Faculty Bibliography

The decisional reference point, the central mechanism underlying behavioral economics, conditions our evaluations of all reinforcers. Whether a given event is experienced as positive or negative depends on this reference point. A pathological elevation of the reference point would lead a person to experience once pleasurable activities as negative reinforcers. Thus, it has been hypothesized that a reference point pathology may play a critical role in the symptomology of major depressive disorder (MDD). Here, we test the hypothesis that the reference point is pathologically elevated and dynamically inflexible in patients suffering with MDD compared to healthy controls. We find that depression is associated with a significant elevation of the reference point, and the magnitude of this elevation correlates with disease severity. The ability of patients with MDD to dynamically adjust their reference point to the environment is also dysfunctional. Our findings link the previously demonstrated treatment of depression by deep brain stimulation to modulation of the reference point in the anterior cingulate cortex and identify pathology in the dynamics of reference point setting as a potential cognitive mechanism in the disorder. Finally, these results reveal that a three-minute video game-like task measuring the reference point strongly correlates with depression severity. After further testing for clinical validity, this rapid assay may serve as a potential tool for assessing and monitoring depression.

There is a lack of consensus in the field about the indefinite use of psychostimulants for adult ADHD and the circumstances under which their deprescribing warrants consideration. To address this gap in knowledge, the American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology (ASCP) convened a Task Force on the deprescribing of psychotropic medications, including stimulant medications for adult ADHD, which entailed a focused literature review and 2-round Delphi survey querying 45 international psychopharmacology experts on factors related to deprescribing. Consensus (≥75% agreement, defined by endorsements of "strongly agree" or "moderately agree") was reached on 10 of 11 (91%) Delphi statements. Survey responses plus literature review suggest that stimulant deprescribing may be appropriate when 1) the diagnosis of ADHD is deemed incorrect upon reevaluation unless another stimulant-responsive condition is evident; 2) cognitive complaints have other more likely etiologies for which stimulant medications are inappropriate; 3) cognitive benefits are absent; 4) stimulant medications exacerbate medical or other psychiatric comorbidities; 5) adverse effects, if present, are non-remediable; 6) stimulant medications are misused; and 7) untreated comorbid non-cannabis substance use disorders are present. Panelists just fell short of consensus in perceiving regular use of cannabis as an insufficient reason to deprescribe stimulant medications in adult ADHD patients. In sum, clinical circumstances and rationales can be identified that support decisions to deprescribe stimulant medications for adult ADHD. Deliberate stimulant misuse or abuse, comorbid medical or psychiatric contraindications, and diagnostic inaccuracy pose strong reasons to consider deprescribing stimulants, potentially in favor of alternative pharmacotherapies and psychotherapies for adult ADHD.

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is a severe and debilitating illness. Despite the available treatments, clinical outcomes remain suboptimal, and hence, it is crucial to identify predictive factors for response. This is a secondary analysis investigating the relationship between treatment preference and response to treatment in the antidepressant incomplete and non-responders with treatment resistant depression (ASCERTAIN-TRD) trial (NCT02977299) comparing three treatment arms [aripiprazole augmentation, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) augmentation, switching to venlafaxine XR or duloxetine] in MDD patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) who are currently on ongoing, stable, and adequate antidepressant therapy. Patient treatment preferences were recorded in the study entry. In total, 278 subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups: aripiprazole (n = 92), rTMS (n = 70), or venlafaxine/duloxetine (n = 98). Of these 278 subjects, 256 (92.1%) had at least one postbaseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score and a recorded treatment preference and were included in this secondary analysis. In the total population, participants' preferences did not affect their response to treatment, and the change in MADRS score was similar among patients who received their preferred treatment, had no preference, or received treatment against their preference (P = 0.49). These results indicate that patient preference is not a significant factor that predisposes to optimal treatment outcomes.

