Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE:It has been a widely accepted practice that a previous placed pacemaker, automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators, or central line can be a contraindication to placing a hemodialysis catheter in the ipsilateral jugular vein. Fear of dislodging pacing wires, tunneling close to the battery site or causing venous obstruction has been a concern for surgeons and interventionalists alike. We suggest that this phobia may be unfounded. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted of patients in whom hemodialysis catheters were placed over a period of 10 years. For each hemodialysis catheter that was placed, perioperative chest X-ray performed was used to evaluate for pre-existing pacemakers and central lines. The position and laterality of placement of the hemodialysis catheter along with presence of arteriovenous fistula with functional capacity for access were noted. RESULTS:A total of 600 hemodialysis catheters were placed in patients over the period of 10 years. The mean age of the patients was 73.6 ± 12 years with a median age of 76 years. We found 20 pacemakers or automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators and 19 central lines on the same side of the neck as the hemodialysis catheter that was placed in the ipsilateral jugular vein. No patient exhibited malfunction or dislodgment of the central line, the pacemaker, or automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator or evidence of upper extremity venous obstruction based upon signs symptoms or duplex exams. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Based on our experience, we suggest that placement of hemodialysis catheter in the internal jugular vein ipsilateral to the pre-existing catheter/leads is safe and spares the contralateral limb for arteriovenous fistula creation.

Background Ureteral arterial fistulas are rare but potentially life threatening. We present a female who developed a ureteral arterial fistula following a right robotic nephrectomy. After several endovascular interventions to control the bleeding had failed, we approached the fistula through the right ureteral stump with coil embolization. Methods Coil embolization of the right ureteral stump was performed. We utilized a 6Fr × 45 cm sheath inserted through one of the cystoscope channels to cannulate the right ureteral orifice. We then performed a retrograde ureterogram. After, we were able to visualize full length of the ureter, ahd we began placing several 10-12 mm Nester coils to pack the ureter and tamponade the fistula for hemostasis. After the ureter was packed, we injected 1 g of Vancomycin into the ureter. The sheath and cytoscope were removed and the patient did well and was sent to the recovery room. Results Postoperatively, the patient had no complaints of hematuria and her hemoglobin level remained unchanged. She was observed for a few days prior to being discharged to home. The patient's follow-up at six months revealed resolution of her hematuria. Conclusion Ureteral arterial fistula is a potentially life-threatening condition. Endovascular stenting has provided a safe, reliable alternative to open surgery. However, when endovascular options are not satisfactory, coil embolization of the ureteral stump may serve as a safe and effective alternative treatment for these cases.

Background The development and use of minimally invasive procedures provide improved options for the management of symptoms of chronic venous insufficiency. While many patients with iliac venous occlusive disease and superficial venous insufficiency improve with combined iliac venous stenting and correction of superficial venous reflux, some patients have symptoms which persist. The goal of this study was to identify clinical factors related to persistent symptoms in patients with leg swelling after treatment of both iliac vein stenting and thermal ablation. Methods This observational study analyzed data for patients who underwent both iliac vein stent placement as well as endovenous ablation (either RFA or EVLT) as a management for chronic venous insufficiency between February 2012 and February 2014. Follow-up was performed after completion of both procedures and inquiring for improvement of swelling. Statistical analysis performed using Chi-square and student's t-test. Results Of the total 173 patients who underwent both endovenous closure and iliac vein stent placements, 55 (31.8%) patients were men; 29 (16%) patients stated they had no improvement after these procedures. The average age of patients who did not improve was 68.8 (±16.7 SD) years and 66.2 (±13.3 SD) years for patients who improved. Over all, the classification of the presenting symptoms by CEAP classification demonstrated 25.4%, 53.2%, 5.8%, and 15.6%, for C3-C6, respectively. There was no correlation with failure to improve the swelling with: age ( P = .44), gender ( P = .33), presenting symptom ( P = .67), use of calcium channel blockers ( P = .85), nitroglycerin ( P = .86), Plavix ( P = .07), aspirin ( P = .55), Synthyroid ( P = .55), Coumadin ( P = .14), angiotensin receptor blocker ( P = .81), β Blockers ( P = .61), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors ( P = .88), furosemide 40 mg ( P = .74), hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg ( P = .07), hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg ( P = .48), and EVLT vs. RFA ( P = .91). The use of furosemide (20 mg) was associated with continued swelling ( P = .01). The use of dual diuretics (furosemide and hydrochlorothiazide) was associated with persistent swelling even after these combined endovenous procedures P = .03). Conclusion These preliminary data suggest that the treatment with diuretics may be associated with failure to relieve lower extremity swelling despite combined endovascular therapy for chronic venous insufficiency.

A 28-year-old Hispanic female with a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) presented to the emergency room with left lower extremity swelling and pain. On duplex venous examination, an extensive left lower extremity DVT extending to her left common iliac vein was identified. A perforator vein measuring 2.6 mm located in the midcalf area was used to access and perform mechanical and chemical thrombolysis. Complete resolution of symptoms was observed.

BACKGROUND:Routine radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of an incompetent perforator vein (IPV) using the standard treatment protocol at 85°C has a treatment time of 6 minutes. To make treatment time more efficient, we sought to determine the effect of a shortened protocol for radiofrequency stylet (RFS) ablation by comparing the early success using three different temperatures: 85°C, 90°C, and 95°C. METHODS:A retrospective study examined 642 procedures of IPV closures in 255 patients with varying degrees of venous insufficiency treated with RFA from 2009 to 2015. The Covidien (Mansfield, Mass) RFA system allows the operator to regulate temperature and allows increments in temperature of the RFS to 85°C, 90°C, and 95°C. The RFS probe was angled at four 90-degree angles at the mentioned temperatures with a shorter treatment time at 6, 4, and 3 minutes, respectively. The three different treatment protocols were compared. All patients had comparative preoperative and postoperative duplex ultrasound scans. Postoperative duplex ultrasound scans were performed 3 to 7 days after the procedure. Successful obliteration was defined as lack of color flow on postoperative duplex ultrasound scanning. Clinical correlation with age, gender, laterality, presenting symptoms (Clinical, Etiology, Anatomy, and Pathophysiology [CEAP] classification), location, and vein diameter was also performed. RESULTS:Of the 255 patients who underwent RFS ablation, 138 were female, with a mean age of 65 years (standard deviation, ±14.6 years). These patients had CEAP presentations from C1 to C6 (0 C1, 1 C2, 57 C3, 118 C4, 4 C5, 75 C6). The location of the 642 IPVs was distributed as 472 in the calf and 170 in the ankle; 322 of these procedures were performed on the right leg. Use of a shortened protocol had no significant effect on the early obliteration rates with the 85°C, 90°C, and 95°C protocols, which were 66.1%, 61.8%, and 67.1%, respectively. Significant correlation was seen between location of targeted vein and successful obliteration (P < .001). There was a borderline inverse linear association between higher stylet temperature and successful obliteration in the proximal calf at 85°C. After accounting for within-patient correlation, the middle and distal calf continued to show higher nonobliteration compared with the ankle. No clinical correlation with age, gender, laterality, presenting symptoms of CEAP, or vein diameter was observed. CONCLUSIONS:The study showed that shortening the protocol time for RFA of the perforator did not make a significant difference in the early success rate, regardless of the temperature. The overall early success rate is still low (65.1%). RFA of perforator veins has a higher successful closure rate in proximal calf and ankle areas compared with the middle and distal calf.