Faculty Bibliography

Patients requiring breast reconstruction following radiation therapy or prior failed autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) or implant-based breast reconstruction (IBBR) represent a challenging cohort and often present with compromised vascularity, scarred anatomy, and subsequent increased rates of complications. In this review, we discuss microsurgical strategies designed to optimize donor tissue in these challenging clinical scenarios, including the use of stacked or bipedicled flaps, and the utility of intraoperative indocyanine green angiography. We also review approaches to alternate recipient vessel selection in the suboptimal chest, and we address specific strategies for the revision setting, like soft tissue support and hybrid reconstruction with ABR and IBBR. By synthesizing the current literature and expert experience, this narrative review provides a practical framework for microsurgeons managing complex breast reconstruction in higher-risk patients.

Prepectoral breast reconstruction offers esthetic and recovery advantages but may be more vulnerable to complications due to the absence of muscular coverage. This study examined the clinical course of patients with failed prepectoral implant reconstruction. All consecutive prepectoral reconstructions performed between March 2017 and July 2022 at a single tertiary center were reviewed. Of 239 reconstructions, 42 (17.5%) ultimately failed, most commonly due to infection (50%). Sixteen patients (38%) underwent definitive reconstruction with a median interval of 379 days (IQR 249) from initial surgery to final reconstruction. The most common secondary reconstruction modalities were implant-based reconstruction (31%) and free-tissue transfer (31%). On multivariate analysis, increasing age, higher body mass index (BMI), and prior radiation were independently associated with implant loss. Failure of salvage after prepectoral reconstruction remains a major challenge and often results in delayed or abandoned reconstruction, highlighting the need for careful patient selection.

BACKGROUND:Concerns regarding information inaccuracy when using general-purpose large language models have prompted the quest for alternative tools. OpenEvidence has emerged as a healthcare-focused large language model trained exclusively on data from peer-reviewed medical literature. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:This study compared the quality, accuracy, and readability of aesthetic surgery patient education materials generated by OpenEvidence and ChatGPT. METHODS:A standardized prompt requesting comprehensive postoperative discharge instructions for twenty of the most common aesthetic surgery procedures was entered into OpenEvidence and ChatGPT-5. Outputs were evaluated using four validated assessment tools: the DISCERN instrument for information quality (1-5), the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Printable Materials (PEMAT-P) for information understandability and actionability (0-100), the Flesch-Kincaid scale for estimated grade level (fifth grade to professional level) and reading ease (0-100), and a Likert scale for citation accuracy (1-4). RESULTS:OpenEvidence scored significantly higher than ChatGPT-5 in DISCERN (3.3 ± 0.4 vs. 1.7 ± 0.4, p<0.001) and the citation accuracy scale (2.4 ±1.3 vs. 1.5 ± 0.7, p=0.007). Scores were comparable among both tools in PEMAT-P understandability (71 ± 5 vs. 69 ± 0, p=0.3) and actionability (52 ± 12 vs. 54 ± 5, p=0.6), as well as on the Flesch Kincaid Grade Level (9.3 ± 1.0 vs. 9.2 ± 0.6, p=0.8) and the Flesch Reading Ease Score (40.0 ± 6.6 vs. 41.0 ± 5.5, p=0.6). CONCLUSIONS:OpenEvidence generated materials of significantly higher quality and reliability than ChatGPT, suggesting it may serve as a more reliable alternative for patient education in aesthetic surgery practice.

BACKGROUND:Umbilicoplasty is a critical step in donor-site closure following abdominally based autologous breast reconstruction (ABR). While various incision designs and transposition techniques have been described, their impact on patient- and surgeon-assessed aesthetic outcomes remains poorly defined. METHODS:A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Ovid EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched through August 1, 2025, for studies evaluating umbilicoplasty after ABR. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case series reporting surgical technique, aesthetic, and/or patient satisfaction outcomes. Data extraction included study characteristics, surgical techniques, patient- and surgeon-assessed aesthetic outcomes, and complications. Risk of bias was assessed using standardized tools. RESULTS:Eight studies comprising 362 patients met inclusion criteria. Umbilicoplasty techniques varied, including oval, U/inverted-U, and Mercedes/inverted Mercedes as well as a neo-umbilicoplasty approaches. Complication rates were low with hypertrophic scarring and umbilical stenosis being most common. Aesthetic outcomes were variably reported, with limited use of validated scales, but generally favored designs that avoid an uninterrupted oval. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:While reported complication rates are low, methodological limitations and underreporting preclude definitive conclusions about technique safety or superiority. Umbilicoplasty should be individualized, with careful attention to perfusion. Future studies should prioritize standardized reporting, validated outcome measures, and multicenter collaboration to strengthen the evidence base and guide best practices in abdominally based breast reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III/METHODS:This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Despite the growing demand for hyaluronic acid (HA) lip fillers, there is a paucity of robust, quantitative data across high-powered studies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of HA lip fillers as reported by randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, utilizing PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane, and eligible studies included RCTs with human subjects utilizing HA filler for lip augmentation. Meta-analysis evaluated rates of improvement in lip fullness, aesthetic appearance, patient satisfaction, and adverse events. A comprehensive review initially identified 2,038 articles. Following screening by title and abstract, full-text review, and risk of bias assessment with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2), sixteen articles were included in the study. Meta-analysis demonstrated that 60% (95% CI: 44-76%) had improvement in lip fullness, 82% (95% CI: 67-92%) had improvement in aesthetic appearance, 68% (95% CI: 58-78%) reported satisfaction, 50% (95% CI: 27-73%) had adverse events, and 1.5% (95% CI: 1.9-4.0%) had serious adverse events requiring treatment, needing follow-up, or lasting beyond 30 days. The most common adverse events were swelling (78%), firmness (48%), bruising (34%), and tenderness (33%). Across studies with the highest level of evidence, HA filler efficacy and patient satisfaction is moderate to high. Severe adverse reactions are rare, but adverse events are common.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Prepectoral direct-to-implant (DTI) breast reconstruction has gained popularity for reducing postoperative pain, animation deformity, and the number of surgical procedures. However, the limited vascularized tissue overlying the implant presents challenges. This study evaluated mean 18-month outcomes in prepectoral DTI patients using a poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB) wrap designed to optimize reconstructive results. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:We retrospectively reviewed all consecutive patients who underwent prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction with our P4HB-implant construct. Data were collected via chart review. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:. The mean (± SD) follow-up time was 18.1 (± 5.1) months. Thirty (30 of 50, 60%) patients did not require further procedures beyond the index operation. No patients had implant malposition/dystopia. Of patients requiring a subsequent operation, the majority (12 of 20, 60%) of operations were for aesthetic optimization. Eight (8 of 87, 9.2%) breasts required a subsequent operation due to complications with 4 (4 of 87, 4.6%) of these breasts requiring removal of the construct. Increased BMI and age were found to significantly decrease the odds of rippling (odds ratios 0.73 and 0.89, respectively), and increased BMI was also found to significantly increase the odds of major complications (odds ratio 1.21). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:This is the first study reporting mean 18-month P4HB outcomes in prepectoral DTI breast reconstruction at full hydrolysis. Most patients did not require revisional procedures during the follow-up period, and reoperations were primarily for aesthetic concerns. These findings suggest that P4HB is an effective adjunct for implant stabilization in breast reconstruction.

