Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:ef737
Cervical Cancer Prevention and Screening
Tsai, Ming; Pessel, Caroline; Fitzgerald, Erin; Oh, So-Young; Kraja, Violetta; Garcia, Julio; Phan, Scarlett; Cason, Molly; Shah, Amisha; Lee, Sabrina; Vieira, Dorice; Maxwell, Elizabeth
The complexity of the Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-host interaction along with dense cervical cancer screening guidelines hamper students' easy learning of the subject. This online learning-module intends to provide a comprehensive overview of HPV infection to help students better understand the rationale behind the screening protocol. The content of this module summarizes key concepts such as viral structure and replication, human immune-defense, immunization strategy, pathogenesis of cervical pre-cancer and cancer, and finally, prevention and management strategy of HPV infection in gynecologic patients. The target audience will be primarily third-year medical students rotating through their OB-GYN clerkship. In-house training of residents or attending physicians could also benefit from the educational material contained in this module. The module takes advantage of the audio-visual effects to maximize student learning. It is organized in sessions of sub-topics with core text, embedded images, illustrations and recorded voice-over script. In addition, there is a video at the end of the module which simulates a patient encounter in a doctor's office to discuss cervical cancer screening and management. Pre-test and post-test questions help the viewer keep track of their progress upon completion
ORIGINAL:0006991
ISSN: 2374-8265
CID: 150923
MRI features of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B; Hindman, Nicole; Fitzgerald, Erin F; Niver, Benjamin E; Melamed, Jonathan; Babb, James S
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to retrospectively describe the MRI features of the pathologically related entities renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-eight cases of histologically proven renal oncocytoma and 15 of chromophobe RCC evaluated with preoperative MRI from January 2003 through June 2009 at our institution were independently reviewed for an array of MRI features by two radiologists blinded to the final histopathologic diagnosis. These features were tabulated and compared between chromophobe RCC and renal oncocytoma by use of the Mann-Whitney test and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Renal oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC showed no significant difference in size or any of 16 qualitative imaging features (p = 0.0842-1.0, reader 1; p = 0.0611-1.0, reader 2). Microscopic fat, hemorrhage, cysts, infiltrative margins, perinephric fat invasion, renal vein invasion, enhancement homogeneity, and hypervascularity were each observed in less than 20% of cases by both readers. A central scar and segmental enhancement inversion (a recently described finding in which early contrast-enhanced images show relatively more enhanced and less enhanced intralesional components with inversion of their relative enhancement on later images) were observed by both readers in at least 10% of cases of both renal oncocytoma and of chromophobe RCC with no significant difference between the two entities (p = 0.2092-0.2960). CONCLUSION: We have presented the largest series to date of the MRI features of both renal oncocytoma and chromophobe RCC. These related entities exhibited similar findings, and no MRI features were reliable in distinguishing between them
PMID: 21098174
ISSN: 1546-3141
CID: 114840
Utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient for distinguishing clear cell renal cell carcinoma of low and high nuclear grade
Rosenkrantz, Andrew B; Niver, Benjamin E; Fitzgerald, Erin F; Babb, James S; Chandarana, Hersh; Melamed, Jonathan
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of our study was to assess the utility of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in distinguishing low-grade and high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cases of 57 patients with pathologically proven ccRCC who underwent preoperative MRI, including diffusion-weighted imaging, were retrospectively assessed. ADC values were obtained from ADC maps calculated using b-value combinations of 0 and 400 s/mm(2) and of 0 and 800 s/mm(2) (hereafter referred to as ADC-400 and ADC-800). Lesions were also evaluated for an array of conventional MRI features. A single expert uropathologist reviewed all slides to determine nuclear grade. The utility of ADC for detecting high-grade ccRCC, alone and in combination with conventional MRI features, was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: ADC-400 and ADC-800 were significantly lower among high-grade than among low-grade ccRCC (2.24 +/- 0.50 mm(2)/s vs 1.59 +/- 0.57 mm(2)/s for ADC-400, p < 0.001; 1.85 +/- 0.40 mm(2)/s vs 1.28 +/- 0.48 mm(2)/s for ADC-800; p < 0.001). The area under the ROC curve for identifying high-grade ccRCC using ADC-400 and ADC-800 was 0.801 and 0.824 respectively (p = 0.606), with optimal thresholds, sensitivity, and specificity as follows: ADC-400: 2.17 mm(2)/s, 88.5%, 64.5% and ADC-800: 1.20 mm(2)/s, 65.4%, 96.0%. Using multivariate logistic regression, only necrosis (p = 0.0229) and perinephric fat invasion (p = 0.0160) were retained among conventional imaging features as independent risk factors for high-grade ccRCC. The accuracy of the logistic regression model for predicting high-grade ccRCC was significantly improved by inclusion of either ADC-400 (p = 0.0143) or ADC-800 (p = 0.015). CONCLUSION: ADC is significantly lower in high-grade ccRCC compared with low-grade ccRCC and increases the accuracy for detecting high-grade ccRCC compared with conventional MRI features alone
PMID: 20966299
ISSN: 1546-3141
CID: 114050