Faculty Bibliography

RATIONALE/BACKGROUND:Lower airway enrichment with oral commensals has been previously associated with grade 3 severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD) after lung transplantation (LT). We aimed to determine whether this dysbiotic signature is present across all PGD severity grades, including milder forms, and whether it is associated with a distinct host inflammatory endotype. METHODS:Lower airway samples from 96 LT recipients with varying degrees of PGD were used to evaluate the lung allograft microbiota via 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) cytokine concentrations and cell differential percentages were compared across PGD grades. In a subset of samples, we evaluated the lower airway host transcriptome using RNA sequencing methods. RESULTS:Differential analyses demonstrated lower airway enrichment with supraglottic-predominant taxa (SPT) in both moderate and severe PGD. Dirichlet Multinomial Mixtures (DMM) modeling identified two distinct microbial clusters. A greater percentage of subjects with moderate-severe PGD were identified within the dysbiotic cluster (C-SPT) than within the no PGD group (48 and 29%, respectively) though this difference did not reach statistical significance (p=0.06). PGD severity associated with increased BAL neutrophil concentration (p=0.03) and correlated with BAL concentrations of MCP-1/CCL2, IP-10/CXCL10, IL-10, and TNF-α (p<0.05). Furthermore, microbial signatures of dysbiosis correlated with neutrophils, MCP-1/CCL-2, IL-10, and TNF-α (p<0.05). C-SPT exhibited differential expression of TNF, SERPINE1 (PAI-1), MPO, and MMP1 genes and upregulation of MAPK pathways, suggesting that dysbiosis regulates host signaling to promote neutrophilic inflammation. CONCLUSIONS:Lower airway dysbiosis within the lung allograft is associated with a neutrophilic inflammatory endotype, an immune profile commonly recognized as the hallmark for PGD pathogenesis. This data highlights a putative role for lower airway microbial dysbiosis in the pathogenesis of this syndrome.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Classification of persons with long COVID (LC) or post-COVID-19 condition must encompass the complexity and heterogeneity of the condition. Iterative refinement of the classification index for research is needed to incorporate newly available data as the field rapidly evolves. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To update the 2023 research index for adults with LC using additional participant data from the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER-Adult) study and an expanded symptom list based on input from patient communities. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:Prospective, observational cohort study including adults 18 years or older with or without known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection who were enrolled at 83 sites in the US and Puerto Rico. Included participants had at least 1 study visit taking place 4.5 months after first SARS-CoV-2 infection or later, and not within 30 days of a reinfection. The study visits took place between October 2021 and March 2024. EXPOSURE/UNASSIGNED:SARS-CoV-2 infection. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Presence of LC and participant-reported symptoms. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:A total of 13 647 participants (11 743 with known SARS-CoV-2 infection and 1904 without known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection; median age, 45 years [IQR, 34-69 years]; and 73% were female) were included. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator analysis regression approach from the 2023 model, symptoms contributing to the updated 2024 index included postexertional malaise, fatigue, brain fog, dizziness, palpitations, change in smell or taste, thirst, chronic cough, chest pain, shortness of breath, and sleep apnea. For the 2024 LC research index, the optimal threshold to identify participants with highly symptomatic LC was a score of 11 or greater. The 2024 index classified 20% of participants with known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection and 4% of those without known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection as having likely LC (vs 21% and 5%, respectively, using the 2023 index) and 39% of participants with known prior SARS-CoV-2 infection as having possible LC, which is a new category for the 2024 model. Cluster analysis identified 5 LC subtypes that tracked quality-of-life measures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:The 2024 LC research index for adults builds on the 2023 index with additional data and symptoms to help researchers classify symptomatic LC and its symptom subtypes. Continued future refinement of the index will be needed as the understanding of LC evolves.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:A substantial number of individuals worldwide experience long COVID, or post-COVID condition. Other postviral and autoimmune conditions have a female predominance, but whether the same is true for long COVID, especially within different subgroups, is uncertain. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To evaluate sex differences in the risk of developing long COVID among adults with SARS-CoV-2 infection. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This cohort study used data from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER)-Adult cohort, which consists of individuals enrolled in and prospectively followed up at 83 sites in 33 US states plus Washington, DC, and Puerto Rico. Data were examined from all participants enrolled between October 29, 2021, and July 5, 2024, who had a qualifying study visit 6 months or more after their initial SARS-CoV-2 infection. EXPOSURE/UNASSIGNED:Self-reported sex (male, female) assigned at birth. