Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Discharge to acute rehabilitation is strongly correlated with functional recovery after traumatic injury, including spinal cord injury (SCI). However, services such as acute care rehabilitation and Skilled Nursing Facilities (SNF) are expensive. Our objective was to understand if high-cost, resource-intensive post-discharge rehabilitation or alternative care facilities are utilized at disparate rates across socioeconomic groups after SCI. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We performed a cohort analysis using the National Trauma Data Bank® tabulated from 2012-2016. Eligible patients had a diagnosis of cervical or thoracic spine fracture with spinal cord injury (SCI) and were treated surgically. We evaluated associations of sociodemographic and psychosocial variables with non-home discharge (e.g., discharge to SNF, other healthcare facility, or intermediate care facility) via multivariable logistic regression while correcting for injury severity and hospital characteristics. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:We identified 3933 eligible patients. Patients who were older, male (OR=1.29 95% Confidence Interval [1.07-1.56], p=.007), insured by Medicare (OR=1.45 [1.08-1.96], p=.015), diagnosed with a major psychiatric disorder (OR=1.40 [1.03-1.90], p=.034), had a higher Injury Severity Score (OR=5.21 [2.96-9.18], p<.001) or a lower Glasgow Coma Score (3-8 points, OR=2.78 [1.81-4.27], p<.001) had a higher chance of a non-home discharge. The only sociodemographic variable associated with lower likelihood of utilizing additional healthcare facilities following discharge was uninsured status (OR=0.47 [0.37-0.60], p<.001). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Uninsured patients are less likely to be discharged to acute rehabilitation or alternative healthcare facilities following surgical management of SCI. High out-of-pocket costs for uninsured patients in the United States may deter utilization of these services.

BACKGROUND:Paravertebral cluneal nerves are constrained within a tunnel consisting of the thoracolumbar fascia and the iliac crest's superior rim as they pass over the iliac crest. Their involvement in low back pain has not been presented previously. OBJECTIVE:To develop a diagnostic and therapeutic protocol for radiofrequency ablation of paravertebral and iliac cluneal trigger points. STUDY DESIGN:In a prospective observational cohort study, clinically painful trigger points were anatomically defined with diagnostic local anesthetic injections containing a steroid. Validated trigger points were ablated and the resolution of low back pain was monitored and analyzed. SETTING:The Spinal Foundation, The Weymouth Hospital, London, United Kingdom. METHODS:Injections at painful trigger points were considered diagnostic if patients reported 50% or more low back pain relief sustained for 10 days or more. These patients were treated with aware state radiofrequency ablation of the trigger points if the back or referred pain remained refractory despite 3 months of core correction physiotherapy. Clinical outcomes were assessed with the visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores for low back pain at a minimum follow-up of 2 years. RESULTS:This prospective feasibility study included 52 patients with an average age of 56.9 ± 14.9 years ranging from 29 to 83. The mean follow-up was 38.33 months ranging from 25 to 66 months. The average symptom duration before the first consultation was 54.8 months. Many patients had multiple failed chronic pain management interventions, including failed epidural steroid injections (28/52, 53.8%); failed facet injections (45/52, 86.5%); failed facet rhizotomies (20/52, 38.5%); and failed sacroiliac joint ablations (34/52, 65/4%). The majority had had spine surgery before presenting with persistent low back or radiating pain. The surgeries were microdiscectomy (38.5%), laminectomy (11.5%), laminotomy (3.8%), endoscopic transforaminal decompression (9.6%), foraminoplasty (1.9%), sacroiliac joint fusion (11.5%), total disc replacement (13.5%), and lumbar fusion (34.6%). Chief concerns were low back (69.2%), buttock pain (71.2%), groin pain (40.4%), trochanteric pain (28.8%), abdominal or flank pain (5.8%), anterior thigh pain (32.7%), and symptoms mimicking sciatica (19.2%). Validated painful trigger points were the lateral (5.7%), superior (48.1%), medial (23.1%), or a combination of 2 (23.1%). The VAS reduction was from 7.25 ± 1.79 to 1.11 ± 0.98 (P < 0.0001). The ODI reduction was from 51.23 ± 9.58 to 7.11 ± 6.69 (P < 0.001). The Prolo score was reduced from 3.59 ± 0.72 to 1.35 ± 0.59. Symptoms resolved completely in 34 (65.4%) patients but persisted slightly in 9 (17.3%) and mildly in another 8 (15.4%). There were no cases of infection, dysesthesia, numbness, or paralysis. LIMITATIONS:Our study suffers from low patient numbers and the absence of another diagnostic test definitively confirming the presence of painful cluneal nerve involvement. CONCLUSION:Cluneal trigger points should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pain in the lower back, flank, lower abdominal, buttock, trochanteric, groin, and thigh area. It is one form of so-called "pseudo-sciatica." The authors' diagnostic injection protocol suggests that most patients with cluneal trigger points may successfully be treated with percutaneous radiofrequency ablation.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) is a minimally invasive fusion procedure that may be performed with or without supplemental instrumentation. However, there is a paucity of evidence on the effect of supplemental instrumentation technique on perioperative morbidity and fusion rate in LLIF. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A single-institutional retrospective review of patients who underwent LLIF for lumbar spondylosis was conducted. Patients were grouped according to supplemental instrumentation technique: stand-alone LLIF, LLIF with laterally placed instrumentation, or LLIF with posterior percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF). Outcomes included fusion rates, peri-operative complication, and reoperation; estimated blood loss (EBL); surgery duration; length of stay; and length of follow-up. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED: = 0.001). Choice of instrumentation group was a statistically significant predictor of reoperation. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:While rates of complete radiographic fusion on imaging follow-up didn't differ, patients receiving PPSF were less likely than stand-alone or lateral instrumentation groups to require reoperation, though operative time was significantly longer. Further study of choice of supplemental instrumentation with LLIF is indicated.

