Searched for: in-biosketch:true
person:ogedeo01
Association Between Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Coronary Artery Calcification: The JHS
Zhang, Yiyi; Schwartz, Joseph E; Jaeger, Byron C; An, Jaejin; Bellows, Brandon K; Clark, Donald; Langford, Aisha T; Kalinowski, Jolaade; Ogedegbe, Olugbenga; Carr, John Jeffrey; Terry, James G; Min, Yuan-I; Reynolds, Kristi; Shimbo, Daichi; Moran, Andrew E; Muntner, Paul
High blood pressure (BP) based on measurements obtained in the office setting has been associated with the presence and level of coronary artery calcification (CAC)-a measure of subclinical atherosclerosis. We studied the association between out-of-office BP and CAC among 557 participants who underwent 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring at visit 1 in 2000-2004 and a computed tomography scan at visit 2 in 2005-2008 as part of the JHS (Jackson Heart Study)-a community-based cohort of African American adults. Mean awake, asleep, and 24-hour BP were calculated for each participant. Among participants included in this analysis, 279 (50%) had any CAC defined by an Agatston score >0. After multivariable adjustment including office systolic BP (SBP), the prevalence ratios for any CAC comparing the highest versus the lowest quartiles of SBP on ambulatory BP monitoring were 1.08 (95% CI, 0.84-1.39) for awake SBP, 1.32 (95% CI, 1.01-1.74) for asleep SBP, and 1.19 (95% CI, 0.91-1.55) for 24-hour SBP. After multivariable adjustment including office diastolic BP, the prevalence ratios for any CAC comparing the highest versus the lowest quartiles of awake, asleep, and 24-hour diastolic BP were 1.27 (95% CI, 1.02-1.59), 1.29 (95% CI, 1.02-1.64), and 1.25 (95% CI, 0.99-1.59), respectively. The current results suggest that higher asleep SBP and higher awake and asleep diastolic BP may be risk factors for subclinical atherosclerosis and underscore the potential role of ambulatory BP monitoring in identifying individuals at high risk for coronary artery disease.
PMID: 33896192
ISSN: 1524-4563
CID: 4852892
Screening for Vitamin D Deficiency in Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Krist, Alex H; Davidson, Karina W; Mangione, Carol M; Cabana, Michael; Caughey, Aaron B; Davis, Esa M; Donahue, Katrina E; Doubeni, Chyke A; Epling, John W; Kubik, Martha; Li, Li; Ogedegbe, Gbenga; Owens, Douglas K; Pbert, Lori; Silverstein, Michael; Stevermer, James; Tseng, Chien-Wen; Wong, John B
Importance:Vitamin D is a fat-soluble vitamin that performs an important role in calcium homeostasis and bone metabolism and also affects many other cellular regulatory functions outside the skeletal system. Vitamin D requirements may vary by individual; thus, no one serum vitamin D level cutpoint defines deficiency, and no consensus exists regarding the precise serum levels of vitamin D that represent optimal health or sufficiency. Objective:To update its 2014 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review on screening for vitamin D deficiency, including the benefits and harms of screening and early treatment. Population:Community-dwelling, nonpregnant adults who have no signs or symptoms of vitamin D deficiency or conditions for which vitamin D treatment is recommended. Evidence Assessment:The USPSTF concludes that the overall evidence on the benefits of screening for vitamin D deficiency is lacking. Therefore, the balance of benefits and harms of screening for vitamin D deficiency in asymptomatic adults cannot be determined. Recommendation:The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for vitamin D deficiency in asymptomatic adults. (I statement).
