Faculty Bibliography
Searched for:
in-biosketch:true
person:peterm15
Total Results:
145
Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease
BACKGROUND:Patients with obstructive left main coronary artery disease are usually treated with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG). Randomized trials have suggested that drug-eluting stents may be an acceptable alternative to CABG in selected patients with left main coronary disease. METHODS:We randomly assigned 1905 eligible patients with left main coronary artery disease of low or intermediate anatomical complexity to undergo either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with fluoropolymer-based cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (PCI group, 948 patients) or CABG (CABG group, 957 patients). Anatomic complexity was assessed at the sites and defined by a Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) score of 32 or lower (the SYNTAX score reflects a comprehensive angiographic assessment of the coronary vasculature, with 0 as the lowest score and higher scores [no upper limit] indicating more complex coronary anatomy). The primary end point was the rate of a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 3 years, and the trial was powered for noninferiority testing of the primary end point (noninferiority margin, 4.2 percentage points). Major secondary end points included the rate of a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 30 days and the rate of a composite of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 3 years. Event rates were based on Kaplan-Meier estimates in time-to-first-event analyses. RESULTS:At 3 years, a primary end-point event had occurred in 15.4% of the patients in the PCI group and in 14.7% of the patients in the CABG group (difference, 0.7 percentage points; upper 97.5% confidence limit, 4.0 percentage points; P=0.02 for noninferiority; hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.26; P=0.98 for superiority). The secondary end-point event of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 30 days occurred in 4.9% of the patients in the PCI group and in 7.9% in the CABG group (P<0.001 for noninferiority, P=0.008 for superiority). The secondary end-point event of death, stroke, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization at 3 years occurred in 23.1% of the patients in the PCI group and in 19.1% in the CABG group (P=0.01 for noninferiority, P=0.10 for superiority). CONCLUSIONS:In patients with left main coronary artery disease and low or intermediate SYNTAX scores by site assessment, PCI with everolimus-eluting stents was noninferior to CABG with respect to the rate of the composite end point of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction at 3 years. (Funded by Abbott Vascular; EXCEL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01205776 .).
PMID: 27797291
ISSN: 1533-4406
CID: 5451162
Shock complicating type A acute aortic dissection: Clinical correlates, management, and outcomes
AIMS:Shock is among the most dreaded and common complications of type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD). However, clinical correlates, management, and short- and long-term outcomes of TAAAD patients presenting with shock in real-world clinical practice are not known. METHODS AND RESULTS:We evaluated 2,704 patients with TAAAD enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection between January 1, 1996, and August 18, 2012. On admission, 407 (15.1%) TAAAD patients presented with shock. Most in-hospital complications (coma, myocardial or mesenteric ischemia or infarction, and cardiac tamponade) were more frequent in shock patients. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in TAAAD patients with than without shock (30.2% vs 23.9%, P=.007), regardless of surgical or medical treatment. Most shock patients underwent surgical repair, with medically managed patients demonstrating older age and more complications at presentation. Estimates using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis indicated that most (89%) TAAAD patients with shock discharged alive from the hospital survived 5years, a rate similar to that of TAAAD patients without shock (82%, P=.609). CONCLUSIONS:Shock occurred in 1 of 7 TAAAD patients and was associated with higher rates of in-hospital adverse events and mortality. However, TAAAD survivors with or without shock showed similar long-term mortality. Successful early and aggressive management of shock in TAAAD patients has the potential for improving long-term survival in this patient population.
PMID: 27264225
ISSN: 1097-6744
CID: 5450062
Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgeons/Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery Joint Position Statement on Open and Endovascular Surgery for Thoracic Aortic Disease
In 2014, the Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) published a position statement on the management of thoracic aortic disease addressing size thresholds for surgery, imaging modalities, medical therapy, and genetics. It did not address issues related to surgical intervention. This joint Position Statement on behalf of the CCS, Canadian Society of Cardiac Surgeons, and the Canadian Society for Vascular Surgery provides recommendations about thoracic aortic disease interventions, including: aortic valve repair, perfusion strategies for arch repair, extended arch hybrid reconstruction for acute type A dissection, endovascular management of arch and descending aortic aneurysms, and type B dissection. The position statement is constructed using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology, and has been approved by the primary panel, an international secondary panel, and the CCS Guidelines Committee. Advent of endovascular technology has improved aortic surgery safety and extended the indications of minimally invasive thoracic aortic surgery. The combination of safer open surgery with endovascular treatment has improved patient outcomes in this rapidly evolving subspecialty field of cardiovascular surgery.
