Faculty Bibliography

Partial articular fractures of the distal humerus commonly involve the capitellum and may extend medially to involve the trochlea. As the complex nature of capitellar fractures has become better appreciated, treatment options have evolved from closed reduction and immobilization and fragment excision to a preference for open reduction and internal fixation. The latter is now recommended to achieve stable anatomic reduction, restore articular congruity, and initiate early motion. More complex fracture patterns require extensile surgical exposures. The fractures are characterized by metaphyseal comminution of the lateral column and have associated ipsilateral radial head fracture. With advanced instrumentation, elbow arthroscopy may be used in the management of these articular fractures. Though limited to level IV evidence, clinical series reporting outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation of fractures of the capitellum, with or without associated injuries, have demonstrated good to excellent functional results in most patients when the injury is limited to the radiocapitellar compartment. Clinically significant osteonecrosis and heterotopic ossification are rare, but mild to moderate posttraumatic osteoarthrosis may be anticipated at midterm follow-up

The purpose of this study was to describe 3-dimensional scapular motion during the activities of daily living (ADL) and the full range of arm motion, and to suggest a standardized method for evaluating scapular mobility. Eight healthy subjects between the ages of 25-40, with no prior history of shoulder pathology or surgery for the past 12 months, were recruited for this study. Touching 8 predetermined landmarks on the head and the trunk was used to simulate ADL. Touching the contralateral ear and contralateral shoulder resulted in the maximum scapular protraction 46 degrees (8 degrees) and 48 degrees (8 degrees), respectively, and the maximum degrees of the scapular anterior tilt, -11 degrees (4 degrees) and -11 degrees (5 degrees), respectively. Asking patients to reach to the back of the neck, and the contralateral shoulder, the clinician can evaluate the overall scapular mobility in all directions. A protocol controlling the performance variability during ADL tasks was suggested to improve the clinical evaluation of the shoulder joint complex. Findings of this study can guide clinicians to identify specific tasks which may relate to particular shoulder girdle dysfunction

BACKGROUND: The outcome of operatively treated capitellar fractures has not been reported frequently. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation of capitellar fractures that were treated with a uniform surgical approach in order to further define the impact on the outcome of fracture type and concomitant lateral column osseous and/or ligamentous injuries. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of the upper extremity database at our institution identified sixteen skeletally mature patients (mean age, 40 +/- 17 years) with a closed capitellar fracture. In all cases, an extensile lateral exposure and articular fixation with buried cannulated variable-pitch headless compression screws was performed at a mean of ten days after the injury. Clinical, radiographic, and elbow-specific outcomes, including the Mayo Elbow Performance Index, were evaluated at a mean of 27 +/- 19 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Six Type-I, two Type-III, and eight Type-IV fractures were identified with use of the Bryan and Morrey classification system. Four of five ipsilateral radial head fractures occurred in association with a Type-IV fracture. The lateral collateral ligament was intact in fifteen of the sixteen elbows. Metaphyseal comminution was observed in association with five fractures (including four Type-IV fractures and one Type-III fracture). Supplemental mini-fragment screws were used for four of eight Type-IV fractures and one of two Type-III fractures. All fractures healed, and no elbow had instability or weakness. Overall, the mean ulnohumeral motion was 123 degrees (range, 70 degrees to 150 degrees). Fourteen of the sixteen patients achieved a functional arc of elbow motion, and all patients had full forearm rotation. The mean Mayo Elbow Performance Index score was 92 +/- 10 points, with nine excellent results, six good results, and one fair result. Patients with a Type-IV fracture had a greater magnitude of flexion contracture (p = 0.04), reduced terminal flexion (p = 0.02), and a reduced net ulnohumeral arc (p = 0.01). An ipsilateral radial head fracture did not appear to affect ulnohumeral motion or the functional outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the presence of greater flexion contractures at the time of follow-up in elbows with Type-IV fractures or fractures with an ipsilateral radial head fracture, good to excellent outcomes with functional ulnohumeral motion can be achieved following internal fixation of these complex fractures. Type-IV injuries may be more common than previously thought; such fractures often are associated with metaphyseal comminution or a radial head fracture and may require supplemental fixation