BACKGROUND:Spontaneous spinal cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leaks are a rare entity that can lead to intracranial hypotension and associated headaches, meningismus, and patient debility. Surgical treatment may be necessary for patients who do not respond to conservative management. Surgical repair of CSF leaks located in the ventral thoracic spine traditionally require an invasive, open approach. METHODS:We describe the case of a patient with a ventral thoracic spontaneous spinal CSF leak associated with a ventral bony osteophyte successfully treated with spinal endoscopy. We also provide a systematic review of the literature to better understand outcomes of this approach. RESULTS:A total of 55 patients were included in the systematic review. The study designs found in the literature review included case reports (66.7%), retrospective cohorts (22.2%), and prospective cohorts (11.1%). Of the studies reporting data, 50% of studies stated they used an open posterior approach to the dural defect, while 37.5% reported using an open anterior approach to the pathology. Only 1 (12.5%) study reported using an endoscope. Most studies (62.5%) used primary closure of the dura in their technique, while 37.5% reported using a local tissue graft (fat or muscle) or a dural sealant for their closure technique, and 25% of studies reported using a dural substitute for their closure technique. Overall mean clinical follow-up was 19.8 months. CONCLUSIONS:The endoscopic approach described here for treatment of this rare entity allows for removal of bony spicules/osteophytes and dural repair without the morbidity associated with traditional open dorsolateral or ventrolateral approaches.

International collaborations can be the key to overcoming innovation implementation hurdles. The authors report on a joint symposium between the International Society For The Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISASS) and La Sociedad Iberolatinoamerica de Columna (SILACO), and La Sociedad Interamericana de Cirurgia de columna de Minima invasión (SICCMII) aimed at improving joint surgeon education programs. The symposium highlighted that patient-related spine care issues are similar across geographical, cultural, and language barriers. The sustainability of such programs depends on funding and mutually respectful relationships orchestrated by multi-lingual leaders who will bridge gaps created by geographical, cultural, and language barriers to effectively develop clinical research content focused on advancing surgeon education and improving patient outcomes across the Americas.

BACKGROUND:Frailty is associated with adverse outcomes in traumatically injured geriatric patients but has not been well-studied in geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). OBJECTIVE:To assess relationships between frailty and outcomes after TBI. METHODS:The records of all patients aged 70 or older admitted from home to the neurosurgical service of a single institution for non-operative TBI between January 2020 and July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was adverse discharge disposition (either in-hospital expiration or discharge to skilled nursing facility (SNF), hospice, or home with hospice). Secondary outcomes included major inpatient complication, 30-day readmission, and length of stay. RESULTS:100 patients were included, 90% of whom presented with Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) 14-15. The mean length of stay was 3.78 days. 7% had an in-hospital complication, and 44% had an unfavorable discharge destination. 49% of patients attended follow-up within 3 months. The rate of readmission within 30 days was 13%. Patients were characterized as low frailty (FRAIL score 0-1, n = 35, 35%) or high frailty (FRAIL score 2-5, n = 65, 65%). In multivariate analysis controlling for age and other factors, frailty category (aOR 2.63, 95CI [1.02, 7.14], p = 0.005) was significantly associated with unfavorable discharge. Frailty was not associated with increased readmission rate, LOS, or rate of complications on uncontrolled univariate analyses. CONCLUSION:Frailty is associated with increased odds of unfavorable discharge disposition for geriatric patients admitted with TBI.

