Faculty Bibliography

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Advanced therapies infrequently achieve complete fistula closure in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). The primary objective of the STOMP2 clinical trial was to determine whether the implantable autologous cell therapy AVB-114 is effective in inducing remission of persistent Crohn's perianal fistulas versus standard of care. METHODS:Eligible patients had a single perianal fistula tract and had failed prior treatment or had documented medication intolerance to biologic or conventional CD therapy. All enrolled subjects underwent surgical fistula optimization and adipose tissue biopsy collection (in order to manufacture AVB-114) followed by 1:1 randomization to either standard of care (repeat fistula optimization including seton replacement) or AVB-114 implantation. The primary endpoint was combined fistula remission at 36 weeks, defined as closure of the external opening, no drainage of fluid despite gentle finger compression, and no collections >2cm in at least two of the three dimensions on MRI. RESULTS:Subjects at 14 U.S. sites were equally randomized to SoC (N=24) or AVB-114 (N=24). Week 36 combined remission was 8.3% and 45.8% for subjects randomized to SoC and AVB-114, respectively (38% difference, 95% CI 11-60%; p=0.0078). At Week 36, MRI revealed no subjects with collections >2cm, radiological improvement (≥50% decrease in the MAGNIFI-CD score from baseline) in 1 SoC subject and 3 AVB-114 subjects, and radiological healing (complete resolution of T2-weighted hyperintensity in fistula tract) in 2 SoC subjects and 5 AVB-114 subjects. Through Week 36, there were 40 and 56 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) for SoC and AVB-114, respectively. There were no serious TEAEs in the AVB-114 group through Week 36. CONCLUSIONS:A significantly higher proportion of patients treated with AVB-114 achieved combined remission versus SoC, and the treatment was well tolerated. These data support the safety and efficacy of AVB-114 in persistent Crohn's perianal fistulas.

OBJECTIVE:This research aimed to review the literature for definitions of moderate Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). BACKGROUND:Real-world evidence suggests that biologics may achieve better outcomes in patients with moderate disease than with severe disease; however, research has been hindered by the lack of consensus on the definition of moderate disease. STUDY/METHODS:We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) of observational and interventional studies published from 2015 onwards, followed by a targeted literature review (TLR) of phase 3 trials of pharmacological therapies from 2000 onwards, to identify definitions of disease severity. A consensus meeting was convened for experts to discuss how to distinguish moderate from mild or severe disease in clinical practice. RESULTS:The SLR and TLR included 140 and 101 publications, respectively. Six definitions of moderate CD were identified from 7 publications and 16 definitions of moderate UC from 23 publications. Most definitions were based on Crohn's Disease Activity Index (CDAI) or Mayo score (for UC). Three publications defined moderate CD as CDAI of 200 to 450, 220 to 450, or ≤330. Moderate UC was mostly defined as a Mayo score of 6 to 10 but there was overlap with the range used for severe UC. No definition of moderate disease encompassed quality of life or disease course and prognosis, which were considered important by experts in assessments of disease severity in clinical practice. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:A comprehensive and clinically relevant definition of moderate disease is needed to identify patients with CD or UC who can benefit from biologics.

