Faculty Bibliography

CMA values have been effectively used to evaluate the amount of BI, the brainstem and medulla compression, and the amount of postoperative decompression. However, the reliability and reproducibility of this measurement have yet to be determined. In addition, the information that is available concerning CMA values in normal individuals has been limited to small series of patients. We recruited 200 patients that underwent MR imaging of the craniovertebral junction (CVJ) for unrelated reasons. None of the patients had evidence of abnormalities at the CVJ. Two senior spine surgeons then measured the CMAs of these patients in a blind manner on three separate occasions. The CMA values ranged from 139.0 degrees to 175.5 degrees , with an average value of 158.46 degrees , and a 95% confidence interval from 144.8 degrees to 172.1 degrees . Overall, the CMA had excellent intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reliability. The CMA also had excellent intraobserver repeatability based on both the age and gender of the patients (P = 0.87 and 0.93, respectively). At the same time, the CMA also demonstrated excellent interobserver reliability based on gender (P = 0.97), while good interobserver reliability based on patients age (P = 0.23). No significant correlation between the actual CMA values and the patients' gender (P = 0.17), age (P = 0.058), or spin-echo series used (P = 0.342). This study demonstrated that CMA values obtained from midsagittal T1 MR images were a highly reliable and repeatable measurement. The data reported in this study can be used as baseline parameters for normal individuals

The study design included an in vivo laboratory study. The objective of the study is to quantify the kinematics of the lumbar spinous processes in asymptomatic patients during un-restricted functional body movements with physiological weight bearing. Limited data has been reported on the motion patterns of the posterior spine elements. This information is necessary for the evaluation of traumatic injuries and degenerative changes in the posterior elements, as well as for improving the surgical treatment of spinal diseases using posterior procedures. Eight asymptomatic subjects with an age ranging from 50 to 60 years underwent MRI scans of their lumbar segments in a supine position and 3D models of L2-5 were constructed. Next, each subject was asked to stand and was positioned in the following sequence: standing, 45 degrees flexion, maximal extension, maximal left and right twisting, while two orthogonal fluoroscopic images were taken simultaneously at each of the positions. The MRI models were matched to the osseous outlines of the images from the two orthogonal views to quantify the position of the vertebrae in 3D at each position. The data revealed that interspinous process (ISP) distance decreased from L2 to L3 to L4 to L5 when measured in the supine position; with significantly higher values at L2-3 and L3-4 compared with L4-5. These differences were not seen with weight-bearing conditions. During the maximal extension, the ISP distance at the L2-3 motion segment was significantly reduced, but no significant changes were detected at L3-4 and L4-5. During flexion the ISP distances were not significantly different than those measured in the MRI position at all segments. Going from the left to right twist positions, the L4-5 segment had greater amounts of ISP rotation, while all segments had similar ranges of translation in the transverse plane. The interspinous process distances were dependent on body posture and vertebral level

Quantitative data on the range of in vivo vertebral motion is critical to enhance our understanding of spinal pathology and to improve the current surgical treatment methods for spinal diseases. Little data have been reported on the range of lumbar vertebral motion during functional body activities. In this study, we measured in vivo 6 degrees-of-freedom (DOF) vertebral motion during unrestricted weightbearing functional body activities using a combined MR and dual fluoroscopic imaging technique. Eight asymptomatic living subjects were recruited and underwent MRI scans in order to create 3D vertebral models from L2 to L5 for each subject. The lumbar spine was then imaged using two fluoroscopes while the subject performed primary flexion-extension, left-right bending, and left-right twisting. The range of vertebral motion during each activity was determined through a previously described imaging-model matching technique at L2-3, L3-4, and L4-5 levels. Our data revealed that the upper vertebrae had a higher range of flexion than the lower vertebrae during flexion-extension of the body (L2-3, 5.4 +/- 3.8 degrees ; L3-4, 4.3 +/- 3.4 degrees ; L4-5, 1.9 +/- 1.1 degrees , respectively). During bending activity, the L4-5 had a higher (but not significant) range of left-right bending motion (4.7 +/- 2.4 degrees ) than both L2-3 (2.9 +/- 2.4 degrees ) and L3-4 (3.4 +/- 2.1 degrees ), while no statistical difference was observed in left-right twisting among the three vertebral levels (L2-3, 2.5 +/- 2.3 degrees ; L3-4, 2.4 +/- 2.6 degrees ; and L4-5, 2.9 +/- 2.1 degrees , respectively). Besides the primary rotations reported, coupled motions were quantified in all DOFs. The coupled translation in left-right and anterior-posterior directions, on average, reached greater than 1 mm, while in the proximal-distal direction this was less than 1 mm. Overall, each vertebral level responds differently to flexion-extension and left-right bending, but similarly to the left-right twisting. This data may provide new insight into the in vivo function of human spines and can be used as baseline data for investigation of pathological spine kinematics

