Faculty Bibliography

Background/UNASSIGNED:Multiple studies demonstrate the benefit of a vegan diet on cardiovascular risk factors when compared to no intervention or usual dietary patterns. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of a vegan diet versus the American Heart Association (AHA)-recommended diet on inflammatory and glucometabolic profiles in patients with angiographically defined coronary artery disease (CAD). Study Design/UNASSIGNED:This study is a randomized, open label, blinded end-point trial of 100 patients with CAD as defined by ≥50% diameter stenosis in a coronary artery ≥2 mm in diameter on invasive angiography. Participants are randomized to 8 weeks of either a vegan or AHA-recommended diet (March 2014 and February 2017). Participants are provided weekly groceries that adhere to the guidelines of their diet. The primary endpoint is high sensitivity C-reactive concentrations. Secondary endpoints include anthropometric data, other markers of inflammation, lipid parameters, glycemic markers, endothelial function, quality of life data, and assessment of physical activity. Endpoints are measured at each visit (baseline, 4 weeks, and 8 weeks). Dietary adherence is measured by two weekly 24-hour dietary recalls, a 4-day food record during the week prior to each visit, and both plasma and urine levels of trimethylamine-N-oxide at each visit. Conclusion/UNASSIGNED:This study is the first to comprehensively assess multiple indices of inflammation and glucometabolic profile in a rigorously conducted randomized trial of patients with CAD on a vegan versus AHA-recommended diet.

BACKGROUND: Elevated white blood cell (WBC) count is associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in the setting of acute coronary syndrome. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether similar associations persist in an all-comers population of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention in the contemporary era. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the multicenter, prospective, observational PARIS study (Patterns of Non-Adherence to Anti-Platelet Regimens in Stented Patients Registry), 4222 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States and Europe between July 1, 2009, and December 2, 2010, were evaluated. The associations between baseline WBC and MACE (composite of cardiac death, stent thrombosis, spontaneous myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) at 24-month follow-up were analyzed using multivariable Cox regression. Patients with higher WBC were more often younger, smokers, and with less comorbid risk factors compared with those with lower WBC. After adjustment for baseline and procedural characteristics, WBC remained independently associated with MACE (hazard ratio [HR] per 103 cells/muL increase, 1.05 [95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.02-1.09]; P=0.001), cardiac death (HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.05-1.17]; P<0.001), and clinically indicated target revascularization (HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 1.00-1.09]; P=0.03) but not stent thrombosis (HR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.99-1.16]; P=0.10) or spontaneous myocardial infarction (HR, 1.03 [95% CI, 0.97-1.09]; P=0.29). The association between WBC and MACE was consistent in acute coronary syndrome and non-acute coronary syndrome presentations (interaction P=0.15). CONCLUSIONS: Increased WBC is an independent predictor of MACE after percutaneous coronary intervention in a contemporary all-comers cohort. Further studies to delineate the underlying pathophysiologic role of elevated WBC across a spectrum of coronary artery disease presentations are warranted. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00998127.

The SCAI Publications Committee and Emerging Leadership Mentorship (ELM) Fellows concisely summarize and provide context on the most important coronary trials presented at large international meetings in 2016, including SCAI, ACC, TCT, EuroPCR, ESC, and AHA. The intent is to allow quick assimilation of trial results into interventional practice, and enable busy interventional cardiologists to stay up to date. (c) 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Background: Patients with severe aortic stenosis in the setting of low gradient and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remain an area of clinical uncertainty. Methods: Retrospective chart review identified 209 patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) between September 2014 and September 2015. Of these patients, 3 (1.4%) were excluded due to procedural indication other than severe aortic stenosis and 41 (20%) were excluded due to reduced LVEF (<50%). Of the remaining 165 patients with aortic valve area <1 cm2, 77 (47%) had either a peak velocity <4.0 m2 or mean gradient <40 mmHg (LG group) and 88 (53%) had both peak velocity >4.0 m2 and mean gradient >40 mmHg (HG group) across the AV. Outcomes were defined by the valve academic research consortium 2 criteria when applicable and compared between the LG and HG groups via Fisher's exact test. Median follow-up was 367 days. Continuous data are shown as median [interquartile range] and categorical data are shown as proportions. Results: The 30-day mortality risk as assessed by Society of Thoracic Surgery score was not significantly different between the LG and HG groups (5.9% [3.5-8.1] vs 6.2% [4.4-7.6], p=0.45). There were no significant differences in outcomes (Table). Conclusion: In a high-volume center, patients undergoing TAVR for severe AS with LG preserved LVEF have no significant difference in adverse outcomes, both in-hospital and on 1-year follow-up, when compared to patients with HG preserved LVEF. (Figure Presented)