BACKGROUND:The benefits of achieving endoscopic remission among older adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who have mild persistent disease activity are unknown. METHODS:This was a retrospective study of adults ≥ 60 with IBD who had mild or no disease activity on endoscopy from January 1, 2018-January 1, 2023. The primary outcome was a composite of major IBD-specific adverse events (hospitalizations, surgery, and prescription of corticosteroids for IBD-related symptoms) within 1 year of endoscopic assessment. Our secondary outcome was a composite of 1-year morbidity-related events (mortality, all-cause hospitalization, infection requiring antibiotics, venous thromboembolism, cardiovascular events, and osteoporotic fractures). We also assessed outcomes at 5 years. RESULTS:Among 504 patients, 192 (38.1%) had mild endoscopic disease and 312 (61.9%) were in endoscopic remission, with a median disease duration of 11 years. On multivariable analysis, mild endoscopic disease activity increased the odds of a 1-year adverse IBD-specific outcome (aOR 4.16, 95% CI 2.10-8.24), with similar results at 5 years. Furthermore, mild endoscopic disease was associated with increased odds of experiencing an adverse morbidity-related outcome within 1 year as compared to endoscopic remission (aOR 1.56, 95% CI 1.01-2.43). CONCLUSIONS:Among older adults with prevalent IBD, mild endoscopic disease activity, as compared to endoscopic remission, was associated with increased odds of adverse IBD-specific and morbidity-related outcomes at 1 year, with this risk persisting for IBD-specific outcomes at 5 years. These findings highlight the importance of achieving endoscopic remission, which may confer both short- and longer-term benefits in this population.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:There is a lack of safety and efficacy data for newer biologic agents among adults ≥ 60 years old with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) given their limited inclusion in clinical trials. We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing the safety and efficacy of ustekinumab (UST) or vedolizumab (VDZ) use in older adults as compared to younger adults with IBD. METHODS:This single-center retrospective study compared individuals 18 to 59 years old to individuals ≥ 60 years old with a confirmed diagnosis of IBD who began VDZ or UST treatment between 2014 and 2022. The primary efficacy and safety outcomes were endoscopic remission and serious infection, respectively. Secondary outcomes included endoscopic response, clinical remission, and non-severe adverse events. Multivariable regression was used to identify factors independently associated with safety and efficacy. RESULTS:Overall, 948 individuals were included, with 779 (82.2%) < 60 years-old. In total, 548 (57.8%) had Crohn's disease, 367 (38.7%) had ulcerative colitis, 33 (3.5%) had indeterminate colitis, and a total of 403 individuals (42.5%) initiated VDZ whereas 545 (57.5%) initiated UST. When assessing efficacy, younger and older individuals had comparable rates of endoscopic remission (< 60 years-old 27.5% vs 29.0% ≥ 60 years-old, p = 0.69) as well as clinical remission (< 60 years-old 26.4% vs 26.6% ≥ 60 years-old, p = 0.96). When assessing safety, serious infection rates (< 60 years-old 8.9% vs 8.9% ≥ 60 years-old, p  = 0.99) and non-severe adverse event rates (< 60 years-old 12.3% vs 8.9% ≥ 60 years-old, p = 0.21) were not significantly different. On multivariable analysis, measures of disease severity (prior advanced therapy use, prior corticosteroid use, severe disease) significantly decreased the odds of endoscopic and clinical remission. Additionally, prior advanced therapy use and the presence of comorbidities increased the odds of serious infections. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The use of UST and VDZ had similar efficacy and safety outcomes in older adults as compared to younger individuals with IBD. Decisions to utilize these biologics should be driven by overall disease burden and comorbidities, and not be deferred due to advanced chronological age alone.

BACKGROUND:Infliximab (IFX) is commonly used in the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC), yet up to 30% of individuals still require colectomy within 1 year. Clinical data characterizing these patients, however, are limited. AIMS/OBJECTIVE:We aimed to determine risk factors for colectomy among patients with ASUC who received in-hospital IFX treatment. METHODS:We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with ASUC who were treated with at least one dose of IFX while admitted between 2014 and 2022. Cox proportional hazards (PH) models were used to assess demographic, clinical, and laboratory risk factors for colectomy within 30 days and 1 year of IFX initiation. RESULTS:Overall, 36/170 (21.2%) patients underwent colectomy within 1 year of IFX initiation, with 22 (12.9%) individuals requiring colectomy within 30 days. On univariable analysis, concomitant Clostridioides difficile infection during admission, a ≤50% decrease in C-reactive protein (CRP) and experiencing 3 or more bowel movements per day within 48 hours after an initial IFX dose were significantly associated with 1-year colectomy. On multivariable Cox PH analysis, C. difficile infection during admission (aHR=2.92, 95% CI: 1.12-7.58) and a higher CRP/albumin ratio on admission (aHR=1.13, 95% CI: 1.01-1.27) were associated with increased colectomy risk within 1 year of IFX initiation. CONCLUSIONS:C. difficile infection and a higher CRP/albumin ratio on admission are associated with decreased time to colectomy within 1 year of IFX among patients presenting with ASUC. These factors may aid in early risk stratification to minimize delays in JAK-inhibitor initiation or surgical referral.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Targeted immunomodulators (eg, advanced therapies) effectively achieve symptomatic remission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, ~25%-50% of patients with IBD achieving symptomatic remission with an advanced therapy may have continued endoscopically/radiologically active bowel inflammation, and it is uncertain whether changing alternative advanced therapies in asymptomatic patients with IBD will reduce bowel inflammation and achieve durable deep remission. METHODS AND ANALYSIS/METHODS:The QUality Outcomes Treating IBD to Target (QUOTIENT) study is an open-label, multicentre, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial that aims to compare the efficacy and safety of switching to an alternative advanced therapy targeting endoscopic/radiological remission (treat-to-target) versus continuing the initial, or index, advanced therapy, in asymptomatic patients with IBD with moderate-to-severe endoscopic/radiological bowel inflammation. Enrolment is planned for ~250 participants in Canada/USA, randomised 1:1 to switching to alternative advanced therapy or continuing index advanced therapy, and then followed 104 weeks within routine clinical practice. Patient-reported outcomes measure efficacy and quality of life/treatment burden/safety. Primary endpoint is the time from randomisation to treatment failure. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION/BACKGROUND:The study is conducted in compliance with the protocol, ICH Good Clinical Practice, applicable regulatory requirements and appropriate review boards/independent ethics committees (approval numbers: Pro00077486; Pro00061437; STUDY00002062; 22-004171; i22-01269; IRB22-0890; IRB_00154397; 2000032384; SHIRB#2022.095-2; STUDY00007146; MMC#2024-18; REB#125290; 17784; Pro00142214; 20240660-01H), with documented written informed consent. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, scientific presentations, and publicly available Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) websites, including lay summaries. The Crohn's & Colitis Foundation Education, Support, and Advocacy Department, and our patient advocacy stakeholder, will develop educational and marketing resources to communicate findings to a broad audience (>250 000 patients/caregivers/healthcare professionals). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER/BACKGROUND:NCT05230173.

