Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:The optimal number of pulsed field ablation (PFA) applications during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear. We hypothesized that the number of PFA applications would predict atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence rates. OBJECTIVE:To determine whether higher numbers of PFA applications would decrease ATA recurrence rates. METHODS:We studied cases of patients with AF undergoing first-time ablation with PFA between 5/6/24 and 10/7/24. All patients underwent pulmonary vein and posterior wall isolation. The primary outcome was ATA recurrence. Additional outcomes included stroke, post-procedural acute kidney injury (AKI), total procedure time, and major periprocedural complications. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to determine if the number of PFA applications predicted ATA recurrence. RESULTS:In a cohort consisting of 177 patients, univariable and multivariable analysis showed that the number of PFA applications split at the smallest quartile (< 57 applications) versus the largest three quartiles (≥ 57 applications) was the strongest predictor of ATA recurrence (p = 0.03). ATA recurrence at 1 year (29% vs. 8%; p < 0.01) and AF burden on continuous monitor (4% vs. 0%; p < 0.01) was higher with the standard (< 57 applications) vs higher (≥ 57 applications) PFA dose groups. When comparing the standard versus higher PFA dose groups, there was no difference in total procedure time (106 vs. 107 min; p = 0.77), major periprocedural complications (0% vs. 2%; p = 0.33), or post-procedural AKI (2% vs. 2%; p = 0.69). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Increasing number of PFA applications is associated with reduced ATA recurrence. A higher number of PFA applications may decrease ATA recurrence without affecting procedure times or complication rate.

BACKGROUND:Using high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) to improve catheter stability with conventional energy sources during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is associated with higher ablation success and improved arrhythmic outcomes. The utility of HFJV with pulsed field ablation (PFA) for AF is unclear. We investigated the utility of HFJV vs. standard ventilation in PFA for AF. METHODS:We studied consecutive cases of patients with AF undergoing PFA between 5/6/24 to 10/10/24. Procedural data collected included total procedure time and major periprocedural complications. Clinical data collected included atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence, stroke, and major bleeding at one-year follow-up. Outcomes were compared in cases where HFJV was used vs. standard ventilation. RESULTS:A total of 512 patients were included in this study (307 standard ventilation, 205 HFJV). There was no difference in ATA recurrence by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis between standard ventilation and HFJV groups (log rank test p = 0.59). When comparing standard ventilation vs. HFJV groups, there was no difference in ATA recurrence at one year (23% vs. 26%; p = 0.43), AF burden on continuous monitoring (9 ± 5% vs. 8 ± 24%; p = 0.85), total procedure time (114 ± 38 vs. 115 ± 33 min; p = 0.78), or major periprocedural complications (3% vs. 2%; p = 0.64). There was no difference in arrhythmic outcomes when patients were stratified by AF type and whether patients presented for first-time or redo ablation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Using HFJV in PFA for AF produces similar sinus rhythm maintenance overall and when stratified by AF type without affecting procedure times or complication rate.

Randomized trials of ethanol infusion into the vein of Marshall (EIVOM) have shown efficacy in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in patients presenting for de novo ablation. The utility of EIVOM in AF patients who present for redo ablation is unclear. This meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Eligible studies reported outcomes in AF patients with previous ablation who underwent redo catheter ablation (CA) alone vs. combined redo CA and EIVOM. Five observational studies comprising 568 patients were included. When comparing combined redo CA and EIVOM vs. redo CA alone, pooled results showed no difference in freedom from arrhythmia (FFA) in all patients (risk ratio [RR] 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.96-1.33), FFA in persistent AF patients only (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.90-1.29), total procedure time (mean difference -0.59; 95% CI -41.04-39.85), or major periprocedural complications (RR 0.81; 95% CI 0.06-11.64). Patients with AF recurrence after ablation represent a difficult-to-treat population. Salvage therapy with combined CA and EIVOM did not improve arrhythmic outcomes compared to CA alone in AF patients who presented for redo ablation.

BACKGROUND:Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and posterior wall isolation (PWI) are frequently used in the treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Minimal data support adjunct PWI, possibly due to lack of durability via epicardial reconnections. OBJECTIVE:To determine the impact of very high output PW pace-capture testing in patients with persistent AF on AF/AT recurrence. METHODS:We performed a retrospective study of consecutive patients who underwent radiofrequency ablation for persistent AF and received PVI and PWI, as well as a cavotricuspid isthmus line (CTI). After the creation of three linear PW lesions (roof, carina-to-carina, and inferior PV levels), pace-capture testing was performed on the PW. The first cohort confirmed PWI using 10 mA at 2 ms (10 × 2) to pace capture. Sequentially, the second cohort utilized 20 mA at 10 ms (20 × 10). If the PW was captured, additional lesions were performed. Patients were excluded if additional lesion sets beyond PVI, PWI, and CTI were performed. RESULTS:A total of 232 patients were included. Of these, 129 (56%) patients were in the 20 × 10 group, and 103 (44%) patients were in the 10 × 2 group. The two groups did not differ in age, sex, proportion of comorbidities, presenting rhythm, left ventricular ejection fraction, or left atrial size. Despite the increase in procedure time and lesion number, in the time-to-event analysis, patients in the 20 × 10 group experienced recurrent AF/AT more frequently than those in the 10 × 2 group (log rank p = 0.01). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Testing PWI in persistent AF with pace capture at 20 mA at 10 ms did not improve freedom from arrhythmia and may paradoxically be associated with harm. Our findings question whether PWI, regardless of durability, is effective in treating persistent AF.

