE 2012; 35:1222-1231).

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was to determine the effects of isoproterenol infusion on level of consciousness during ablation using total intravenous anesthesia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven patients undergoing total intravenous anesthesia for atrial fibrillation ablation were monitored for level of consciousness using bispectral EEG levels (BIS). Isoproterenol infusion was performed after the ablation during anesthesia. BIS levels prior to, during, and post-isoproterenol infusion were recorded and correlated to isoproterenol infusion doses. In all patients, BIS levels significantly increased during isoproterenol infusion (median BIS prior to infusion, 46; during infusion, 64 (p < 0.02)). With a subsequent increase in anesthetic medication, BIS levels could again be reduced. CONCLUSION: Isoproterenol infusion alters consciousness level during total intravenous anesthesia for atrial fibrillation ablation. BIS monitoring is a novel way to modulate anesthesia during ablation to potentially optimize patient comfort and ablation success.

Background: The Medtronic Sprint Fidelis (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA) lead family is associated with an unacceptable incidence of premature lead failure. There are limited data on risk factors for lead fracture. We hypothesized that factors leading to potential increased forces on the lead related to device implantation or technique may be associated with premature lead failure. Methods: We reviewed the implant data from our group and identified 176 patients who received active fixation Medtronic Fidelis (Model 6931, single coil and Model 6949, dual coil) leads. Implant data, including age, sex, venous access site, implant side, implant location, and number of venous leads were reviewed. Hospital, pacemaker clinic, and Medtronic registration databases were reviewed for evidence of lead failure, replacement, or abandonment. Data was evaluated in univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Results: Of the 176 leads implanted, 10 (5.7%) were noted to develop malfunction. This presented as inappropriate shocks from sensed noise or elevated impedance measurements. Of the above noted implant features, only right-sided (vs left-sided) implant (hazard ratio [HR] 18.8, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 3.8, 93.3), and subpectoral implant (vs prepectoral; HR 14.31, 95% CI 3.2, 64.0) were predictive of lead failure in maximally adjusted models. Conclusions: We have identified both right-sided implantation and subpectoral generator positioning as factors associated with premature lead malfunction in Fidelis active fixation leads. Clinical decisions regarding patient management should incorporate these findings in regard to lead replacement in high-risk patients. (PACE 2012; 35:659-664).

BACKGROUND: There are little data on the appropriate endpoint for slow pathway ablation that balances acceptable procedural times, recurrence rates, and complication rates. This study compared recurrence rates of three commonly utilized endpoints of slow pathway ablation for atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). METHODS: We performed a meta-analysis of AVNRT slow pathway ablation cohorts by searching electronic databases, the Internet, and conference proceedings. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years, >20 human subjects per study, primary AVNRT ablation, English language publication, and >1 month of follow-up. Data were analyzed with a fixed-effects model using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis software version 2.2.046 (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). RESULTS: We included 10 studies encompassing 1,204 patients with a mean age of 41-53 years. Endpoints were complete slow pathway ablation, residual jump only, and single remaining echo beat. Pooled estimates revealed 28 of 641 patients (4.4%) with complete slow pathway ablation, 13 of 192 patients (6.8%) with a residual jump only, and 24 of 371 patients (6.5%) with one echo had recurrences. With uniform isoproterenol use after ablation, there was no significant difference in recurrence rates among the endpoints. However, when isoproterenol was utilized after ablation only if needed to induce AVNRT before ablation, a significantly higher recurrence rate occurred in patients with a residual jump (P = 0.002), a single echo (P = 0.003), or the combined group of a residual jump and/or one echo (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Isoproterenol should be used routinely after slow pathway modification, when a residual jump and/or single echo remain