Faculty Bibliography

Saccades rapidly direct the line of sight to targets of interest to make use of the high acuity foveal region of the retina. These fast eye movements are instrumental for scanning visual scenes, foveating targets, and, ultimately, serve to guide manual motor control, including eye-hand coordination. Cerebral injury has long been known to impair ocular motor control. Recently, it has been suggested that alterations in control may be useful as a marker for recovery. We measured eye movement control in a saccade task in subjects with chronic middle cerebral artery stroke with both cortical and substantial basal ganglia involvement and in healthy controls. Saccade latency distributions were bimodal, with an early peak at 60 ms (anticipatory saccades) and a later peak at 250 ms (regular saccades). Although the latencies corresponding to these peaks were the same in the two groups, there were clear differences in the size of the peaks. Classifying saccade latencies relative to the saccade "go signal" into anticipatory (latencies up to 80 ms), "early" (latencies between 80 and 160 ms), and "regular" types (latencies longer than 160 ms), stroke subjects displayed a disproportionate number of anticipatory saccades, whereas control subjects produced the majority of their saccades in the regular range. We suggest that this increase in the number of anticipatory saccade events may result from a disinhibition phenomenon that manifests as an impairment in the endogenous control of ocular motor events (saccades) and interleaved fixations. These preliminary findings may help shed light on the ocular motor deficits of neurodegenerative conditions, results that may be subclinical to an examiner, but clinically significant secondary to their functional implications.

OBJECTIVE: This study introduces a rapid picture naming test, the Mobile Universal Lexicon Evaluation System (MULES), as a novel, vision-based performance measure for concussion screening. The MULES is a visual-verbal task that includes 54 original photographs of fruits, objects and animals. We piloted MULES in a cohort of volunteers to determine feasibility, ranges of picture naming responses, and the relation of MULES time scores to those of King-Devick (K-D), a rapid number naming test. METHODS: A convenience sample (n=20, age 34+/-10) underwent MULES and K-D (spiral bound, iPad versions). Administration order was randomized; MULES tests were audio-recorded to provide objective data on temporal variability and ranges of picture naming responses. RESULTS: Scores for the best of two trials for all tests were 40-50s; average times required to name each MULES picture (0.72+/-0.14s) was greater than those needed for each K-D number ((spiral: 0.33+/-0.05s, iPad: 0.36+/-0.06s, 120 numbers), p<0.0001, paired t-test). MULES scores showed the greatest degree of improvement between trials (9.4+/-4.8s, p<0.0001 for trials 1 vs. 2), compared to K-D (spiral 1.5+/-3.3s, iPad 1.8+/-3.4s). Shorter MULES times demonstrated moderate and significant correlations with shorter iPad but not spiral K-D times (r=0.49, p=0.03). CONCLUSION: The MULES test is a rapid picture naming task that may engage more extensive neural systems than more commonly used rapid number naming tasks. Rapid picture naming may require additional processing devoted to color perception, object identification, and categorization. Both tests rely on initiation and sequencing of saccadic eye movements.

This paper proposes a parametric model for saccadic waveforms. The model has a small number of parameters, yet it effectively simulates a variety of physiologic saccade properties. In particular, the model reproduces the established relationship between peak saccadic angular velocity and saccadic amplitude (i.e., the saccadic main sequence). The proposed saccadic waveform model can be used in the evaluation and validation of methods for quantitative saccade analysis. For example, we use the proposed saccade model to evaluate four well-known saccade detection algorithms. The comparison indicates the most reliable algorithm is one by Nystrom et al. We further use the proposed saccade model to evaluate the standard technique used for the estimation of peak saccadic angular velocity. The evaluation shows the occurrence of systematic errors. We thus suggest that saccadic angular velocity values determined by the standard technique (low-pass differentiation) should be interpreted and used with caution.