Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study is to determine if compression therapy after endovenous ablation (EVA) of the great saphenous vein (GSV) improves efficacy and patient reported outcomes of pain, ecchymosis and quality of life. METHODS: This was a prospective randomized controlled trial from 2009 to 2013 comparing the use of thigh-high 30-40mmHg compression therapy for 7 days vs no compression therapy following endovenous ablation of the GSV. Severity of venous disease was measured by CEAP scale and the venous clinical severity score (VCSS). Quality of life assessments were carried out with a CIVIQ-2 questionnaire at days 1, 7, 14, 30 and 90, and the visual analog pain scale daily for the first week. Bruising score was assessed at 1 week post procedure. Post ablation venous duplex was also performed. RESULTS: 70 patients and 85 limbs with EVA were randomized. EVA modalities included radiofrequency ablation (91%) and laser ablation (9%). CEAP class and VCSS scores were equivalent between the two groups. There was no significant difference in patient reported outcomes of post-procedural pain scores at day 1 (mean 3.0 vs. 3.12, p =0.948) and at day 7 (mean 2.11 vs 2.81,p =0.147), CIVIQ-2 scores at 1 week (mean 36.9 vs 35.1, p=0.594), at 90 days (mean 29.1 vs 22.5, p =0.367) and bruising score (mean 1.2 vs 1.4,p=0.561) in the compression vs. no compression groups respectively. Additionally, there was a 100% rate of GSV closure in both groups and no endothermal heat-induced thrombosis (eHIT) as assessed by post-ablation duplex. CONCLUSION: Compression therapy does not significantly affect both patient reported and clinical outcomes after GSV ablation in patients with non-ulcerated venous insufficiency. It may be an unnecessary adjunct following GSV ablation.

Background: Patients who present acutely with a femoral vein deep venous thrombosis (DVT) diagnosed by ultrasound are often treated with anticoagulation and instructed to follow up electively. This study sought to assess whether obtaining central imaging in this cohort of patients results in an increased diagnosis of iliocaval DVT and consequently an increased consideration for interventional treatments to effect thrombus removal. Methods: This study was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained RedCap database from November 2014 through August 2016, which is coordinated by the Venous Thromboembolic Center at our institution. Consecutive patients who were diagnosed by ultrasound with a femoral vein DVT were evaluated. The patients who underwent confirmatory central venous imaging (computed tomography venography, magnetic resonance venography; group A) were compared with the patients who did not undergo central venous imaging (group B). Demographic variables were collected. The outcomes evaluated were (1) the presence of iliocaval DVT, (2) candidacy for lytic-based therapies, (3) performance of lytic-based therapy, and (4) performance of any invasive treatment (lytic therapy, mechanical thrombectomy, inferior vena cava filter placement, or venous stenting). Additional outcomes included technical success of invasive treatment and complications associated with invasive treatment. Results:A total of 63 patients were identified who presented with a diagnosis of femoral vein DVT. Group A comprised 20 of 63 (31%) patients. Group B comprised the remainder, 43 of 63 (69%). The baseline demographics did not differ significantly, except for gender (Table). The number of patients who were diagnosed with an iliocaval DVT differed significantly (group A, nine [45%]; group B, nine [20%]; P <.0001). The number of patients who underwent lytic therapy differed significantly (group A, eight [40%] - seven at the index admission and one at 1 month; group B, 0 [0%]; P <.0001). The number of patients without relative contraindications to lytic therapy did not differ significantly (group A, 13 [65%]; group B, 34 [79%]; P =.35). The number of patients who underwent any invasive treatment differed significantly between the two cohorts (group A, 12/20 [60%]; group B, 4/43 [9%]; P =.0001). The majority of interventions were technically successful in both groups (group A, 11/12 [91.7%]; group B, 4/4 [100%]; P = 1.00). Conclusions: This study suggests that a significant percentage of patients diagnosed by ultrasound with femoral vein DVTs have a concomitant iliocaval DVT. The data suggest that in patients with a femoral vein DVT, central venous imaging may be indicated to identify potentially treatable iliocaval thrombosis. Long-term data will be required to see if this results in a decrease in post-thrombotic syndrome on a population basis. (table present)

Standard approaches to lower extremity arteries may be rendered difficult or unusable because of scarring or infection, or both. This article describes unusual alternative approaches to facilitate lower extremity bypasses that would normally require approaches to the common femoral, deep femoral, or popliteal arteries. Techniques are described for using the distal external iliac artery, the distal two-thirds of the deep femoral artery, and the above-knee and below-knee popliteal artery approached laterally.

