Faculty Bibliography

Background Dietary interventions may play a role in secondary cardiovascular prevention. hsCRP (High-sensitivity C-reactive protein) is a marker of risk for major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in coronary artery disease. Methods and Results The open-label, blinded end-point, EVADE CAD (Effects of a Vegan Versus the American Heart Association-Recommended Diet in Coronary Artery Disease) trial randomized participants (n=100) with coronary artery disease to 8 weeks of a vegan or American Heart Association-recommended diet with provision of groceries, tools to measure dietary intake, and dietary counseling. The primary end point was high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. A linear regression model compared end points after 8 weeks of a vegan versus American Heart Association diet and adjusted for baseline concentration of the end point. Significance levels for the primary and secondary end points were set at 0.05 and 0.0015, respectively. A vegan diet resulted in a significant 32% lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (β, 0.68, 95% confidence interval [0.49-0.94]; P=0.02) when compared with the American Heart Association diet. Results were consistent after adjustment for age, race, baseline waist circumference, diabetes mellitus, and prior myocardial infarction (adjusted β, 0.67 [0.47-0.94], P=0.02). The degree of reduction in body mass index and waist circumference did not significantly differ between the 2 diet groups (adjusted β, 0.99 [0.97-1.00], P=0.10; and adjusted β, 1.00 [0.98-1.01], P=0.66, respectively). There were also no significant differences in markers of glycemic control between the 2 diet groups. There was a nonsignificant 13% reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol with the vegan diet when compared with the American Heart Association diet (adjusted β, 0.87 [0.78-0.97], P=0.01). There were no significant differences in other lipid parameters. Conclusions In patients with coronary artery disease on guideline-directed medical therapy, a vegan diet may be considered to lower high-sensitivity C-reactive protein as a risk marker of adverse outcomes. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 02135939.

BACKGROUND:Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for low gradient (LG) severe aortic stenosis (AS) with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains an area of clinical uncertainty. METHODS:Retrospective review identified 422 patients who underwent TAVR between September 4, 2014 and July 1, 2016. Procedural indication other than severe AS (n = 22) or LVEF <50% (n = 98) were excluded. Outcomes were defined by valve academic research consortium two criteria when applicable and compared between LG (peak velocity <4.0 m/s and mean gradient <40 mmHg; n = 73) and high gradient (HG) (n = 229) groups. The LG group was further categorized as low stroke volume index (SVI) (n = 41) or normal SVI (n = 32). Median follow-up was 747 days [interquartile range 220-1013]. RESULTS: = 0.39). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Patients with preserved LVEF undergoing TAVR for severe AS with LG, including LG with low SVI, have no significant difference in adverse outcomes when compared to patients with HG.

Background: Use of a universal diagnostic catheter may decrease procedural time and catheter exchange-related spasm compared to a dual catheter strategy. The aim of this study is to identify demographic and clinical predictors of failure to complete an invasive coronary angiogram with a universal catheter alone. Methods: A retrospective review was performed of consecutive unique patients who underwent a right transradial or transulnar diagnostic coronary angiogram between January 2015 and June 13, 2017 by a transradial operator who routinely starts with a universal catheter (n=624). Patients were excluded if a universal catheter was not initially used (n=84). Multivariable predictors of failure to complete the procedure with a universal catheter alone were identified using logistic regression analysis and presented as odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval (CI)]. Results: Of patients who met study criteria, 317 (58.7%) underwent angiography with a universal catheter alone and 223 (41.3%) required exchange to a coronary-specific catheter (53.2% for right coronary artery alone, 20.1% for left coronary artery alone, 25.2% for both). Patients who required a catheter exchange were more likely to be age >75 years (24.7% vs 14.8%, p<0.005), female (34.4% vs 20.1%, p<0.005), height <64 inches (35.3% vs 25.5%, p=0.016), with diabetes mellitus (47.9% vs 36.7, p=0.010), with hypertension (85.2% vs 74.4%, p=0.003), or with chronic kidney disease (25.9% vs 17.2%, p=0.017). After multivariable adjustment, age >75 years (OR 2.02 [1.29-3.17]), female sex (OR 2.11 [1.42-3.15]), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.54 [1.06- 2.24]), and hypertension (OR 1.96 [1.23-3.12]) independently predicted failure of a universal catheter alone to complete angiography. Conclusion: In patients undergoing a right transradial or transulnar coronary angiogram, consideration may be made to use a dual catheter strategy over a universal catheter strategy if one or more of the following characteristics are present: elderly age, female sex, diabetes mellitus, hypertension. A prospective study is needed to determine if catheter selection based on these pre-procedural characteristics can decrease access crossover rate, procedural time, radiation exposure, and contrast use

