Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect that associated glenohumeral dislocations have on outcomes following surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures. METHODS:This IRB-approved study reports on 301 patients, who underwent operative treatment for proximal humerus fractures at an academic medical center from January 2006 to January 2023. Fractures were classified according to the Neer system. Patients were separated into two cohorts based on whether a glenohumeral dislocation was present at the time of initial injury. Outcomes measured included the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, shoulder range of motion (forward elevation, external rotation, internal rotation), readmission rates, complications, hardware removal, and need for revision surgery. Independent samples t-tests and chi-squared analysis were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A binary logistic regression was performed to analyze the influence of these factors on complication rate. RESULTS:230 patients sustained an isolated fracture (PHF) and 71 sustained a fracture-dislocation (FD). Significant differences were observed between the FD and PHF groups in all measured outcomes. The FD group had a poorer DASH score (24.38 ± 19.09 vs 10.54 ± 13.67; P < 0.001) and reduced range of shoulder motion in forward elevation (114° ± 40° vs 162° ± 19°; P < 0.001), external rotation (40° ± 19° vs 66° ± 19°; P < 0.001), and internal rotation (57° ± 26° vs 82° ± 21°; P < 0.001). Readmission rates were higher in the FD group (0.28 ± 0.85 vs 0.05 ± 0.28; P < 0.001). The FD cohort also had a higher rate of complications (25.35% vs 6.52%; P < 0.001), need for removal of hardware (14.08% vs 3.04%; P = 0.002), and overall revision surgery (11.27% vs 1.30%; P < 0.001). The FD cohort demonstrated a greater incidence of AVN (12.68% vs 4.35%; P = 0.012). No significant difference was observed regarding rates of fracture healing and recurrent dislocation. Multivariate analysis in the form of binary logistic regression indicated that fracture-dislocation significantly increased the complication risk (OR = 3.310, 95% CI = 1.42-7.70; P = 0.005). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Proximal humerus fracture-dislocations are associated with worse functional outcomes and higher complication rates compared to those without dislocations. These findings highlight the potential need for specialized treatment strategies to mitigate the impact of dislocation on recovery.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the rate at which abstracts accepted for the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) Annual Meeting from 2019 to 2024 utilized the Fracture-related Infection (FRI) Consensus Group's definition for infection. METHODS:Data Sources: The data sources for this study included the Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) Annual Meeting Programs from 2019-2024 and the "abstract search" portion of OTA Website. STUDY SELECTION/METHODS:All podium and poster abstract presentations that utilized keywords for infection ("fracture-related infection," "infection," or "SSI") in the title. DATA EXTRACTION/METHODS:All abstracts were reviewed, and grouped into one of the four following categories based on the methodologic descriptors used to define infection characteristics: 1) Utilized Consensus Group Definition, 2) Utilized CDC Definition [deep, superficial, organ/space, or SSI terminology], 3) Utilized an Author Specific Definition, 4) Did Not Utilize Any Definition. DATA SYNTHESIS/RESULTS:Univariate statistics were conducted to determine yearly and overall percentages of abstracts that utilized the Consensus Group's definition as compared to the other 3 definition categories. Bivariate analysis was performed to determine if the use of Consensus Group's definition varied from 2019-2024. RESULTS:52 podium abstracts and 59 poster abstracts were included. Among the podium abstracts, 4 (7.7%) utilized the Consensus Group's definition of FRI, 37 (71.2%) utilized language from the CDC definition, 4 (7.7%) used an author specific definition, and 7 (13.5%) abstracts did not utilize any definition of descriptors of infection. Poster abstracts demonstrated similar utilization of methodical infection descriptors, as 5 (8.5%) utilized the Consensus Group's definition of FRI. The number of abstracts that utilized the Consensus Group's Definition did not vary from 2019-2024 (p=0.952 for podiums, p=0.451 for posters). CONCLUSIONS:Adoption of the FRI Consensus Group's definition among accepted OTA 2019-2024 Annual Meeting abstracts was low. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:IV.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Several types of fifth metatarsal (MT) fractures exist and are treated with various methods of immobilization, weight bearing restrictions, and occasionally operative procedures. This study evaluated the differences in clinical and radiographic outcomes among pseudo-Jones fractures (Zones 1 and 2), true Jones fractures (Zone 3), and fifth metatarsal shaft and neck fractures. METHODS:A retrospective review of a consecutive series of patients presenting to a single academic medical center with a fifth metatarsal fracture between 2012 and 2022 was conducted. Radiographs obtained at the initial presentation were reviewed, and fracture patterns were categorized as either Zone 1, Zone 2, Zone 3, shaft, neck, or head fractures. RESULTS:In total, 1314 patients with isolated fifth metatarsal fractures were treated (mean age = 49.6 ± 18.0 years). In total, 1217 fractures (92.5%) were initially treated nonoperatively, and 97 fractures (7.5%) were treated operatively. The overall time to clinical and radiographic healing for all fifth metatarsal fractures treated nonoperatively was 9.9 ± 8.7 weeks and 17.9 ± 15.6 weeks, respectively (P = .245, P = .088). Immediate weightbearing led to a faster time to clinical healing by (P = .035). There was no statistically significant difference in time to clinical or radiographic union among the different fracture types (P = .496, P = .400). Likewise, there was no evidence of any difference in time to clinical or radiographic union for patients treated operatively versus nonoperatively (P > .05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:.