OBJECTIVE:Anxious depression is a negative prognostic factor linked to worse outcomes in major depressive disorder (MDD). However, its role in treatment-resistant depression (TRD) remains unclear. This secondary analysis of the ASCERTAIN-TRD trial investigates the role of anxious depression as a predictor or moderator of treatment response. METHODS:A Hamilton Depression Rating Scale Anxiety and Somatization Subscale score of at least 7 identified subjects with the anxious depressive subtype. Treatment response was evaluated based on changes in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores using mixed-effects models with repeated measures and included additional terms accounting for the presence or absence of anxious depression. Two hundred fifty-three patients, who had at least one post-baseline Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale score were included in the analysis. Of them, 182 subjects presented anxious and 71 nonanxious depression. RESULTS:Treatment outcomes were similar across the three treatment groups regardless of anxious MDD status (P-value > 0.5 for all comparisons) suggesting that anxious depression was not a significant predictor or moderator of treatment outcome. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:These findings indicate that anxious depression alone may be prognostic rather than predictive. These findings may be a useful guidance for clinicians, suggesting that standard TRD treatments remain applicable in the anxious MDD subtype.

Functional magnetic resonance imaging studies have reported disruptions in functional connectivity within brain networks, known as connectomes. Researchers have tested connectomes to see whether they serve as biomarkers for various psychiatric conditions. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic test accuracy of predictive models of connectomes derived from resting-state fMRI in diagnosing obsessive-compulsive disorder. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted on previous studies assessing the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of connectome-based diagnostic models in obsessive-compulsive disorder and healthy controls. Eight studies were identified, comprising 563 individuals with obsessive-compulsive disorder and 564 healthy controls. The results revealed robust diagnostic performance with a pooled sensitivity of 0.827 (95% CI: 0.779-0.867) and specificity of 0.794 (95% CI: 0.759-0.826). Connectome-based diagnostic models demonstrated excellent clinical utility, with an area under the curve of 87% (95% CI: 84%-90%), and significant predictive power as indicated by positive (4.15) and negative (0.21) likelihood ratios, as well as strong diagnostic odds ratio of 18.69 (95% CI: 11.84-29.49). The results highlight the potential of functional connectome-based predictive modeling as a robust tool for accurately diagnosing obsessive-compulsive disorder, with possibility of future implications for early diagnosis, monitoring treatment-related changes, involving in decision modeling, and understanding the biological mechanisms underlying obsessive-compulsive disorder.

The American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology convened a 45-member international expert task force to identify circumstances supporting the deprescribing of core psychotropic medications for major depressive disorder (MDD) and bipolar disorders. Three Delphi survey rounds plus a selective literature review identified points of consensus (predefined as ≥75% agreement) about when antidepressant, antipsychotic, mood stabiliser and sedative-hypnotic deprescribing is warranted. Twenty out of 32 statements (63%) achieved consensus across seven thematic areas. In MDD, panellists favoured discontinuing antidepressants when mechanisms of action are duplicative, adequate trials produce ≤25% improvement or loss of prior efficacy cannot be regained through dose increases or augmentations. Indefinite antidepressant maintenance in MDD was favoured after three or more lifetime episodes. In bipolar disorder, antidepressant deprescribing was favoured in the setting of rapid cycling, mixed features or emerging mania/hypomania symptoms; and discouraged if prior antidepressant cessation led to relapse. In nonpsychotic mood disorders, panellists favoured deprescribing antipsychotics that caused significant weight gain or tardive dyskinesia over adding pharmacological antidotes. Deprescribing to achieve an eventual medication-free status was considered inappropriate, in bipolar type 1, but not necessarily bipolar type 2 disorder. Although individualised circumstances necessarily inform psychopharmacology management, clinical presentations that misalign with existing pharmacotherapies may signal the desirability of cautious deprescribing.

