Faculty Bibliography

PURPOSE OF REVIEW/UNASSIGNED:Dysphagia is a common medical condition among the geriatric population that can significantly impact a patient's quality of life. The manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of esophageal dysphagia differ greatly based on the underlying etiology, especially in older individuals who may have accompanying complex medical comorbidities. This review explores the intricacies of esophageal dysphagia in the older population and how they are managed. RECENT FINDINGS/UNASSIGNED:Novel modalities, like the functional luminal imaging probe (FLIP) and timed barium esophagram (TBE), are now woven into our diagnostic schemas for esophageal dysphagia. Studies have also looked at the safety profile of available therapeutic interventions for older individuals. There are newer, less invasive treatment options, including radiofrequency application (RFA) and transoral incisionless fundoplication (TIF) for GERD management, that may benefit the geriatric population. SUMMARY/UNASSIGNED:In this review, we discuss the most likely etiologies of esophageal dysphagia in the elderly population. We then explore a diagnostic schema and highlight treatment choices based on diagnosis. Our review specifically explores the risks and benefits of management options in more medically complex geriatric patients.

OBJECTIVE:The videofluoroscopic swallow study (VFSS) is an evaluation of the anatomy and physiology of swallowing, and often includes a screening evaluation of the esophagus. How the esophageal screen translates to esophageal pathology remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine if abnormal esophageal clearance (EC) on VFSS correlates with esophageal function on high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). MATERIALS AND METHODS/METHODS:This is a retrospective review of 115 adult patients who underwent both VFSS with esophageal screen and HRM. EC on VFSS was scored with the modified barium swallow impairment profile (MBSImP) component 17. Motility was characterized using HRM metrics according to the Chicago Classification Version 4.0 (CCv4.0). Predictive metrics were calculated for the esophageal screen. RESULTS:An EC score o greater than or equal to 1 had a sensitivity of 66%, specificity of 57%, PPV of 52%, NPV of 70%, and OR of 2.55 (p = 0.027). EC weakly correlated with incomplete bolus clearance (rho = 0.331, p = 0.0004) and did not correlate with bolus transit time (rho = 0.17, p = 0.105). CONCLUSIONS:The esophageal screen as characterized by the MBSImP is not an effective predictor of esophageal function on HREM as defined by the CCv4.0. Future work may focus on a defining a standardized VFSS protocol for the esophageal screen and potentially a more nuanced assessment of esophageal findings on VFSS that may enhance the sensitivity of the modality to motility disorders.

