Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Pancreatic cancer is a challenging malignancy with an aggressive biology and limited treatment options, contributing to low survival rates. Supportive and palliative care play a key role in improving the quality of life and psychological distress for patients and their families. However, appropriate delivery and effectiveness of these interventions may be influenced by social determinants of health (SDOH). These factors create significant barriers for patients, influencing their access to care and ability to make informed decisions. This review explores the role of SDOH in supportive and palliative care of pancreatic cancer patients and identifies areas for improvement to enhance this type of care for vulnerable populations. METHODS:A thorough narrative review was carried out to evaluate the influence of social determinants of health on supportive and palliative care in the management of pancreatic cancer, focusing on symptom management, psychosocial support, nutritional support, advance care planning, rehabilitation, functional support, and care coordination. RESULTS:This review demonstrates that disparities exist. Black and Asian patients receive less pain medications; those with lower level of education struggle to access psychological support; Hispanic and Black patients often do not receive needed nutritional care; and end-of-life planning is less common among non-White and less-educated patients. CONCLUSIONS:SDOH significantly affects the experience and delivery of supportive and palliative care in pancreatic cancer patients, exacerbating inequities across multiple domains of care. Addressing these disparities requires coordinated efforts at clinical, organizational, and policy levels to ensure equitable access to care for all patients in their final phase of life. Integrating attention to SODH into care delivery models can improve outcomes and enhance quality of life for these patients.

BACKGROUND:Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma has historically poor overall survival, and the impact of perioperative chemotherapy remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of various chemotherapy regimens in patients with resected adenosquamous carcinoma. METHODS:Patients with resected adenosquamous carcinoma were identified from 3 high-volume programs between 2001 and 2022. We analyzed their clinicopathologic data and used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to assess the median overall survival and recurrence-free survival with 95% confidence intervals. Prognostic factors were assessed with a multivariable Cox-regression model adjusting for resectability status and Clavien-Dindo complications. RESULTS:Among 168 patients, cohorts of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (41, 24%) and upfront surgery (127, 76%) showed similar demographics and TNM staging. The median overall survival was shorter in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy cohort compared with the upfront surgery cohort (13 vs 21 months, P = .133). Median overall survival by treatment approach was no chemotherapy (4 months), only neoadjuvant chemotherapy (8 months), only adjuvant therapy (24 months), and both neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant therapy (17 months). Recurrence-free survival data (69 patients) showed upfront surgery had significantly longer recurrence-free survival compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (18 months vs 5 months, P = .046). Multivariable analysis showed adjuvant therapy was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.27; P < .001), whereas age ≥65 (hazard ratio, 1.79, P = .030) was associated with worse overall survival. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The outcomes of resected adenosquamous carcinoma remain poor. Patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy exhibited shorter recurrence-free survival and median overall survival, suggesting minimal benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in treating this aggressive cancer. Meanwhile, adjuvant therapy appears to be protective but requires further investigation.

BACKGROUND:Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)-derived pancreatic cancer was previously categorized into tubular, colloid, and oncocytic subtypes. Intraductal oncocytic papillary neoplasms (IOPN) has long been associated with superior prognosis/indolent behavior, however, there is discordant emerging evidence. This study aimed to investigate this conflicting literature. METHODS:Patients with resected IOPN-derived and IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer were identified from six international centers. Log-rank tests compared time to (TtR) and survival after (SAR) recurrence and five-year overall survival (OS). A multivariable mixed model was used to determine hazard ratios (HR) with confidence intervals (95%CI) for five-year survival. RESULTS:Of 879 patients, 20 (2%) had IOPN-derived pancreatic cancer. Most patients had T1 (55%) or N0 (70%) disease. IOPN and colloid IPMN-derived pancreatic cancers had similar recurrence rates (25% vs. 24%), while recurrence was more common in tubular IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer (42%, p < 0.001). IOPN-derived pancreatic cancer displayed a longer TtR and SAR compared to colloid and tubular IPMN-derived pancreatic cancers. IOPN-derived and colloid IPMN-derived cancers demonstrated significantly lower 5-year mortality risks compared to tubular IPMN-derived cancers (74% and 27% risk reduction, respectively; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:IOPN-derived pancreatic cancers have excellent OS. However, some patients have poor prognostic factors and are at risk for both local and systemic recurrence. Given more indolent disease progression given delayed TtR and prolonged SAR compared to colloid and tubular IPMN-derived pancreatic cancers, there may be a role for prolonged surveillance.