Current glenoid implants are designed to be secured to the articular surface. When the articular surface is compromised, a glenoid component could be implanted if it obtained fixation from the endosteal surface of the glenoid vault. The first step for designing such a glenoid implant is to define the normal three-dimensional anatomy of the glenoid vault. The purpose of this study was to define the variations in glenoid vault shape in a large group of cadaver scapula. Computed tomographic (CT) scans of 61 normal scapulae (mean, 25-34 years) from the Haman-Todd Osteological Collection, with a wide range of sizes, were examined to define the normal glenoid vault anatomy. A custom software program was used to manipulate and measure the scans to determine the morphologic variations among the different glenoid vaults. From these data, we defined a unique glenoid vault shape and empirically developed 5 sizes to represent the study population of the 61 scapulae. A second group of 11 cadaver scapulae were used to validate the shape defined using the other 61. Prototype implants were placed into the real 11 scapulae using standard surgical techniques and then CT-scanned to analyze the shape of the glenoid vault. In the 61 scapulae, 85% of the points defining the endosteal surfaces vary among scapulae by less than 2 mm. For each of the 11 cadaver scapulae, the implant size used in the virtual computer implantation was the same size used for the plastic components placed into the cadaver scapulae. Fifty percent of the measured distances between the outer dimensions of the plastic models was within 2.4 mm of the glenoid endosteal surface. Eighty percent of the surface area of the plastic models was within 3.1 mm of the glenoid endosteal surface. Five percent of the dimensions were less than 1 mm and were considered to be areas of point contact. Before designing implants that can be used in pathologic glenoids, the shape of the normal glenoid vault must first be defined. This study defined a normal glenoid vault shape that can accommodate different sized scapula with 5 sizes. This glenoid shape may be used as a template to design a glenoid implant that obtains fixation within the glenoid vault.

Over the past two decades, it has become accepted that the rotator interval is a distinct anatomic entity that plays an important role in affecting the proper function of the glenohumeral joint. The rotator interval is an anatomic region in the anterosuperior aspect of the glenohumeral joint that represents a complex interaction of the fibers of the coracohumeral ligament, the superior glenohumeral ligament, the glenohumeral joint capsule, and the supraspinatus and subscapularis tendons. As basic science and clinical studies continue to elucidate the precise role of the rotator interval, understanding of and therapeutic interventions for rotator interval pathology also continue to evolve. Lesions of the rotator interval may result in glenohumeral joint contractures, shoulder instability, or in lesions to the long head of the biceps tendon. Long-term clinical trials may clarify the results of current surgical interventions and further enhance understanding of the rotator interval.

Patients with elbow arthritis typically present with complaints of pain and stiffness. Rheumatoid arthritis is the most common cause of elbow arthritis, followed by posttraumatic arthritis and primary osteoarthritis. Nonoperative management consisting of oral analgesics, intra-articular steroid injections, physical therapy, and splinting may provide symptomatic relief in the majority of patients. If these modalities fail, operative treatment is guided by the severity of disease as well as several patient-related factors such as age, activity level, and expectations. Total elbow arthroplasty can provide satisfactory results in the majority of patients with significant degeneration of the elbow. However, due to issues regarding prosthesis longevity, this procedure is generally avoided in young active patients. Other operative treatment options for such patients include arthroscopic or open synovectomy, debridement arthroplasty, and interpositional arthroplasty. As all of these operations may provide a satisfactory outcome for the appropriate patient, a thorough preoperative evaluation is essential in choosing the suitable surgical procedure for each individual patient.

