Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:COVID-19 is a worldwide pandemic, with many patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. Tracheostomy is not recommended by current guidelines as it is considered a super-spreading event due to aerosolization that unduly risks healthcare workers. METHODS:Patients with severe COVID-19 that were on mechanical ventilation ≥ 5 days were evaluated for percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. We developed a novel percutaneous tracheostomy technique that placed the bronchoscope alongside the endotracheal tube, not inside it. This improved visualization during the procedure and continued standard mechanical ventilation after positioning the inflated endotracheal tube cuff in the distal trachea. This technique offers a significant mitigation for the risk of virus aerosolization during the procedure. RESULTS:From March 10 to April 15, 2020, 270 patients with COVID-19 required invasive mechanical ventilation at New York University Langone Health Manhattan's campus of which 98 patients underwent percutaneous dilational tracheostomy. The mean time from intubation to the procedure was 10.6 days (SD ±5 days). Currently, thirty-two (33%) patients do not require mechanical ventilatory support, 19 (19%) have their tracheostomy tube downsized and 8 (8%) were decannulated. Forty (41%) patients remain on full ventilator support, while 19 (19%) are weaning from mechanical ventilation. Seven (7%) died as result of respiratory and multiorgan failure. Tracheostomy related bleeding was the most common complication (5 patients). None of health care providers have developed symptoms or tested positive for COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS:Our percutaneous tracheostomy technique appears to be safe and effective for COVID-19 patients and safe for healthcare workers.

Background/UNASSIGNED:Evidence of the optimal surgery strategy for early stage metachronous second primary lung cancer (SPLC) has been limited and controversial. This study aims to compare the survival outcomes of different extents of resection and lymph node evaluation in these patients. Methods/UNASSIGNED:Early stage metachronous SPLC patients, who had received lobectomy for initial primary lung cancer (IPLC) and developed SPLC more than 3 months later, were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database according to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guideline. Overall survival (OS) and lung cancer-specific survival (CSS) of different extents of resection and lymph node evaluation were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and multivariate Cox regression model. Results/UNASSIGNED:. 64.7%, P<0.001) compared with an examined lymph node number <10. The survival benefits of lobectomy and examined lymph node number ≥10 were further validated in multivariate Cox regression and subgroup analysis stratified by tumor size. Conclusions/UNASSIGNED:Lobectomy and thorough lymph node evaluation provided significantly longer survival, and thus should be considered for early stage metachronous SPLC whenever possible.

BACKGROUND:Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) is increasingly performed in various ways. The lack of international definitions and nomenclature makes accurate comparison of outcomes difficult. METHODS:An international, multi-specialty consensus-writing committee constructed definitions and nomenclature for MIE. After a PubMed search, vetting, and review with all authors a consensus was reached. RESULTS:The proposed definition for MIE is an operation "that removes part or all of the esophagus, does not retract, lift, spread or remove any part of the chest or abdominal wall and the surgeon's and assistant's vision of the operative field is via a monitor, the patient's tissue is manipulated only by instruments that are controlled by the operating surgeon or team, except for during the neck portion if used." A flexible nomenclature is proposed that attempts to describes current and future operations and systems. CONCLUSIONS:Definitions and nomenclature for MIE are needed to ensure that future studies accurately compare results and outcomes of similar operations. Nomenclatures allow surgeons, researchers and patients from different cultures to use a common language to facilitate communication and compare. This process is required in order to improve patient outcomes globally to drive adoption of best of practice yet is lacking for minimally invasive esophagectomy.

BACKGROUND:Our objective is to report our outcomes and demonstrate our evolving technique for robotic sleeve resection of the airway, with or without lobectomy, using video vignettes. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed a single surgeon prospective database from October 2010 to October 2019. RESULTS:Over 9 years, there were 5,573 operations of which 1951 were planned for a robotic approach. There were 755 robotic lobectomies, 306 robotic segmentectomies, and 23 consecutive patients were scheduled for elective completely portal, robotic sleeve resection. Sleeve lobectomy was performed in 18 patients: 10 right upper lobe, 6 left upper lobe, and 2 right lower lobe. Two patients had mainstem bronchus resections and two underwent right bronchus intermedius resections that preserved all of the lung. One patient had a robotic pneumonectomy. There was one conversion to open thoracotomy due to concern for anastomotic tension in a patient who received neoadjuvant therapy. All patients had an R0 resection. In the last 10 operations, we modified our airway anastomosis, using a running self-locking absorbable suture. The median length of stay was 3 days (range 1-11). There were no 30- or 90-day mortalities. Within a median follow-up of 18 months, there were no anastomotic strictures and no recurrent cancers. CONCLUSIONS:Our early and midterm results show that a completely portal robotic sleeve resection is safe and oncologically effective. The technical aspects of a robotic sleeve resection of the airway are demonstrated using video vignettes.

