Faculty Bibliography

When alcohol-related liver disease occurs, the number and composition ratio of intestinal microorganisms will accordingly change. The alcohol-induced changes in the intestinal microbiota play a pivotal role in the process of developing the alcohol-related liver disease through the translocation of microbial products due to increased intestinal permeability. In recent years, therapeutic interventions with a concentration on regulating intestinal microbiota have been conducted for patients with alcohol-related liver disease. We aimed to provide a critical review and updates on the prevention and treatment of alcohol-related liver disease through regulating intestinal microbiota. A literature search was performed on the PubMed database for studies published in English about the therapeutic intervention with microbiota using animal models and patients with alcohol-related liver disease (1/2010-4/2020). The accumulating pieces of evidence suggest that the therapeutic use of probiotics, prebiotics, antibiotics, phages, or fecal microbial transplantation may have several influences on alcohol-related liver disease patients. Emergent data unveiled that these interventions can further regulate the composition of intestinal microbiota, minimize the negative impact of microbiota on the liver, and prevent disease progression from mild to severe alcoholic hepatitis, fibrosis, cirrhosis, or even liver cancer. The current review provides updates on the advances of therapeutic interventions with the effects of regulating intestinal microbiota on patients who have alcohol-related liver disease. In addition, the data gaps and research directions on further exploration of the role of intestinal microbiota for the management of the alcohol-related liver disease are also discussed.

INTRODUCTION: Maternal TDF treatment during the third trimester has been shown to reduce perinatal transmission of the hepatitis B virus (HBV) in highly viremic women in several RCTs. However, the data is limited on the effectiveness of TDF in the real-world setting. With this real-world study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of TDF therapy for these mothers in a single center in the US.
METHOD(S): All Hepatitis B e-antigen positive mothers with HBV DNA .6log10 copies/mL who received TDF in the third trimester and delivered from July 2010 to September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All infants received hepatitis B immunoglobulin and vaccination at birth and subsequently. Primary endpoints were the safety of TDF use and mother-to-child transmission rates. Secondary outcomes were maternal HBV DNA level suppression at delivery.
RESULT(S): Among the 75 patients enrolled, the mean (6SD) age of the patients was 30.47+/-4.49 years, mean (6SD) gestational age was 37.87+/-2.95 weeks, and the mean (6SD) treatment duration before delivery was 9.60+/-3.36 weeks. A significantly lower level of the mean (6SD) serum HBV DNA was achieved at delivery vs. baseline (4.2+/-1.2 vs. 7.6+/-0.80 log10 copies/mL, respectively; P- < 0.01). Additionally, 80% (60/75) of mothers achieved HBV DNA < 6log10 copies/mL at delivery. The median (Interquartile range) alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level before treatment was 26 (20) IU/L, and at delivery was 27 (20) IU/L respectively. Vertical transmission rate among infants was 0%, and all infants were hepatitis B surface antigen negative between 28 -52 weeks after birth. Fatigue was the most common complaint reported by 52% (39/75) of mothers. No infants had a birth defect. On treatment, ALT flares were observed in 4.5% (6/75) of mothers.
CONCLUSION(S): In this US cohort of real-world practice, TDF therapy for highly viremic mothers was well tolerated and reduced vertical transmission effectively. No severe adverse effects were reported in both mothers and infants. Our study supports the use of TDF treatment for highly viremic mothers in a real-world setting. (Figure Presented)

Background: Fewer data exists on basal core promoter/ precore (BCP/PC) mutations in chronic hepatitis B patients at the immune-tolerance (IT) phase Methods: Consecutive treatment-naive hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) positive patients with biopsy and genotyping data were screened Patients who met the clinical criteria of IT phase or immuneclearance (IC) phase were enrolled for comparison. We assessed the frequency of BCP/PC in the two groups as well as the clinical features associated with mutations Subgroup analyses for the IT group were performed to compare patients with mutants against those with wild type In addition, subgroup analyses were also performed in IC patients with stages of fibrosis <=2 and fibrosis >2.
Result(s): Among 301 patients enrolled, 88/301 (29 24%) and 213/301 (70 76%) were at the IT and IC phase, respectively Compared with IC patients, the frequency of BCP/PC mutations in IT phase was significantly lower than that in IC phase (64.79 % vs 15.91%, P<0 001) The frequency of BCP mutation only was higher than PC mutation only in both IT and IC groups, as well as in two subgroups of IC patients (fibrosis <=2 and fibrosis >2). In IT phase, patients with BCP/PC mutations had lower HBV DNA and higher quantitative serum anti-HBc (qAnti-HBc) levels when compared to those in patients with wild-type HBV infection (both P<0 05) Among patients with BCP/PC mutations, those in IT phase had significantly lower mean ALT, AST, total bilirubin and qAnti-HBc levels when compared with patients in both IC subgroups (all P<0 05) IT patients with BCP/PC mutations had higher levels of mean platelet counts, HBV DNA, HBsAg levels and percentage of genotype B, in addition to a significantly younger mean age, than those in IC patients with fibrosis stages >2 (all P<0 05)
Conclusion(s): Our study observed that 16% of patients at the IT phase of chronic HBV presented with BCP/PC mutations. The mutants were BCP mutation dominant The IT patients with BCP/PC mutations had distinct clinical characteristics when compared to patients with IT wild type or IC phase (either fibrosis stages <=2, or fibrosis stages >2). These results warrant further studies of the long-term clinical outcomes, such as the risk of liver cancer and treatment response, in such patients (Table Presented)

