Faculty Bibliography

Background: Hearing loss compounds social isolation. We tested acceptability and benefit of simple hearing assistance devices- Personal Amplifiers (PAs)-provided to older people with hearing loss and risk for social isolation, loneliness and depression.
Method(s): We conducted a pre-post pilot trial with 1-and 2-month follow-up of residents of six low-income senior apartment buildings in Los Angeles (n = 74) who had hearing difficulties, based on either (A) >= 10 (range 0-40) on the Hearing Handicap Inventory - Survey; or (B) hearing loss based on a clinically validated audiological iPad assessment (SHOEBOXTM) with surveys at 0, 1 and 2 months using 4 instruments: (1) Social Isolation Score (SIS); (2) Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9); (3) Sense of Social Support scale; and (4) DG Loneliness Scale. We assessed PA use and perceived benefit using the International Outcome Inventory for Alternative Interventions (IOI-AI).
Result(s): Baseline characteristics and degree of hearing problems did not vary significantly among 74 initial enrollees. Fortytwo residents completed 1-and 2-month surveys. Mean age was 78.2 years; 64% were women; 83% scored >=10 on HHI-S and 83% met SHOEBOX criteria for hearing loss. At baseline, 31% met SIS criteria for social isolation (>=2; mean=1.0; SD:0.98); 41% met DG criteria for loneliness; and 19% had low social support. Mean PHQ-9 was 7.0, (SD:5.3); 26% had moderate to severe mood symptoms. At 2-month follow up, 87% reported PA use of >= one hour/day, and 76% indicated that the device changed life enjoyment 'quite a lot.' Psychosocial measures improved over time.
Conclusion(s): In a vulnerable older population with hearing difficulties, simple PAs were enthusiastically received and may have improved social functioning and mood. Further work with stronger study designs is needed to shed more light on the effectiveness of this approach

BACKGROUND:Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) are at higher risk of vaccine-preventable respiratory infections. However, advanced, homebound individuals may have less access to vaccinations. In light of COVID-19, understanding barriers to vaccination in PD may inform strategies to increase vaccine uptake. OBJECTIVE:To identify influenza and pneumococcal vaccination rates, including barriers and facilitators to vaccination, among homebound and ambulatory individuals with PD and related disorders. METHODS:Cross-sectional US-based study among individuals with PD, aged > 65 years, stratified as homebound or ambulatory. Participants completed semi-structured interviews on vaccination rates and barriers, and healthcare utilization. RESULTS:Among 143 participants, 9.8% had missed all influenza vaccinations in the past 5 years, and 32.2% lacked any pneumococcal vaccination, with no between-group differences. Homebound participants (n = 41) reported difficulty traveling to clinic (p < 0.01) as a vaccination barrier, and despite similar outpatient visit frequencies, had more frequent emergency department visits (31.7% vs. 9.8%, p < 0.01) and hospitalizations (14.6% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.03). Vaccine hesitancy was reported in 35% of participants, vaccine refusal in 19%, and 13.3% reported unvaccinated household members, with no between-group differences. Nearly 13% thought providers recommended against vaccines for PD patients, and 31.5% were unsure of vaccine recommendations in PD. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Among a sample of homebound and ambulatory people with PD, many lack age-appropriate immunizations despite ample healthcare utilization. Many participants were unsure whether healthcare providers recommend vaccinations for people with PD. In light of COVID-19, neurologist reinforcement that vaccinations are indicated, safe, and recommended may be beneficial.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Poor communication is a barrier to care for people with hearing loss. We assessed the feasibility and potential benefit of providing a simple hearing assistance device during an emergency department (ED) visit, for people who reported difficulty hearing. DESIGN/METHODS:Randomized controlled pilot study. SETTING/METHODS:The ED of New York Harbor Manhattan Veterans Administration Medical Center. PARTICIPANTS/METHODS:One hundred and thirty-three Veterans aged 60 and older, presenting to the ED, likely to be discharged to home, who either (1) said that they had difficulty hearing, or (2) scored 10 or greater (range 0-40) on the Hearing Handicap Inventory-Survey (HHI-S). INTERVENTION/METHODS:Subjects were randomized (1:1), and intervention subjects received a personal amplifier (PA; Williams Sound Pocketalker 2.0) for use during their ED visit. MEASUREMENTS/METHODS:Three survey instruments: (1) six-item Hearing and Understanding Questionnaire (HUQ); (2) three-item Care Transitions Measure; and (3) three-item Patient Understanding of Discharge Information. Post-ED visit phone calls to assess ED returns. RESULTS:Of the 133 subjects, 98.3% were male; mean age was 76.4 years (standard deviation (SD) = 9.2). Mean HHI-S score was 19.2 (SD = 8.3). Across all HUQ items, intervention subjects reported better in-ED experience than controls. Seventy-five percent of intervention subjects agreed or strongly agreed that ability to understand what was said was without effort versus 56% for controls. Seventy-five percent of intervention subjects versus 36% of controls said clinicians provided them with an explanation about presenting problems. Three percent of intervention subjects had an ED revisit within 3 days compared with 9.0% controls. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Veterans with hearing difficulties reported improved in-ED experiences with use of PAs, and were less likely to return to the ED within 3 days. PAs may be an important adjunct to older patient ED care but require validation in a larger more definitive randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND:Little is known about long-term recovery from severe COVID-19 disease. Here, we characterize overall health, physical health, and mental health of patients 1 month after discharge for severe COVID-19. METHODS:This was a prospective single health system observational cohort study of patients ≥ 18 years hospitalized with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 disease who required at least 6 l of oxygen during admission, had intact baseline cognitive and functional status, and were discharged alive. Participants were enrolled between 30 and 40 days after discharge. Outcomes were elicited through validated survey instruments: the PROMIS® Dyspnea Characteristics and PROMIS® Global Health-10. RESULTS:A total of 161 patients (40.6% of eligible) were enrolled; 152 (38.3%) completed the survey. Median age was 62 years (interquartile range [IQR], 50-67); 57 (37%) were female. Overall, 113/152 (74%) participants reported shortness of breath within the prior week (median score 3 out of 10 [IQR 0-5]), vs 47/152 (31%) pre-COVID-19 infection (0, IQR 0-1), p < 0.001. Participants also rated their physical health and mental health as worse in their post-COVID state (43.8, standard deviation 9.3; mental health 47.3, SD 9.3) compared to their pre-COVID state, (54.3, SD 9.3; 54.3, SD 7.8, respectively), both p < 0.001. Physical and mental health means in the general US population are 50 (SD 10). A total of 52/148 (35.1%) patients without pre-COVID oxygen requirements needed home oxygen after hospital discharge; 20/148 (13.5%) reported still using oxygen at time of survey. CONCLUSIONS:Patients with severe COVID-19 disease typically experience sequelae affecting their respiratory status, physical health, and mental health for at least several weeks after hospital discharge.