To evaluate the performance of open-weight and proprietary LLMs, with and without Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG), on cardiology board-style questions and benchmark them against the human average. We tested 14 LLMs (6 open-weight, 8 proprietary) on 449 multiple-choice questions from the American College of Cardiology Self-Assessment Program (ACCSAP). Accuracy was measured as percent correct. RAG was implemented using a knowledge base of 123 guideline and textbook documents. The open-weight model DeepSeek R1 achieved the highest accuracy at 86.9% (95% CI: 83.4-89.7%), outperforming proprietary models and the human average of 78%. GPT 4o (80.9%, 95% CI: 77.0-84.2%) and the commercial platform OpenEvidence (81.3%, 95% CI: 77.4-84.7%) demonstrated similar performance. A positive correlation between model size and performance was observed within model families, but across families, substantial variability persisted among models with similar parameter counts. After RAG, all models improved, and open-weight models like Mistral Large 2 (78.0%, 95% CI: 73.9-81.5) performed comparably to proprietary alternatives like GPT 4o. Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into clinical workflows, yet their performance in cardiovascular medicine remains insufficiently evaluated. Open-weight models can match or exceed proprietary systems in cardiovascular knowledge, with RAG particularly beneficial for smaller models. Given their transparency, configurability, and potential for local deployment, open-weight models, strategically augmented, represent viable, lower-cost alternatives for clinical applications. Open-weight LLMs demonstrate competency in cardiovascular medicine comparable to or exceeding that of proprietary models, with and without RAG depending on the model.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:A lower frequency early electrogram (EGM) or broad area of early activation during premature ventricular contraction (PVC) mapping may be associated with a PVC origin in an opposing chamber or deep within the mapped surface. The utility of quantifying EGM frequency at early activation sites and isochronal activated surface area (IASA) is unclear. Our study aimed to investigate the utility of EGM frequency analysis and IASA mapping to complement activation mapping during PVC ablation. METHODS:High density PVC activation and IASA maps were created using a multi-electrode mapping catheter in 25 patients undergoing PVC ablation. EGMs in early activation regions were retrospectively studied. IASAs in each mapped chamber were analyzed. RESULTS:within 10 ms was unsuccessful. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Higher EGM frequency and smaller IASA were associated with successful ablation of PVCs. Ablation at sites with EGM frequency > 325 Hz was successful in all patients. The utility of identifying higher frequency EGMs at early activation sites requires further study.

BACKGROUND:Identifying nearfield and farfield signals is critical to mapping and ablating cardiac arrhythmias. This assessment is qualitative, depending on the "sharpness" of pulmonary vein (PV) electrograms. Electrogram peak frequency (PF) analysis is hypothesized to be a quantitative measure of signal proximity. OBJECTIVE:To confirm if PF defines nearfield versus farfield electrical signals and if it can be used during ablation to establish pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). METHODS:We created a cohort of 30 patients with AF undergoing PVI. Left atrial and PV maps of PF were generated before and after PVI. In the first 10 patients with paroxysmal AF (cohort 1), a cutoff value was selected to predict nearfield versus farfield signals. This cutoff was validated in a cohort of 10 patients with paroxysmal AF (cohort 2) and a cohort of 10 patients with persistent AF (cohort 3). RESULTS:PF was lower in farfield electrograms than nearfield electrograms. A PF cutoff of 300 Hz had a sensitivity of 93.2% (95% CI 81.3% - 98.6%) in cohort 1, 90.0% (95% CI 76.3 - 97.2) in cohort 2, and 98.6% (95% CI 90.1 - 99.7%) in cohort 3 for differentiating farfield from nearfield electrograms. The specificity was 100.0% (95% CI 98.2% - 100.0%) and the AUC was 0.99 (95% CI 0.97 - 1.00) in all patients. CONCLUSIONS:We confirmed the hypothesis that PF distinguishes nearfield from farfield electrograms. PF analysis improves the recognition of PV isolation. Mapping and ablation strategies utilizing PF should be pursued to improve ablation outcomes.

BACKGROUND:Vein of Marshall (VOM) ethanol ablation is effective in preventing recurrence in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) as a de novo strategy. There is minimal data on its use in recurrent AF. OBJECTIVE:We investigated the efficacy of VOM ethanol ablation for recurrence despite initial AF ablation. METHODS:Retrospective analysis was performed of persistent AF patients who underwent repeat ablation after an initial ablation for persistent AF. All patients had pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), posterior wall isolation (PWI), and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) during their previous ablation(s). At redo ablation, controls underwent confirmation and completion of previous ablation steps, substrate modification, and a search for non-PV triggers. Cases had additional VOM ethanol ablation combined with mitral isthmus ablation. RESULTS:One hundred and seven patients (49 VOM, 60 control) were included. There was no difference in AF recurrence at 1-year comparing VOM patients (47%) and controls (38%), (p = 0.39). Within the VOM group, the mean AF burden decreased from 38% preablation to 10% 12-months post (p = 0.003). The proportion of recurrent persistent AF decreased from 65% preablation to 26% post (p = 0.004). There was no significant difference in reduction in AF burden or proportion of recurrent persistent AF when comparing VOM cases and controls. Six percent of VOM patients developed intraprocedural left atrial appendage (LAA) isolation. CONCLUSIONS:In patients with previous PVI, PWI, and CTI ablation, VOM ethanol ablation did not demonstrate a reduction in AF recurrence or burden when compared with a strategy of substrate modification and trigger ablation alone and increases the risk of LAA isolation.