Try a new search

Format these results:

Searched for:

in-biosketch:true

person:cerfor01

Total Results:

399


Largest single-institution series of robotic pneumonectomy

Asban, Ammar; Pachos, Nikolaos; Snyder, Caroline A; Ferraro, Isabella; Chang, Stephanie; Bizekis, Costas; Cerfolio, Robert J; Zervos, Michael D
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Minimally invasive pneumonectomy via robotic or video-assisted platforms is not yet widely adopted. Rates of conversion-to-thoracotomy and 90-day mortality are reported at 30%-50% and 12%, respectively. We describe our experience with the largest single-institution consecutive series of robotic pneumonectomy. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This is a retrospective review of prospective database of a consecutive (non-selected) series of patients who underwent robotic pneumonectomy from January 2019 to December 2024 at our institution. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:There were 21 patients (67% male) with median age 70 (range 15-79), DLCO 76% (range 48%-106%), and FEV1 76% (range 44%-126%). Indication for pneumonectomy was cancer in 17 patients (81%), of which 15 (88%) had a primary lung cancer. Four patients (19%) had destroyed lung from infection, and six (29%) underwent completion pneumonectomy. Thirteen (76%) of the 17 cancer patients had neoadjuvant therapy, including chemotherapy (11 patients), immunotherapy (10 patients), and radiation therapy (6 patients). A robotic approach was selected for all patients, with planned conversion-to-open in two patients (9%). There were no intraoperative transfusions. Median chest tube duration was one day (range 1-4). Median length of stay was five days (range 1-25). Thirty-day readmission was 19% (4 patients). Thirty-day morbidity was 19%, including atrial fibrillation in two patients, hemothorax in one patient, and chylothorax in one patient. Thirty-day mortality was 0% and 90-day mortality was 5% (one patient). CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Pneumonectomy can be performed safely and effectively robotically even in high-risk patients with previous ipsilateral thoracotomy and/or neoadjuvant chemo-, immuno-, or radio-therapy. We demonstrate that a robotic approach enables minimal unplanned conversion-to-thoracotomy, no blood transfusions and excellent short-term outcomes. Our pre-, intra- and post-operative strategies are shared.
PMCID:13342049
PMID: 42421869
ISSN: 2296-875x
CID: 6064032

Control before crisis: A six-step robotic approach to pulmonary artery management

Asban, Ammar; Pachos, Nikolaos; Bizekis, Costas; Cerfolio, Robert J; Snyder, Caroline A; Zervos, Michael D
PMCID:13261313
PMID: 42292101
ISSN: 2666-2507
CID: 6049352

Outcomes of robotic anatomic lung resection after neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Yongue, Camille; Asban, Ammar; McCormack, Ashley; Snyder, Caroline A; Ferraro, Isabella; Pachos, Nikolaos; Zervos, Michael; Cerfolio, Robert
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Previous studies report a 20% conversion to open thoracotomy and 25% major morbidity rate for minimally invasive thoracic surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective review includes a consecutive (non-selected) series of patients from two surgeons who underwent robotic resection after neoadjuvant therapy for non-small cell lung cancer. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:From January 2018 to October 2024, 150 patients (51% male) underwent surgery following systemic therapy. The median age was 67 years. Preoperatively, 92% received chemotherapy, 65% immunotherapy, and 27% radiation. Median time from therapy to surgery was 6 weeks. The most common tumor type was stage IIIA adenocarcinoma (25%). Median operative time was 152 min, and median blood loss was 20 mL. There were no unplanned conversions to open thoracotomy or from lobectomy to pneumonectomy. Median length of stay was 1 day; 28% had chest tube removed on the day of surgery. Twenty-one patients experienced Clavien-Dindo grade III complications (primarily atrial fibrillation and effusion). There were no 30-day mortalities and two 90-day mortalities. Median follow-up was 19 months, with a median postoperative survival of 513 days. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Robotic lobectomy and pneumonectomy can be safely performed after neoadjuvant therapy, with conversion rates <1% and minimal 30- and 90-day mortality. Key technical factors include intra-pericardial control of the pulmonary artery, division of the lobar airway prior to pulmonary artery dissection, and performing surgery within 6 weeks of completing neoadjuvant therapy.
PMCID:13231731
PMID: 42245313
ISSN: 2296-875x
CID: 6044622

World's Largest Single-Surgeon Experience in Robotic Resection of Pulmonary and Bronchial Carcinoid Tumors

