Faculty Bibliography

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) has seen long standing interest as a therapy for resistant cancers, but the main Achilles' heel for its successful clinical exploitation is the use of poorly penetrating visible light. This limitation could be overcome by using radioluminescent nanoparticles, which can be excited during radiation therapy (RT) with penetrating X-rays. When infused in tumors, X-ray activated-nanoscintillators act as internal light sources and excite nearby photosensitizers. Recent studies demonstrated that it is realistic to achieve low dose PDT with current nanoscintillators. However, as the origin of enhanced RT efficacy with nanoscintillators may have varying origins, we aimed to answer the basic question: Is a combination of low-dose PDT beneficial to the RT efficacy in clinically relevant models of cancer? Pancreatic cancer (PanCa) remains a lethal disease for which RT is part of the palliative care and for which PDT demonstrated promising results in clinical trial. We thus evaluated the combination of low-dose PDT and RT delivered in absence of nanoscintillators on various heterocellular spheroid models that recapitulate the clinical heterogeneity of PanCa. Although therapeutic effects emerged at different timepoints in each model, the RT/PDT combination uniformly achieved favorable outcomes. With RT providing stunted tumor growth while PDT drove adjuvant apoptotic and necrotic cell death, the combination produced significantly smaller and less viable PanCa spheroids. In conclusion, the beneficial RT/PDT treatment outcomes encourage the further development of nanoscinitillators for X-ray-activated PDT. Assessment of such combination treatments should encompass multiparametric and temporally-spaced assessment of treatment effects in preclinical cancer models.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:An ASCO provisional clinical opinion (PCO) offers timely clinical direction to ASCO's membership and other health care providers. This PCO addresses identification and management of patients and family members with possible predisposition to pancreatic adenocarcinoma. METHODS:ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature published from January 1998 to June 2018. Results of the databases searched were supplemented with hand searching of the bibliographies of systematic reviews and selected seminal articles and contributions from Expert Panel members' curated files. PROVISIONAL CLINICAL OPINION/UNASSIGNED:All patients diagnosed with pancreatic adenocarcinoma should undergo assessment of risk for hereditary syndromes known to be associated with an increased risk for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Assessment of risk should include a comprehensive review of family history of cancer. Individuals with a family history of pancreatic cancer affecting two first-degree relatives meet criteria for familial pancreatic cancer (FPC). Individuals (cancer affected or unaffected) with a family history of pancreatic cancer meeting criteria for FPC, those with three or more diagnoses of pancreatic cancer in same side of the family, and individuals meeting criteria for other genetic syndromes associated with increased risk for pancreatic cancer have an increased risk for pancreatic cancer and are candidates for genetic testing. Germline genetic testing for cancer susceptibility may be discussed with individuals diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, even if family history is unremarkable. Benefits and limitations of pancreatic cancer screening should be discussed with individuals whose family history meets criteria for FPC and/or genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

Purpose: To evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of metronomic 5-fluorouracil plus nab-paclitaxel, bevacizumab, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FABLOx) in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC). Methods: A total of 12 treatment-naive patients (aged 18-65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status [ECOG PS] ≤1) with MPC received 5-fluorouracil 180 mg/m² per day (days 1-14 continuous infusion); nab-paclitaxel 75 mg/m², leucovorin 20 mg/m², and oxaliplatin 40 mg/m² (days 1, 8, and 15); and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg (days 1 and 15) administered intravenously in each 28-day cycle. The primary end-point was incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in cycle 1. Safety was further evaluated as a secondary end-point; preliminary efficacy was also examined. Results: Two DLTs (grade 3 anemia requiring transfusion and grade 3 mucositis unresponsive to treatment within 4 days of onset) were observed in one of six patients enrolled in dose cohort 1. Cohort 1 was expanded from 6 to 12 patients to further evaluate safety, per the investigators' recommendation. All patients discontinued treatment. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were abdominal pain, fatigue, mucositis, and decreased neutrophil count. Objective response rate was 33% (four partial responses). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.6 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-11.3) and 9.9 (95% CI, 4.4-13.2) months, respectively; 1-year PFS and OS rates were 12.2% (95% CI, 0.7-40.8) and 38.9% (95% CI, 12.6-65.0). Conclusion: FABLOx is feasible and tolerable in patients newly diagnosed with MPC. However, preliminary efficacy data are inconclusive for continued investigation in a phase II trial.

The tumor microenvironment plays a vital role in therapeutic resistance in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We have created a 3D model to study the tumor microenvironment ex vivo that integrates tumor cells with tumor associated macrophages (TAMs) and cancer associated fibroblasts (CAFs). The microtumor model recreates the complex histology of a primary tumor and can be analyzed histologically or with viability assays for therapeutic testing. Microtumors demonstrate increased resistance to gemcitabine when compared to tumor cells alone in a 3D spheroid, highlighting the contribution of TAMs and CAFs when designing models for therapeutic testing.

