Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:The purpose of this study was to examine factors that were associated with a decline in functional ambulatory status following fractures of the tibial diaphysis. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A retrospective review of an IRB-approved tibial diaphysis fracture database from 2012 to 2024 was conducted. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18, isolated OTA 42A-C tibia fracture treated with an intramedullary nail, and minimum 12 months follow-up. Demographics, injury, and surgical information were collected. Functional ambulatory status was measured at routine follow up intervals by the Functional Ambulatory Category (FAC) score, a six-point scale where zero represents non-ambulation and five represents normal ambulatory ability. Univariate analysis was performed using Student's T-tests and Chi-squared tests. A backwards stepwise multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine factors that were independently associated with a decline in FAC score (SPSS version 29, Armonk, NY). RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:289 patients, with a mean follow up time of 15.04 ± 6.18 months, were included in the analysis with a mean age of 43.24 ± 16.22 years, body mass index of 27.19 ± 6.30, and age-unadjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index of 0.18 ± 0.54. 39.1 % of patients were female, 28.0 % patients sustained open fractures, and 52.6 % sustained high energy injuries. The logistic regression demonstrated that older age (OR = 1.04 p < .001), higher BMI (OR = 1.06 p = .024), high-energy mechanism (OR = 3.18 p = .003), nonunion (OR = 3.66, p = .005), and concomitant lower extremity fractures (OR = 4.47 p = 002), were risk factors for a decrease in final FAC score. The AUROC of the logistic regression equation was 0.787 indicating a moderate ability to discriminate between patients that will experience a loss in functional ambulatory ability and those who will not. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:This study suggests that concomitant lower extremity injuries, increased age, increased BMI, high-energy mechanisms, and nonunion are risk factors that are associated with a decline in ambulatory capacity following diaphyseal tibia fractures.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To assess the healing outcomes of patients who sustained a comminuted clavicle fracture and underwent operative fixation with or without the addition of demineralized bone matrix (DBM). METHODS:A total of 271 comminuted midshaft clavicle fractures that presented to our hospital system and underwent operative fixation with a plate and screw construct were retrospectively reviewed. Data collected include patient demographics, initial injury information, and use of demineralized bone matrix during surgery to enhance bone healing. Patients were grouped based on whether or not their fixation was augmented with DBM. Fracture-related infection (FRI), lack of fracture healing, and the need for revision fracture surgery were reviewed. Adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder and screw back out were categorized as "minor complications." Clinical healing was defined as non-tenderness about the fracture site, and radiographic healing was defined as presence of bridging callus and lack of fracture line on X-ray. Chi-square, T-test, and linear regression analysis were used to determine any significant differences between cohorts. RESULTS:Sixty-nine patients had DBM used in their repair, and 202 patients did not. Cohorts had a similar follow-up (range: 6-18 months). There were no differences in patient demographics or fracture pattern between the two groups (P > 0.05 for all). There were no differences in major and minor complications; however, the cohort treated with DBM had shorter time to radiographic healing, confirmed with regression analysis (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Augmentation of midshaft clavicle fracture constructs with DBM was associated with quicker radiographic healing.

OBJECTIVE:To develop a stratification tool to identify hip fracture patients at risk for second contralateral hip fracture and mortality within 5 years of an index fracture, and to assess the cost-effectiveness of prophylactic fixation in high-risk/low-mortality patients. METHODS:Design: Retrospective prognostic cohort study. SETTING/METHODS:Single academic system with 2 Level 1 Trauma Centers, 1 orthopedic specialty hospital, and 1 tertiary care hospital. PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA/UNASSIGNED:Patients who were 60 years or older with OTA 31A/B hip fractures from low-energy mechanisms between 11/1/2014 and 11/31/2023 with ≥5 years follow-up or until death were included. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS/UNASSIGNED:The study included four phases: (1) identifying factors associated with second hip fracture within 5 years; (2) using multivariate logistic regression to generate models predicting 5-year second hip fracture (vs. FRAX) and mortality risk; (3) creating a "risk matrix" to identify candidates for prophylactic fixation using Youden's Index which determined cutoff points encompassing the maximum sensitivity and specificity for each risk equation and were used to define a value-based target group; (4) cost analysis comparing standard vs. prophylactic care in high-risk/low-mortality patients. RESULTS:Of 426 patients (mean age 80.25 years, 73.4% female), 78 sustained second hip fractures (mean interval: 594 days). Predictors included higher FRAX score (p=0.004), dementia (p<.001), ICU stay (p=0.014), discharge to subacute care (p<.001), and 90-day readmission (p=0.011). Logistic regression predicted 5-year second fracture risk (AUC 0.742 vs. FRAX 0.617, p=0.012) and 5-year mortality (AUC 0.723). The risk matrix used cutoff points of 18.2% (mortality) and 38.2% (second fracture) to define a value-based target group (n=26; 13 experienced second fracture). Cost analysis showed prophylactic fixation of all 26 patients ($781,508) would save $353,067 compared to treating the 13 who fractured again ($1,134,575). CONCLUSIONS:A novel matrix was developed that accurately predicted 5-year second hip fracture and mortality risk. Prophylactic fixation in low-mortality, high-risk patients may reduce costs and prevent future fractures. [Tool available: https://sttgmacom.wpcomstaging.com/predicting-risk-of-second-hip-fractures/]. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III Diagnostic.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:ACL tears are among the most common injuries in active individuals, with Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone (BTB) autograft being the gold-standard treatment for reconstruction. Despite excellent outcomes, complications such as patella fractures, reported as high as 1.8%, remain a concern. This study aimed to update the incidence of patella fractures after BTB ACL reconstruction at a high-volume center and compare patient outcomes with isolated ACL rupture or patella fracture. We hypothesized a lower incidence than previously reported and comparable post-operative outcomes across groups. METHODS:We retrospectively reviewed patients undergoing BTB ACL reconstruction (2012-2022) who sustained harvest site patella fractures. Cases were 2:1 propensity score-matched with patients having isolated ACL rupture or patella fracture. Inclusion criteria were age > 18, ≥ 1-year follow-up, and post-op patella fracture diagnosis. Data collected included demographics, surgical details, bone plug dimensions, and patient-reported outcomes (Lysholm, IKDC, Tegner Activity Scale). Treatment strategies and healing outcomes for patella fractures were also recorded. RESULTS:Among 5770 BTB ACL reconstructions, 12 patients (0.21%) sustained post-op patella fractures. They were matched to 24 with isolated ACL rupture and 24 with patella fracture. Average follow-up was 6.4 years. Pre-op scores demonstrated significant differences: ACL + patella fracture group had lower Lysholm (62.8), IKDC (48.1), and Tegner scores (7.1) compared to isolated ACLR and patella fracture groups. Post-op scores in the ACL + patella fracture group improved significantly (Lysholm 84.4, IKDC 72.0). CONCLUSIONS:Patella fracture incidence after BTB ACL reconstruction is lower than previously reported (0.21%). Patients with this complication still achieve excellent outcomes comparable to those with isolated ACL or patella injuries.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Delays in time to surgery (TTS) for patients with a hip fracture negatively affect patient outcomes, including mortality. Surgery within 24 to 48 hours of admission for a hip fracture markedly reduces these risks; however, attempts at improving TTS after hip fracture have had mixed results. Drivers of delays in TTS across different settings in the United States are not well described. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify drivers of delays in TTS for patients with a hip fracture from different settings to inform where patient- and context-specific improvements in TTS may be implemented. METHODS:Semistructured interviews were completed using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Theoretical Domains Framework. Interviews were completed with stakeholders involved in hip fracture care between June 2023 and October 2023. Transcripts were analyzed iteratively through a combined inductive and deductive approach. The data were analyzed to synthesize overarching themes related to drivers of delays of TTS. RESULTS:A total of 25 stakeholders, 24 orthopaedic surgeons, and 1 nurse practitioner, from 22 different hospital systems across the United States participated in semistructured interviews. Eight themes of drivers of delayed TTS emerged: (1) patient health; (2) structural drivers of health; (3) care coordination; (4) prioritization; (5) improvement climate; (6) availability; (7) incentive structure; and (8) empowerment. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Eight major themes related to drivers in TTS for patients with a hip fracture were identified across hospital systems. These findings inform the process of identifying site-specific drivers of delayed TTS at individual health systems and implementing targeted improvement programs for TTS for patients with a hip fracture.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To compare functional outcomes of distal third humeral shaft fractures (OTA 12A-C and 13A2-3) treated with either triceps-splitting or triceps-sparing surgical approach. Secondarily, the purpose was to compare healing and complication rates between the two surgical approaches. METHOD/METHODS:A retrospective review of a prospectively collected humeral shaft registry was performed from 01/2018-12/2024. Inclusion criteria was: age > 18yo, OTA 12A-C or 13A2-3 distal third humeral shaft fracture, either triceps-splitting or triceps-sparing surgical approach, and minimum 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome was 1-year postoperative functional status measured using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score. Secondary outcomes measures included surgical time, radiographic union times, union rates, iatrogenic nerve injury, fracture related infection, hardware failure, reoperation, and documented range of motion (ROM) at last follow-up. Univariate analysis with two-tailed Student's t-tests and chi-square tests was used to compare demographics, injury and surgical characteristics. RESULT/RESULTS:A total of 39 patients met inclusion criteria: 27 (69.2%) underwent a triceps-splitting approach and 12 (30.8%) a triceps-sparing approach. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics. At final follow-up, functional outcomes were comparable. DASH scores were similar between groups (7.7 ± 13.8 vs 7.0 ± 9.0, p = 0.89), as were fracture healing times (5.5 ± 2.2 vs 6.1 ± 3.6 months, p = 0.63), with all fractures achieving union. Surgical duration was shorter in the splitting group (83 ± 42 vs 103 ± 52 min, p = 0.26), though not statistically significant. No hardware-related complications were reported. Two radial nerve palsies (7.6%) occurred in the splitting group, while one postoperative infection (8.3%) occurred in the sparing group (all p > 0.05). Elbow range of motion was similar. Mean flexion was 137.9 ± 10.0° in the splitting group vs 131.3 ± 30.0° in the sparing group (p = 0.47); mean extension was 2.3 ± 4.7° vs 4.6 ± 5.5°, respectively (p = 0.21). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:There is no difference in 1-year functional outcomes as measured by the DASH score between the triceps-splitting versus triceps-sparing approach for surgical fixation of the OTA 12A-C and 13A2-3 distal third humeral shaft fractures. Either surgical approach is viable for distal third humeral shaft fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level III.