The locus coeruleus (LC) plays important roles in sleep/wake regulation and cognitive functions. LC neurons may be particularly sensitive to neural injury and serve as an early site of accumulation pathological tau in Alzheimer's disease. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) creates both chronic intermittent hypoxia and sleep fragmentation as potential insults to differentially sensitive neural populations including the locus coeruleus (LC). Using high field 7T imaging in cognitively normal older adults, we demonstrate that time spent with an oxygen saturation below 90% (T90), a measure of OSA's hypoxic burden, inversely correlates with LC structural integrity and explains significant variance in LC structural integrity after controlling for age, sex, and BMI. In contrast, other sleep variables such as the apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), total sleep time, and sleep efficiency did not contribute significant variance in LC structural integrity in this model. Thus, in the diagnosis of OSA, attention to hypoxic burden variables may be important in risk stratification for LC neural injury. This observation may inform future work determining whether mitigation of the hypoxemic burden from OSA can slow deterioration in LC integrity.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:There is a need for greater recognition of clinical psychopharmacology endpoints, including instances where specific psychotropic medications may become unnecessary, redundant, contradictory, or otherwise inappropriate and therefore merit deprescribing. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To address circumstances warranting psychotropic medication deprescribing. EVIDENCE REVIEW/UNASSIGNED:The American Society of Clinical Psychopharmacology convened a panel of 45 international psychopharmacology experts who developed and completed a multiround Delphi survey and conducted a focused literature review between January and May of 2025, in order to identify areas of consensus or disagreement on key aspects of the deprescribing of psychotropic medications. These included collaborative risk-benefit assessments with patients; pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors; pharmacogenomics; distinguishing redundant or conflictual from complementary mechanisms of action; managing adverse effects; assuring medication adherence; drug tolerance or tachyphylaxis; medication misuse; and the psychological context and ramifications of deprescribing. FINDINGS/UNASSIGNED:Consensus was achieved on 44 of 50 final Delphi statements (88%). Panelists unanimously agreed that components of a pharmacotherapy regimen should undergo periodic review to ensure that treatments target relevant symptoms and have favorable risk-benefit ratios. Key points of consensus were that deprescribing: (1) should not occur without first assessing medication adherence; (2) merits consideration if less than partial therapeutic response is apparent, or if treatment goals have been reached and relapse prevention is not a long-term objective; (3) involves psychological ramifications that warrant attention; (4) should be followed by close clinical monitoring; and (5) risk-benefit decisions should ideally involve active patient participation within a shared decision-making model. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:Through this Consensus Statement, the Task Force identified circumstances in which the selective elimination of certain psychotropic medications may be clinically indicated. Empirical trials are needed to assess the implementation of deprescribing protocols and gauge their safe, effective, and acceptable outcomes.

Bipolar disorder is associated with increased mortality from cardiovascular disease, incidence of Metabolic Syndrome (MetS), and obesity. Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) may contribute to this increased incidence, but findings have been mixed. We aimed to determine associations between ACEs and cardiometabolic risk markers in people with bipolar disorder, and how they change during pharmacological treatment. Data was analysed from 482 participants with bipolar disorder treated for 24 weeks with lithium or quetiapine, comparing those with and without ACEs across cardiometabolic markers. At baseline, those with ACEs had higher body mass indexes but were similar on all other cardiometabolic measures. During the 24-week treatment period, those with ACEs improved slightly more on continuous metabolic syndrome score (cMetS; p = .004), waist circumference, (p = .041) high density lipoproteins (HDL) cholesterol, (p = .028) and diastolic blood pressure (p = .042) than those without ACEs. Sensitivity analysis exploring the role of ACE type revealed that change in HDL was most strongly associated with sexual abuse; higher diastolic blood pressure with emotional abuse; and increased waist circumference with emotional and physical abuse, and higher cMetS with all three ACE types. There were almost no baseline differences in cardiometabolic markers between the ACE and no ACE groups. Those with ACEs seemingly benefitted more from psychiatric treatment regarding their cardiovascular health compared to the no ACE group. Future research should explore links between ACEs and cardiovascular health in those with bipolar disorder, including benefits of psychiatric treatment, the role of specific ACE types, and longer-term outcomes.

PURPOSE/UNASSIGNED:Substantial evidence supports the effectiveness of implanted Vagus Nerve Stimulation (VNS) in the management of unipolar difficult-to-treat depression (DTD). While the treatment is included in several national and international guidelines, there is limited information to guide clinicians regarding patient selection and use of VNS in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS/UNASSIGNED:A group of 32 experts in the use of VNS were identified from the main countries currently providing the treatment globally. A modified Delphi technique was used to document views on 55 statements regarding the goals, patient selection, and use of VNS treatment in routine clinical practice. Statements were rated on a 9-point Likert scale from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree". Over the course of three rounds of voting, with statements modified based on anonymous comments from panelists, consensus agreement or disagreement was deemed if at least 75% of panel members scored a statement between 7 and 9, or 1 and 3, respectively. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Consensus was reached by the panel on 75% of the statements covering a wide range of issues. There was agreement that the main goals for VNS are long-term management of symptoms and improvement in quality of life, that the treatment is appropriate for all ages of patients and that there are few contraindications. CONCLUSION/UNASSIGNED:A set of expert recommendations for the use of VNS for DTD was generated. These should be of value to clinicians to ensure current best practices are followed when considering this treatment.