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Development of long COVID, measured using a self-reported symptom-based questionnaire and scoring guideline at the first study visit that occurred at least 6 months after infection. Propensity score matching was used to estimate risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (95% CIs). The full model included demographic and clinical characteristics and social determinants of health, and the reduced model included only age, race, and ethnicity. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 12 276 participants who had experienced SARS-CoV-2 infection (8969 [73%] female; mean [SD] age at infection, 46 [15] years), female sex was associated with higher risk of long COVID in the primary full (RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.06-1.62) and reduced (RR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.17-1.77) models. This finding was observed across all age groups except 18 to 39 years (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.72-1.49). Female sex was associated with significantly higher overall long COVID risk when the analysis was restricted to nonpregnant participants (RR, 1.50; 95%: CI, 1.27-1.77). Among participants aged 40 to 54 years, the risk ratio was 1.42 (95% CI, 0.99-2.03) in menopausal female participants and 1.45 (95% CI, 1.15-1.83) in nonmenopausal female participants compared with male participants. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this prospective cohort study of the NIH RECOVER-Adult cohort, female sex was associated with an increased risk of long COVID compared with male sex, and this association was age, pregnancy, and menopausal status dependent. These findings highlight the need to identify biological mechanisms contributing to sex specificity to facilitate risk stratification, targeted drug development, and improved management of long COVID.

OBJECTIVE:Studies show metformin use before and during SARS-CoV-2 infection reduces severe COVID-19 and postacute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC) in adults. Our objective was to describe the incidence of PASC and possible associations with prevalent metformin use in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS/METHODS:This is a retrospective cohort analysis using the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C) and Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) electronic health record (EHR) databases with an active comparator design that examined metformin-exposed individuals versus nonmetformin-exposed individuals who were taking other diabetes medications. T2DM was defined by HbA1c ≥6.5 or T2DM EHR diagnosis code. The outcome was death or PASC within 6 months, defined by EHR code or computable phenotype. RESULTS:In the N3C, the hazard ratio (HR) for death or PASC with a U09.9 diagnosis code (PASC-U09.0) was 0.79 (95% CI 0.71-0.88; P < 0.001), and for death or N3C computable phenotype PASC (PASC-N3C) was 0.85 (95% CI 0.78-0.92; P < 0.001). In PCORnet, the HR for death or PASC-U09.9 was 0.87 (95% CI 0.66-1.14; P = 0.08), and for death or PCORnet computable phenotype PASC (PASC-PCORnet) was 1.04 (95% CI 0.97-1.11; P = 0.58). Incident PASC by diagnosis code was 1.6% metformin vs. 2.0% comparator in the N3C, and 2.1% metformin vs. 2.5% comparator in PCORnet. By computable phenotype, incidence was 4.8% metformin and 5.2% comparator in the N3C and 24.7% metformin vs. 26.1% comparator in PCORnet. CONCLUSIONS:Prevalent metformin use is associated with a slightly lower incidence of death or PASC after SARS-CoV-2 infection. PASC incidence by computable phenotype is higher than by EHR code, especially in PCORnet. These data are consistent with other observational analyses showing prevalent metformin is associated with favorable outcomes after SARS-CoV-2 infection in adults with T2DM.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the clinical significance of low-field MRI lung opacity severity. METHODS:Retrospective cross-sectional analysis of post-acute Covid-19 patients imaged with low-field MRI from 9/2020 through 9/2022, and within 1 month of pulmonary function tests (PFTs), 6-min walk test (6mWT), and symptom inventory (SI), and/or within 3 months of St. George Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) was performed. Univariate and correlative analyses were performed with Wilcoxon, Chi-square, and Spearman tests. The association between disease and demographic factors and MR opacity severity, PFTs, 6mWT, SI, and SGRQ, and association between MR opacity severity with functional and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), was evaluated with mixed model analysis of variance, covariance and generalized estimating equations. Two-sided 5 % significance level was used, with Bonferroni multiple comparison correction. RESULTS:81 MRI exams in 62 post-acute Covid-19 patients (median age 57, IQR 41-64; 25 women) were included. Exams were a median of 8 months from initial illness. Univariate analysis showed lung opacity severity was associated with decreased %DLCO (ρ = -0.55, P = .0125), and lung opacity severity quartile was associated with decreased %DLCO, predicted TLC, FVC, and increased FEV1/FVC. Multivariable analysis adjusting for sex, initial disease severity, and interval from Covid-19 diagnosis showed MR lung opacity severity was associated with decreased %DLCO (P < .001). Lung opacity severity was not associated with PROs. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Low-field MRI lung opacity severity correlated with decreased %DLCO in post-acute Covid-19 patients, but was not associated with PROs.