BACKGROUND:The purpose of this study was to compare hospital quality and patient outcomes of hip arthroplasty for femoral neck fractures (FNFs) based on the subspecialty training of the treating surgeon: orthopaedic trauma (OT) versus adult reconstruction (AR) fellowship training. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted on 1,008 elderly patients treated for an FNF with hemiarthroplasty or total hip arthroplasty between 2014 and 2024. Patients were grouped by their surgeon's subspecialty training (OT versus AR). Outcomes analyzed included length of stay, complications, 30-day and 90-day readmissions, dislocations, infections, and 30-day mortality. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. RESULTS:Baseline patient demographics were similar between groups, except for a higher proportion of women in the AR cohort (P = 0.008) and Black patients in the OT cohort (P = 0.016). Although age-unadjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was significantly higher in the AR group (P = 0.046), Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle Aged (STTGMA) scores, which take CCI and other health factors into account, were not significantly different (P = 0.59). In-hospital outcomes, including length of stay (P = 0.89) and minor and major complication rates (P = 0.38, P = 0.38), demonstrated no significant differences between groups. Post-discharge outcomes, including readmissions (30-day: P = 0.52, 90-day: P = 0.16), infections (P = 0.25), dislocations (P = 0.89), and 30-day mortality (P = 0.14), were also similar. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:No differences were identified in any of the outcomes analyzed between OT-trained and AR-trained surgeons in our study. This suggests that when FNFs are treated at high-volume academic institutions, subspecialty training may not substantially influence the short-term results of FNFs treated with hip arthroplasty. These findings highlight the importance of timely surgical intervention rather than waiting for a particularly trained surgeon to be available.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term postoperative outcomes of patients undergoing patella open reduction internal fixation procedures based on the type of anesthesia administered. METHODS:A retrospective review was conducted of patients who were surgically treated for displaced patella fractures from 2012 to 2024 at a single multi-site academic institution. Patients were included if they were > 18 years of age, sustained an isolated patella fracture, and had a minimum of 6-month follow-up. Patients were divided into groups based on the anesthetic modality used during their surgery: regional anesthesia only (RA), general/neuraxial anesthesia (NR), and a combination of these methods (CA). Comparisons of statistics were performed using Pearson chi-squared tests, one-way ANOVA tests, and linear regression tests as appropriate. RESULTS:There were no complications associated with the administration of anesthesia within each cohort. There was no significant difference in fracture healing rates (p = .210) nor complication rates between the anesthesia groups (p = .088). The RA and CA groups had significantly shorter operating room (wheels in to wheels out) times than the NR group (p < .001), significantly greater 3-month (p = .001) and 6-month knee ROM (p = .016) than the NR group when controlling for age, fracture pattern, and repair method. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates the efficacy of the use of regional anesthesia only for repair of a patella fracture. This technique is associated with greater early range of knee motion in patients after surgery and a shorter surgical time with no increase in intra or postoperative complications.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To identify factors associated with prolonged length of stay following geriatric hip fractures. METHODS:A single-center retrospective study of a consecutive series of geriatric (age > 65) hip fractures between 10/1/14 and 11/1/23 was performed. Patient demographics, injury/surgery characteristics, and inpatient complications were reviewed. Patients who died during hospitalization were excluded. Patients were cohorted into "average" LOS (nLOS) and "prolonged" LOS (pLOS); pLOS was defined as 1 standard deviation above the mean LOS. Cohort variables were compared using standard statistical tests. Multivariable logistic regression was used to isolate covariates that were independently associated with pLOS while controlling for confounders. RESULTS:A total of 3383 patients were identified. Average LOS was 6.38 days (S.D. = 4.24 days), and prolonged LOS was 10.62 days. The pLOS cohort was sicker and less functionally independent at baseline. The pLOS cohort had a more complicated hospital course with a 6 × increase in major complications and 2 × increase in minor complications. The demographic characteristic associated the most to pLOS was male gender. The injury/surgery characteristic contributing the most to pLOS was time from admission to surgery. The complication contributing the most to pLOS was new-onset stroke. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Multiple demographic and outcome factors are associated with pLOS in geriatric hip fractures. While demographics cannot be changed, teams should focus on modifiable factors such as reducing time to surgery and identification, prevention, and treatment of perioperative complications, most importantly stroke and pneumonia, to prevent delays in discharge following hip fracture in the elderly population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE/METHODS:Level IV.