Despite the high global prevalence of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection, datasets covering the whole hepatitis B viral genome from large patient cohorts are lacking, greatly limiting our understanding of the viral genetic factors involved in this deadly disease. We performed deep sequencing of viral samples from patients chronically infected with HBV to investigate the association between viral genome variation and patients' clinical characteristics. We discovered novel viral variants strongly associated with viral load and HBeAg status. Patients with viral variants C1817T and A1838G had viral loads nearly three orders of magnitude lower than patients without those variants. These patients consequently experienced earlier viral suppression while on treatment. Furthermore, we identified novel variants that either independently or in combination with precore mutation G1896A were associated with the transition from HBeAg positive to the negative phase of infection. These observations are consistent with the hypothesis that mutation of the HBeAg open reading frame is an important factor driving CHB patient's HBeAg status. This analysis provides a detailed picture of HBV genetic variation in the largest patient cohort to date and highlights the diversity of plausible molecular mechanisms through which viral variation affects clinical phenotype.

Although hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation has been reported in hepatitis C patients who received interferon therapy, rare cases of HBV reactivation occur in the context of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) agent therapy for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Recent studies observed that the reactivations were predominantly in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positive patients, but reactivation can rarely occur in patients who are HBsAg negative and hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb) positive. The severity of an HBV flare varies. In some cases, severe liver injury or fulminant hepatic failure may occur. HBV reactivation may occur regardless of HCV genotype and type of DAA regimens. The onset of HBV reactivation can range from 4 to 48 weeks after initiating DAA therapy. These patients may have undetectable levels of HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) prior to DAA treatment. Pre-emptive antiviral therapy for HBV should be considered in HBsAg-positive patients with high levels of viremia who are not receiving HBV treatment. If HBV DNA viral load is less than the guideline criteria for HBV treatment, one should consider pre-emptive HBV antiviral versus HBV DNA monitoring during DAA therapy. For patients who are HBsAg negative but HBcAb positive, close monitoring of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels during/post-treatment is highly recommended. The current review summarizes the recommendations of different society guidelines and discusses the appropriate management strategies in various patient profiles.

Background: Limited data exist evaluating the treatment outcomes with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) in patients with drug use in the community setting. We aim to assess the treatment response of DAAs in this subset of patients with or without the opioid agonist therapy (OAT). Methods: All the hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients treated with DAAs were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were stratified into two groups by the presence or absence of abusing alcohol, cocaine and heroin. All the patients who were assigned to the abuser group had positive urine toxicology with one of the drugs during the DAA treatment. The primary assessment was the sustained virologic response (SVR12) at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12). Results: Among the 314 patients, 152, 128 and 58 were patients with drug use, non-drug use and receiving OAT. Among the patients with injectable or non-injectable drug use treatment, completion rate was 99% (151/152) and SVR12 was 93.4%. Among the patients with no drug use treatment, completion rate was 95% (122/128) and SVR12 was 88.3%. Among patients receiving OAT alone, SVR12 was 100%, and in patients with OAT + other drug use, SVR12 was 96.5%. None of the patients included in this study discontinued the treatment due to adverse events associated with treatment medications. Conclusions: In this community-based study, DAAs are safe, effective with high overall SVR12 in patients with active drug use (injectable and non-injectable) and OAT enrolled patients. These results support the removal of drug use as a barrier to DAA therapy.