INTRODUCTION/UNASSIGNED:Mounting evidence indicates that an individual's humoral adaptive immune response plays a critical role in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 infection, and that the efficiency of the response correlates with disease severity. The relationship between the adaptive immune dynamics in the lower airways with those in the systemic circulation, and how these relate to an individual's clinical response to SARS-CoV-2 infection, are less understood and are the focus of this study. MATERIAL AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We investigated the adaptive immune response to SARS-CoV-2 in paired samples from the lower airways and blood from 27 critically ill patients during the first wave of the pandemic (median time from symptom onset to intubation 11 days). Measurements included clinical outcomes (mortality), bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and blood specimen antibody levels, and BALF viral load. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:While there was heterogeneity in the levels of the SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies, we unexpectedly found that some BALF specimens displayed higher levels than the paired concurrent plasma samples, despite the known dilutional effects common in BALF samples. We found that survivors had higher levels of anti-spike, anti-spike-N-terminal domain and anti-spike-receptor-binding domain IgG antibodies in their BALF (p<0.05), while there was no such association with antibody levels in the systemic circulation. DISCUSSION/UNASSIGNED:Our data highlight the critical role of local adaptive immunity in the airways as a key defence mechanism against primary SARS-CoV-2 infection.

STUDY OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been associated with more severe acute coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) outcomes. We assessed OSA as a potential risk factor for Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC). METHODS:We assessed the impact of preexisting OSA on the risk for probable PASC in adults and children using electronic health record data from multiple research networks. Three research networks within the REsearching COVID to Enhance Recovery initiative (PCORnet Adult, PCORnet Pediatric, and the National COVID Cohort Collaborative [N3C]) employed a harmonized analytic approach to examine the risk of probable PASC in COVID-19-positive patients with and without a diagnosis of OSA prior to pandemic onset. Unadjusted odds ratios (ORs) were calculated as well as ORs adjusted for age group, sex, race/ethnicity, hospitalization status, obesity, and preexisting comorbidities. RESULTS:Across networks, the unadjusted OR for probable PASC associated with a preexisting OSA diagnosis in adults and children ranged from 1.41 to 3.93. Adjusted analyses found an attenuated association that remained significant among adults only. Multiple sensitivity analyses with expanded inclusion criteria and covariates yielded results consistent with the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS:Adults with preexisting OSA were found to have significantly elevated odds of probable PASC. This finding was consistent across data sources, approaches for identifying COVID-19-positive patients, and definitions of PASC. Patients with OSA may be at elevated risk for PASC after SARS-CoV-2 infection and should be monitored for post-acute sequelae.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The optimal amount of anticoagulation for critically ill COVID-19 patients is controversial. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of escalated doses of anticoagulation in critically ill patients with severe COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:We conducted a systematic search of three major databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, from inception to May 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included comparing therapeutic or intermediate doses to standard prophylactic doses of anticoagulants in critically ill COVID-19 patients, with heparins as the only anticoagulation therapy considered. RESULTS:Out of the six RCTs, 2130 patients were administered escalated dose anticoagulation (50.2%) and standard thromboprophylaxis therapy (49.8%). The escalated dose showed no significant impact on mortality (RR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.13). Although there was no significant difference in DVT (RR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.61-1.08), the risk of PE was significantly reduced in patients receiving escalated dose anticoagulation (RR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.21-0.60), with an increased risk of bleeding events (RR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.08-2.53). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This systematic review and meta-analysis fail to support escalated anticoagulation doses to reduce mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients. However, higher doses of anticoagulants appear to reduce thrombotic events while increasing the risk of bleeding effectively.