Faculty Bibliography

AIMS: To assess the reliability of urinary cytology and cystoscopy to screen and diagnose bladder cancer in patients with NB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A systematic literature search of the Medline and Embase databases was performed in April 2017. Data extraction was performed by two independent reviewers. A narrative synthesis was made. RESULTS: Out of 220 records assessed, 15 were included in this systematic review. All studies were prospective or retrospective series with no control group. Cystoscopy allowed the detection of asymptomatic bladder cancer in 0-10 patients, with a screening sensitivity (available in only one study) of 0%, a screening specificity ranging from 65% to 90%, and a yield in detecting asymptomatic bladder cancer of 0% in all series where it could be calculated. Urinary cytology allowed the detection of bladder cancer in asymptomatic patients in 0-12 patients, with a screening sensitivity of 71%, a screening specificity ranging from 92% to 97% and a yield ranging from 0% to 1.25%. Sensitivity of cystoscopy for diagnosis of bladder cancer ranged from 27% to 81% and specificity was 54% in the only study where it could be calculated. Sensitivity of urinary cytology for diagnosis of bladder cancer was 0-72% and specificity was 100%. CONCLUSION: There is currently insufficient data to support formal recommendations of using both tools in the screening of bladder cancer in patients with neurogenic bladder. Urinary cytology outperformed cystoscopy for screening and might be the best tool currently available.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:Radical prostatectomy (RP) is the standard surgical treatment for localized prostate cancer. One of the side effects after RP impacting quality of life is urinary incontinence. Because of the impact in quality of life, more patients are seeking treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Urodynamics are an important tool to help understand how prostate surgery changes bladder and urethral function. We reviewed the current literature in order to determine the role of urodynamics in post-prostatectomy incontinence. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:Studies have been done to demonstrate the anatomical and functional changes in incontinent men after radical prostatectomy compared to continent men, as well as to evaluate the use of urodynamics in the work-up for post-prostatectomy incontinence prior to treatment. However, there is not a consensus about the indications of urodynamics in this population and new studies have questioned the real role of urodynamics in this setting. Because of the impact in quality of life, more patients are seeking treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Urodynamics have been used to have a better understanding of the anatomical and functional changes in incontinent men after radical prostatectomy; however, the role of urodynamic testing to assess these patients and offer treatment is still to be determined.

CONTEXT/BACKGROUND:Pharmacological treatment is a cornerstone in the management of patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). OBJECTIVE:To review emerging evidence in the medical treatment of LUTS. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION/METHODS:An Embase/Pubmed-based literature search was conducted in December 2017, screening for randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective and retrospective series, animal model studies, and reviews on medical treatment of LUTS. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS/RESULTS:receptor agonist, has recently completed a large phase 3 trial in male patients with nocturia. Other phase 3 trials are ongoing in bladder pain syndrome (AQX 11-25, a SHIP-1 activator) and in neurogenic detrusor overactivity (mirabegron and abobotulinum toxin A). CONCLUSIONS:Medical treatment of LUTS is a very active research field with recently approved drugs for nocturia (desmopressin acetate nasal spray/orally disintegrated tablet) and numerous emerging drugs currently investigated in OAB, LUTS/benign prostatic hyperplasia, nocturia, bladder pain syndrome, and neurogenic detrusor overactivity. PATIENT SUMMARY/UNASSIGNED:Medical treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms is a very active research field with recently approved drugs for nocturia (desmopressin acetate nasal spray/orally disintegrated tablet) and numerous emerging drugs in overactive bladder, nocturia, neurogenic detrusor overactivity, bladder pain syndrome, or benign prostatic hyperplasia.

The use of botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) has revolutionized the treatment of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) over the past three decades. Initially, it was used as a sphincteric injection for detrusor sphincter dyssynergia but now is used mostly as intradetrusor injection to treat neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO). Its use is supported by high-level-of-evidence studies and it has become the gold-standard treatment for patients with NDO refractory to anticholinergics. Several novelties have emerged in the use of BTX-A in neurourology over the past few years. Although onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX^®, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) remains the only BTX-A for which use is supported by large, multicenter, randomized, controlled trials (RCT), and is therefore the only one to be licensed in the United States and Europe, a second BTX-A, abobotulinumtoxinA (Dysport^®, Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Basking Ridge, NJ), is also supported by high-level-of-evidence studies. Other innovations in the use of BTX-A in neurourology during the past few years include the BTX switch (from abobotulinumtoxinA to onabotulinumtoxinA or the opposite) as a rescue option for primary or secondary failures of intradetrusor BTX-A injection and refinements in intradetrusor injection techniques (number of injection sites, injection into the trigone). There is also a growing interest in long-term failure of BTX-A for NDO and their management, and a possible new indication for urethral sphincter injections.