OBJECTIVE:To determine if the occurrence of short-term post-operative altered mental status (AMS) was lower in geriatric patients undergoing operative repair of hip fractures with Monitored Anesthesia Care and Soft-Tissue Infiltration with Local Anesthesia (MAC-STILA) when compared with general anesthesia (GA). DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Two U.S. hospitals within a single academic medical center. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA/UNASSIGNED:Geriatric patients with hip fractures (AO/OTA 31A and 31B) undergoing operative repair were identified. Propensity matching was performed in a 1:2 ratio to minimize selection bias (age, sex, BMI, ASA class, fracture pattern, fixation construct, pre-injury ambulatory status, and assistive device use). OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Patients who underwent surgical fixation with MAC-STILA were compared with GA. Primary outcome was post-operative AMS, defined as missing ≥1 items on the alert and oriented assessment (person, place, and time) at any point from post-operative days 0-3. RESULTS:After matching, 228 patients (76 MAC-STILA: 152 GA) were included in the analysis. The average age of patients in both groups was 83 years. In the MAC-STILA group, 62% were female and 33% had baseline dementia while in the GA group 66% were female and 29% had baseline dementia. Treating patients with MAC-STILA was associated with 72% lower odds of having AMS compared with GA, controlling for baseline comorbidity and dementia (OR: 0.28. 95% CI: 0.09-0.075, p=0.016). Among patients with baseline dementia, the rate of AMS was lower in patients treated with MAC-STILA compared with GA (64.0% vs 95.3%, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Monitored Anesthesia Care and Soft-Tissue Infiltration with Local Anesthesia (MAC-STILA) was associated with lower odds of short-term postoperative altered mental status (AMS) compared to general anesthesia (GA) in hip fracture patients undergoing operative repair. Given the high rate of post-operative AMS and complications associated with geriatric hip fracture patient, MAC-STILA should be considered for use in patients with increased risk of post-operative AMS, particularly in the setting of preoperative dementia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Therapeutic III.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study was to examine factors that were associated with a decline in functional ambulatory status following fractures of the tibial diaphysis. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective review of an IRB-approved tibial diaphysis fracture database from 2012 to 2024 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18, isolated OTA 42A-C tibia fracture treated with an intramedullary nail, and minimum 12 months follow-up. Demographics, injury, and surgical information were collected. Functional ambulatory status was measured at routine follow up intervals by the Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC) score, a six-point scale where zero represents non-ambulation and five represents normal ambulatory ability. Univariate analysis was performed using Student's T-tests and Chi-squared tests. A backwards stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors that were independently associated with a decline in FAC score (SPSS version 29, Armonk, NY). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:289 patients, with a mean follow up time of 15.04 ± 6.18 months, were included in the analysis with a mean age of 43.24 ± 16.22 years, body mass index of 27.19 ± 6.30, and age-unadjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0.18 ± 0.54. 39.1 % of patients were female, 28.0 % patients sustained open fractures, and 52.6 % sustained high energy injuries. The logistic regression demonstrated that older age (OR = 1.04 p < .001), higher BMI (OR = 1.06 p = .024), high-energy mechanism (OR = 3.18 p = .003), nonunion (OR = 3.66, p = .005), and concomitant lower extremity fractures (OR = 4.47 p = 002), were risk factors for a decrease in final FAC score. The AUROC of the logistic regression equation was 0.787 indicating a moderate ability to discriminate between patients that will experience a loss in functional ambulatory ability and those who will not. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:This study suggests that concomitant lower extremity injuries, increased age, increased BMI, high-energy mechanisms, and nonunion are risk factors that are associated with a decline in ambulatory capacity following diaphyseal tibia fractures.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To assess the healing outcomes of patients who sustained a comminuted clavicle fracture and underwent operative fixation with or without the addition of demineralized bone matrix (DBM). METHODS:A total of 271 comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures that presented to our hospital system and underwent operative fixation with a plate and screw construct were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected include patient demographics, initial injury information, and use of demineralized bone matrix during surgery to enhance bone healing. Patients were grouped based on whether or not their fixation was augmented with DBM. Fracture-related infection (FRI), lack of fracture healing, and the need for revision fracture surgery were reviewed. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and screw back out were categorized as "minor complications." Clinical healing was defined as non-tenderness about the fracture site, and radiographic healing was defined as presence of bridging callus and lack of fracture line on X-ray. Chi-square, T-test, and linear regression analysis were used to determine any significant differences between cohorts. RESULTS:Sixty-nine patients had DBM used in their repair, and 202 patients did not. Cohorts had a similar follow-up (range: 6-18 months). There were no differences in patient demographics or fracture pattern between the two groups (P > 0.05 for all). There were no differences in major and minor complications; however, the cohort treated with DBM had shorter time to radiographic healing, confirmed with regression analysis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Augmentation of midshaft clavicle fracture constructs with DBM was associated with quicker radiographic healing.

OBJECTIVE:To develop a stratification tool to identify hip fracture patients at risk for second contralateral hip fracture and mortality within 5 years of an index fracture, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic fixation in high-risk/low-mortality patients. METHODS:Design: Retrospective prognostic cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Single academic system with 2 Level 1 Trauma Centers, 1 orthopedic specialty hospital, and 1 tertiary care hospital. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA/UNASSIGNED:Patients who were 60 years or older with OTA 31A/B hip fractures from low-energy mechanisms between 11/1/2014 and 11/31/2023 with ≥5 years follow-up or until death were included. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS/UNASSIGNED:The study included four phases: (1) identifying factors associated with second hip fracture within 5 years; (2) using multivariate logistic regression to generate models predicting 5-year second hip fracture (vs. FRAX) and mortality risk; (3) creating a "risk matrix" to identify candidates for prophylactic fixation using Youden's Index which determined cutoff points encompassing the maximum sensitivity and specificity for each risk equation and were used to define a value-based target group; (4) cost analysis comparing standard vs. prophylactic care in high-risk/low-mortality patients. RESULTS:Of 426 patients (mean age 80.25 years, 73.4% female), 78 sustained second hip fractures (mean interval: 594 days). Predictors included higher FRAX score (p=0.004), dementia (p<.001), ICU stay (p=0.014), discharge to subacute care (p<.001), and 90-day readmission (p=0.011). Logistic regression predicted 5-year second fracture risk (AUC 0.742 vs. FRAX 0.617, p=0.012) and 5-year mortality (AUC 0.723). The risk matrix used cutoff points of 18.2% (mortality) and 38.2% (second fracture) to define a value-based target group (n=26; 13 experienced second fracture). Cost analysis showed prophylactic fixation of all 26 patients ($781,508) would save $353,067 compared to treating the 13 who fractured again ($1,134,575). CONCLUSIONS:A novel matrix was developed that accurately predicted 5-year second hip fracture and mortality risk. Prophylactic fixation in low-mortality, high-risk patients may reduce costs and prevent future fractures. [Tool available: https://sttgmacom.wpcomstaging.com/predicting-risk-of-second-hip-fractures/]. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III Diagnostic.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:ACL tears are among the most common injuries in active individuals, with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BTB) autograft being the gold-standard treatment for reconstruction. Despite excellent outcomes, complications such as patella fractures, reported as high as 1.8%, remain a concern. This study aimed to update the incidence of patella fractures after BTB ACL reconstruction at a high-volume center and compare patient outcomes with isolated ACL rupture or patella fracture. We hypothesized a lower incidence than previously reported and comparable post-operative outcomes across groups. