Faculty Bibliography

Purpose of review: This review summarizes current and emerging treatments for hypoxic-ischemic brain injury (HIBI). Guidance on neuroprognostication after HIBI is also presented. Recent findings: After two 2002 studies demonstrated cooling improved neurologic outcome after HIBI, a 2013 trial found targeting 36 °C was non-inferior to targeting 33 °C. Research is ongoing, but there is no other definitive human data on therapies to prevent secondary brain injury after HIBI. Summary: Guideline-recommended treatment of HIBI includes early, optimal cardiopulmonary resuscitation to prevent primary brain injury, and targeted temperature management to mitigate secondary brain injury. Multiple novel treatment options, including anti-inflammatory agents, anesthetics, and neuroprotective cocktails, are currently being investigated. Additionally, neurostimulants may help promote wakefulness after HIBI. Neuroprognostication after HIBI requires a multimodal approach using the neurologic exam, electroencephalography, somatosensory evoked potentials, neuroimaging, and serum biomarkers. It is important to avoid premature prognostication and nihilism.

The ESM was updated in the original article to replace an incorrect version that was published with tracked changes notes.

OBJECTIVE:We reviewed the literature on cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) testing in patients with altered olfactory/gustatory function due to COVID-19 for evidence of viral neuroinvasion. METHODS:We performed a systematic review of Medline and Embase to identify publications that described at least one patient with COVID-19 who had altered olfactory/gustatory function and had CSF testing performed. The search ranged from December 1, 2019 to November 18, 2020. RESULTS:We identified 51 publications that described 70 patients who met inclusion criteria. Of 51 patients who had CSF SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing, 3 (6%) patients had positive results and 1 (2%) patient had indeterminate results. Cycle threshold (Ct; the number of amplification cycles required for the target gene to exceed the threshold, which is inversely related to viral load) was not provided for the patients with a positive PCR. The patient with indeterminate results had a Ct of 37 initially, then no evidence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA on repeat testing. Of 6 patients who had CSF SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing, 3 (50%) were positive. Testing to distinguish intrathecal antibody synthesis from transudation of antibodies to the CSF via breakdown of the blood-brain barrier was performed in 1/3 (33%) patients; this demonstrated antibody transmission to the CSF via transudation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Detection of SARS-CoV-2 in CSF via PCR or evaluation for intrathecal antibody synthesis appears to be rare in patients with altered olfactory/gustatory function. While pathology studies are needed, our review suggests it is unlikely that these symptoms are related to viral neuroinvasion.

When making decisions about goals-of-care for a patient who lacks decision-making capacity, surrogates sometimes have internal disagreements, particularly if there are complicated family dynamics. Here, I describe the evolution of end-of-life discussions for a patient who had a catastrophic stroke amongst a family who had preexisting discord.

