Faculty Bibliography

Objective To analyze the patterns of care and survival for pT1-2N1M0 head and neck cancer based on receipt of surgery alone, surgery + postoperative radiotherapy (S + RT), or surgery + postoperative chemoradiotherapy (S + CRT). Study Design Retrospective analysis. Setting National Cancer Database. Subjects and Methods We queried the database for patients with stage pT1-2N1M0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx between 2004 and 2012 who were treated with surgery with negative margins and no extracapsular extension. Logistic regression was used to assess predictors of receipt of postoperative treatment. Overall survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method, and Cox regression analysis identified covariates that affected it. Results There were 1598 patients included in this study: 566 (35.4%) received surgery alone; 726 (45.4%), S + RT; and 306 (19.1%), S + CRT. The 5-year overall survival was 68.8%, 74.0%, and 87.8%, respectively ( P = .009 comparing S + RT and surgery alone, P < .001 for all other comparisons). On multivariable logistic regression, academic centers were associated with a decreased likelihood of S + RT (odds ratio = 0.71) and S + CRT (odds ratio = 0.66). Multivariable Cox regression demonstrated no difference in survival for S + RT over surgery alone (hazard ratio = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.70-1.09, P = .24); however, there was a survival benefit associated with S + CRT (hazard ratio = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.39-0.81, P = .002). Conclusion Nearly 65% of patients with pT1-2N1 head and neck cancer with negative margins and no extracapsular extension received S + RT or S + CRT. Improvement in survival was noted only for patients who received S + CRT.

PURPOSE: The National Cancer Data Base was analyzed to evaluate the patterns of care and impact of brachytherapy (BT) boost on overall survival (OS) for patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the base of tongue between 2004 and 2012 who received concurrent external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and chemotherapy with or without BT boost in the definitive setting were queried. Overall survival was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to identify covariates that affected OS. RESULTS: There were 15,934 patients included in this study; 137 (0.9%) received EBRT + BT and the remaining received EBRT only. Median followup was 41.2 months. The utilization of BT boost declined from 2.1% in 2004 to 0.2% in 2012 (p < 0.0001), whereas intensity-modulated radiation therapy use increased from 22.8% in 2004 to 69.2% in 2012 (p < 0.0001). The three- and 5-year OS was 83.2% and 78.3% for patients receiving EBRT + BT compared with 77.4% and 69.0% for those receiving EBRT only (p = 0.03). The difference in survival was significantly better among patients with T3-4 tumors with EBRT + BT boost (p = 0.009) however, there was no survival benefit among patients with T1-2 tumors (p = 0.72). The analysis was repeated with patients who received intensity-modulated radiation therapy vs. EBRT with BT boost and the survival difference was sustained only for those with T3-4 tumors (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Brachytherapy boost has decreased in its utilization even though it was associated with favorable survival outcomes particularly among patients with higher T-stage tumors.

Purpose/Objective(s): Early stage supraglottic larynx cancers treated with definitive radiotherapy (RT) require treatment of the bilateral neck because of high rates of regional spread. Compared to older techniques, modern intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has been shown to precisely target tumor and draining nodal regions with the potential to spare organs at risk including those essential for prevention of aspiration. However, previous hospital-based studies have demonstrated decreased survival associated with the use of IMRT compared to 3D and 2D radiotherapy techniques in glottic larynx. We used the National Cancer Data Base (NC

Food and beverage marketing contributes to poor dietary choices among adults and children. As consumers spend more time on the Internet, food and beverage companies have increased their online marketing efforts. Studies have shown food companies' online promotions use a variety of marketing techniques to promote mostly energy-dense, nutrient-poor products, but no studies have compared the online marketing techniques and nutritional quality of products promoted on food companies' international websites. For this descriptive study, we developed a qualitative codebook to catalogue the marketing themes used on 18 international corporate websites associated with the world's three largest fast food and beverage companies (i.e. Coca-Cola, McDonald's, Kentucky Fried Chicken). Nutritional quality of foods featured on those websites was evaluated based on quantitative Nutrient Profile Index scores and food category (e.g. fried, fresh). Beverages were sorted into categories based on added sugar content. We report descriptive statistics to compare the marketing techniques and nutritional quality of products featured on the company websites for the food and beverage company websites in two high-income countries (HICs), Germany and the United States, two upper-middle-income countries (UMICs), China and Mexico, and two lower-middle-income countries (LMICs), India and the Philippines. Of the 406 screenshots captured from company websites, 67.8% depicted a food or beverage product. HICs' websites promoted diet food or beverage products/ healthier alternatives (e. g. baked chicken sandwich) significantly more often on their pages (25%), compared to LMICs (14.5%). Coca-Cola featured diet products significantly more frequently on HIC websites compared to LMIC websites. Charities were featured more often on webpages in LMICs (15.4%) compared to UMICs (2.6%) and HICs (2.3%). This study demonstrates that companies showcase healthier products in wealthier countries and advertise their philanthropic activities in lower income countries, which is concerning given the negative effect of nutrition transition (double burden of overnutrition and undernutrition) on burden of non-communicable diseases and obesity in lower income countries.

BACKGROUND: Unilateral radiotherapy (RT) of oropharyngeal carcinomas is accepted for patients with lateralized primary and low-volume nodal disease. Utilizing prospectively defined criteria of laterality and staging positron emission tomography (PET)/CT, we studied outcomes in patients with advanced-stage oropharyngeal cancer undergoing unilateral RT. METHODS: Thirty-seven patients with oropharyngeal tumors >1 cm from midline regardless of node status underwent unilateral RT and were followed prospectively. Patient characteristics: T1 = 11; T2 = 22; T3 = 4; N0 = 3; N1 = 9; N2a = 3; N2b = 21; and Nx = 1. Dosimetry were determined and weekly National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) distress thermometer data were collected. RESULTS: At median follow-up of 32 months, 3-year locoregional control, contralateral regional failure, distant metastasis-free survival, and disease-free survival were 96%, 0%, 7%, and 93%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Low rates of contralateral neck failure are demonstrated utilizing prospectively defined criteria for unilateral RT. The tolerances of contralateral organs are respected and patients report low to moderate levels of distress throughout treatment.