Faculty Bibliography

Stereotactic radiation treatment can be used to treat spinal cord neoplasms in patients with either unresectable lesions or residual disease after surgical resection. While treatment guidelines have been suggested for epidural lesions, the utility of stereotactic radiation for intradural and intramedullary malignancies is still debated. Prior reports have suggested that stereotactic radiation approaches can be used for effective tumor control and symptom management. Treatment-related toxicity has been documented in rare subsets of patients, though the incidences of injury are not directly correlated with higher radiation doses. Further studies are needed to assess the factors that influence the risk of radiation-induced myelopathy when treating spinal cord neoplasms with stereotactic radiation, which can include, but may not be limited to, maximum dose, dose-fractionation, irradiated volume, tumor location, histology and treatment history. This review will discuss evidence for current treatment approaches.

Personalized cancer treatments using combinations of drugs with a synergistic effect is attractive but proves to be highly challenging. Here we present an approach to uncover the efficacy of drug combinations based on the analysis of mono-drug effects. For this we used dose-response data from pharmacogenomic encyclopedias and represent these as a drug atlas. The drug atlas represents the relations between drug effects and allows to identify independent processes for which the tumor might be particularly vulnerable when attacked by two drugs. Our approach enables the prediction of combination-therapy which can be linked to tumor-driving mutations. By using this strategy, we can uncover potential effective drug combinations on a pan-cancer scale. Predicted synergies are provided and have been validated in glioblastoma, breast cancer, melanoma and leukemia mouse-models, resulting in therapeutic synergy in 75% of the tested models. This indicates that we can accurately predict effective drug combinations with translational value.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/OBJECTIVE:Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor, and the available treatment options are limited. This article reviews the recent preclinical and clinical investigations that seek to expand the repertoire of effective medical and radiotherapy options for GBM. RECENT FINDINGS/RESULTS:Recent phase III trials evaluating checkpoint inhibition did not result in significant survival benefit. Select vaccine strategies have yielded promising results in early phase clinical studies and warrant further validation. Various targeted therapies are being explored but have yet to see breakthrough results. In addition, novel radiotherapy approaches are in development to maximize safe dose delivery. A multitude of preclinical and clinical studies in GBM explore promising immunotherapies, targeted agents, and novel radiation modalities. Recent phase III trial failures have once more highlighted the profound tumor heterogeneity and diverse resistance mechanisms of glioblastoma. This calls for the development of biomarker-driven and personalized treatment approaches.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Glioblastoma is the most frequent and lethal primary brain tumor. Development of novel therapies relies on the availability of relevant preclinical models. We have established a panel of 96 glioblastoma patient derived xenografts (PDX) and undertaken its genomic and phenotypic characterization. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/METHODS:PDX were established from glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype (n=93), glioblastoma, IDH-mutant (n=2), diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant (n=1), and both primary (n=60) and recurrent (n=34) tumors. Tumor growth rates, histopathology, and treatment response were characterized. Integrated molecular profiling was performed by whole exome sequencing (WES, n=83), RNA-sequencing (n=68), and genome-wide methylation profiling (n=76). WES data from 24 patient tumors was compared with derivative models. RESULTS:amplification. However, in four patient-PDX pairs, driver alterations were gained or lost on engraftment, consistent with clonal selection. CONCLUSIONS:Our PDX panel captures the molecular heterogeneity of glioblastoma and recapitulates many salient genetic and phenotypic features. All models and genomic data are openly available to investigators.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Exploration of novel strategies to extend the benefit of PARP inhibitors beyond BRCA-mutant cancers is of great interest in personalized medicine. Here we identified EGFR-amplification as a potential biomarker to predict sensitivity to PARP inhibition, providing selection for GBM patient population who will benefit from PARP inhibition therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN/METHODS:Selective sensitivity to PARP inhibitor talazoparib was screened and validated in two sets [test set (n=14) and validation set (n=13)] of well-characterized patient-derived glioma-sphere-forming cells (GSC). FISH was used to detect EGFR copy number. DNA damage response following talazoparib treatment was evaluated by γH2AX and 53BP1 staining and neutral comet assay. PARP-DNA trapping was analyzed by subcellular fractionation. The selective monotherapy of talazoparib was confirmed using in-vivo glioma models. RESULTS:EGFR-amplified GSCs showed remarkable sensitivity to talazoparib treatment. EGFR- amplification was associated with increased ROS and subsequent increased basal expression of DNA repair pathways to counter elevated oxidative stress, and thus rendered vulnerability to PARP inhibition. Following talazoparib treatment, EGFR-amplified GSCs showed enhanced DNA damage and increased PARP-DNA trapping which augmented the cytotoxicity. EGFR-amplification associated selective sensitivity was further supported by the in vivo experimental results showing that talazoparib significantly suppressed tumor growth in EGFR-amplified subcutaneous models but not in non-amplified models. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:EGFR-amplified cells are highly sensitive to talazoparib. Our data provide insight into the potential of using EGFR amplification as a selection biomarker for the development of personalized therapy.

