Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Recipient selection is an important determinant of surgical outcomes in facial transplantation (FT). Appropriately, each FT program develops their own guidelines for recipient selection criteria. Currently, there is no resource to simultaneously assess and identify similarities and differences between these guidelines. Such information could be useful in distinguishing areas of FT that are well understood from those that could benefit from further exploration. METHODS:We performed a systematic review of the scientific literature from inception to June 18, 2021, using Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Scopus to identify articles pertaining to recipient selection criteria. Clinical trials were identified through the Clinicaltrials.gov registry. United States and international program websites were reviewed for patient-facing information. RESULTS:Our systematic review yielded 90 suitable articles, 8 clinical trials, and 7 program websites containing the recipient selection criteria of 24 different FT programs. The most reported on recipient criteria were age, positive human immunodeficiency viral status (HIV+), positive hepatitis C viral status, psychosocial stability, and medical compliance. Other criteria were rarely addressed, such as blindness and recipient immune status. CONCLUSIONS:Guidelines among different face transplant programs are changing over time. We found consensus on certain recipient selection criteria, but the majority remain program or surgeon dependent, emphasizing that FT is still an evolving procedure. Although most programs reported on their recipient selection criteria, the rationale was often missing. Further discussion about recipient selection criteria and the reasoning behind employing or changing them will help advance the field.

SUMMARY:Defects involving the midface and maxilla pose unique challenges to reconstructive surgeons. The maxilla serves as the central keystone of the face and interfaces with various other facial subunits to affect form and function. Reconstructive methods range from prosthetics to free tissue transfer, and the indications for different options are reviewed here. Finally, special considerations including management of the orbit, dental rehabilitation, and future directions are discussed.

BACKGROUND:Vascularized composite allotransplantation (VCA) has redefined the frontiers of plastic and reconstructive surgery. At the cutting edge of this evolving paradigm, we present the first successful combined full face and bilateral hand transplant (FT-BHT). METHODS:A 21-year-old man with sequelae of an 80% total body surface area burn injury sustained following a motor vehicle accident presented for evaluation. The injury included full face and bilateral upper extremity composite tissue defects, resulting in reduced quality of life and loss of independence. Multidisciplinary evaluation confirmed eligibility for combined FT-BHT. The operative approach was validated through 11 cadaveric rehearsals utilizing computerized surgical planning. Institutional review board and organ procurement organization approvals were obtained. The recipient, his caregiver, and the donor family consented to the procedure. RESULTS:Combined full face (eyelids, ears, nose, lips, and skeletal subunits) and bilateral hand transplantation (forearm level) was performed over 23 hours on August 12-13th, 2020. Triple induction and maintenance immunosuppressive therapy and infection prophylaxis were administered. Plasmapheresis was necessary postoperatively. Minor revisions were performed over seven subsequent operations, including five left upper extremity, seven right upper extremity, and seven facial secondary procedures. At eight months, the patient is approaching functional independence and remains free of acute rejection. He has significantly improved range of motion, motor power, and sensation of the face and hand allografts. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Combined FT-BHT is feasible. This is the most comprehensive VCA procedure successfully performed to date, marking a new milestone in plastic and reconstructive surgery for patients with otherwise irremediable injuries.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Despite significant advances in the management of frontal sinus fractures, there is still a paucity of large-cohort data, and a comprehensive synthesis of the current literature is warranted. The purpose of this study was to present an evidence-based overview of frontal sinus fracture management and outcomes. Methods/UNASSIGNED:A comprehensive literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted for studies published between 1992 and 2020 investigating frontal sinus fractures. Data on fracture type, intervention, and outcome measurements were reported. Results/UNASSIGNED:In total, 456 articles were identified, of which 53 met our criteria and were included in our analysis. No statistically significant difference in mechanism of injury, fracture pattern, form of management, or total complication rate was identified. We found a statistically significant increase in complication rates in patients with nasofrontal outflow tract injury compared with those without. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Frontal sinus fracture management is a challenging clinical situation, with no widely accepted algorithm to guide appropriate management. Thorough clinical assessment of the fracture pattern and associated injuries can facilitate clinical decision-making.

BACKGROUND:There is a paucity of data on the impact of cytomegalovirus (CMV) serostatus and CMV infection on outcomes in facial vascularized composite allotransplantation. METHODS:This international, multicenter, retrospective cohort study presents data on CMV and basic transplant-related demographics, including pretransplant viral D/R serostatus, and duration of antiviral prophylaxis. CMV-related complications (viremia, disease), allograft-related complications (rejection episodes, loss), and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS:We included 19 patients, 4 of whom received CMV high-risk transplants (D+/R-). CMV viremia was noted in 6 patients (all 4 D+/R- patients and 2 D-/R+), mostly within the first-year posttransplant, shortly after discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis (median 2 mo). CMV disease occurred in 2 D+/R- patients. The high-risk group experienced relatively more rejection episodes per month follow-up. None of D+/R- patients suffered allograft loss due to rejection (longest follow-up: 121 mo). CONCLUSIONS:D+/R- patients were at increased risk of CMV-related complications. Although a higher number of rejections was noted in this group, none of the D+/R- patients lost their allograft or died because of CMV or rejection. Thus, CMV D+/R- face transplantation can likely be safely performed with prophylaxis, active surveillance, and prompt treatment.