Background and aims: TAF provides similar efficacy to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) but with an improved safety profile particularly for renal injury. Here, we assess clinical experience with TAF for patients with HBV in US Clinical Practice.
Method(s): The TRIO HBV Registry, consisting of 1078 enrolled patients from 6 academic and 4 community-based centers serving 17 US States, was created to understand real-world HBV treatment. Data presented here are limited to 250 registry patients who initiated TAF between Nov 2016 and Apr 2018, received >= 6 months of TAF therapy, and were followed up to 18 months. Baseline measures were closest to but between -30 to +60 days from regimen start. Measures in other time periods were those with the maximum date while on TAF. Comparisons to baseline were made using paired 2-tailed T-Tests. eGFR was calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
Result(s): Characteristics of the study population: median age 52 years, BMI 24.3 kg/m2, male (147/250, 59%), Asian ethnicity (220/250, 88%), HBeAg positive (54/250, 22%), osteopenia/osteoporosis (47/250, 19%), and FIB-4 >3.25 (17/250, 7%). Mean and median TAF duration was 13 months as of data collection. 233/250 (93%) of patients receiving TAF switched from TDF (214/233, 92%), entecavir (16/233, 7%), or other therapies (3/233, 1%). At TAF initiation, 17/250 (7%) patients had baseline HBV DNA >= 2000 IU/ml. Of the 17, 16 patients had controlled HBV (< 2000 IU/ml) after 6 or 12 months of TAF therapy. One patient had a 50% viral reduction to 30, 000 IU/ml after 6 months of therapy but did not achieve suppression. 233/250 (93%) patients had baseline HBV DNA<2000 IU/ml; of these, 226 were assessed after 6 or 12 months of therapy and all had maintained HBV suppression (< 2000 IU/ml). 224/250 (90%) patients had baseline eGFR >= 60 ml/min and 26/250 (10%) < 60 ml/min with minimum 28 ml/min. In paired comparisons, mean eGFR increased 5% from baseline 85.7 to 90.1 ml/min (p < 0.001) after 6 months of TAF therapy (n = 213). Of 158 patients with eGFR measures after 12 months of TAF, the mean eGFR increase was 4% from baseline 86.9 to 90.5 ml/min (p = 0.001). For patients with baseline eGFR < 60 ml/min, mean eGFR increased 16% from 48.4 to 56.0 ml/min after 6 months (n = 24, p < 0.001). In the eGFR < 60 ml/min subset with 12+ months of TAF, the change in eGFR was 14% from baseline 54.0 to 61.4 ml/min though this change did not reach significance (n = 11, p = 0.066).
Conclusion(s): In US, clinical practice experience with TAF indicates effective HBV suppression after switching and improved renal function in real-world application. Continued long-term monitoring is critical to assess potential effects of prolonged treatment with lower dose tenofovir. (HBsAg). Currently approved drugs, nucleos (t)ide analogues, effectively reduce HBV DNA but only rarely result in a functional cure (defined as sustained HBsAg loss). Therefore, a critical need arises for novel therapies that reduce HBsAg levels and restore virus-specific immune responsiveness in patients. We have found that two subregions in 3' untranslated region of 2.1/2.4 kb HBV RNAs, here referred as "region X" and "region Y," regulate HBsAg production (unpublished data). Here, focusing on region X and Y, we aimed to screen host proteins to identify novel therapeutic targets reducing HBsAg.
Method(s): Host proteins binding to region X and Y were determined by following two methods. (1) The lysate of HepG2.2.15 hepatoblastoma cells was incubated with in vitro-transcribed RNA corresponding to above two regions, and binding proteins were pulled-down. The proteins pulled-down were identified by SDS-PAGE and LC-MS/MS. (2) Host proteins binding to region X and Y were presented by searching an RNA-binding protein database. siRNAs specific to the proteins determined by above two methods were transfected into HepG2.2.15 cells, and the effects on the HBsAg production were analyzed.
Result(s): Among those proteins either identified by pull-down assays or presented by database search, knockdown of 7 proteins showed potent anti-HBsAg effects, more than 90% reduction in HBsAg, without affecting cell viability. Interestingly, these were all nuclear-localizing proteins. Some of them were reported to regulate RNA splicing, stability or nuclear export of mRNA while the others were functionally unknown. Then, expression levels of 2.1/2.4 kb HBV RNAs were quantified, and silencing of these proteins showed less than 80% reduction in those RNAs, that was slightly milder reduction compared with that in HBsAg protein. These data suggested that the proteins identified here could regulate HBsAg production by affecting RNA processing or dynamics.
Conclusion(s): Host proteins binding to region X and Y in 2.1/2.4 kb HBV RNAs were shown to be attractive therapeutic targets to reduce HBsAg, suggesting novel insights for better understanding of HBV virology.
Copyright