PURPOSE:The treatment of cancer is complex, which can overwhelm patients and lead to poor comprehension and recall of the specifics of the cancer stage, prognosis, and treatment plan. We hypothesized that an oncologist can feasibly record and deliver a custom video summary of the consultation that covers the diagnosis, recommended testing, treatment plan, and follow-up in < 5 minutes. The video summary allows the patient to review and share the most important part of a cancer consultation with family and caregivers. METHODS:At the conclusion of the office visit, oncologists recorded the most important points of the consultation, including the diagnosis and management plan as a short video summary. Patients were then e-mailed a link to a secure Website to view and share the video. Patients and invited guests were asked to respond to an optional survey of 15 multiple-choice and four open-ended questions after viewing the video online. RESULTS:Three physicians recorded and sent 58 video visit summaries to patients seen in multidisciplinary GI cancer clinics. Forty-one patients logged into the secure site, and 38 viewed their video. Fourteen patients shared their video and invited a total of 46 visitors, of whom 36 viewed the videos. Twenty-six patients completed the survey, with an average overall video satisfaction score of 9 on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being most positive. CONCLUSION:Video visit summaries provide a personalized education tool that patients and caregivers find highly useful while navigating complex cancer care. We are exploring the incorporation of video visit summaries into the electronic medical record to enhance patient and caregiver understanding of their specific disease and treatment.

The ineffectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer highlights a critical unmet need in pancreatic cancer therapy. Two commonly mutated genes in pancreatic cancer, KRAS and CDKN2A, have an incidence exceeding 90%, supporting investigation of dual targeting of MEK and CDK4/6 as a potential therapeutic strategy for this patient population. An in vitro proliferation synergy screen was conducted to evaluate response of a panel of high passage and patient-derived pancreatic cancer models to the combination of trametinib and palbociclib to inhibit MEK and CDK4/6, respectively. Two adenosquamous carcinoma models, L3.6pl and UM59, stood out for their high synergy response. In vivo studies confirmed that this combination treatment approach was highly effective in subcutaneously implanted L3.6pl and UM59 tumor-bearing animals. Both models were refractory to single agent treatment. Reverse phase protein array analysis of L3.6pl tumors excised from treated animals revealed strong down regulation of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in response to combination treatment. Expression of COX-2 under a CMV-driven promoter and shRNA knockdown of COX-2 both led to resistance to combination treatment. Our findings suggest that COX-2 may be involved in the improved therapeutic outcome seen in some pancreatic tumors that fail to respond to MEK or CDK4/6 inhibitors alone but respond favorably to their combination.

Cancer heterogeneity is a notorious hallmark of this disease, and it is desirable to tailor effective treatments for each individual patient. Drug combinations have been widely accepted in cancer treatment for better therapeutic efficacy as compared to a single compound. However, experimental complexity and cost grow exponentially with more target compounds under investigation. The primary challenge remains to efficiently perform a large-scale drug combination screening using a small number of patient primary samples for testing. Here, a scalable, easy-to-use, high-throughput drug combination screening scheme is reported, which has the potential of screening all possible pairwise drug combinations for arbitrary number of drugs with multiple logarithmic mixing ratios. A "Christmas tree mixer" structure is introduced to generate a logarithmic concentration mixing ratio between drug pairs, providing a large drug concentration range for screening. A three-layer structure design and special inlets arrangement facilitate simple drug loading process. As a proof of concept, an 8-drug combination chip is implemented, which is capable of screening 172 different treatment conditions over 1032 3D cancer spheroids on a single chip. Using both cancer cell lines and patient-derived cancer cells, effective drug combination screening is demonstrated for precision medicine.

Adaptive resistance to MEK inhibitors (MEK-Is) typically occurs via induction of genes for different receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) and/or their ligands, even in tumors of the same histotype, making combination strategies challenging. SHP2 (PTPN11) is required for RAS/ERK pathway activation by most RTKs, and might provide a common resistance node. We found that combining the SHP2 inhibitor SHP099 with a MEK-I inhibited the proliferation of multiple cancer cell lines in vitro. PTPN11 knockdown/MEK-I treatment had similar effects, while expressing SHP099 binding-defective PTPN11 mutants conferred resistance, demonstrating that SHP099 is on-target. SHP099/trametinib was highly efficacious in xenograft and/or genetically engineered models of KRAS-mutant pancreas, lung, and ovarian cancer and in wild type RAS-expressing triple negative breast cancer. SHP099 inhibited activation of KRAS mutants with residual GTPase activity, impeded SOS/RAS/MEK/ERK1/2 reactivation in response to MEK-Is and blocked ERK1/2-dependent transcriptional programs. We conclude that SHP099/MEK-I combinations could have therapeutic utility in multiple malignancies.

Bladder cancer is a significant health problem. It is estimated that more than 16,000 people will die this year in the United States from bladder cancer. While 75% of bladder cancers are non-invasive and unlikely to metastasize, about 25% progress to an invasive growth pattern. Up to half of the patients with invasive cancers will develop lethal metastatic relapse. Thus, understanding the mechanism of invasive progression in bladder cancer is crucial to predict patient outcomes and prevent lethal metastases. In this article, we present a three-dimensional cancer invasion model which allows incorporation of tumor cells and stromal components to mimic in vivo conditions occurring in the bladder tumor microenvironment. This model provides the opportunity to observe the invasive process in real time using time-lapse imaging, interrogate the molecular pathways involved using confocal immunofluorescent imaging and screen compounds with the potential to block invasion. While this protocol focuses on bladder cancer, it is likely that similar methods could be used to examine invasion and motility in other tumor types as well.