Introduction: Acute rejection is exceptionally common in the first year after vascularized composite allotransplantation. Recipients with burns are at increased risk of developing donor-specific antibodies due to sensitization. Lymphocyte depleting induction with rabbit antithymocyte globulin is commonly utilized. We hypothesized that combination B- and T-cell depletion induction therapy is more efficacious in preventing acute rejection in the early post-transplant period.
Method(s): Our induction protocol calls for intraoperative administration of methylprednisolone (1000 mg) and rabbit antithymocyte globulin beginning intraoperatively (1.5 mg/ kg, cumulative dose 6 mg/kg over the first postoperative week) and rituximab (1000 mg administered on postoperative day 1) for thorough T and mature B-cell depletion. Standard infection prophylaxis is utilized. Donor-specific antibodies are monitored postoperatively with Luminex single-antigen microbeads (mean fluorescence intensity >= 1000 considered clinically significant).
Result(s): Our latest recipient was a 22-year-old male with 80% total body surface area burns. The donor was an ABOidentical, 47-year-old brain dead male. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatch was 0, 1, 0 (A, B, DR), and 2 HLA-DPB1. Donor-recipient complement-dependent cytotoxicity and flow cytometric T- and B-cell crossmatch were all negative. Abrupt rise in donor-specific antibodies on postoperative days 7 and 8 was treated with two rounds of plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin. Persistent wound colonization (Acinetobacter baumannii) was treated with meropenem, polymyxin, and tigecycline. The recipient experienced a single episode of acute rejection 9 months post-transplant, successfully treated with pulse doses of methylprednisolone (500 mg intravenous, daily) over 3 days. We suspect this may have been triggered by inflammation induced by revision surgery of all three vascularized composite allotransplantation components in the preceding month
Conclusion(s): We present our third consecutive vascularized composite allotransplantation recipient utilizing this novel immune strategy. In the context of the most extensive vascularized composite allotransplantation performed to date, acute rejection was prevented until 9 months post-transplant in this highly sensitized patient. Two previous recipients remained rejection-free for greater than 1 year post-transplant and have experienced only one rejection episode each to date. Acute rejection in vascularized composite allotransplantation may be better prevented by including rituximab in the induction immunosuppression strategy, and the risk of metabolic or severe infectious complications appears to be manageable

Introduction: Vascularized composite allotransplantation has redefined the frontiers of plastic and reconstructive surgery. The field has seen considerable advancement since its inception, with the first successful hand transplant in 1998 and the first partial face transplant in 2005. To date, over 40 bilateral hand transplants have been reported in the literature, along with 47 face transplants. Due to still limited available evidence and the heterogeneity of the sample population, little consensus exists on the anticipated timeline of functional recovery following vascularized composite allotransplantation. We hereby report on the early and accelerated functional recovery of a combined face and bilateral hand transplant recipient.
Method(s): A 21-year-old male was referred with sequelae of an 80% total body surface area burn sustained in a motor vehicle accident 1 year prior. The patient had extensive facial and bilateral upper extremity injuries. Serial debridement and split thickness skin grafting procedures left the patient with proximal digital syndactyly and distal digit amputations. Procurement and transplantation of the face and upper extremities was performed over a 23-h period in August of 2020. Postoperative functional assessment at predetermined time points included active range of motion, grip strength, sensory assessment, Carroll's Upper Extremity Function test, and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire.
Result(s): Functional assessments were performed at 3 and 6 months post-transplant. Range of motion, grip strength, Carroll's test scores (left = 58 at 6 months post-transplant vs 13 pre-transplant, right = 61 at 6 months post-transplant vs 20 pre-transplant) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand evaluation (37 at 6 months post-transplant vs 90 pretransplant) showed substantial improvement. The patient remained rejection-free during the first 9 months post-transplant and has had steady and progressive functional improvement. He is highly motivated and consistently demonstrates functional independence in activities of daily living.
Conclusion(s): Combined face and bilateral hand transplant is a feasible, comprehensive reconstructive solution for composite face and bilateral hand injury in the appropriately selected recipient. Patient motivation, psychosocial support, intensive physical and occupational therapy, and vigilant clinical and immunologic surveillance are essential features of postoperative recovery