Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:moyl02

Total Results:

245


BI-RADS Category 3 Is a Safe and Effective Alternative to Biopsy or Surgical Excision [Comment]

Moy, Linda
PMID: 32428420
ISSN: 1527-1315
CID: 4481922

Sentinel lymph node positivity in patients undergoing mastectomies for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS)

Price, Alison; Schnabel, Freya; Chun, Jennifer; Kaplowitz, Elianna; Goodgal, Jenny; Guth, Amber; Axelrod, Deborah; Shapiro, Richard; Mema, Eralda; Moy, Linda; Darvishian, Farbod; Roses, Daniel
Current guidelines recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for patients undergoing mastectomy for a preoperative diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). We examined the factors associated with sentinel lymph node positivity for patients undergoing mastectomy for a diagnosis of DCIS on preoperative core biopsy (PCB). The Institutional Breast Cancer Database was queried for patients with PCB demonstrating pure DCIS followed by mastectomy and SLNB from 2010 to 2018. Patients were divided according to final pathology (DCIS or invasive cancer). Clinico-pathologic variables were analyzed using Pearson's chi-squared, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum and logistic regression. Of 3145 patients, 168(5%) had pure DCIS on PCB and underwent mastectomy with SLNB. On final mastectomy pathology, 120(71%) patients had DCIS with 0 positive sentinel lymph nodes (PSLNs) and 48(29%) patients had invasive carcinoma with 5(10%) cases of ≥1 PSLNs. Factors positively associated with upstaging to invasive cancer in univariate analysis included age (P = .0289), palpability (P < .0001), extent of disease on imaging (P = .0121), mass on preoperative imaging (P = .0003), multifocality (P = .0231) and multicentricity (P = .0395). In multivariate analysis, palpability (P = .0080), extent of disease on imaging (P = .0074) and mass on preoperative imaging (P = .0245) remained significant (Table 2). In a subset of patients undergoing mastectomy for DCIS with limited disease on preoperative evaluation, SLNB may be omitted as the risk of upstaging is low. However, patients who present with clinical findings of palpability, large extent of disease on imaging and mass on preoperative imaging have a meaningful risk of upstaging to invasive cancer, and SLNB remains important for management.
PMID: 31957944
ISSN: 1524-4741
CID: 4272692

Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Evaluation of Pathologic Complete Response in Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Breast Cancer After HER2-Targeted Therapy

Heacock, Laura; Lewin, Alana; Ayoola, Abimbola; Moccaldi, Melanie; Babb, James S; Kim, Sungheon G; Moy, Linda
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Pathologic complete response (pCR) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer after HER2-targeted therapy correlates increased disease-free survival and decreased mastectomy rates. The aim of this study was to explore tumor shrinkage patterns and initial tumor enhancement with pCR in HER2-positive breast cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:This was an institutional review board-approved retrospective analysis of 51 HER2 positive breast cancer patients with breast MRI both pre- and post-HER2-targeted therapy. Initial enhancement ratio (IER, initial enhancement percentage over baseline at first postcontrast imaging), pattern of tumor shrinkage, and Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI imaging features were assessed. Wilcoxon rank, Spearman correlation, Fisher's exact, and Mann-Whitney tests were used to correlate MRI imaging features with pCR. IER reader agreement was evaluated by intraclass correlation. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate multivariate associations with pCR. RESULTS:56.9% (29/51) of patients had pCR at surgery. Concentric tumor shrinkage pattern was associated with pCR (p = 0.001, Area under the curve (AUC) 0.778): accuracy 80.4%, specificity 96.6%, and sensitivity of 59.1%. There was no association with pCR and imaging response as defined by RECIST criteria (p = 0.169), pretreatment IER (Reader 1 (R1) p = 0.665, Reader 2 (R2) p = 0.766), or lesion size (p = 0.69). IER was associated with axillary metastases (R1 p = 0.016, R2 < 0.001) and ki-67 (R1 r = 0.52, p = 0.008, R2 r = -0.44, p = 0.028). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The shrinkage pattern of HER2-positive tumors after targeted therapy may be associated with pCR. There was no association between IER and pCR. Future studies evaluating the correlation of shrinkage patterns to texture radiomics are of interest.
PMID: 31444111
ISSN: 1878-4046
CID: 4047202

Axillary Nodal Evaluation in Breast Cancer: State of the Art

Chang, Jung Min; Leung, Jessica W T; Moy, Linda; Ha, Su Min; Moon, Woo Kyung
Axillary lymph node (LN) metastasis is the most important predictor of overall recurrence and survival in patients with breast cancer, and accurate assessment of axillary LN involvement is an essential component in staging breast cancer. Axillary management in patients with breast cancer has become much less invasive and individualized with the introduction of sentinel LN biopsy (SLNB). Emerging evidence indicates that axillary LN dissection may be avoided in selected patients with node-positive as well as node-negative cancer. Thus, assessment of nodal disease burden to guide multidisciplinary treatment decision making is now considered to be a critical role of axillary imaging and can be achieved with axillary US, MRI, and US-guided biopsy. For the node-positive patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, restaging of the axilla with US and MRI and targeted axillary dissection in addition to SLNB is highly recommended to minimize the false-negative rate of SLNB. Efforts continue to develop prediction models that incorporate imaging features to predict nodal disease burden and to select proper candidates for SLNB. As methods of axillary nodal evaluation evolve, breast radiologists and surgeons must work closely to maximize the potential role of imaging and to provide the most optimized treatment for patients.
PMID: 32315268
ISSN: 1527-1315
CID: 4402182