BACKGROUND:Lumbar radiculopathy secondary to L5-S1 degenerative changes adjacent to a lumbar fusion usually requires extending the fusion to include the degenerative L5-S1 level; this revision surgery can often be a very invasive procedure. OBJECTIVE:To describe outcomes of awake, transforaminal endoscopic decompression surgery for patients presenting with lumbar radiculopathy as a result of L5-S1 degenerative disc disease below lumbar fusions. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective chart review. METHODS:Awake, endoscopic decompression surgery was performed in 538 patients over a 5-year period from 2014 through 2019 by a single surgeon at a single institution.  The records of 18 consecutive patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar endoscopic decompression surgery to treat radiculopathy secondary to L5-S1 adjacent segment disease were retrospectively reviewed. All included patients were followed for at least 2 years after surgery. All patients were treated at L5-S1 and had fusion constructs that ended at L5. RESULTS:Thirteen men and 5 women patients ranging in age from 38 to 83 (average age of 68.9 ± 11.5) were treated for symptomatic adjacent segment disease at L5-S1 during the 5-year time period. Surgery was successful in all cases, except 2 patients (11%) at 2 years follow-up had recurrent symptomatic pathology at L5-S1 and required additional surgical treatment. The average preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were 7.5(± 1.3) and 45.3 (± 12.3) respectively. The average 2-year postoperative VAS and ODI scores were 2.4 (± 1.5) and 22.5 (± 9.6) respectively, excluding the 2 patients with recurrent pathology. The average body mass index (BMI) and L5-S1 disc height in the 2-year successful group (n = 16) were 30.6 (± 7.4) and 8.7 mm (± 3.5 mm) respectively; the average BMI and L5-S1 disc height in the 2-year failure group (n = 2) were 25.8 (± 5.9) and 7.9 (± 2.6) respectively. LIMITATIONS:This was a retrospective case series. CONCLUSIONS:Endoscopic spine surgery offers patients with fusions that terminate at L5 a safe and effective option for treatment of lumbar degenerative spine disease at L5-S1 below their fusion constructs. A longer follow-up and a larger prospective study would be necessary to consider the utility of endoscopic compression versus extending the fusion construct.

Background: Endoscopically visualized spine surgery has become an essential tool that aids in identifying and treating anatomical spine pathologies that are not well demonstrated by traditional advanced imaging, including MRI. These pathologies may be visualized during endoscopic lumbar decompression (ELD) and categorized into primary pain generators (PPG). Identifying these PPGs provides crucial information for a successful outcome with ELD and forms the basis for our proposed personalized spine care protocol (SpineScreen). Methods: a prospective study of 412 patients from 7 endoscopic practices consisting of 207 (50.2%) males and 205 (49.8%) females with an average age of 63.67 years and an average follow-up of 69.27 months was performed to compare the durability of targeted ELD based on validated primary pain generators versus image-based open lumbar laminectomy, and minimally invasive lumbar transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) using Kaplan-Meier median survival calculations. The serial time was determined as the interval between index surgery and when patients were censored for additional interventional and surgical treatments for low back-related symptoms. A control group was recruited from patients referred for a surgical consultation but declined interventional and surgical treatment and continued on medical care. Control group patients were censored when they crossed over into any surgical or interventional treatment group. Results: of the 412 study patients, 206 underwent ELD (50.0%), 61 laminectomy (14.8%), and 78 (18.9%) TLIF. There were 67 patients in the control group (16.3% of 412 patients). The most common surgical levels were L4/5 (41.3%), L5/S1 (25.0%), and L4-S1 (16.3%). At two-year f/u, excellent and good Macnab outcomes were reported by 346 of the 412 study patients (84.0%). The VAS leg pain score reduction was 4.250 ± 1.691 (p < 0.001). No other treatment during the available follow-up was required in 60.7% (125/206) of the ELD, 39.9% (31/78) of the TLIF, and 19.7% (12/61 of the laminectomy patients. In control patients, only 15 of the 67 (22.4%) control patients continued with conservative care until final follow-up, all of which had fair and poor functional Macnab outcomes. In patients with Excellent Macnab outcomes, the median durability was 62 months in ELD, 43 in TLIF, and 31 months in laminectomy patients (p < 0.001). The overall survival time in control patients was eight months with a standard error of 0.942, a lower boundary of 6.154, and an upper boundary of 9.846 months. In patients with excellent Macnab outcomes, the median durability was 62 months in ELD, 43 in TLIF, and 31 months in laminectomy patients versus control patients at seven months (p < 0.001). The most common new-onset symptom for censoring was dysesthesia ELD (9.4%; 20/206), axial back pain in TLIF (25.6%;20/78), and recurrent pain in laminectomy (65.6%; 40/61) patients (p < 0.001). Transforaminal epidural steroid injections were tried in 11.7% (24/206) of ELD, 23.1% (18/78) of TLIF, and 36.1% (22/61) of the laminectomy patients. The secondary fusion rate among ELD patients was 8.8% (18/206). Among TLIF patients, the most common additional treatments were revision fusion (19.2%; 15/78) and multilevel rhizotomy (10.3%; 8/78). Common follow-up procedures in laminectomy patients included revision laminectomy (16.4%; 10/61), revision ELD (11.5%; 7/61), and multilevel rhizotomy (11.5%; 7/61). Control patients crossed over into ELD (13.4%), TLIF (13.4%), laminectomy (10.4%) and interventional treatment (40.3%) arms at high rates. Most control patients treated with spinal injections (55.5%) had excellent and good functional outcomes versus 40.7% with fair and poor (3.7%), respectively. The control patients (93.3%) who remained in medical management without surgery or interventional care (14/67) had the worst functional outcomes and were rated as fair and poor. Conclusions: clinical outcomes were more favorable with lumbar surgeries than with non-surgical control groups. Of the control patients, the crossover rate into interventional and surgical care was 40.3% and 37.2%, respectively. There are longer symptom-free intervals after targeted ELD than with TLIF or laminectomy. Additional intervention and surgical treatments are more often needed to manage new-onset postoperative symptoms in TLIF- and laminectomy compared to ELD patients. Few ELD patients will require fusion in the future. Considering the rising cost of surgical spine care, we offer SpineScreen as a simplified and less costly alternative to traditional image-based care models by focusing on primary pain generators rather than image-based criteria derived from the preoperative lumbar MRI scan.