PMID: 33847711
ISSN: 1538-3598
CID: 4979462
Screening for Hearing Loss in Older Adults: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Krist, Alex H; Davidson, Karina W; Mangione, Carol M; Cabana, Michael; Caughey, Aaron B; Davis, Esa M; Donahue, Katrina E; Doubeni, Chyke A; Epling, John W; Kubik, Martha; Li, Li; Ogedegbe, Gbenga; Pbert, Lori; Silverstein, Michael; Stevermer, James; Tseng, Chien-Wen; Wong, John B
Importance:Age-related sensorineural hearing loss is a common health problem among adults. Nearly 16% of US adults 18 years or older report difficulty hearing. The prevalence of perceived hearing loss increases with age. Hearing loss can adversely affect an individual's quality of life and ability to function independently and has been associated with increased risk of falls, hospitalizations, social isolation, and cognitive decline. Objective:To update its 2012 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review on screening for hearing loss in adults 50 years or older. Population:Asymptomatic adults 50 years or older with age-related hearing loss. Evidence Assessment:Because of a lack of evidence, the USPSTF concludes that the benefits and harms of screening for hearing loss in asymptomatic older adults are uncertain and that the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. More research is needed. Recommendation:The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of screening for hearing loss in older adults. (I statement).
PMID: 33755083
ISSN: 1538-3598
CID: 4851112
Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Krist, Alex H; Davidson, Karina W; Mangione, Carol M; Barry, Michael J; Cabana, Michael; Caughey, Aaron B; Davis, Esa M; Donahue, Katrina E; Doubeni, Chyke A; Kubik, Martha; Landefeld, C Seth; Li, Li; Ogedegbe, Gbenga; Owens, Douglas K; Pbert, Lori; Silverstein, Michael; Stevermer, James; Tseng, Chien-Wen; Wong, John B
Importance/UNASSIGNED:Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and the leading cause of cancer death in the US. In 2020, an estimated 228 820 persons were diagnosed with lung cancer, and 135 720 persons died of the disease. The most important risk factor for lung cancer is smoking. Increasing age is also a risk factor for lung cancer. Lung cancer has a generally poor prognosis, with an overall 5-year survival rate of 20.5%. However, early-stage lung cancer has a better prognosis and is more amenable to treatment. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To update its 2013 recommendation, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a systematic review on the accuracy of screening for lung cancer with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) and on the benefits and harms of screening for lung cancer and commissioned a collaborative modeling study to provide information about the optimum age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal screening interval, and the relative benefits and harms of different screening strategies compared with modified versions of multivariate risk prediction models. Population/UNASSIGNED:This recommendation statement applies to adults aged 50 to 80 years who have a 20 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. Evidence Assessment/UNASSIGNED:The USPSTF concludes with moderate certainty that annual screening for lung cancer with LDCT has a moderate net benefit in persons at high risk of lung cancer based on age, total cumulative exposure to tobacco smoke, and years since quitting smoking. Recommendation/UNASSIGNED:The USPSTF recommends annual screening for lung cancer with LDCT in adults aged 50 to 80 years who have a 20 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years. Screening should be discontinued once a person has not smoked for 15 years or develops a health problem that substantially limits life expectancy or the ability or willingness to have curative lung surgery. (B recommendation) This recommendation replaces the 2013 USPSTF statement that recommended annual screening for lung cancer with LDCT in adults aged 55 to 80 years who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years.
PMID: 33687470
ISSN: 1538-3598
CID: 5080282
Listening to Latinx Patient Perspectives on COVID-19 to Inform Future Prevention Efforts [Comment]
Ornelas, India J; Ogedegbe, Gbenga
PMID: 33704469
ISSN: 2574-3805
CID: 4836002
Why the global health community should support the EndSARS movement in Nigeria [Letter]
Mmonu, Nnenaya A; Aifah, Angela; Onakomaiya, Deborah; Ogedegbe, Gbenga
PMID: 33610205
ISSN: 1474-547x
CID: 4799942
Implementation science research for the scale-up of evidence-based interventions for sickle cell disease in africa: a commentary [Letter]
Gyamfi, Joyce; Ojo, Temitope; Iwelunmor, Juliet; Ogedegbe, Gbenga; Ryan, Nessa; Diawara, Amy; Nnodu, Obiageli; Wonkam, Ambroise; Royal, Charmaine; Peprah, Emmanuel
BACKGROUND:The burden of sickle cell disease (SCD) is greatest among African nations. Effective scalability of evidence-based interventions (e.g., newborn screening, health education, prophylaxis for infection, optimal nutrition and hydration, hydroxyurea therapy, blood transfusions, and transcranial Doppler (TCD) screening) is urgently needed particularly in these settings for disease management. However, Africa is constrained by limited resources and the lack of capacity to conduct implementation science research for proper understanding of context, and assessment of barriers and facilitators to the uptake and scalability of evidence-based interventions (EBI) for SCD management. MAIN BODY/UNASSIGNED:We outline implementation science approaches to embed EBI for SCD within the African context and highlight key implementation research programs for SCD management. Building implementation research capacity will meet the major need of developing effective life-long and accessible locally-tailored interventions for patients with SCD in Africa. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This commentary communicates the importance of the application of implementation science methodology to scale-up evidence-based interventions for the management of SCD in order to reduce pain, prevent other morbidities and premature death experienced by people with SCD in Africa, and improve their overall quality of life.
