Faculty Bibliography

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by a combination of autonomic failure, cerebellar ataxia, and parkinsonism. Laryngeal stridor is an additional feature for MSA diagnosis, showing a high diagnostic positive predictive value, and its early occurrence might contribute to shorten survival. A consensus definition of stridor in MSA is lacking, and disagreement persists about its diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. An International Consensus Conference among experts with methodological support was convened in Bologna in 2017 to define stridor in MSA and to reach consensus statements for the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Stridor was defined as a strained, high-pitched, harsh respiratory sound, mainly inspiratory, occurring only during sleep or during both sleep and wakefulness, and caused by laryngeal dysfunction leading to narrowing of the rima glottidis. According to the consensus, stridor may be recognized clinically by the physician if present at the time of examination, with the help of a witness, or by listening to an audio recording. Laryngoscopy is suggested to exclude mechanical lesions or functional vocal cord abnormalities related to different neurologic conditions. If the suspicion of stridor needs confirmation, drug-induced sleep endoscopy or video polysomnography may be useful. The impact of stridor on survival and quality of life remains uncertain. Continuous positive airway pressure and tracheostomy are both suggested as symptomatic treatment of stridor, but whether they improve survival is uncertain. Several research gaps emerged involving diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Unmet needs for research were identified.

INTRODUCTION: Familial dysautonomia (FD) is a progressive neurogenetic disease with carrier rate as high as 1 in 18 persons in European Jews of Polish origin. Clinical hallmarks include cardiovascular instability, spinal deformities, renal dysfunction, alacrima, ataxia, and impaired nociception. Physical or emotional stress may elicit autonomic crises characterized by hypertension and vomiting. Despite profound sensory deficits, GI perturbations are frequently reported by FD patients. While the incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and FD is unknown, concurrence is underreported given increased frequency of both diseases in Ashkenazi Jews. CASE DESCRIPTION/METHODS: We report a 33-year-old female with FD and ulcerative colitis who presented with one week of abdominal pain and bloody diarrhea. She had been maintained on balsalazide. Colonoscopy one year prior revealed endoscopic and histologic remission. On physical examination, her abdomen was tender in the lower quadrants. A CT scan revealed pancolitis. Stool studies resulted negative. Her CRP was 58.4 mg/L and albumin was 2.4 g/dL. A flexible sigmoidoscopy noted Mayo endoscopic score 3 in the rectum and CMV staining was negative. The patient was started on IV steroids. Her hospital course was complicated by ileus, parainfluenza infection, and MSSA bacteremia with a pacemaker lead vegetation, requiring extraction. Lack of optimal clinical response to treatment on hospital day five led to consideration of alternative treatments with careful attention to her underlying FD. A subtotal colectomy with end ileostomy was unfavorable due to concern for volume loss. Infliximab and cyclosporine were opposed due to infection risk and later exhibiting possible nephrotoxicity. During this discussion the patient improved enough to be transitioned to oral steroids with a plan to initiate vedolizumab as an outpatient. On recent colonoscopy she had achieved mucosal healing. DISCUSSION: This is the first case of UC in a FD patient reported. Given myriad GI symptoms in the later diagnosis it can be hard to distinguish disease-related from treatment-related events. Due to the gut-specificity of vedolizumab, infection risk is considerably reduced compared to that of other biologics and is the most favorable option in the setting of underlying FD. This case highlights the difficulty encountered when treating IBD in the setting of systemic illness and underscores the need to carefully consider management options to enhance patient outcomes. (Figure Presented)