Faculty Bibliography

On May 22-24, 2019, the 15th Antiepileptic Drug and Device (AEDD) Trials Conference was held, which focused on current issues related to AEDD development from preclinical models to clinical prognostication. The conference featured regulatory agencies, academic laboratories, and healthcare companies involved in emerging epilepsy therapies and research. The program included discussions around funding and support for investigations in epilepsy and neurologic research, clinical trial design and integrated outcome measures for people with epilepsy, and drug development and upcoming disease-modifying therapies. Finally, the conference included updates from the preclinical, clinical, and device pipeline. Summaries of the talks are provided in this paper, with the various pipeline therapeutics in the listed tables to be outlined in a subsequent publication.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To provide information on the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on people with epilepsy and provide consensus recommendations on how to provide the best possible care for people with epilepsy while avoiding visits to urgent care facilities and hospitalizations during the Novel Coronavirus pandemic. METHODS:Authors individually scored statements on a scale of -10 (strongly disagree) to +10 (strongly agree). 5/11 recommendations for physicians and 3/5 recommendations for individuals/families were rated by all authors as 7 or above (strongly agree) on the first round of rating. Subsequently, a tele-conference was held where statements for which there was a lack of strong consensus were revised. RESULTS:After revision, all consensus recommendations received a score of 7 or above. The recommendations focus on administration of as much care as possible at home to keep people with epilepsy out of health care facilities, where they are likely to encounter COVID-19 (including strategies for rescue therapy), as well as minimization of risk of seizure exacerbation through adherence, and through ensuring a regular supply of medication. We also provide helpful links to additional helpful information for people with epilepsy and health providers. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These recommendation may help healthcare professionals provide optimal care to people with epilepsy during the coronavirus pandemic.

OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive cenobamate 200 mg/d in patients with uncontrolled focal (partial-onset) seizures despite treatment with 1 to 3 antiepileptic drugs. METHODS:In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, adults 18 to 65 years of age with focal seizures were randomized 1:1 (cenobamate:placebo) after an 8-week baseline period. The 12-week double-blind treatment period consisted of a 6-week titration phase and a 6-week maintenance phase. The primary outcome was percent change in seizure frequency (from baseline) per 28 days during double-blind treatment. RESULTS:< 0.0001). Focal seizures with motor component, impaired awareness, and focal to bilateral tonic-clonic seizures were significantly reduced with cenobamate vs placebo. During maintenance, 28.3% of cenobamate-treated and 8.8% of placebo-treated patients were seizure-free. Treatment-emergent adverse events reported in >10% in either group (cenobamate vs placebo) were somnolence (22.1% vs 11.9%), dizziness (22.1% vs 16.5%), headache (12.4% vs 12.8%), nausea (11.5% vs 4.6%), and fatigue (10.6% vs 6.4%). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Adjunctive treatment with cenobamate 200 mg/d significantly improved seizure control in adults with uncontrolled focal seizures and was well tolerated. CLINICALTRIALSGOV IDENTIFIER/UNASSIGNED:NCT01397968. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:This study provides Class I evidence that, for patients with uncontrolled focal seizures, adjunctive cenobamate reduces seizures.

OBJECTIVE:A meta-analysis of published studies was performed to determine whether the efficacy of antiseizure drugs in adults with primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures (PGTCS) is comparable with that in the pediatric population (2-12 years of age). METHODS:Electronic searches were conducted in EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for clinical trials of PGTCS in adults and children 2-12 years of age. Neurologists used standardized search and study evaluations to select eligible trials. Median percent reduction in seizure frequency from baseline and ≥50% responder rates were used to compare drug efficacy in adults and children. RESULTS:Among 7 adjunctive-therapy PGTCS trials in adults and children (2-12 years of age) that met evaluation criteria, effect sizes were consistent between adults and children for lamotrigine and topiramate. The baseline-subtracted median percent seizure reduction in seizure frequency ranged from 50.0% to 79.7% in children and 57.0% to 64.0% in adults. The ≥50% responder rate was similar between children and adults in a topiramate study (50% in children compared with 58% in adults). CONCLUSIONS:This meta-analysis supports the use of drug response from antiseizure drug clinical trials for PGTCS in adults to predict comparable treatment response in children 2-12 years of age with PGTCS.

Introduction: Antiseizure medications are the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. Currently therapies are not specific to epilepsy etiology, and control seizures in two thirds of cases. Drugs in clinical development aim to bridge that gap by targeting novel receptors and epileptogenesis. While currently approved antiseizure medications target focal or generalized epilepsies regardless of etiology, newly approved and investigational epilepsy drugs also target rare or orphan epilepsy syndrome indications, such as Lennox-Gastaut or Dravet syndrome. We identified investigational drugs through the Epilepsy Foundation pipeline tracker and conference proceedings of recent novel epilepsy drug conferences (XV AEDD, XIV EILAT).Areas Covered: We review antiseizure medications in clinical development and their targets (GABA, T-type calcium channels, 5-HT, potassium channels). We also discuss drugs with unknown or multiple mechanisms of action (cannabinoids, carisbamate, cenobamate). Therapies with potential disease-modifying effects in preclinical and clinical development are then outlined, ranging from gene-targeted treatments (antisense oligonucleotide, gene therapy, antisense transcript regulators) targeting specific genetic epilepsies, mTOR inhibitors, to inflammation-targeted treatments.Expert Opinion: Drugs to treat novel targets to control seizures as well as prevent epileptogenesis offer great promise. To assess disease modifying agents, we may need new clinical trial designs. Precision medicine therapies for genetic epilepsies may control seizures and restore brain health.

Medicines currently used in the management of epilepsy have been developed to suppress seizures, and they have no known impact on the underlying disease. Using the term "antiepileptic" to describe these compounds is misleading because it suggests an action on the epilepsy itself. Pharmacological agents that have a merely symptomatic effect should be referred to as antiseizure medicines. Using appropriate terminology is especially important at a time innovative treatments targeting the development of epilepsy and its comorbidities are being actively pursued.