Faculty Bibliography

In the rat, blockade of angiotensin II type 1 receptors diminishes the functional changes that occur after kidney irradiation. It has been hypothesized that some of the beneficial effects of angiotensin II type 1 blockers in renal disease are caused by a rise in angiotensin II that stimulates the angiotensin II type 2 receptor. If this hypothesis applied in this model, blockade of the type 2 receptor should exacerbate radiation nephropathy and/or counteract the beneficial effects of type 1 receptor blockade. To assess this hypothesis, rats were given total-body irradiation plus bone marrow transplantation and then treated for 12 weeks with a type 1 receptor blocker (L158,809), a type 2 blocker (PD123319), both blockers, or no blockers. Rats were assessed for renal function (proteinuria, hypertension, azotemia) and renal failure for up to 62 weeks. Contrary to the hypothesis, the type 2 blocker alone produced a temporary delay in the development of radiation nephropathy, and it substantially enhanced the efficacy of the type 1 blocker. This implies that both type 1 and type 2 angiotensin receptors need to be blocked to achieve the maximum level of prophylaxis of radiation nephropathy. We speculate that the beneficial effect of the angiotensin II type 2 receptor blocker is due to a reduction in radiation-induced renal cell proliferation or fibrosis.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) is a consequence of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection and is a B-cell hyperplasia with CD-20 positive lymphocytes. The treatment of PTLD includes reduction/withdrawal of immunosuppression and chemotherapy. This study reports our center experience with humanized monoclonal antibody against CD-20 (Rituximab) for the treatment of PTLD. MATERIAL AND METHODS/METHODS:Eight cases of PTLD after solid organ transplantation [six kidney, one kidney/pancreas (KP) and one liver] occurred between September 1998 and October 2001. The mean time between transplant and the diagnosis of PTLD was 57.3 months (range 3 months to 10 yr). Five patients underwent cadaveric transplant, five males and six were Caucasians with mean age of 48 yr (range 20-67 yr). RESULTS:The clinical presentation was as follows: lymphadenopathy--5, gastrointestinal bleeding--2 and tonsillar enlargement--1. The diagnosis was made by a lymph node biopsy in five, a gastric ulcer biopsy in two and a tonsillar biopsy in one case. Six of them had polymorphous, two had monoclonal B-cell lymphoma, and all were positive for CD-20. Six were related to EBV, documented by latent membrane protein (LMP) or Epstein-Barr encoded RNA (EBER) staining. Immunosuppression at the time of PTLD diagnosis consisted of tacrolimus in six cases and cyclosporine A (CsA) in two with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine--3 each and sirolimus--1. Rituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m2 once a week for 4 wk. There were no side effects seen with this therapy. Immunosuppression was reduced in all patients. Complete remission was observed in seven cases (one required two courses). One patient who did not respond received chemotherapy. Patients were followed for a mean period of 22.5 months (range 10-45 months post-PTLD diagnosis. At the last follow-up all eight patients were alive, seven with a functioning graft and one on maintenance dialysis. Three of these patients had been in remission for more than 2.5 yr. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Rituximab is an effective agent in the treatment of PTLD without the morbidity characteristic of chemotherapy. Chemotherapy should be reserved only for those refractory to Rituximab therapy.

The pronounced radiosensitivity of renal tissue limits the total radiotherapeutic dose that can be applied safely to treatment volumes that include the kidneys. The incidence of clinical radiation nephropathy has increased with the use of total-body irradiation (TBI) in preparation for bone marrow transplantation and as a consequence of radionuclide therapies. The clinical presentation is azotemia, hypertension, and, disproportionately, severe anemia seen several months to years after irradiation that, if untreated, leads to renal failure. Structural features include mesangiolysis, sclerosis, tubular atrophy, and tubulointerstitial scarring. Similar changes are seen in a variety of experimental animal models. The classic view of radiation nephropathy being inevitable, progressive, and untreatable because of DNA damage-mediated cell loss at division has been replaced by a new paradigm in which radiation-induced injury involves not only direct cell kill but also involves complex and dynamic interactions between glomerular, tubular, and interstitial cells. These serve both as autocrine and as paracrine, if not endocrine, targets of biologic mediators that mediate nephron injury and repair. The renin angiotensin system (RAS) clearly is involved; multiple experimental studies have shown that antagonism of the RAS is beneficial, even when not initiated until weeks after irradiation. Recent findings suggest a similar benefit in clinical radiation nephropathy.