OBJECTIVE:Identifying patients at risk of increased health care resource utilization is a valuable opportunity to develop targeted preoperative and perioperative interventions. In the present investigation, we sought to examine patient sociodemographic factors that predict prolonged length of stay (LOS) after traumatic spine fracture. METHODS:We performed a cohort analysis using the National Trauma Data Bank tabulated during 2012-2016. Eligible patients were those who were diagnosed with cervical or thoracic spine fracture with spinal cord injury and who were treated surgically. We evaluated the effects of sociodemographic as well as psychosocial variables on LOS by negative binomial regression and adjusted for injury severity, injury mechanism, and hospital characteristics. RESULTS:We identified 3856 eligible patients with a median LOS of 9 days (interquartile range, 6-15 days). Patients in older age categories, who were male (incidence rate ratio (IRR), 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.01-1.09), black (IRR, 1.12; CI, 1.05-1.19) or Hispanic (IRR, 1.09; CI, 1.03-1.16), insured by Medicaid (IRR, 1.24; CI, 1.17-1.31), or had a diagnosis of alcohol use disorder (IRR, 1.12; CI, 1.06-1.18) were significantly more likely to have a longer LOS. In addition, patients with severe injury on Injury Severity Score (IRR, 1.32; CI, 1.14-1.53) and lower Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores (GCS score 3-8, IRR, 1.44; CI, 1.35-1.55; GCS score 9-11, IRR, 1.40; CI, 1.25-1.58) on admission had a significantly lengthier LOS. Patients admitted to a hospital in the Southern United States (IRR, 1.09; CI, 1.05-1.14) had longer LOS. CONCLUSIONS:Socioeconomic factors such as race, insurance status, and alcohol use disorder were associated with a prolonged LOS after surgical management of traumatic spine fracture with spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND:The treatment of post-laminectomy lumbar radiculopathy in the setting of a large posterolateral fusion mass presents an anatomic challenge to the spine interventionalist. OBJECTIVE:To describe outcomes of awake, transforaminal endoscopic surgical treatment for patients presenting with lumbar radiculopathy after instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusions. STUDY DESIGN:Retrospective chart review. SETTING:This study took place in a single-center, academic hospital. METHODS:The records of 538 patients who underwent awake transforaminal lumbar endoscopic decompression surgery performed by a single surgeon at a single institution between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Fifteen consecutive patients who required drilling through their posterolateral fusion masses to access the post-fusion foraminal stenosis were included in this study. All included patients were followed for at least one year after surgery. RESULTS:Fifteen patients (7 male and 8 female) with an average age of 68.1 years (range 38-89, standard deviation 13.4 years) underwent awake transforaminal foraminal decompression surgeries that utilized special techniques to drill through large posterolateral fusion masses to access their foraminal stenosis. One patient (7%) required repeat surgery in the postoperative period due to lack of surgical improvement. For the remaining 14 patients, at one year follow up, the preoperative visual analog scale (VAS) for leg pain and Oswestry disability index (ODI) improved from 7.0 (± 1.7) and 40.7% (± 12.9) to 1.7 (± 1.6) and 12.1% (± 11.3). There were no complications such as infection, durotomy, or neurologic injury. LIMITATIONS:Retrospective case series. CONCLUSION:Transforaminal endoscopic spine surgery offers a unique approach to post-laminectomy and post-fusion foraminal compression because it avoids scar tissue resulting from previous posterior approaches. Large posterolateral fusion masses associated with some posterior fusions can be a sizeable bony barrier to transforaminal access. The authors share their techniques and success for navigating large posterior, bony fusion masses in transforaminal post-fusion foraminal decompression.