The median survival for patients with glioblastoma (GBM) is 12-15 months highlighting the need for better therapeutic strategies for this deadly disease. Genomic and epigenomic sequencing analysis at the single cell level have identified multiple genomic aberrations as potential targets for therapeutic intervention in GBM. EGFR and PDGFR amplification are evident in nearly 40% and 12% of human GBM, respectively. Although the first and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase small molecule inhibitors failed to show long term therapeutic benefit in GBM patients, multiple factors such as incorrect patient selection, acquired resistance, and drug-target heterogeneity may all lead to clinical failure of targeted therapies. Although the multilevel genomic characterization of gliomas are increasing, the clinical translation of these findings is beginning to unravel. In this study, we attempted to correlate the genomic variations using an unbiased high throughput drug screen using primary glioma stem-like cell (GSCs) as our model system. An unbiased high-throughput screen utilizing our GSC models identified that glioblastoma cells harboring focal EGFR amplification are sensitive to mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors. MEK inhibition induced apoptosis in EGFR amplified cells at low concentration. RNA sequence analysis of cells treated with MEK inhibitors revealed upregulation of genes related to neuronal differentiation and down regulation of MEK target genes in MEK sensitive glioma stem cells. Additionally, RNA sequencing of GSCs with acquired MEK inhibitor resistance demonstrated an upregulation of oncogenic transcription factor ETS Variant Gene 1 (ETV1) as a mediator of resistance. Overall our data suggest that the MEK inhibition in combination with ETV inhibitors could be a potential therapeutic target for a subset of GBM patients

BACKGROUND: Approximately 50% of nGBMs harbor EGFR-amp. Depatuxizumab mafodotin (depatux-m) is an antibody drug conjugate: a monoclonal antibody that binds activated EGFR (wild-type and EGFRvIII mutant) linked to a microtubule-inhibitor toxin. Pre-clinical and earlier clinical trials suggested efficacy.
METHOD(S): RTOGF 3508/AbbVie M13-813 (INTELLANCE-1, NCT02573324) was a phase 3 academic-industry collaboration (RTOG-Foundation, AbbVie). Eligible adults (KPS >= 70, EGFR-amp nGBM, centrally confirmed histology and biomarkers) were randomized 1:1 to radiotherapy (RT) and temozolomide and either depatux-m (2.0 mg/kg during RT, 1.25 mg/kg thereafter, q 14 days) or placebo, stratified by region of world, RPA class, MGMT methylation, and EGFRvIII mutation. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with 640 patients planned for randomization; 441 events yielded 85% power to detect 25% reduction in hazard of death (HR 0.75), one-sided 2.5% level of significance by stratified weighted log-rank.
RESULT(S): 2229 patients were screened and 639 (median age 60, range 22-84; 394 men, 62%) randomized. Pre-specified interim analysis after 346 events (>= 75% required) found no OS improvement for depatux-m over placebo (median 18.9 vs. 18.7 months, HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.82-1.25, one-sided p= 0.63). Progression-free survival (PFS) trended toward depatux-m (median 8.0 vs. 6.3 months; HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.70-1.02), particularly among the ~50% with EGFRvIII mutation (median 8.3 vs. 5.9 months, HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.93) but without an OS improvement (median 19.8 vs. 18.2, HR=0.95, 95% CI 0.71-1.27). Ocular side effects (grade >= 1) occurred in 95% of depatux-m treated patients, 61% grade 3-4, causing 12% to discontinue, and were the most common treatment related adverse events.
CONCLUSION(S): Interim analysis demonstrated no OS benefit for treating EGFR-amp nGBM with depatux-m. PFS trended toward favoring depatux-m, particularly in the EGFRvIII harboring subgroup. No new important safety risks were identified. The trial was stopped for futility. Active patients are permitted to continue treatment