PMID: 27233892
ISSN: 1916-7075
CID: 5450822
Two-Year Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Moderate Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation
BACKGROUND:In a trial comparing coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone with CABG plus mitral-valve repair in patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation, we found no significant difference in the left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVI) or survival after 1 year. Concomitant mitral-valve repair was associated with a reduced prevalence of moderate or severe mitral regurgitation, but patients had more adverse events. We now report 2-year outcomes. METHODS:We randomly assigned 301 patients to undergo either CABG alone or the combined procedure. Patients were followed for 2 years for clinical and echocardiographic outcomes. RESULTS:At 2 years, the mean (±SD) LVESVI was 41.2±20.0 ml per square meter of body-surface area in the CABG-alone group and 43.2±20.6 ml per square meter in the combined-procedure group (mean improvement over baseline, -14.1 ml per square meter and -14.6 ml per square meter, respectively). The rate of death was 10.6% in the CABG-alone group and 10.0% in the combined-procedure group (hazard ratio in the combined-procedure group, 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 1.83; P=0.78). There was no significant between-group difference in the rank-based assessment of the LVESVI (including death) at 2 years (z score, 0.38; P=0.71). The 2-year rate of moderate or severe residual mitral regurgitation was higher in the CABG-alone group than in the combined-procedure group (32.3% vs. 11.2%, P<0.001). Overall rates of hospital readmission and serious adverse events were similar in the two groups, but neurologic events and supraventricular arrhythmias remained more frequent in the combined-procedure group. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with moderate ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing CABG, the addition of mitral-valve repair did not lead to significant differences in left ventricular reverse remodeling at 2 years. Mitral-valve repair provided a more durable correction of mitral regurgitation but did not significantly improve survival or reduce overall adverse events or readmissions and was associated with an early hazard of increased neurologic events and supraventricular arrhythmias. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and Canadian Institutes of Health Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00806988.).
PMID: 27040451
ISSN: 1533-4406
CID: 5451202
Management of severe asymmetric pectus excavatum complicating aortic repair in a patient with Marfan's syndrome [Case Report]
We describe the case of a 28-year old man with Marfan's syndrome and severe pectus excavatum who required an aortic root replacement for an ascending aortic aneurysm. There was a near-vertical angulation of the sternum that presented challenges with opening and exposure of the heart during aortic surgery. Furthermore, removal of the sternal retractor after aortic repair resulted in sudden loss of cardiac output. A Ravitch procedure was then performed to successfully close the chest without further cardiovascular compromise. We propose that patients with a severe pectus excavatum and mediastinal displacement seen on preoperative CT scanning should be considered for simultaneous, elective repair.
PMID: 26874148
ISSN: 1569-9285
CID: 5450032
Advances in aortic disease management: a year in review
PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:The medical and surgical management of aortic disease is continually changing in search for improved outcomes. Our objective is to highlight recent advances in a few select areas pertaining to aortic disease and aortic surgery: the genetics of aortopathy, medical therapy of aortic aneurysms, advances in cardiac imaging, and operative strategies for the aortic arch. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:As our understanding of the genetic basis for aortopathy continues to improve, routine genetic testing may be of value in assessing patients with genetically triggered forms of aortic disease. With regard to medical advances, treating patients with Marfan syndrome with either losartan or atenolol at an earlier stage in their disease course improves outcomes. In addition, novel imaging indices such as wall shear stress and aortic stiffness assessed by MRI may become useful markers of aortopathy and warrant further study. With regard to the optimal technique for cerebral perfusion in aortic arch surgery, high-quality data are still lacking. Finally, in patients with complex, multilevel aortic disease, the frozen elephant trunk is a viable single-stage option compared with the conventional elephant trunk, although with an increased risk for spinal cord injury. SUMMARY/CONCLUSIONS:Based on recent advances, continued studies in genetics, cardiac imaging, and surgical trials will further elucidate the etiology of aortopathy and ultimately guide management, both medically and surgically.
PMID: 26766164
ISSN: 1531-7080
CID: 5450012
State-of-the-Art Surgical Management of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection
Acute type A aortic dissections still present a major challenge to cardiac surgeons. Although surgical management remains the gold standard, operative mortality remains high, including in experienced centres. Nevertheless, recent advances in the understanding and management of various aspects of these complex operations are expected to improve overall patient outcomes. The Canadian Thoracic Aortic Collaborative (CTAC) represents a group of surgeons with interest and expertise in the management of patients with aortic diseases. The purpose of this state-of-the-art review is to detail our approach to the contemporary surgical management of acute type A aortic dissections. We focus specifically on cannulation strategies, cerebral protection, and extent of proximal and distal resection. In addition, specific clinical scenarios-including malperfusion, intramural hematomas, and surgery in octogenarians-are explored.
