Faculty Bibliography

The medical complexity and critical care needs of patients admitted to cardiac ICUs are increasing, and prospective studies examining the underlying cardiac and noncardiac diagnoses, the management strategies, and the prognosis of cardiac ICU patients with respiratory failure are needed.

BACKGROUND:Myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with high mortality. Early coronary revascularization improves survival, but the optimal mode of revascularization remains uncertain. We sought to characterize practice patterns and outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with MI complicated by CS. METHODS:Patients hospitalized for MI with CS between 2002 and 2014 were identified from the United States National Inpatient Sample. Trends in management were evaluated over time. Propensity score matching was performed to identify cohorts with similar baseline characteristics and MI presentations who underwent PCI and CABG. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality. RESULTS:A total of 386,811 hospitalizations for MI with CS were identified; 67% were STEMI. Overall, 62.4% of patients underwent revascularization, with PCI in 44.9%, CABG in 14.1%, and a hybrid approach in 3.4%. Coronary revascularization for MI and CS increased over time, from 51.5% in 2002 to 67.4% in 2014 (P for trend < .001). Patients who underwent CABG were more likely to have diabetes mellitus (35.5% vs. 29.2%, P < .001) and less likely to present with STEMI (48.7% vs. 80.9%, P < .001) than those who underwent PCI. CABG (without PCI) was associated with lower mortality than PCI (without CABG) overall (18.9% vs. 29.0%, P < .001) and in a propensity-matched subgroup of 19,882 patients (19.0% vs. 27.0%, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS:CABG was associated with lower in-hospital mortality than PCI among patients with MI complicated by CS. Due to the likelihood of residual confounding, a randomized trial of PCI versus CABG in patients with MI, CS, and multi-vessel coronary disease is warranted.

To explore demographics, comorbidities, transfers, and mortality in critically ill patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

The COVID-19 pandemic has presented a major unanticipated stress on our workforce, organizational structure, systems of care, and critical resource supply. In order to ensure provider safety, maximize efficiency, and optimize patient outcomes, health systems need to be agile. Critical care cardiologists may be uniquely positioned to treat the numerous respiratory and cardiovascular complications of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and support clinicians without critical care training who may be suddenly asked to care for critically ill patients. This manuscript draws upon the experiences of colleagues from heavily impacted regions of the United States and Europe as well as lessons learned from military mass casualty medicine. We offer pragmatic suggestions on how to implement scalable models for critical care delivery, cultivate educational tools for team training, and embrace technologies such as telemedicine to enable effective collaboration despite social distancing imperatives.

Background Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy (ACM) can mimic inflammatory processes. We present a complex patient with scleroderma (Sc)-dermatomyositis overlap syndrome (Sc-DM) and cardiac disease. Case A 57-year-old woman with family history of Sc presented with progressive weakness, dyspnea, edema, and Raynaud's (1A). Troponin was 1.6 ng/mL and CRP was 13.2 mg/L. EKGs revealed sinus rhythm with RBBB and AV sequential pacing with multifocal PVCs (1B-C). CT chest showed bibasilar fibrosis (1D). Echocardiography revealed biventricular dysfunction. Cardiac catheterization showed non-obstructive coronaries and a cardiac index of 1.8 L/min/m2. Cardiac MRI had diffuse biventricular subendocardial late gadolinium enhancement (1E). Electromyography revealed proximal myopathy. Rheumatologic workup was consistent with seronegative Sc-DM. Decision-making She was treated with steroids, mycophenolate, IV immunoglobulins, diuretics, and inotropes. Her course was complicated by recurrent VT cardiac arrests, prompting escalation to VA-ECMO. She underwent cardiac transplant on day 9 of ECMO. Pathology revealed biventricular fibrofatty replacement consistent with ACM (1F-G), patchy fibrosis of the pericardium, and mitral valve with thickened and fused chordae suggestive of inflammatory changes from Sc (1H-I). Conclusion This case highlights an atypical presentation of ACM in a patient with Sc-DM and the multidisciplinary approach necessary for proper diagnosis and management. [Figure presented]
Copyright

Background Positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) may have differential hemodynamic effects according to right ventricular (RV), left ventricular (LV) function and filling pressures. We assessed the association between PEEP and outcomes in patients (pts) admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) undergoing mechanical ventilation (MV). Methods Patients undergoing MV in the first 48 hours of CICU admission at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (MIMIC III database) were included. Pts were stratified into preload dependent (hypovolemia, RV dysfunction, tamponade, hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy) and high afterload (LV dysfunction). Pts with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) were classified by their pulmonary artery diastolic pressure (PADP) as high (>20mmHg) and normal (<20mmHg). Mortality, lactate clearance and inotropic vasopressor score were compared in pts with PEEP levels above and below the median. Multivariable regression analysis was performed adjusting for age, sex, OASIS score, PaO2, pH, lactate and cardiac arrest on admission. Results We included 321 CICU pts (age 68, IQR 57-78) who had a median PEEP levels of 5.38 (IQR 5.00-6.78) cmH2O in the preload dependent group and 5.00 (IQR 5.00-8.00) cmH2O in the afterload dependent group. Unadjusted hospital mortality was higher in pts receiving PEEP above the median in the preload dependent group (66.7% vs. 36.4%, p=0.04, adjusted OR 1.74 95%CI 0.85-3.57, p=0.12), but not in the afterload dependent group (31.1% vs. 26% p=0.51, adjusted OR 1.002 95%CI 0.81-1.24, p=0.98). In patients with PAC (n=80), multivariate analysis demonstrated no differences in mortality by PEEP in low PADP (OR 0.93, 95%CI 0.38-2.75, p=0.87) or high PADP (OR 1.17, 95%CI 0.72-1.91p=0.51). There were no differences in lactate clearance or inotropic/vasopressor score by PEEP in preload/afterload dependent status and with normal/high PADP. Conclusion In CICU pts undergoing MV, the use of low-moderate levels of PEEP was not associated with differences in outcomes. Further research is warranted to better characterize the impact of PEEP, particularly at higher levels, on hemodynamics and clinical outcomes.
Copyright