Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:jkh305
CLINICAL PARAMETERS AND PREDICTORS OF MONOZYGOTIC TWINS (MZT) AFTER SINGLE FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER (FET). [Meeting Abstract]
Kelly, Amelia G.; Blakemore, Jennifer K.; McCaffrey, Caroline; Grifo, James A.
ISI:000579355300709
ISSN: 0015-0282
CID: 4685302
NEONATAL AND MATERNAL OUTCOMES IN SINGLETON LIVE BIRTHS (LB) FOLLOWING SINGLE EUPLOID FROZEN EMBRYO TRANSFER (FET): DOES TRANSFER PROTOCOL MATTER?. [Meeting Abstract]
Friedlander, Hilary S.; Voigt, Paxton E.; Blakemore, Jennifer K.; Grifo, James A.
ISI:000579355301027
ISSN: 0015-0282
CID: 4685312
IMPROVING RESIDENT EDUCATION AND MASTERY IN REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY AND INFERTILITY FOR THE GENERALIST OB/GYN: A SURVEY-BASED [Meeting Abstract]
Gilmore, Emma V.; Blakemore, Jennifer K.; Maxwell, Susan; Devore, Shannon
ISI:000579355300240
ISSN: 0015-0282
CID: 4685202
EXPERIENCE EQUALS EXPERTISE: OUTCOMES OF LIVE EMBRYO TRANSFERS (ET) BY REPRODUCTIVE ENDOCRINOLOGY AND INFERTILITY (REI) FELLOWS (FEL) COMPARED TO ATTENDING (ATT) PHYSICIANS. [Meeting Abstract]
Shaw, Jacquelyn; Parra, Carlos M.; Blakemore, Jennifer K.; Fino, Mary Elizabeth; Licciardi, Frederick L.
ISI:000579355300238
ISSN: 0015-0282
CID: 4685192
THE USE OF OOCYTE CRYOPRESERVATION (OC) FOR FERTILITY PRESERVATION (FP) IN GIRLS WITH SEX CHROMOSOME DISORDERS (SCD): A CASE SERIES DESCRIBING OUTCOMES. [Meeting Abstract]
Martel, Rachel A.; Blakemore, Jennifer K.; Fino, Mary Elizabeth
ISI:000579355300204
ISSN: 0015-0282
CID: 4685182
SOCIO-DEMOGRAPHIC DISPARITIES IN UTILIZATION OF FERTILITY SERVICES AMONG REPRODUCTIVE AGE WOMEN DIAGNOSED WITH CANCER IN THE US: A SECONDARY ANALYSIS OF THE 2011-2017 NATIONAL SURVEY FOR FAMILY GROWTH (NSFG). [Meeting Abstract]
Voigt, Paxton E.; Persily, Jesse Benjamin; Thakker, Sameer; Blakemore, Jennifer K.; Licciardi, Frederick L.; Najari, Bobby B.
ISI:000579355300203
ISSN: 0015-0282
CID: 4685172
PLANNED OOCYTE CYROPRESERVATION-10-15 YEAR FOLLOW-UP: RETURN RATES AND CYCLE OUTCOMES. [Meeting Abstract]
Blakemore, Jennifer K.; Grifo, James A.; Devore, Shannon; Hodes-Wertz, Brooke; Berkeley, Alan S.
ISI:000579355300201
ISSN: 0015-0282
CID: 4685162
MAKING IT (NET)WORK: A SOCIAL NETWORK ANALYSIS OF "FERTILITY" ON TWITTER BEFORE AND DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. [Meeting Abstract]
Smith, Meghan Brooke; Blakemore, Jennifer K.; Ho, Jacqueline; Grifo, James A.
ISI:000579355300167
ISSN: 0015-0282
CID: 4685142
AN ANALYSIS OF THE EFFECT OF MATERNAL AND PATERNAL AGE ON CHROMOSOMAL MOSAICISM. [Meeting Abstract]
Reich, Jenna; Blakemore, Jennifer K.; Besser, Andria; Hodes-Wertz, Brooke; Grifo, James A.
ISI:000582706800037
ISSN: 0015-0282
CID: 4677712
Equal opportunity for all? An analysis of race and ethnicity in fertility preservation in New York City
Voigt, Paxton E; Blakemore, Jennifer K; McCulloh, David; Fino, M Elizabeth
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare the racial and ethnic make-up of patients who accessed medically indicated fertility preservation services (MIFP) against the overall racial diversity (including Hispanic origin) across women of reproductive age diagnosed with cancer in New York City (NYC). METHODS:All patients who completed at least one MIFP between January 2017 and December 2018 were reviewed. Race was self-reported. A calculation of the expected racial distribution across women of reproductive age with cancer in NYC was determined using the most recent NYC census data. Statistical analysis included chi-square goodness of fit and test for independence and Kruskal-Wallis H test, with p < 0.05 considered significant. RESULTS:A total of 107 patients who accessed MIFP were included. A total of 55 (51.4%) identified as White, 3 (2.8%) as Black, 13 (12.2%) as Asian, 6 (5.6%) as Hispanic, 3 (2.8%) as other, and 27 (25.2%) did not report. A total of 78.5% of patients had insurance. There was no significant difference in racial distribution by cancer type (p = 0.255). A subgroup analysis excluding the BRCA+ patients and races not reported by the census (n = 69) was then performed, showing a statistically significant difference between observed (O) and expected (E) cases of fertility preservation (FP) by race at our center-White 47O/32E, Black 3O/15E, Asian 13O/7E, and Hispanic 6O/15E (p < 0.001). A statistically significant difference in racial distribution by FP type was observed. CONCLUSIONS:There is a difference in the observed vs expected racial distribution of patients accessing MIFP. Further studies are needed to identify modifiable factors to better ensure equal opportunity to all patients.
PMCID:7576106
PMID: 33085025
ISSN: 1573-7330
CID: 4652002