PMCID:7888072
PMID: 33596947
ISSN: 1744-8603
CID: 4835622
Bridging the evidence-to-practice gap: a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating practice facilitation as a strategy to accelerate translation of a multi-level adherence intervention into safety net practices
Schoenthaler, Antoinette; De La Calle, Franzenith; Soto, Amanda; Barrett, Derrel; Cruz, Jocelyn; Payano, Leydi; Rosado, Marina; Adhikari, Samrachana; Ogedegbe, Gbenga; Rosal, Milagros
BACKGROUND:Poor adherence to antihypertensive medications is a significant contributor to the racial gap in rates of blood pressure (BP) control among Latino adults, as compared to Black and White adults. While multi-level interventions (e.g., those aiming to influence practice, providers, and patients) have been efficacious in improving medication adherence in underserved patients with uncontrolled hypertension, the translation of these interventions into routine practice within "real world" safety-net primary care settings has been inadequate and slow. This study will fill this evidence-to-practice gap by evaluating the effectiveness of practice facilitation (PF) as a practical and tailored strategy for implementing Advancing Medication Adherence for Latinos with Hypertension through a Team-based Care Approach (ALTA), a multi-level approach to improving medication adherence and BP control in 10 safety-net practices in New York that serve Latino patients. METHODS AND DESIGN/METHODS:We will conduct this study in two phases: (1) a pre-implementation phase where we will refine the PF strategy, informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, to facilitate the implementation of ALTA into routine care at the practices; and (2) an implementation phase during which we will evaluate, in a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial, the effect of the PF strategy on ALTA implementation fidelity (primary outcome), as well as on clinical outcomes (secondary outcomes) at 12 months. Implementation fidelity will be assessed using a mixed methods approach based on the five core dimensions outlined by Proctor's Implementation Outcomes Framework. Clinical outcome measures include BP control (defined as BP< 130/80 mmHg) and medication adherence (assessed using the proportion of days covered via pharmacy records). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:The study protocol applies rigorous research methods to identify how implementation strategies such as PF may work to expedite the translation process for implementing evidence-based approaches into routine care at safety-net practices to improve health outcomes in Latino patients with hypertension, who suffer disproportionately from poor BP control. By examining the barriers and facilitators that affect implementation, this study will contribute knowledge that will increase the generalizability of its findings to other safety-net practices and guide effective scale-up across primary care practices nationally. TRIAL REGISTRATION/BACKGROUND:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03713515, date of registration: October 19, 2018.