Re: Molecular Breast Imaging Under Threat by the Protecting Access to Medicare Act and ACR Appropriate Use Criteria [Letter]

Mainiero, Martha B; Moy, Linda; Lourenco, Ana P
PMID: 32057786
ISSN: 1558-349x
CID: 4394622

Deep Neural Networks Improve Radiologists' Performance in Breast Cancer Screening

Wu, Nan; Phang, Jason; Park, Jungkyu; Shen, Yiqiu; Huang, Zhe; Zorin, Masha; Jastrzebski, Stanislaw; Fevry, Thibault; Katsnelson, Joe; Kim, Eric; Wolfson, Stacey; Parikh, Ujas; Gaddam, Sushma; Lin, Leng Leng Young; Ho, Kara; Weinstein, Joshua D; Reig, Beatriu; Gao, Yiming; Pysarenko, Hildegard Toth Kristine; Lewin, Alana; Lee, Jiyon; Airola, Krystal; Mema, Eralda; Chung, Stephanie; Hwang, Esther; Samreen, Naziya; Kim, S Gene; Heacock, Laura; Moy, Linda; Cho, Kyunghyun; Geras, Krzysztof J
We present a deep convolutional neural network for breast cancer screening exam classification, trained and evaluated on over 200,000 exams (over 1,000,000 images). Our network achieves an AUC of 0.895 in predicting the presence of cancer in the breast, when tested on the screening population. We attribute the high accuracy to a few technical advances. (i) Our network's novel two-stage architecture and training procedure, which allows us to use a high-capacity patch-level network to learn from pixel-level labels alongside a network learning from macroscopic breast-level labels. (ii) A custom ResNet-based network used as a building block of our model, whose balance of depth and width is optimized for high-resolution medical images. (iii) Pretraining the network on screening BI-RADS classification, a related task with more noisy labels. (iv) Combining multiple input views in an optimal way among a number of possible choices. To validate our model, we conducted a reader study with 14 readers, each reading 720 screening mammogram exams, and show that our model is as accurate as experienced radiologists when presented with the same data. We also show that a hybrid model, averaging the probability of malignancy predicted by a radiologist with a prediction of our neural network, is more accurate than either of the two separately. To further understand our results, we conduct a thorough analysis of our network's performance on different subpopulations of the screening population, the model's design, training procedure, errors, and properties of its internal representations. Our best models are publicly available at https://github.com/nyukat/breastcancerclassifier.
PMID: 31603772
ISSN: 1558-254x
CID: 4130202

Consecutive Screening Rounds with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Enable Detection of Breast Cancers with Poor Prognosis [Comment]

Moy, Linda; Heller, Samantha L
PMID: 32159450
ISSN: 1527-1315
CID: 4349772

Unknown case #5 diagnosis: Rheumatoid arthritis-associated lymphocytic mastopathy

Airola, Krystal; Moy, Linda
SCOPUS:85083064857
ISSN: 2631-6110
CID: 4420862

Assessing Radiology Research on Artificial Intelligence: A Brief Guide for Authors, Reviewers, and Readers-From the Radiology Editorial Board [Editorial]

Bluemke, David A; Moy, Linda; Bredella, Miriam A; Ertl-Wagner, Birgit B; Fowler, Kathryn J; Goh, Vicky J; Halpern, Elkan F; Hess, Christopher P; Schiebler, Mark L; Weiss, Clifford R
PMID: 31891322
ISSN: 1527-1315
CID: 4481462

The relationship of breast density in mammography and magnetic resonance imaging in women with triple negative breast cancer

Mema, Eralda; Schnabel, Freya; Chun, Jennifer; Kaplowitz, Elianna; Price, Alison; Goodgal, Jenny; Moy, Linda
PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relationship between mammographic density, background parenchymal enhancement and fibroglandular tissue on MRI in women with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) compared to women with non-triple negative breast cancer (non-TNBC). METHODS:The institutional Breast Cancer Database was queried to identify the clinicopathologic and imaging characteristics among women who underwent mammography and breast MRI between 2010-2018. Statistical analyses included Pearson's Chi Square, Wilcoxon Rank-Sum and logistic regression. RESULTS:Of 2995 women, 225 (7.5 %) had TNBC with a median age of 60 years (23-96) and median follow-up of 5.69 years. Compared to women with non-TNBC, TNBC was associated with African-American race 36/225 (16 %), BRCA1,2 positivity 34/225 (15.1 %), previous history of breast cancer 35/225 (15.6 %), presenting on breast exam 126/225 (56 %) or MRI 13/225 (5.8 %), palpability 133/225 (59.1 %), more invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) 208/225 (92.4 %), higher stage (stage III) 37/225 (16.5 %), higher grade (grade 3) 186/225 (82.7 %) (all p < 0.001), lower mammographic breast density (MBD) 18/225 (8 %) (p = 0.04), lower fibroglandular tissue (FGT) 17/225 (7.6 %) (p = 0.01), and lower background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) 89/225 (39.8 %) (p = 0.02). Nine of 225 (4 %) women with TNBC experienced recurrence with no significant association with MBD, FGT, or BPE. There was no significant difference in median age of our TNBC and non-TNBC cohorts. CONCLUSIONS:The higher proportion of women with lower MBD, FGT and BPE in women with TNBC suggests that MBD, amount of FGT and degree of BPE may be associated with breast cancer risk in women with TNBC.
PMID: 31927471
ISSN: 1872-7727
CID: 4262842