Systems engineering is an interdisciplinary approach to creating, evaluating, and managing a complex process in order to increase reliability, cost-effectiveness, and quality. The operating room is a complex environment that requires human-human interaction, human-device interaction, planning, and coordination of scarce resources for the purpose of providing surgery to patients in a safe and efficient manner. The operating room is an important revenue generator, but it can also be responsible for unsustainable costs if not managed effectively. Reducing costs and increasing the efficiency of surgical cases is important for generating health care value. Efficiency efforts that aim for standardization of surgical protocols must be balanced by flexibility in the unpredictable operating room environment. This paper reviews systems engineering efforts to improve efficiency in the operating room including operating room scheduling, personnel factors, resource management, orthopedicspecific initiatives, and future innovations.

Lymph node dissection (LND) along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is a technically challenging part of esophageal cancer surgery, especially after chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Robotic surgery holds promise to increase its safety and feasibility. The aim of this study was to describe a single thoracoscopic surgeon's experience related to the transition from video-assisted esophagectomy (VATE) to robotic esophagectomy (RE)-with a special focus on the safety of left RLN LND. Patients who underwent minimally invasive esophagectomy and RLN dissection following CRT were dichotomized according to the use of robotic surgery (robotic esophagectomy [RE] versus video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy [VATE]). The following parameters were determined: (1) number of dissected nodes, (2) rates of RLN palsy, (3) rates of perioperative complications, and (4) learning curve. Learning curve analysis was performed using the 10-patient moving average (MA) for operation times and with the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method for left RLN LND (target failure rate: 15%). The RE and VATE groups consisted of 39 and 67 patients, respectively. The intraoperative identification of the left RLN was more common in the RE group (97.4%) than in the VATE group (68.7%; P < 0.001). Postoperative left RLN palsy was significantly more frequent in the VATE group (26.9%) than in the RE group (10.3%; P = 0.042), with a higher rate of pneumonia in the former (16.4% versus 2.6%; P = 0.03). The MA chart revealed a downward trend followed by a flattening of the RE operation time at operation number 17 and 29, respectively. CUSUM analysis showed that the left RLN palsy rate decreased to the target rate after 12 operations. We conclude that at least 12 cases are required for a surgeon with prior experience in VATE to safely accomplish left RLN LND through a robotic approach.

BACKGROUND:Intraoperative catastrophes during robotic anatomical pulmonary resections are potentially devastating events. The present study aimed to assess the incidence, management, and outcomes of these intraoperative catastrophes for patients with primary lung cancers. METHODS:This was a retrospective, multiinstitutional study that evaluated patients who underwent robotic anatomical pulmonary resections. Intraoperative catastrophes were defined as events necessitating emergency thoracotomy or requiring an additional unplanned major surgical procedure. Standardized data forms were collected from each institution, with questions on intraoperative management strategies of catastrophic events. RESULTS:Overall, 1810 patients underwent robotic anatomical pulmonary resections, including 1566 (86.5%) lobectomies. Thirty-five patients (1.9%) experienced an intraoperative catastrophe. These patients were found to have significantly higher clinical TNM stage (P = .031) and lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second (81% vs 90%; P = .004). A higher proportion of patients who had a catastrophic event underwent preoperative radiotherapy (8.6% vs 2.3%; P = .048), and the surgical procedures performed differed significantly compared with noncatastrophic patients. Patients in the catastrophic group had higher perioperative mortality (5.7% vs 0.5%; P = .018), longer operative duration (195 minutes vs 170 minutes; P = .020), and higher estimated blood loss (225 mL vs 50 mL; P < .001). The most common catastrophic event was intraoperative hemorrhage from the pulmonary artery, followed by injury to the airway, pulmonary vein, and liver. Detailed management strategies were discussed. CONCLUSIONS:The incidence of catastrophic events during robotic anatomical pulmonary resections was low, and the most common complication was pulmonary arterial injury. Awareness of potential intraoperative catastrophes and their management strategies are critical to improving clinical outcomes.