BACKGROUND: Lymphedema is an incurable and disfiguring disease secondary to excessive fluid and protein in the interstitium as a result of lymphatic obstruction. Pneumatic compression (PC) offers a novel modality for treatment of lymphatic obstruction through targeting lymphatic beds and mimicking a functional drainage system. The objective of this study is to demonstrate improved quality of life in patients with lower-extremity lymphedema. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting to a single institution for treatment of lymphedema were all treated with PC for at least 3 months. All patients underwent a pre- and post-PC assessment of episodes of cellulitis, number of ulcers, and venous insufficiency. Post-PC symptom questionnaires were administered. Symptom improvement was the primary outcome for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients met inclusion criteria. At presentation, 70% were female with a mean age of 57.5 years. Secondary lymphedema was present in 78%. Mean length of PC use was 12.7 months with a mean of 5.3 treatments per week. Ankle and calf limb girth decreased after PC use, (28.3 vs. 27.5 cm, P = 0.01) and (44.7 vs. 43.8 cm, P = 0.018), respectively. The number of episodes of cellulitis and ulcers pre- and post-PC decreased from mean of 0.26-0.05 episodes (P = 0.002) and 0.12-0.02 ulcers (P = 0.007), respectively. Fourteen percent had concomitant superficial venous insufficiency, all of whom underwent venous ablation. Overall 100% of patients reported symptomatic improvement post-PC with 54% greatly improved. 90% would recommend the treatment to others. CONCLUSIONS: PC improves symptom relief and reduces episodes of cellulitis and ulceration in lower-extremity lymphedema. It is well tolerated by patients and should be recommended as an adjunct to standard lymphedema therapy. Screening for venous insufficiency is recommended.

OBJECTIVE: Neck radiation therapy (XRT) can induce carotid artery stenosis and may increase the technical difficulty of endarterectomy. It is considered a relative indication for carotid angioplasty and carotid artery stenting (CAS). This study sought to evaluate differences in CAS embolic potential and restenosis performed on XRT and non-XRT patients. METHODS: At three institutions, 366 CAS procedures were performed on 321 patients (XRT, n = 43; non-XRT, n = 323). Mean follow-up was 410 days (median, 282 days; range, 7-1920 days). Patients were observed with duplex ultrasound to assess for restenosis. Additional end points included target lesion revascularization (TLR), myocardial and cerebrovascular events, and perioperative complications. Captured particulate from embolic protection filters was analyzed with photomicroscopy and image analysis software for 27 XRT and 214 non-XRT filters. RESULTS: XRT patients were more likely to be male and had lower rates of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and diabetes mellitus, although the mean age at procedure did not differ. There was no increase in severe internal carotid tortuosity among XRT patients (XRT: 50% vs non-XRT: 34.7%; P = .06). Indication for CAS did not differ between the two groups, including the number of CAS procedures performed for symptomatic carotid stenosis (XRT: 39.7% vs non-XRT: 39.0%; P = NS). Perioperative outcomes, including the composite 30-day stroke, myocardial infarction, and mortality, were not significantly different (XRT: 2.6% vs non-XRT: 3.9%; P = NS.) There were no significant differences in restenosis rate at the 50% (XRT: 9.4% vs non-XRT: 8.6%; P = NS) or 70% (XRT: 3.5% vs non-XRT: 8.6%; P = NS) threshold. Filter particle analysis revealed that filters from XRT patients had more numerous large particles per filter (1.4 vs 0.7; P < .05) and larger mean particle size (464.1 mum vs 320.0 mum; P < .05). TLR did not differ significantly between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to earlier studies, this analysis reveals that there are significant differences in XRT and non-XRT patients undergoing CAS in terms of medical comorbidities and embolic material captured in embolic protection filters. The decreased incidence of atherosclerotic risk factors was observed in XRT patients probably because XRT was the primary factor responsible for carotid stenosis. Despite increased embolic particle size, CAS can be performed safely with no increased morbidity, TLR, or restenosis in XRT patients.

Introduction and Objectives: Lymphedema is an incurable and disfiguring disease secondary to excessive fluid and protein in the interstitium as a result of lymphatic obstruction. Pneumatic compression (PC) offers a novel modality for treatment of lymphatic obstruction through targeting lymphatic beds and mimicking a functional drainage system. The objective of this study is to demonstrate improved quality of life in patients with lower extremity lymphedema. Methods: Consecutive patients presenting to a single institution for treatment of lymphedema were all treated with PC for at least three months. All patients underwent a pre-and post-PC assessment of episodes of cellulitis, number of ulcers, and venous insufficiency. Post-PC symptom questionnaires were administered. Symptom improvement was the primary outcome for analysis. Results: 100 patients met inclusion criteria. At presentation, 70 % were female with a mean age of 57.5 years. Secondary lymphedema was present in 78%. Mean length of PC use was 12.7 months with a mean of 5.3 treatments per week. The number of episodes of cellulitis and ulcers pre- and post-PC decreased from mean of 0.26 to 0.05 episodes (p=0.002) and 0.12 to 0.02 ulcers (p=0.007) respectively. 14 % had concomitant superficial venous insufficiency, all of whom underwent venous ablation. 100% of patients reported symptomatic improvement post-PC with 54% greatly improved. 90% would recommend the treatment to others. Conclusions: PC improves symptom relief and reduces episodes of cellulitis and ulceration in lower extremity lymphedema. It is well tolerated by patients and should be recommended as an adjunct to standard lymphedema therapy. Screening for venous insufficiency is recommended