Snyder, Caroline A; Pachos, Nikolaos; Cerfolio, Robert J
PMID: 42033544
ISSN: 1863-2491
CID: 6033302

European Analysis of Patients with Early-Stage Lung Adenocarcinoma and Invasive Pathological Features Who Underwent Lobectomy versus Segmentectomy

Lula, Lukadi Joseph; Costa, Rita; Franssen, Aimée J P M; Huang, Lin; Go Kay O Zgu R, Emrah; Barreda, Clara Forcada; Domjan, Matic; Weedle, Rebecca; Jasovic, Crt; Marinucci, Beatrice Trabalza; Rebei, Mohamed; Ghasemi, Kiarash; Moreira, Adelino Leite; Ryan, Ronan; Bekiroglu, Gülnaz Nural; Young, Vincent; Gomez, Teresa; de Loos, Erik R; Fitzmaurice, Gerard J; Bennett, Kathleen E; Mancini, Massimiliani; Varela, Gonzalo; Savu, Cornel; Mariolo, Alessio Vincenzo; Bunn, Paul; Stupnik, Tomaz; Furak, Jozsef; D'Andrilli, Antonio; Jimenez, Marcelo; Cerfolio, Robert; Bolca, Ciprian; Brunelli, Alessandro; Rami-Porta, Ramón; Petersen, René Horsleben; Rendina, Erino Angelo
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Evaluate impact of common pathologic features, single or in combination, in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma, according to lung resection extent. METHODS:Retrospective multicentric cohort study including patients with cT1a-bN0M0 lung adenocarcinoma and with at least: visceral pleural invasion (VPI) under surface (PL1) or up to surface (PL2), lymphovascular invasion (LVI), spread through airspace (STAS), necrosis, or neural invasion, who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy with systematic lymph nodal dissection (SND) from 2015-2021 in 10 European centers. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and lung cancer specific death (LCSD) between both groups were assessed before and after stabilized inverse probability of treatment-weighting (IPTW)-matching. Risk factors for oncologic outcomes were analyzed using parsimonious model Cox proportional hazard regression in entire and multiple features datasets. Kaplan Meir and cumulative incidence function assessed outcome. Log-rank and Gray' tests compared the groups. Linearized risk assessed recurrences. RESULTS:Of 1703 patients with cT1a-bN0M0 lung adenocarcinoma, 530 had at least one poor pathological feature and 130 had multiple features. For the 530 patients, 5-year OS lobectomy 83.0%, segmentectomy 89.4%, p=0.2; 5-year DFS lobectomy 78.1%, segmentectomy 83.8%, p=0.06; and 5-year LCSD lobectomy 8.9%, segmentectomy 7.2%, p=0.6 were similar. It was the same in matched cohort. In multivariable analysis, no poor pathological feature impacted outcome more than others. Multiple poor features were not associated with any clinical, pathological trait, but impacted OS (HR:3.24, p=0.002). Locoregional recurrence (linearized risk: lobectomy 0.083, segmentectomy 0.086) was similar in matched entire dataset. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Segmentectomy with SND dissection can be indicated in patients with stage IA1-2 lung adenocarcinoma suspected to have poor pathological features. Multiple factors were not predictable but impacted OS.
PMID: 42086164
ISSN: 1097-685x
CID: 6031082

Less pain and earlier recovery after extra-thoracic single-port robotic lung resection: a propensity-matched comparison

Pachos, Nikolaos; Cerfolio, Robert J; Bizekis, Costas; Chang, Stephanie H; Kent, Amie J; Liao, Ming; Zervos, Michael
PMID: 42053964
ISSN: 1863-2491
CID: 6029322

Redefining stapling in single-port thoracic surgery: initial clinical experience

Pachos, Nikolaos; Patel, Dhruv; Cerfolio, Robert J; Bizekis, Costas; Zervos, Michael D
PMID: 41851415
ISSN: 1863-2491
CID: 6016812

Robotic tracheal resections on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with 23-hour length of stay and without guardian chin stitch