BACKGROUND:There are no established ranges for metabolic values prior to death by neurologic criteria/brain death determination (DNC/BD) and the thresholds required by institutional protocols and accepted by neurointensivists is unknown. METHODS:We designed a survey that addressed 1) the metabolic tests required in institutional guidelines prior to brain death determination, 2) the metabolic tests the respondent reviewed prior to brain death determination, and 3) the metabolic test thresholds for laboratory tests that were perceived to preclude or permit clinical DNC/BD determination. The survey was distributed online to physicians in the Neurocritical Care Society from September to December 2019. Respondents were dichotomized based on the number of brain death evaluations they had performed (≤20 vs. > 20) and responses were compared between groups. RESULTS:The survey was completed by 84 physicians. Nearly half (47.6%) of respondents did not believe their institutions required metabolic testing. The metabolic testing for which institutions most commonly provided a defined threshold were arterial pH (34.5%, 29/84), sodium (28.6%, 24/84), and glucose (15.5%, 13/84). Nearly all (97.6%) respondents routinely reviewed metabolic tests prior to brain death evaluation, the most common of which were: sodium (91.7%, 77/84), arterial pH (83.3%, 70/84), and glucose (79.8%, 67/84). Respondents who had performed > 20 evaluations were less likely to check thyroxine and total bilirubin (3.6%, 2/55 vs. 20.7%, 6/29 (p = 0.011) and 12.7%, 7/55 vs. 31%, 9/29 (p = 0.042), respectively), and had a more liberal upper limit of potassium (6.3 mEq/L vs 6.0 mEq/L, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Prior to brain death evaluation, neurocritical care providers commonly review similar metabolic tests and have similar thresholds regarding values that would preclude clinical brain death determination. This finding is independent of experience with brain death determination.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:While the thrombotic complications of COVID-19 have been well described, there are limited data on clinically significant bleeding complications including hemorrhagic stroke. The clinical characteristics, underlying stroke mechanism, and outcomes in this particular subset of patients are especially salient as therapeutic anticoagulation becomes increasingly common in the treatment and prevention of thrombotic complications of COVID-19. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with hemorrhagic stroke (both non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage and spontaneous non-aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage) who were hospitalized between March 1, 2020, and May 15, 2020, within a major healthcare system in New York, during the coronavirus pandemic. Patients with hemorrhagic stroke on admission and who developed hemorrhage during hospitalization were both included. We compared the clinical characteristics of patients with hemorrhagic stroke and COVID-19 to those without COVID-19 admitted to our hospital system between March 1, 2020, and May 15, 2020 (contemporary controls), and March 1, 2019, and May 15, 2019 (historical controls). Demographic variables and clinical characteristics between the individual groups were compared using Fischer's exact test for categorical variables and nonparametric test for continuous variables. We adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method. RESULTS:During the study period in 2020, out of 4071 patients who were hospitalized with COVID-19, we identified 19 (0.5%) with hemorrhagic stroke. Of all COVID-19 with hemorrhagic stroke, only three had isolated non-aneurysmal SAH with no associated intraparenchymal hemorrhage. Among hemorrhagic stroke in patients with COVID-19, coagulopathy was the most common etiology (73.7%); empiric anticoagulation was started in 89.5% of these patients versus 4.2% in contemporary controls (p ≤ .001) and 10.0% in historical controls (p ≤ .001). Compared to contemporary and historical controls, patients with COVID-19 had higher initial NIHSS scores, INR, PTT, and fibrinogen levels. Patients with COVID-19 also had higher rates of in-hospital mortality (84.6% vs. 4.6%, p ≤ 0.001). Sensitivity analyses excluding patients with strictly subarachnoid hemorrhage yielded similar results. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We observed an overall low rate of imaging-confirmed hemorrhagic stroke among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. Most hemorrhages in patients with COVID-19 infection occurred in the setting of therapeutic anticoagulation and were associated with increased mortality. Further studies are needed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of therapeutic anticoagulation in patients with COVID-19.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and hematoma expansion are independently associated with worse outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), but the relationship between SIRS and hematoma expansion remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We performed a retrospective review of patients admitted to our hospital from 2013 to 2020 with primary spontaneous ICH with at least two head CTs within the first 24 hours. The relationship between SIRS and hematoma expansion, defined as ≥6 mL or ≥33% growth between the first and second scan, was assessed using univariable and multivariable regression analysis. We assessed the relationship of hematoma expansion and SIRS on discharge mRS using mediation analysis. RESULTS:Of 149 patients with ICH, 83 (56%; mean age 67±16; 41% female) met inclusion criteria. Of those, 44 (53%) had SIRS. Admission systolic blood pressure (SBP), temperature, antiplatelet use, platelet count, initial hematoma volume and rates of infection did not differ between groups (all p>0.05). Hematoma expansion occurred in 15/83 (18%) patients, 12 (80%) of whom also had SIRS. SIRS was significantly associated with hematoma expansion (OR 4.5, 95% CI 1.16 - 17.39, p= 0.02) on univariable analysis. The association remained statistically significant after adjusting for admission SBP and initial hematoma volume (OR 5.72, 95% CI 1.40 - 23.41, p= 0.02). There was a significant indirect effect of SIRS on discharge mRS through hematoma expansion. A significantly greater percentage of patients with SIRS had mRS 4-6 at discharge (59 vs 33%, p=0.02). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:SIRS is associated with hematoma expansion of ICH within the first 24 hours, and hematoma expansion mediates the effect of SIRS on poor outcome.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:There are multiple factors that may cause end-of-life conflict in the critical care setting. These include severe illness, family distress, lack of awareness about a patient's wishes, prognostic uncertainty, and the participation of multiple providers in goals-of-care discussions. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Case report and discussion of the associated ethical issues. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:We present a case of a patient with a pontine stroke, in which the family struggled with decision-making about goals-of-care, leading to fluctuation in code status from Full Code to Do Not Resuscitate-Comfort Care, then back to Full Code, and finally to Do Not Resuscitate-Do Not Intubate. We discuss factors that contributed to this situation and methods to avoid conflict. Additionally, we review the effects of discord at the end-of-life on patients, families, and the healthcare team. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:It is imperative that healthcare teams proactively collaborate with families to minimize end-of-life conflict by emphasizing decision-making that prioritizes the best interest and autonomy of the patient.