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing BTB ACL reconstruction (2012-2022) who sustained harvest site patella fractures. Cases were 2:1 propensity score-matched with patients having isolated ACL rupture or patella fracture. Inclusion criteria were age > 18, ≥ 1-year follow-up, and post-op patella fracture diagnosis. Data collected included demographics, surgical details, bone plug dimensions, and patient-reported outcomes (Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner Activity Scale). Treatment strategies and healing outcomes for patella fractures were also recorded. RESULTS:Among 5770 BTB ACL reconstructions, 12 patients (0.21%) sustained post-op patella fractures. They were matched to 24 with isolated ACL rupture and 24 with patella fracture. Average follow-up was 6.4 years. Pre-op scores demonstrated significant differences: ACL + patella fracture group had lower Lysholm (62.8), IKDC (48.1), and Tegner scores (7.1) compared to isolated ACLR and patella fracture groups. Post-op scores in the ACL + patella fracture group improved significantly (Lysholm 84.4, IKDC 72.0). CONCLUSIONS:Patella fracture incidence after BTB ACL reconstruction is lower than previously reported (0.21%). Patients with this complication still achieve excellent outcomes comparable to those with isolated ACL or patella injuries.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Delays in time to surgery (TTS) for patients with a hip fracture negatively affect patient outcomes, including mortality. Surgery within 24 to 48 hours of admission for a hip fracture markedly reduces these risks; however, attempts at improving TTS after hip fracture have had mixed results. Drivers of delays in TTS across different settings in the United States are not well described. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify drivers of delays in TTS for patients with a hip fracture from different settings to inform where patient- and context-specific improvements in TTS may be implemented. METHODS:Semistructured interviews were completed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Theoretical Domains Framework. Interviews were completed with stakeholders involved in hip fracture care between June 2023 and October 2023. Transcripts were analyzed iteratively through a combined inductive and deductive approach. The data were analyzed to synthesize overarching themes related to drivers of delays of TTS. RESULTS:A total of 25 stakeholders, 24 orthopaedic surgeons, and 1 nurse practitioner, from 22 different hospital systems across the United States participated in semistructured interviews. Eight themes of drivers of delayed TTS emerged: (1) patient health; (2) structural drivers of health; (3) care coordination; (4) prioritization; (5) improvement climate; (6) availability; (7) incentive structure; and (8) empowerment. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Eight major themes related to drivers in TTS for patients with a hip fracture were identified across hospital systems. These findings inform the process of identifying site-specific drivers of delayed TTS at individual health systems and implementing targeted improvement programs for TTS for patients with a hip fracture.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare functional outcomes of distal third humeral shaft fractures (OTA 12A-C and 13A2-3) treated with either triceps-splitting or triceps-sparing surgical approach. Secondarily, the purpose was to compare healing and complication rates between the two surgical approaches. METHOD/METHODS:A retrospective review of a prospectively collected humeral shaft registry was performed from 01/2018-12/2024. Inclusion criteria was: age > 18yo, OTA 12A-C or 13A2-3 distal third humeral shaft fracture, either triceps-splitting or triceps-sparing surgical approach, and minimum 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was 1-year postoperative functional status measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Secondary outcomes measures included surgical time, radiographic union times, union rates, iatrogenic nerve injury, fracture related infection, hardware failure, reoperation, and documented range of motion (ROM) at last follow-up. Univariate analysis with two-tailed Student's t-tests and chi-square tests was used to compare demographics, injury and surgical characteristics. RESULT/RESULTS:A total of 39 patients met inclusion criteria: 27 (69.2%) underwent a triceps-splitting approach and 12 (30.8%) a triceps-sparing approach. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics. At final follow-up, functional outcomes were comparable. DASH scores were similar between groups (7.7 ± 13.8 vs 7.0 ± 9.0, p = 0.89), as were fracture healing times (5.5 ± 2.2 vs 6.1 ± 3.6 months, p = 0.63), with all fractures achieving union. Surgical duration was shorter in the splitting group (83 ± 42 vs 103 ± 52 min, p = 0.26), though not statistically significant. No hardware-related complications were reported. Two radial nerve palsies (7.6%) occurred in the splitting group, while one postoperative infection (8.3%) occurred in the sparing group (all p > 0.05). Elbow range of motion was similar. Mean flexion was 137.9 ± 10.0° in the splitting group vs 131.3 ± 30.0° in the sparing group (p = 0.47); mean extension was 2.3 ± 4.7° vs 4.6 ± 5.5°, respectively (p = 0.21). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There is no difference in 1-year functional outcomes as measured by the DASH score between the triceps-splitting versus triceps-sparing approach for surgical fixation of the OTA 12A-C and 13A2-3 distal third humeral shaft fractures. Either surgical approach is viable for distal third humeral shaft fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III.