McCormack, Ashley J; Chang, Stephanie H; Smith, Deane E; Geraci, Travis C; Phillips, Katherine G; Cerfolio, Robert J
OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:Mid-to-distal tracheal surgery for cancer can be safely performed minimally invasively with a one-day length of stay, avoiding a guardian chin suture, and ensuring a R0 resection in select patients. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This is a retrospective technical review of the largest series to date of patients with mid-to-distal tracheal cancers. All were offered a right robotic approach using veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO) support via percutaneous right internal jugular vein and right common femoral vein access. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:From May 2019 to April 2024, five consecutive patients (3 men, 2 women; aged 11, 29, 37, 40, and 74 years) presented with a mid-to-distal tracheal cancer. All underwent right robotic mid-distal tracheal resections on VV ECMO for primary tracheal cancers. All patients had an end-to-end tracheal anastomosis and R0 resection and all avoided: systemic heparinization, suprahyoid release maneuvers and a postoperative guardian chin stitch. Median operative time was 258 min (range 227-292). All patients tolerated the operations well and were discharged home on the morning of postoperative day 1. There was no minor or major morbidity, no 30 or 90-day mortality, and no re-admissions. Two patients complained of cough. All had R0 resections and to date none have evidence of recurrent disease or stricture. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Resection of mid-to-distal primary tracheal cancers can be performed safely and efficiently via a right robotic approach while on VV ECMO with little to no morbidity or mortality and require only an overnight hospital stay. The techniques used to perform the operation and achieve these results are described.
PMCID:12909573
PMID: 41710042
ISSN: 2296-875x
CID: 6004932

Is it safe to remove the chest tube in the operating room after robotic lobectomy, segmentectomy, and wedge resection with lymphadenectomy?

McCormack, Ashley J; Phillips, Katherine G; Cerfolio, Robert J
BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:We have previously shown that it is safe to remove chest tubes within four hours after robotic pulmonary resection with aggressive thoracic lymphadenectomy in patients without an air leak. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:This is a prospective quality improvement study that examines the process of removing chest tubes before the patient leaves the operating room (OR) after robotic pulmonary resection. Chest tubes were removed in the OR if the air leak was ≤75 mL/min on a digital drainage system. The tubes were reinserted only for oxygen desaturations from increasing pneumothorax and/or increasing subcutaneous emphysema. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Between 1 March 2023 and 12 December 2024, 223 consecutive patients underwent pulmonary resection with complete lymphadenectomy by one surgeon. Overall, 130 patients (58%) had their chest tubes removed in the OR, in 54% (62/114) of lobectomies, 62% (48/78) of segmentectomies, and 65% (20/31) of wedge resections. Thirteen patients (10%) required chest tube reinsertion, 11 after lobectomy and 2 after segmentectomy. The median operative time was 90 min (range 29-244 min), blood loss was 20 mL (range 10-60 mL), and all but one patient went home on postoperative day 1. No 30-day or 90-day mortality rate was recorded. A postoperative thoracentesis was performed in 1% of patients. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:Chest tubes can be safely removed in selective patients before they leave the OR after a robotic pulmonary resection with complete lymphadenectomy. Factors that may lead to these outcomes are the meticulous intraoperative technique and hemo-chylostasis. An air leak threshold of <20 mL/min may be optimal to minimize chest tube reinsertions and reduce failure rates.
PMCID:12711843
PMID: 41424827
ISSN: 2296-875x
CID: 6041782

Delivering the news of an intraoperative death; literature-based guidance from the American Association for Thoracic Surgery Wellness Committee

Edgerton, James R; Warren, Ann Marie; Wolf, Andrea S; Ungerleider, Ross; Ungerleider, Jamie Dickey; Erkmen, Cherie P; Maddaus, Michael; Firstenberg, Michael S; Olds, Anna Hollembeak; Cerfolio, Robert J; Mennander, Ari; Motomura, Noboru; Bremner, Ross M; ,
OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Fortunately, operating room deaths and unexpected deaths are infrequent occurrences. However, when they occur, the surgeon is called upon to deliver this news to family and loved ones. There is a paucity of literature on this topic and little guidance preparing cardiothoracic surgeons for this important but difficult situation. Furthermore, the surgeon may very well lack previous experience with this challenging situation. Having contemplated this in advance and having a script in mind will likely benefit both the surgeon and family. METHODS:The American Association for Thoracic Surgery Wellness Committee called upon the available published literature, consultation with experts, and upon their collective experience and cumulative wisdom to address this topic. RESULTS:The result of this process is a narrative discussion of delivering news of an unexpected death and a bullet point guide to speaking with the bereaved family. CONCLUSIONS:In this stressful situation, precontemplation of the surgeon's duties and being armed with a bullet point guide may benefit the surgeon, family, and heath care team. The lessons learned may be applicable to other situations requiring the delivery of distressing information.
PMID: 39710175
ISSN: 1097-685x
CID: 5965392