Several biologic and synthetic adjuncts have been employed to reduce ptosis and improve cosmesis in breast surgery. Poly-4-hydroxybutyrate (P4HB), a fully absorbable polymer, continues to increase in use. This study sought to identify uses of P4HB in both reconstructive and aesthetic breast surgery and synthesize the available data on its outcomes and efficacy. A literature search was performed from inception to May 2024 following PRISMA in PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Two independent reviewers screened the studies for eligibility. Bibliographies and citing references from selected articles from Scopus (Elsevier) were also reviewed. The search identified 372 studies, with 16 articles included. All prospective and retrospective case series utilizing P4HB reported high rates of patient satisfaction and scaffold incorporation as well as low complication rates including recurrent ptosis, implant malposition, and capsular contracture. One retrospective cohort study reported significantly higher rates of capsular contracture with use of P4HB sling in dual-plane, two-stage breast reconstruction. No other studies reported significantly higher rates of capsular contracture with P4HB and no other significant differences in complication rates were noted. Two animal studies exploring the use of P4HB in nipple reconstruction reported that P4HB promoted the growth of fibrovascular tissue with higher rates of nipple projection with respect to control. This study supports P4HB as a safe and efficacious adjunct in a variety of indications. Large-scale, randomized trials between P4HB and other types of soft-tissue support are needed to further delineate the above trends.

Simultaneous rhytidectomy and laser resurfacing has become a common single-stage facial rejuvenation technique. However, concerns remain, particularly with photothermal injury to undermined tissue. This is the first methodologically robust systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety, satisfaction, and predictors of outcomes for this dual-modality procedure. Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines, a systematic review was conducted through April 2025. Data extracted included patient satisfaction, postoperative complications, and covariates for meta-regression. Seventeen studies comprising 1,361 patients were included. The pooled patient satisfaction rate was 98.1%. Complications were rare: full-thickness flap necrosis (0.01%), skin slough (0.21%), secondary superficial infections (0.74%), hypertrophic scarring (0.51%), hematoma (0.35%), ectropion (0.12%), nontransient dyspigmentation (0.35%), contour irregularity (0.04%), and delayed reepithelialization (0.03%). Meta-regression demonstrated that lasering in areas undermined in the facelift dissection at the same energy density as non-dissected regions of the face was significantly associated with higher skin slough rates. Superficial musculoaponeurotic system manipulation and biplanar rhytidectomy techniques were more likely to result in nontransient dyspigmentation compared to endoscopic subperiosteal techniques. Additionally, lasering undermined flaps with multiple different techniques was associated with higher rates of nontransient dyspigmentation. Procedures performed by plastic surgeons were also associated with lower rates of hypertrophic scarring compared to dermatologists. Concomitant rhytidectomy and laser resurfacing appears safe with high patient satisfaction when laser and surgical technique are optimized. Identification of modifiable risk factors provides guidance to reduce complications and improve outcomes.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:A seroma following prepectoral tissue expander (TE) reconstruction often begets other complications, which may compromise the reconstruction. This study investigated the association between seroma and subsequent complications. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:All consecutive prepectoral TE reconstructions performed between March 2017 and December 2022 at a single center were reviewed. Demographics, operative characteristics, and complications data were extracted for all patients and analyzed. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:< 0.01). CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:Although causality cannot be determined, our data suggests that seroma may be the "kiss of death" in prepectoral TE reconstruction because half of all breasts with a seroma went on to develop other complications.