PMCID:7888171
PMID: 33597041
ISSN: 2662-2211
CID: 4799402
Screening for Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Krist, Alex H; Davidson, Karina W; Mangione, Carol M; Barry, Michael J; Cabana, Michael; Caughey, Aaron B; Donahue, Katrina; Doubeni, Chyke A; Epling, John W; Kubik, Martha; Ogedegbe, Gbenga; Pbert, Lori; Silverstein, Michael; Simon, Melissa A; Tseng, Chien-Wen; Wong, John B
Importance:Carotid artery stenosis is atherosclerotic disease that affects extracranial carotid arteries. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis refers to stenosis in persons without a history of ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, or other neurologic symptoms referable to the carotid arteries. The prevalence of asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis is low in the general population but increases with age. Objective:To determine if its 2014 recommendation should be reaffirmed, the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) commissioned a reaffirmation evidence review. The reaffirmation update focused on the targeted key questions on the potential benefits and harms of screening and interventions, including revascularization procedures designed to improve carotid artery blood flow, in persons with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Population:This recommendation statement applies to adults without a history of transient ischemic attack, stroke, or other neurologic signs or symptoms referable to the carotid arteries. Evidence Assessment:The USPSTF found no new substantial evidence that could change its recommendation and therefore concludes with moderate certainty that the harms of screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis outweigh the benefits. Recommendation:The USPSTF recommends against screening for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis in the general adult population. (D recommendation).
PMID: 33528542
ISSN: 1538-3598
CID: 4793112
Interventions for Tobacco Smoking Cessation in Adults, Including Pregnant Persons: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
Krist, Alex H; Davidson, Karina W; Mangione, Carol M; Barry, Michael J; Cabana, Michael; Caughey, Aaron B; Donahue, Katrina; Doubeni, Chyke A; Epling, John W; Kubik, Martha; Ogedegbe, Gbenga; Pbert, Lori; Silverstein, Michael; Simon, Melissa A; Tseng, Chien-Wen; Wong, John B
Importance/UNASSIGNED:Tobacco use is the leading preventable cause of disease, disability, and death in the US. In 2014, it was estimated that 480 000 deaths annually are attributed to cigarette smoking, including second hand smoke exposure. Smoking during pregnancy can increase the risk of numerous adverse pregnancy outcomes (eg, miscarriage and congenital anomalies) and complications in the offspring (including sudden infant death syndrome and impaired lung function in childhood). In 2019, an estimated 50.6 million US adults (20.8% of the adult population) used tobacco; 14.0% of the US adult population currently smoked cigarettes and 4.5% of the adult population used electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes). Among pregnant US women who gave birth in 2016, 7.2% reported smoking cigarettes while pregnant. Objective/UNASSIGNED:To update its 2015 recommendation, the USPSTF commissioned a review to evaluate the benefits and harms of primary care interventions on tobacco use cessation in adults, including pregnant persons. Population/UNASSIGNED:This recommendation statement applies to adults 18 years or older, including pregnant persons. Evidence Assessment/UNASSIGNED:The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that the net benefit of behavioral interventions and US Food and Drug Associated (FDA)-approved pharmacotherapy for tobacco smoking cessation, alone or combined, in nonpregnant adults who smoke is substantial. The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that the net benefit of behavioral interventions for tobacco smoking cessation on perinatal outcomes and smoking cessation in pregnant persons is substantial. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence on pharmacotherapy interventions for tobacco smoking cessation in pregnant persons is insufficient because few studies are available, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. The USPSTF concludes that the evidence on the use of e-cigarettes for tobacco smoking cessation in adults, including pregnant persons, is insufficient, and the balance of benefits and harms cannot be determined. The USPSTF has identified the lack of well-designed, randomized clinical trials on e-cigarettes that report smoking abstinence or adverse events as a critical gap in the evidence. Recommendations/UNASSIGNED:The USPSTF recommends that clinicians ask all adults about tobacco use, advise them to stop using tobacco, and provide behavioral interventions and FDA-approved pharmacotherapy for cessation to nonpregnant adults who use tobacco. (A recommendation) The USPSTF recommends that clinicians ask all pregnant persons about tobacco use, advise them to stop using tobacco, and provide behavioral interventions for cessation to pregnant persons who use tobacco. (A recommendation) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of pharmacotherapy interventions for tobacco cessation in pregnant persons. (I statement) The USPSTF concludes that the current evidence is insufficient to assess the balance of benefits and harms of e-cigarettes for tobacco cessation in adults, including pregnant persons. The USPSTF recommends that clinicians direct patients who use tobacco to other tobacco cessation interventions with proven effectiveness and established safety. (I statement).
PMID: 33464343
ISSN: 1538-3598
CID: 4809852