Early revascularization is the gold standard for management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and cardiogenic shock (CS). The use of transradial artery access (TRA) in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has increased in recent years and has emerged as a safe and effective approach to PCI in high-risk patients, with advantages in reduced major bleeding events, other peri-procedural complications, and all-cause mortality when compared with transfemoral artery access (TFA). Multiple randomized clinical trials have demonstrated these advantages of TRA vs. TFA PCI in STEMI patients. Although there remains a lack of dedicated randomized trials in CS, observational data suggest benefits on the same endpoints as in STEMI with TRA vs. TFA PCI in CS. This review summarizes the existing literature on the use of TRA compared to TFA for STEMI and CS patients; the reduction of major bleeding events, other peri-procedural complications, and mortality associated with TRA in STEMI and CS; and technical considerations and challenges in the care of these high-risk patient populations.

To determine whether arterial responsiveness is impaired among patients with gout, and whether arterial responsiveness inversely correlates with serum urate and inflammatory measures. This is a cross-sectional study of untreated gout subjects (n = 34) and non-gout healthy controls (n = 64). High-resolution dynamic ultrasound-measured flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and nitroglycerin-mediated dilation (NMD) assessed endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent arterial responsiveness respectively. Serum urate (sUA) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) were measured in the gout group, and correlated with FMD and NMD responses. Both FMD (2.20 ± 0.53 vs 3.56 ± 0.31, p = 0.021) and NMD (16.69 ± 1.54 vs 24.51 ± 0.90, p = 0.00002) were impaired in the gout versus control group. Stratification for individual comorbidities suggested that no single risk factor accounted for impaired FMD/NMD in the gout subjects. However, the degree of association between gout and FMD, but not NMD impairment, was dampened after multivariable adjustment (FMD unadjusted beta = - 1.36 (SE 0.58), p = 0.02; adjusted beta = - 1.16 (SE 0.78), p = 0.14 and NMD unadjusted beta = - 7.68 (SE 1.78), p < 0.0001; adjusted beta = - 5.33 (SE 2.46), p = 0.03). Within the gout group, there was an inverse correlation between FMD and sUA (R = - 0.5, p = 0.003), and between FMD and hsCRP (R = - 0.42, p = 0.017), but not between NMD and sUA or hsCRP. Compared with healthy controls, subjects with gout have reduced arterial function. Individual comorbidities are insufficient to account for differences between gout and control groups, but multiple comorbidities may collectively contribute to impairment in endothelium-dependent arterial responsiveness. Endothelial impairment is also related to sUA and hsCRP, markers of gout severity and inflammation respectively. Studies to determine whether gout therapy may improve arterial responsiveness are warranted.

Colchicine is an ancient medication that is currently approved for the treatment of gout and FMF. However, colchicine has a wide range of anti-inflammatory activities, and studies indicate that it may be beneficial in a variety of other conditions. This paper reviews the evidence for the well-established use of colchicine in gout, as well as several other rheumatic diseases. In addition, we highlight the potential benefit of colchicine in cardiac disease, including coronary artery disease in patients both with and without gout.