Faculty Bibliography

Over the past two decades, it has become accepted that the rotator interval is a distinct anatomic entity that plays an important role in affecting the proper function of the glenohumeral joint. The rotator interval is an anatomic region in the anterosuperior aspect of the glenohumeral joint that represents a complex interaction of the fibers of the coracohumeral ligament, the superior glenohumeral ligament, the glenohumeral joint capsule, and the supraspinatus and subscapularis tendons. As basic science and clinical studies continue to elucidate the precise role of the rotator interval, understanding of and therapeutic interventions for rotator interval pathology also continue to evolve. Lesions of the rotator interval may result in glenohumeral joint contractures, shoulder instability, or in lesions to the long head of the biceps tendon. Long-term clinical trials may clarify the results of current surgical interventions and further enhance understanding of the rotator interval.

Patients with elbow arthritis typically present with complaints of pain and stiffness. Rheumatoid arthritis is the most common cause of elbow arthritis, followed by posttraumatic arthritis and primary osteoarthritis. Nonoperative management consisting of oral analgesics, intra-articular steroid injections, physical therapy, and splinting may provide symptomatic relief in the majority of patients. If these modalities fail, operative treatment is guided by the severity of disease as well as several patient-related factors such as age, activity level, and expectations. Total elbow arthroplasty can provide satisfactory results in the majority of patients with significant degeneration of the elbow. However, due to issues regarding prosthesis longevity, this procedure is generally avoided in young active patients. Other operative treatment options for such patients include arthroscopic or open synovectomy, debridement arthroplasty, and interpositional arthroplasty. As all of these operations may provide a satisfactory outcome for the appropriate patient, a thorough preoperative evaluation is essential in choosing the suitable surgical procedure for each individual patient.

Neuropathic arthropathy, also known as Charcot arthropathy, of the elbow joint is a rare and progressive joint disorder with little available information in the literature. Presentation and treatment data on 6 patients with this pathology are reviewed. In addition, outcome data are presented on all 6 patients at a mean follow-up of 51 months. Three of these patients had undergone surgical procedures for the treatment of their pathology. At the time of their latest follow-up, 2 patients had died but reported good pain relief and functional range of motion before their deaths. At a mean follow-up of 63 months, the remaining 4 patients also had minimal pain. Of these 4 patients, 3 reported moderate to gross instability in their elbows. Nevertheless, all 4 patients had good functional use of their arms with a mean Mayo Elbow Performance Score of 91. Our data suggest that surgical treatment of appropriate patients does not necessarily preclude a successful outcome. However, surgical treatment was also associated with an unpredictable course and a high rate of complications. Therefore, most patients with this pathology should be treated with nonoperative methods, and routine surgical intervention should be avoided

BACKGROUND: The effect of arthroscopic rotator interval closure on glenohumeral motion and translation is not well understood, nor is the ideal location or number of sutures required for closure. HYPOTHESIS: The number of arthroscopic rotator interval closure sutures and their placement will have a significant effect on glenohumeral range of motion and anterior-posterior translation. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Using a custom testing apparatus, the authors measured range of motion in 12 fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders; anterior-posterior translation in adduction and neutral rotation was measured in 9. Specimens were initially tested without sutures and then tested after 3 interval closures using a random sequence of (1) an isolated medial suture at the level of the glenoid, (2) an isolated lateral suture 1 cm lateral to the glenoid, or (3) both sutures followed by removal of all sutures. RESULTS: Analysis of variance demonstrated that interval closure had a significant effect on decreasing flexion (mean, 6 degrees ), external rotation (mean, 10 degrees ), and anterior translation (mean, 3 mm) of the adducted shoulder. There was no significant difference between the 3 interval closures in any of the tests. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic interval closure produced significant decreases in range of motion and anterior-posterior translation. The effects of single lateral or medial suture closures were similar to the use of 2 sutures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study suggests that the initial effect of arthroscopic rotator interval closure on anterior translation of the shoulder will be similar whether 1 or 2 sutures are used. In vivo studies are necessary to determine if the effect of these 2 methods would be the same over time

BACKGROUND: Evidence to justify the use of porcine small intestine submucosa to augment repairs of large and massive rotator cuff tears is based on favorable results found in studies of Achilles tendon and infraspinatus tendon repairs in canines. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of a small intestine submucosal patch to augment the repair of chronic two-tendon rotator cuff tears in humans. METHODS: Thirty shoulders with a chronic two-tendon rotator cuff tear that was completely repairable with open surgery were randomized to be treated with either augmentation with porcine small intestine mucosa or no augmentation. All patients completed a PENN shoulder-score questionnaire preoperatively and at the time of the latest follow-up (at an average of fourteen months). Magnetic resonance imaging showed that nine shoulders had a large tear and twenty-one had a massive tear. All patients underwent a magnetic resonance imaging scan with intra-articular gadolinium one year after the repair to assess the status of the rotator cuff. RESULTS: The rotator cuff healed in four of the fifteen shoulders in the augmentation group compared with nine of the fifteen in the control group (p = 0.11). The median postoperative PENN total score was 83 points in the augmentation group compared with 91 points in the control group (p = 0.07). Healing of the defects in both groups demonstrated a strong correlation with the patients' clinical scores. The median postoperative PENN total score was 96 points in the group with a healed repair and 81 points in the group with a failed repair (p = 0.007). The percentage change between the preoperative and postoperative patient satisfaction scores was 400% in the group with a healed repair, and 50% in the group with a failed repair (p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of the surgical repair of large and massive chronic rotator cuff tears with porcine small intestine submucosa did not improve the rate of tendon-healing or the clinical outcome scores. On the basis of these data, we do not recommend using porcine small intestine submucosa to augment repairs of massive chronic rotator cuff tears done with the surgical and postoperative procedures described in this study

Humeral head replacement has been widely used for the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures. The procedure is associated with a high rate of patient satisfaction as well as reliable relief of pain. The functional outcomes, however, have been variable. Reported complications include infection, neurologic injury, intraoperative fracture, instability, tuberosity malunion and nonunion, rotator cuff tear, heterotopic ossification, glenoid erosion, and stiffness. When technical factors such as tuberosity malunion or component malpositioning are considered as postoperative complications, the incidence of complications is relatively high. This high rate of complications, in turn, may be related to the wide range of reported functional outcomes

After its initial description by Neer and associates, humeral head replacement has been widely used to treat complex fractures of the proximal humerus. Many studies have confirmed that the treatment of proximal humeral fractures with humeral head replacement is associated with reliable pain relief as well as good patient satisfaction. A limited number of studies have also suggested that the prostheses have reasonable longevity, with the rate of prosthesis survival at 83% to 94% at 10 years. The functional outcome after the procedure, however, has not been as predictable. Using various outcomes scoring instruments, multiple studies have reported a wide range of results. Some authors have reported mostly disappointing outcomes, whereas others have reported generally satisfactory results. The most critical factor influencing the long-term outcome appears to be the position of the greater tuberosity. Other factors that are also associated with a good outcome include younger age, minimal delay between the traumatic event and the surgical procedure, and the absence of any neurologic deficit. For young patients with a complex proximal humeral fracture, humeral head replacement still remains a viable treatment option. However, whenever possible, most authors favor open reduction and internal fixation because of the issues affecting the longevity of the prosthesis. By understanding and minimizing the risk factors leading to a poor result, a reasonable functional outcome, reliable pain relief and a high rate of patient satisfaction can be expected after treatment of proximal humeral fractures with humeral head replacement