OBJECTIVES/UNASSIGNED:The ideal clinical model to deliver palliative care to patients with advanced kidney disease is currently unknown. Internationally, ambulatory kidney palliative care clinics have emerged with positive outcomes, yet there is limited data from the United States (US). In this exploratory study we report perceptions of a US-based ambulatory kidney palliative care clinic from the perspective of patient and caregiver attendees. The objective of this study was to inform further improvement of our clinical program. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Semi-structured interviews were conducted to elicit the patient and caregiver experience. Eleven interviews (8 patients with chronic kidney disease stage IV or V and 3 caregivers) were analyzed using qualitative description design. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:We identified 2 themes: "Communication addressing the emotional and physical aspects of disease" and "Filling gaps in care"; Subthemes include perceived value in symptom management, assistance with coping with disease, engagement in advance care planning, program satisfaction and patient activation. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Qualitative analysis showed that attendees of an ambulatory kidney palliative care clinic found the clinic enhanced the management of their kidney disease and provided services that filled current gaps in their care. Shared experiences highlight the significant challenges of life with kidney disease and the possible benefits of palliative care for this population. Further study to determine the optimal model of care for kidney palliative care is needed. Inclusion of the patient and caregiver perspective will be essential in this development.

Meeting the mental health needs of our current veteran population is one of the primary challenges facing the Veteran's Health Administration (VHA). Particularly for veterans residing in rural areas, the lack of providers, high provider turnover, and the burden of traveling long distances to VHA facilities may contribute to difficulties accessing mental health care. Telemental Health (TMH) services help bridge the geographic gap between mental health providers and veterans who need mental health services. The VHA TMH Hub initiative has attempted to leverage changes in technology-facilitated care by developing a model in which a facility "hub" could expand mental health resources to remote "spoke" clinics and veterans' residences. This paper describes the implementation of the VA New York Harbor Health care System (VA NYH) TMH Hub, which was one of 6 programs funded by the VHA Office of Rural Health (ORH) in September 2016. We will describe the structure of the program, services provided, veterans served, and our efforts to integrate quality improvement, research, and clinical training into the operations of the program. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Objective: To describe sociodemographic differences between individuals with advanced Parkinson's Disease (PD) still receiving care in an outpatient clinic vs. those enrolled in an interdisciplinary home visit study.
Background(s): Individuals with PD from underrepresented minority backgrounds face disparities in access to expert neurologic care. Such disparities also persist in PD research participation, sometimes attributed to mistrust and stigma. As minority patients become homebound, they are further estranged from care and research representation. We launched an interdisciplinary home visit study to extend continuity of care to homebound individuals with advanced PD. Here, we seek to identify sociodemographic differences between home visit (HV) participants and the outpatient (OP) clinic population from which they were recruited to determine whether disparities in care and research enrollment among minority patients persist with this patient-centered, care-focused intervention. Design/Methods: Cross-sectional study comparing individuals with advanced PD-Hoehn & Yahr stage >3-drawn from a single movement disorders center between 2017- 2019. We conducted a chart review for demographic information and used t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests as appropriate to assess population differences.
Result(s): The HV population is significantly older (n = 58 HV, 1015 OP; mean age 78.4 (SD 7.5) vs. 75.0 (SD 9.2), respectively, p = 0.002) and includes nearly twice the percentage of minority patients (26.3% non-Caucasian vs. 14.7% non-Caucasian in OP, p = 0.02). As expected, HV had worse PD severity, with 62.1% stage 4 and 17.2% stage 5, vs. 28.6% and 11.0% of OP, respectively (p <0.0001).
Conclusion(s): The proportion of minority patients with advanced PD enrolled in a home-based study is significantly greater than that receiving care in the OP setting from which they originated. This suggests that social determinants of health may contribute to advanced PD patients from underrepresented minorities becoming lost to follow-up earlier than white patients. We are actively comparing our homebound population with matched controls from a longitudinal national registry to determine the generalizability of this finding. Our results suggest that despite their advanced age, disease, and homebound status, this population is amenable to research participation. Ultimately, continued access to care poses a large but surmountable hurdle to research participation for minority patients