BACKGROUND: The effect of arthroscopic rotator interval closure on glenohumeral motion and translation is not well understood, nor is the ideal location or number of sutures required for closure. HYPOTHESIS: The number of arthroscopic rotator interval closure sutures and their placement will have a significant effect on glenohumeral range of motion and anterior-posterior translation. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Using a custom testing apparatus, the authors measured range of motion in 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders; anterior-posterior translation in adduction and neutral rotation was measured in 9. Specimens were initially tested without sutures and then tested after 3 interval closures using a random sequence of (1) an isolated medial suture at the level of the glenoid, (2) an isolated lateral suture 1 cm lateral to the glenoid, or (3) both sutures followed by removal of all sutures. RESULTS: Analysis of variance demonstrated that interval closure had a significant effect on decreasing flexion (mean, 6 degrees ), external rotation (mean, 10 degrees ), and anterior translation (mean, 3 mm) of the adducted shoulder. There was no significant difference between the 3 interval closures in any of the tests. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic interval closure produced significant decreases in range of motion and anterior-posterior translation. The effects of single lateral or medial suture closures were similar to the use of 2 sutures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that the initial effect of arthroscopic rotator interval closure on anterior translation of the shoulder will be similar whether 1 or 2 sutures are used. In vivo studies are necessary to determine if the effect of these 2 methods would be the same over time

BACKGROUND: Evidence to justify the use of porcine small intestine submucosa to augment repairs of large and massive rotator cuff tears is based on favorable results found in studies of Achilles tendon and infraspinatus tendon repairs in canines. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a small intestine submucosal patch to augment the repair of chronic two-tendon rotator cuff tears in humans. METHODS: Thirty shoulders with a chronic two-tendon rotator cuff tear that was completely repairable with open surgery were randomized to be treated with either augmentation with porcine small intestine mucosa or no augmentation. All patients completed a PENN shoulder-score questionnaire preoperatively and at the time of the latest follow-up (at an average of fourteen months). Magnetic resonance imaging showed that nine shoulders had a large tear and twenty-one had a massive tear. All patients underwent a magnetic resonance imaging scan with intra-articular gadolinium one year after the repair to assess the status of the rotator cuff. RESULTS: The rotator cuff healed in four of the fifteen shoulders in the augmentation group compared with nine of the fifteen in the control group (p = 0.11). The median postoperative PENN total score was 83 points in the augmentation group compared with 91 points in the control group (p = 0.07). Healing of the defects in both groups demonstrated a strong correlation with the patients' clinical scores. The median postoperative PENN total score was 96 points in the group with a healed repair and 81 points in the group with a failed repair (p = 0.007). The percentage change between the preoperative and postoperative patient satisfaction scores was 400% in the group with a healed repair, and 50% in the group with a failed repair (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of the surgical repair of large and massive chronic rotator cuff tears with porcine small intestine submucosa did not improve the rate of tendon-healing or the clinical outcome scores. On the basis of these data, we do not recommend using porcine small intestine submucosa to augment repairs of massive chronic rotator cuff tears done with the surgical and postoperative procedures described in this study

Neuropathic arthropathy, also known as Charcot arthropathy, of the elbow joint is a rare and progressive joint disorder with little available information in the literature. Presentation and treatment data on 6 patients with this pathology are reviewed. In addition, outcome data are presented on all 6 patients at a mean follow-up of 51 months. Three of these patients had undergone surgical procedures for the treatment of their pathology. At the time of their latest follow-up, 2 patients had died but reported good pain relief and functional range of motion before their deaths. At a mean follow-up of 63 months, the remaining 4 patients also had minimal pain. Of these 4 patients, 3 reported moderate to gross instability in their elbows. Nevertheless, all 4 patients had good functional use of their arms with a mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 91. Our data suggest that surgical treatment of appropriate patients does not necessarily preclude a successful outcome. However, surgical treatment was also associated with an unpredictable course and a high rate of complications. Therefore, most patients with this pathology should be treated with nonoperative methods, and routine surgical intervention should be avoided