PURPOSE: To compare tumor progression based on clinical radiological assessment and on Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria between GBM patients treated with proton radiotherapy (PT) vs. photon intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).
METHOD(S): Eligible patients were enrolled on the described prospective phase II trial and had MR imaging at baseline and follow-up beyond 12 weeks from treatment completion. 'Clinical' progression was based on a radiology report of progression in combination with changes in treatment due to suspected disease progression. A single blinded observer applied RANO criteria to determine the RANO-based tumor progression.
RESULT(S): Of 90 enrolled patients, 66 were evaluable, with median follow-up of 19.8 (Range: 3.2-65.1) months; median of 22.6 months for PT (n=25) vs. 18.9 months for IMRT (n=41). Median time to progression (TTP) was 7.9 months based on clinical progression criteria (8.1 months IMRT, 6.3 months PT) and 7.2 months (7.3 months IMRT, 5.7 months PT) by RANO criteria (p=ns for all). Median 'clinical' progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.7 (Range: 6.4-11.1) months; 8.9 months IMRT vs. 8.7 months PT (p=0.065). Median RANO PFS was 8.3 (range, 5.8-11.6) months: 8.3 months IMRT vs. 6.9 months PT (p=0.226). There were 14 discrepant cases: 3 had progression based on 'clinical' but not RANO criteria, and 11 had progression based on RANO but not 'clinical' criteria.
CONCLUSION(S): Based on this secondary analysis of a randomized trial of PT vs. IMRT for GBM, there was no difference in tumor progression relative to treatment technique used. There was no statistical difference in PFS noted between clinical and RANO-based assessments, but RANO criteria identified progression more often than clinical assessment, and TTP was shortened with the use of RANO criteria alone. Further development of tumor assessment tools that improve consistency and accuracy of determining tumor progression are needed to guide therapeutic trials in GBM

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: Dose constraints for re-irradiation of recurrent primary brain tumors are not well-established, especially for treatment volumes too large for stereotactic radiotherapy. This prospective trial was performed to test dose constraints for conventionally-fractionated re-irradiation of recurrent primary brain tumors MATERIALS/METHODS: A singleinstitution, prospective trial of 21 adults with recurrent brain tumors was performed. Electronic dosimetry records from the first course of radiation (RT1) were obtained and deformed onto the simulation CT for the second course of radiation (RT2). Treatment plans for RT2 were developed that met protocol-assigned dose constraints for RT2 alone and the composite dose of RT1+RT2. Dose constraints were also based on histology and interval since RT1. The primary endpoint was the rate of symptomatic brain necrosis after RT2.
RESULT(S): Twenty one adults enrolled from March 2017 to May 2018. Twelve had glioblastoma, four had oligodendroglioma, two had anaplastic astrocytoma, and one each had choroid plexus papilloma, hemangiopericytoma, and pleomorphic xanthroastrocytoma (PXA). Twenty patients were treated with VMAT and one was treated with proton CSI. Median RT1-RT2 interval was 45 months (range, 9-141 months). Median RT2 dose was 42.8 Gy (range, 17.5-60 Gy). Median PTV volume was 208 cc (range, 7-1537 cc). Median imaging followup was 9 months (range, 1-20 months). Two months after RT2, the patient with PXA developed a trapped temporal horn adjacent to the RT2 treatment volume; pathology from emergent resection revealed necrotic brain tissue. The patient recovered fully and lived another 18 months until dying of disease progression. No other patient developed symptomatic radionecrosis. Median overall survival from RT2 for all patients was 11 months (range, 3-20 months).
CONCLUSION(S): Re-irradiation can be performed with conventionally fractionated schemes. Given the low rate of symptomatic radionecrosis, the dose constraints described here are a starting point for future studies of conventionally fractionated re-irradiation