Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Computerized cognitive batteries may facilitate the integration of neuropsychological assessments into routine clinical care of patients with multiple sclerosis (PwMS). OBJECTIVE:To assess the construct and criterion validity of a computerized, multi-domain cognitive assessment battery (CAB, NeuroTrax) in MS. METHODS:81 PwMS and 15 healthy controls (HC) completed the CAB and a set of traditional neuropsychological tests recommended for MS on the same day. Principal component factor analysis was used to assess construct validity. For criterion validity, the gold standard definition of cognitive impairment was a score of ≥1.5SD below average on at least one cognitive domain, based upon traditional test normative data. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to examine the ability of the CAB to discriminate cognitively impaired PwMS. RESULTS:Traditional and computerized tests of memory, processing speed, visuospatial and executive function converged by factor analysis. Computerized tests detected cognitive impairment with 85% sensitivity and 70% specificity. PwMS classified as impaired on only the computerized battery had significantly prolonged response times and a higher rate of unemployment compared with PwMS classified as unimpaired on both batteries. Poor executive function was more likely to be revealed by the CAB. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The specific computerized assessment battery evaluated is valid for cognitive screening of people with MS and may be more likely to detect prolonged response times and impaired executive function.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The proliferation of computerized neuropsychological assessment devices (CNADs) for screening and monitoring cognitive impairment is increasing exponentially. Previous reviews of computerized tests for multiple sclerosis (MS) were primarily qualitative and did not rigorously compare CNADs on psychometric properties. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:We aimed to systematically review the literature on the use of CNADs in MS and identify test batteries and single tests with good evidence for reliability and validity. METHOD/UNASSIGNED:A search of four major online databases was conducted for publications related to computerized testing and MS. Test-retest reliability and validity coefficients and effect sizes were recorded for each CNAD test, along with administration characteristics. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:We identified 11 batteries and 33 individual tests from 120 peer-reviewed articles meeting the inclusion criteria. CNADs with the strongest psychometric support include the CogState Brief Battery, Cognitive Drug Research Battery, NeuroTrax, CNS-Vital Signs, and computer-based administrations of the Symbol Digit Modalities Test. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:We identified several CNADs that are valid to screen for MS-related cognitive impairment, or to supplement full, conventional neuropsychological assessment. The necessity of testing with a technician, and in a controlled clinic/laboratory environment, remains uncertain.