BACKGROUND:Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management has become increasingly complex, and education varies across fellowship programs. IBD 101 was designed to introduce first-year gastroenterology (GI) fellows to IBD care and training. METHODS:In 2019, a cohort of fellows participated in a 1-day course with small group learning and group observed structured clinical examinations. Pre- and postcourse surveys were administered to evaluate the course. To assess the long-term impact, surveys were emailed in May 2022 to all third-year fellows from previously participating programs. The primary outcome was comfort managing IBD scenarios and information regarding each fellow's exposure to IBD education. RESULTS:Fifty-five fellows from 32 programs participated. A total of 49 (89%) of 55 completed pre- and postcourse surveys. All fellows agreed that the course content was appropriate. In the postcourse survey, all fellows reported increased comfort managing IBD patients. Ninety-six percent of attendees stated that they would strongly recommend this course. Thirty-six fellows completed surveys in 2022, 21 (58%) attendees and 15 (42%) nonattendees. Attendees reported equivalent or higher levels of comfort compared with nonattendees. Higher global competence was noted among attendees (odds ratio, 5.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.91-29.9; P = .06) after adjusting for presence of a local IBD specialist, number of IBD patients seen monthly (≤5 vs >5), and rotation through an IBD service. CONCLUSIONS:IBD 101, an introductory course for first-year GI trainees, was associated with increased comfort managing IBD with a durable benefit independent of individual access to IBD education. Continuation of this program will further enhance the IBD education of future GI fellows.

BACKGROUND & AIMS/OBJECTIVE:The pivotal phase 3 True North (TN) study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of ozanimod in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. This analysis assessed ozanimod during TN and the ongoing open-label extension (OLE) in patients with active disease who were naive to advanced therapies (ATs). METHODS:TN was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial consisting of 10-week induction period and 42-week maintenance period. Eligible patients could enter the OLE. Symptomatic efficacy was evaluated from induction through the OLE. Clinical, endoscopic, and mucosal outcomes were evaluated at the end of induction (Week [W] 10) and maintenance (W52) and at predefined OLE timepoints (OLE W46 and W94). Safety during TN was reported. RESULTS:This analysis included 616 AT-naive patients. Numerically greater proportions of patients receiving ozanimod than placebo achieved symptomatic response (39% vs 29%, 95% confidence interval, -0.1 to 18.8) by W2, with significant differences (56% vs 39%, 95% confidence interval, 6.3-26.3) achieved by W4. Patients receiving ozanimod showed significant improvements across efficacy outcomes versus placebo at W10 and W52 (P < .05, all endpoints). In patients on continuous ozanimod who entered the OLE in clinical response at W52, 91% maintained clinical response through OLE W94, and 74% achieved endoscopic improvement and 57% achieved mucosal healing at OLE W94. In ozanimod-treated patients without clinical response by W10 who received extended induction in the OLE, 62% achieved symptomatic response by OLE W10. Safety outcomes in AT-naive patients were consistent with the total TN population. CONCLUSIONS:Ozanimod is an effective, durable, and well-tolerated oral therapy for AT-naive ulcerative colitis patients. CLINICALTRIALS/RESULTS:gov, numbers NCT02435992 and NCT02531126.