Nocturia is a condition that has a tremendous impact on a patient's health and wellbeing. Getting up 2 or more times a night to urinate fragments sleep, preventing deep, restorative stages of the sleep cycle. With safer and more effective therapies, nocturia is a treatable condition that no longer should be overlooked. The simplicity of directly targeting the cause of nocturia, the overproduction of urine (ie, nocturnal polyuria) should be considered. Noctivaâ„¢ (desmopressin acetate) nasal spray (Avadel Pharmaceuticals plc, Chesterfield, MO), a novel FDA-approved microdose desmopressin nasal spray, can reduce nighttime urine production and potentially mitigate the potential harm of nocturia.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA, mirabegron, and anticholinergics in adults with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) using network meta-analysis (NMA). SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Information sources were searched for randomized blinded controlled trials, of at least 2 weeks duration, comparing any dose of onabotulinumtoxinA, eligible oral/transdermal anticholinergics, or mirabegron, with each other or placebo, in adults with OAB. Bayesian random-effects models were used to synthesize the results at week 12: NMA for responder analyses and network meta-regression (NMR) for change from baseline analyses. The NMR was used to adjust for differences in baseline severity between studies. Sensitivity analysis, excluding studies considered to be at a high risk of methodological bias, was conducted. RESULTS: 56 randomized trials were included in the networks. For each outcome, results are reported for all licensed treatment doses. For each NMR, results are based on patients with an average number of episodes of the outcome at baseline. After 12 weeks, all treatments are more efficacious than placebo. Patients who received onabotulinumtoxinA (100U) had, on average, the greatest reductions in urinary incontinence episodes (UIE), urgency, and micturition frequency, and the highest odds of achieving decreases of 100% and >/=50% in the daily number of UIE. When comparing onabotulinumtoxinA with other pharmacotherapies, mean differences favoured onabotulinumtoxinA 100U over all comparators for UIE and urgency (credible intervals excluded zero) and all but two of the comparators for micturition frequency. OnabotulinumtoxinA 100U was also associated with higher odds of achieving a 100% and >/=50% decrease in daily UIE than most other licensed treatments in the network. The exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias had little impact on the conclusions. CONCLUSION: The results indicate that, after 12 weeks, onabotulinumtoxinA 100U provides greater relief of OAB symptoms compared with most other licensed doses of other pharmacotherapies in the network

Purpose: We sought to assess for impact on management trends in new patients presenting to our institution with stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following the release of the FDA Health Notification in July 2011 for vaginal mesh. Materials and methods: Chart analysis was performed on patients assigned a primary International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) diagnosis code of 625.6 for SUI at initial consultation by two providers at our institution between June 1, 2010 and November 30, 2014. Rates of treatment and types of procedures performed were analyzed: urethral bulking, mesh sling, or pubovaginal sling. Results: A total of 333 new patients were identified with an increasing trend over time. One hundred and twenty-three patients underwent 153 procedures for stress incontinence. The mean proportion that had a procedure per six-month period was 37%, with decreasing proportions over time. Initially all procedures were midurethral mesh slings, with a decline at the time of and after the notification, and a temporary increase in bulking procedures. Subsequently, there was a rise again in sling placement, namely with an increase in pubovaginal slings. Of the 20 pubovaginal slings placed, 13 were placed in patients who had a prior anti-incontinence surgery (eight for sling failure, vaginal mesh, or fixed urethra, and two in patients with mesh extrusion/erosion). Seven were performed in patients who had never had prior surgery (two for very high-grade incontinence, two with urethral diverticulectomy, and three in patients who expressed concern about mesh). Conclusions: Although there were an increasing number of patients seen for management of SUI over time, there was a progressive decrease in the proportion of patients having anti-incontinence procedures after release of the FDA notification. There was an overall decrease in the use of mesh slings and an increase in bulking, and more notably, placement of pubovaginal slings.