PMID: 26604123
ISSN: 1916-7075
CID: 5450002
Innominate and Axillary Cannulation in Aortic Arch Surgery Provide Similar Neuroprotection
BACKGROUND:Contemporaneous trends in cerebral protection during aortic arch surgery include moderate hypothermia (22°C-28°C) and continuous antegrade cerebral perfusion (ACP). Innominate artery cannulation is a simplified, alternative route for ACP; however, clinical outcomes have yet to be evaluated against the gold standard of axillary cannulation. METHODS:Between 2008 and 2015, 140 consecutive patients underwent hemiarch reconstruction with moderate hypothermia and continuous ACP at 2 institutions. Axillary cannulation was used in 74 patients (31.1% female, 64.8 ± 12.7 years) and the remaining 66 patients (24.2% female, 60.8 ± 10.5 years) had direct cannulation of the innominate artery for delivery of ACP. RESULTS:Although there were no statistically significant differences in complications, neurological events were almost twice as frequent in innominate (19.7%) than in axillary (10.8%; P = 0.142) whereas prolonged mechanical ventilation was much more common with axillary (17.6%) vs innominate (7.6%; P = 0.078). There were no mortalities in the axillary group and 1 in the innominate group (0% vs 1.5%; P > 0.471) and no statistically significant differences in any other postoperative complications or hospital length of stay. There was a reduction in total operating room time in the innominate group (axillary 454 ± 115 minutes, innominate 318 ± 125 minutes; P < 0.001), and in the matched subgroup analysis of patients who underwent Bentall and hemiarch reconstruction (axillary 456 ± 109 minutes, innominate 370 ± 106 minutes; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS:Axillary and innominate artery cannulation for ACP during proximal aortic arch reconstructive surgery resulted in similarly excellent neurological outcomes. Innominate artery cannulation might reduce total surgical time. Possible clinically relevant differences in neurological and respiratory complications require assessment in randomized controlled trials.
PMID: 26549866
ISSN: 1916-7075
CID: 5451112
Journal of thoracic & cardiovascular surgery. 2015:150(4):824-31.e1.DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.07.026
Knowledge, attitudes, and practice preferences of Canadian cardiac surgeons toward the management of acute type A aortic dissection
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:The complexity of surgical treatment for acute type A dissection contributes to the variability in patient management. This study was designed to elucidate the contemporary practice preferences of cardiac surgeons regarding different phases of management of acute type A aortic dissection. METHODS:A 34-item questionnaire was distributed to all Canadian adult cardiac surgeons addressing the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative management of acute type A dissection. A total of 100 responses were obtained (82% of active surgeons in Canada). Outcomes were compared between high- and low-volume aortic surgeons. RESULTS:Seventy-six percent of respondents favored axillary artery cannulation. High-volume surgeons (>150 cases) were more likely to indicate a target lowest nasopharyngeal temperature more than 20 °C (53% vs 25%, P = .02). The majority of surgeons (65%) recommended using selective antegrade cerebral perfusion, with a significantly greater proportion for higher-volume aortic surgeons (P = .03). In addition, high-volume aortic surgeons were more likely to recommend aortic root replacement at smaller diameters (73% vs 55%, P = .02), to recommend more extensive distal aortic resection with routine open hemiarch anastomosis (85% vs 65%, P = .04), and to more commonly perform total arch reconstruction when needed (93% vs 77%, P = .04). In the follow-up period, frequency of serial imaging of the residual aorta was significantly higher for high-volume aortic surgeons (P = .04). CONCLUSIONS:This study identified some commonalities in practice preferences among Canadian cardiac surgeons for the management of acute type A aortic dissection. However, it also highlighted significant differences in temperature management, cerebral protection strategies, and extent of resection between high-volume and low-volume aortic surgeons.
PMID: 26277466
ISSN: 1097-685x
CID: 5449992
Balloon-Expandable and Self-Expanding Transcatheter Heart Valves: Friend or Foe? [Case Report]
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with balloon-expandable (BE) or self-expanding (SE) transcatheter heart valves (THVs) is indicated for the treatment of high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Limited data are available comparing the two THV designs, and evidence suggests that each may offer unique advantages. Herein are described two patients who underwent TAVR with BE-THV and SE-THV, and who each developed a device-related complication that was successfully treated by using the alternate THV design.
PMID: 26897845
ISSN: 0966-8519
CID: 5450042