BACKGROUND:Antithrombotic therapy (AT) aims to strike a balance between preventing thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. However, evidence for AT management after pancreatectomy with vascular reconstruction is lacking. We aimed to provide an overview of the current use of AT for pancreatic surgery with vascular reconstructions. PATIENTS AND METHODS/METHODS:A web-based survey was distributed to 123 surgeons from high-volume pancreas centers (>50 pancreatic resections/year). AT management after different types of vascular reconstruction were investigated. An "aggressive" protocol was defined as the use of any AT protocol other than prophylactic heparin, aspirin, or their combination. RESULTS:The survey was completed by 80 surgeons (59% Europe, 30% USA, 11% Asia). In Europe/Asia, prophylactic heparin was the most commonly reported protocol after partial venous resection/end-to-end anastomosis/human graft (71%/65%/50%, respectively), and an "aggressive" protocol (86%) was the most frequently used after prosthetic graft reconstruction. Conversely, in the USA, prophylactic heparin + aspirin was the most commonly reported protocol after all types of venous reconstruction. Following arterial reconstruction, heparin + aspirin was the most commonly reported protocol, regardless of region. An "aggressive" protocol was more frequently used in Europe/Asia (odds ratio (OR) 1.28; p < 0.001) and following vein reconstruction with either human graft (OR 1.2; p = 0.007) or prosthetic graft (OR 1.56, p <0.001), while ultrasound (OR 1.65; p < 0.001) and arterial reconstruction (OR 1.64; p < 0.001) were significantly associated with antiplatelet use. CONCLUSIONS:In an international cohort of high-volume pancreas surgeons, significant variation in the use of AT following pancreatectomy with vascular reconstruction was observed. This variation was driven by geographical differences and the type of vascular reconstructions performed. In an international cohort of high-volume pancreas surgeons, this Worldwide Snapshot Survey analyzed the current use of antithrombotic therapy for pancreatic surgery with vascular reconstruction. A significant heterogeneity in antithrombotic practice was found and it was mainly driven by geographical differences and the type of vascular reconstructions performed.

Patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) frequently present with liver metastases, which severely limit treatment options and prognosis. In other cancers, treatment of liver disease can improve outcomes and similar approaches are being explored in PDAC. Clinical data for locoregional control of pancreatic cancer liver metastases (PCLM) are limited, and histotripsy offers a new noninvasive tool for disease control. This study evaluates the preliminary safety, efficacy, and imaging findings of histotripsy in patients with PCLM.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To evaluate patient preferences for decision-making role in the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) of the pancreas and to identify individual characteristics associated with those preferences. BACKGROUND:Management of IPMNs is rooted in uncertainty with current guidelines failing to incorporate patients' preferences and values. METHODS:A representative sample of participants aged 40-70 were recruited to evaluate a clinical vignette where they were given the option to undergo surveillance or surgical resection of their IPMN. Their preferred role in the decision-making process for the vignette was evaluated using the Control Preference Scale. The relationship between control preference and variables including cancer anxiety, health literacy, and education level was analyzed. RESULTS:Of the 520 participants in the study, most preferred an active role (65%), followed by shared (29%), and passive roles (6%) in the decision-making process. Lower health literacy was significantly associated with a more passive control preference (p = 0.003). Non-active preference was significantly associated with Latino race compared to White race (odds ratio = 0.52, p = 0.009) in multivariate analysis. We found no significant association between control preference and education level or cancer anxiety. CONCLUSIONS:Most patients preferred an active role in IPMN treatment decisions. Lower health literacy and Latino race were associated with a preference for non-active decision roles. Clinicians should strive to align patient involvement in IPMN treatment decisions with their patient's preferred role.

OBJECTIVE:To establish a novel method for evaluating carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) during neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and assess its role in predicting overall (OS) and disease-free (DFS) survival in borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma (BR-PC). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA/BACKGROUND:Static CA19-9 values or percentage changes often fail to capture therapeutic responses in patients with BR-PC undergoing NAT. Improved evaluation methods are essential for guiding the treatment. METHODS:This was a retrospective multicenter study of patients who underwent BR-PC surgery. Two parameters were developed: slope coefficient (SC, change in CA19-9 divided by therapy duration) and mean δf (mδf, calculated as the sum of CA19-9 values over therapy intervals divided by the number of 15-day periods). The main objective was to correlate mδf with OS thresholds derived using a maximally selected log-rank statistic and validated in independent cohorts. RESULTS:Overall, 991 patients (median age 65 [59-71] years; 49% male) were included. The thresholds for mδf were defined as U.mL-1. month-1 (negative SC) and U.mL-1. month-1 (positive SC). Patients with mδf below these thresholds had significantly better prognoses, with hazard ratios (HR) for OS (95% CI) of 0.6 (0.4-0.8; P<0.01) and 0.4 (0.2-0.9; P=0.04) for negative and positive SC, respectively. Both thresholds were validated for mOS, with 29 vs 22 months (P=0.015) and 32 vs 16 months (P=0.0034) for negative and positive SC, respectively. Similarly, the mDFS was 13 vs 10 months (P=0.011) and 12 vs 7 months (P=0.0018), respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:This CA19-9 evaluation approach accurately predicts survival outcomes, offering a valuable tool for optimizing treatment strategies. An mδf calculator is available at https://www.pancpals.com/tools.