Quantitative data of spinal intervertebral disc deformation is instrumental for investigation of spinal disc pathology. In this study, we employed a combined dual fluoroscopic imaging system and the MR imaging technique to determine the lumbar disc deformation in living human subjects. Discs at L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 levels were investigated in 8 normal subjects. The geometric deformation of the discs under full body weight loading condition (upright standing) was determined using the supine, non-weightbearing condition as a reference. The average maximum tensile deformation was -21% in compression and 24% in tension, and maximum shear deformation on the disc surface reached 26%. The data indicated that different portions of the disc are under different tensile and shear deformation. Further, discs of L2-3, L3-4 and L4-5 have different deformation behavior under the physiological weightbearing condition. In general, the higher level discs have higher deformation values. The technique used in this study can be used to investigate the deformation behaviors of diseased discs as well as the efficacy of different surgical modalities at restoring normal disc deformation patterns

Powers ratio, as assessed on plain radiographs or computed tomography (CT) images, appears to have clinical and prognostic value. To date, the validation of this assessment tool has been limited to a small number of observers at a single site. No study has examined the intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of the Powers ratio measurement on plain radiographs or CT images among a large cohort of spine surgeons. This type of validation is critical to allow for the broader use of the Powers ratio methodology in research studies and clinical applications. Plain radiographs and spiral CT images of the cervical spine of 32 patients were assessed, and the Powers ratio was determined by five spine surgeons. Each surgeon performed three readings, 7 months apart. In the first round of measurements, the observers used only the Powers' method of instruction. The second and third measurement sets were obtained after an interactive teaching session on the methodology. The order of the images was altered for the second and third set of measurements. The coefficient of variation (Cv) was calculated to determine the intraobserver repeatability and interobserver reliability for each imaging technique. A Bland-Altman plot was then used to assess the agreement between the two imaging techniques. For interobserver reliability, the mean Cv of the Powers ratio was 9.09 and 4.31% for plain radiographs and CT, respectively. The Cv mean value for intraobserver reproducibility averaged 4.95% (range 1.39-9.08) when CT scans were used and 14.17% (range 7.54-34.30) when plain radiographs were used. For intraobserver reproducibility, the lowest and highest Cv mean value of five raters was 1.39 and 9.08% using CT scans and 7.54 and 34.3% using plain radiographs. The Bland-Altman plot, demonstrated that the two methods were in close agreement on the -0.8 and 0.89% interval for limits of agreement (bias +/- 1.96sigma). The intraobserver reproducibility and interobserver reliability of Powers ratio measurement was acceptable (<5%) with CT scans but not with plain radiographs. However, despite the statistically inferior reliability and repeatability, the Bland-Altman plot analysis showed that given the -0.8 and 0.89% limits of agreement, the two methods may be used interchangeably in clinical practice

STUDY DESIGN: In vitro and in vivo laboratory study. OBJECTIVE: To validate a dual fluoroscopic image matching technique for measurement of in vivo spine kinematics. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Accurate knowledge of the spinal structural functions is critical to understand the biomechanical factors that affect spinal pathology. Many studies have investigated vertebral motion both in vitro and in vivo. However, determination of in vivo motion of the vertebrae under physiologic loading conditions remains a challenge in biomedical engineering because of the limitations of current technology and the complicated anatomy of the spine. METHODS: In in vitro validation, an ovine spine was moved to a known distance in a known speed by an MTS machine. The dual fluoroscopic system was used to capture the spine motion and reproduce the moving distance and speed. In in vivo validation, a living subject moved the spine in various positions under weightbearing. The fluoroscopes were used to reproduce the in vivo spine positions 5 times. The standard deviations in translation and orientation of the 5 measurements were used to evaluate the repeatability of technique. RESULTS: The translation positions of the ovine spine could be determined with a mean accuracy less than 0.40 mm for the image matching technique using magnetic resonance image-based vertebral models. The spine speed could be reproduced within an accuracy of 0.2 mm/s. The repeatability of the method in reproducing in vivo human spine 6DOF kinematics was less than 0.3 mm in translation and less than 0.7 degrees in orientation. CONCLUSION: The image matching technique was accurate and repeatable for noninvasive measurement of spine vertebral motion. The technique could be a useful tool for determination of vertebral positions and orientations before and after surgical treatment of spinal pathology to evaluate and improve the efficacy of the various surgical methods in restoring normal spine function