Progressive improvement in short-term kidney transplant survival and reduction in acute rejection rates have restricted our ability to assess newer therapy. Past and present conventional endpoints, such as short-term graft survival and acute rejection rates, are no longer practical. This has prompted investigators to search for alternative endpoints. Long-term graft survival is an ideal endpoint. However, this requires a large cohort of patients with longer follow-up. A simpler approach would be to identify short-term markers, which can predict long-term survival. Short-term potential markers that can predict long-term survival are: clinical (renal function), histological (renal pathological markers) and immunological (anti-donor antibody, blood and urine cytokines). Post-transplant renal function estimated by serum creatinine, cystatin C and creatinine clearance within 1 year, and histological indices, as the Banff chronicity score, have the potential to predict long-term graft survival. Serum creatinine is limited as a marker by its variability based on recipient age, body weight, race and sex. Histological indices are limited, due to the invasive nature of evaluation. Post-transplant renal function and histological indices can be used potentially as a composite endpoint, in combination with conventional endpoints, such as graft loss, death and acute rejection. A practical approach for assessing newer therapies in future studies is to use composite endpoints, which combine conventional endpoints (graft loss, death, acute rejection) with newer endpoints (renal function, histological indices).

Use of child-to-parent (CTP) kidney donation may be limited because of ethical concerns as well as doubts about its effectiveness. We used the United Network for Organ Sharing database to examine the effectiveness of CTP kidney donation compared with other types of living-related (LD) kidney donation and to cadaveric kidney donation. Data from 56 873 kidney transplants performed between 1988 and 1998 showed significantly greater transplant and patient survival for CTP kidney transplants compared with cadaveric kidney transplants. The average gain in kidney transplant half-life is 3.6 years for a CTP compared with a cadaveric kidney transplant, and it is estimated that this gain for the recipient far outweighs the 1 in 3000 risk of death to the donor associated with kidney donation. We conclude that CTP kidney donation should not be discouraged, and represents a useful source of transplantable kidneys.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The aim of this report is to document the successful treatment of radiation nephropathy. METHODS:Clinical case report with statistical analysis of evolution of kidney function. RESULTS:A case of radiation nephropathy was found in a kidney transplant recipient whose kidney transplant had been irradiated with 750 cGy 23 years previously. Use of the angiotensin II blocker, losartan, was associated with significant stabilization of the kidney function. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Radiation nephropathy can be successfully treated. Other normal-tissue radiation injuries may also be treatable.

Irradiation of the kidneys is followed by a well-defined sequence of changes leading eventually to kidney failure. In the rat, inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme or blockade of angiotensin II receptors can prevent the structural and functional changes that occur after kidney irradiation. These interventions are particularly effective between 3 and 10 weeks after irradiation. However, in a series of studies with the rat model we failed to find any evidence that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) is activated in the first 10 weeks after kidney irradiation. First, if the RAS was activated during this interval, one would expect hypertension followed by proteinuria and azotemia. However, hypertension is significant only at the end of this period and is preceded by significant proteinuria and azotemia. This evolution is not in favor of an obviously activated RAS during the 3- to 10-week postirradiation interval that is critical for interventions aimed at the RAS. Second, plasma renin activity and active plasma renin protein concentrations are not significantly increased over the first 10 weeks after irradiation. Third, whole-blood and intrarenal angiotensin II levels are not increased and may even be decreased over this interval. This last observation is particularly important because the assay used is sensitive enough to detect the effects of dietary salt manipulation. We hypothesize that even the normal activity of the RAS contributes to injury after kidney irradiation, possibly by supporting the proliferation of cells that carry potentially lethal radiation injuries.

Total-body irradiation or renal irradiation is followed by a well-defined sequence of changes in renal function leading eventually to renal failure. Previous studies in a rat model have shown that inhibition of angiotensin-converting enzyme or blockade of angiotensin II receptors can prevent the structural and functional changes that occur after renal irradiation, and that these interventions are particularly important between 3 and 10 weeks after irradiation. We have now shown that in the same rat model, total-body irradiation induces proliferation of renal tubular cells (i.e., an increase in the number of cells staining positive for proliferating cell nuclear antigen) within 5 weeks after irradiation. Treatment with an angiotensin II receptor blocker delays this radiation-induced tubular proliferation and decreases its magnitude. Renal radiation also induces proliferation of glomerular cells, but the relative increase in glomerular proliferation is not as great as that seen in renal tubular cells, and the increase is not delayed or decreased by treatment with an angiotensin II receptor blocker. We hypothesize that angiotensin II receptor blockers exert their beneficial effect in radiation nephropathy by delaying the proliferation (and hence the eventual mitotic death) of renal tubular cells that have been genetically crippled by radiation.