BACKGROUND:High-resolution manometry (HRM) tools, like esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI), assess EGJ barrier function. GOALS/OBJECTIVE:This study aimed to evaluate the relationships between manometric EGJ metrics with esophageal acid exposure. STUDY/METHODS:We conducted a retrospective review of 284 patients who underwent HRM and ambulatory reflux testing between 11/2017-1/2020. EGJ-CI and total-EGJ-CI were manually calculated. Pathologic acid exposure was defined as pH  < 4 with esophageal acid exposure time (EAET) exceeding 6.0%. Pearson's correlation, univariable and multivariable regression models were utilized to assess the relationships between pathologic acid exposure and EGJ parameters. Sensitivity and specificity thresholds for EGJ-CI and total EGJ-CI were optimized with ROC analyses. RESULTS:On univariable analysis, patients with pathologic acid exposure had increased odds of having lower mean basal LES pressures, EGJ-CI, and total EGJ-CI than patients without pathologic acid exposure. On multivariable analysis, age, EGJ-CI and mean DCI were significant predictors of pathologic acid exposure. There were significant, though weak, correlations between EAET and EGJ-CI and total EGJ-CI (r =  - 0.18,  - 0.19, p < 0.01, respectively). An EGJ-CI cutoff of 44.16 as a predictor for pathologic acid exposure had a sensitivity of 46% and specificity of 42% (AUC 0.60). Total EGJ-CI cutoff of 11,461.3 for pathologic acid exposure had a sensitivity of 44% and a specificity of 43% (AUC 0.62). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:EGJ-CI can independently predict pathologic acid exposure. However, the poor correlation between EGJ-CI and acid exposure, as well as the low sensitivity and specificity of calculated thresholds, indicate that mechanisms other than EGJ barrier function may impact acid exposure.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:Despite the high prevalence of typical symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), approximately 30% of patients have functional esophageal disorders (FED) on ambulatory reflux monitoring, which may include reflux hypersensitivity (RH; defined as physiologic acid exposure but temporally correlated symptoms of reflux), or functional heartburn (FH; defined as physiologic acid exposure and negative symptom correlation). There are limited epidemiological data characterizing these conditions. We investigated demographic and socioeconomic factors as well as medical comorbidities which may predispose to FED versus pathologic GERD. METHODS:Adult patients with reflux symptoms for at least 3 months were studied with 24-h pH-impedance testing from 11/2019 to 3/2021. Participants were categorized into pathologic GERD, FH, or RH using pH-impedance data and reported symptom correlation. Demographic data, including age, gender, race/ethnicity, zip code, insurance status, and medical comorbidity data were retrospectively retrieved from the electronic medical record on all participants. RESULTS:229 patients were included. Non-Hispanic Asian ethnicity (OR 5.65; p = 0.01), underweight BMI (OR 7.33; p = 0.06), chronic pain (OR 2.33; p < 0.01), insomnia (OR 2.83; p = 0.06), and allergic rhinitis (OR 3.90; p < 0.01) were associated with a greater risk for FED. Overweight BMI (OR 0.48; p = 0.03) and alcohol use (OR 0.57; p = 0.06) were associated with a decreased risk for FED. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:This is the first report of a greater risk of FED in patients with underweight BMI, insomnia, chronic pain, allergic rhinitis, or of Asian or Hispanic ethnicities. The weak associations between female gender and anxiety are corroborated in other studies. Our findings enable clinicians to better screen patients with reflux for this disorder.

BACKGROUND:Adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) have an increased risk of a variety of cancers, notably gastrointestinal cancers. In CF higher body mass index (BMI) is associated with improved long-term outcomes, yet in the general population high BMI is associated with increased cancer risk. We aimed to delineate associations between BMI and other factors with cancer risk in adults with CF. METHODS:This was a retrospective cohort study using CF Foundation Patient Registry data from 1992 to 2015. Data were collected on age, sex, CFTR mutation class, pancreatic insufficiency, and annualized data on BMI and FEV1. The primary analysis was the association between BMI and cancer, with secondary analyses focused on BMI trajectory. Multivariable logistic regression was performed, with analyses stratified by history of transplant. RESULTS:Of 26,199 adults with CF, 446 (1.7%) had cancer diagnosed by histology at a mean age of 40.0 years (SD 12.2), with a higher proportion of transplanted patients developing cancer (137 (3.8%) v 309(1.4%), p < 0.001). Among non-transplanted patients, there was no association between BMI and cancer (p for trend = 0.43). Pancreatic insufficiency (p < 0.01) and higher FEV1 (p < 0.01) were associated with increased cancer risk. In transplanted patients, higher BMI was associated with reduced risk of cancer (p for trend = 0.04). Older age was associated with increased risk in both groups (p < 0.001). BMI trajectories were not associated with cancer risk in either group. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Higher BMI is associated with a reduced risk of cancer in transplanted adults with CF. Pancreatic insufficiency is a risk factor for cancer in non-transplanted CF patients.

Introduction: Prolonged esophageal 96-hour wireless pH monitoring can reliably diagnose pathologic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), with each study providing ample time to assess dietary influences on esophageal acid exposure time (AET). There is a paucity of literature detailing the influence of acidity in the diet on esophageal AET during ambulatory pH testing. This study aimed to evaluate differences in the quantity of acid reflux during days of high acid and low acid diets during prolonged wireless pH studies.
Method(s): 96 patients who underwent esophageal 96-hour wireless pH monitoring for evaluation of potential GERD were included in the study. The patients were educated on foods of high and low acidity and instructed to consume a primarily high acid diet on one day and a primarily low acid diet on a separate day during the recording period while detailing all consumed meals in a diary. Each food diary was physician confirmed for accuracy. Demographics, BMI, and comorbidities were also assessed. Patients were considered to have pathologic GERD if the average esophageal AET was .6% for the entire pH study and considered normal on an individual day if esophageal AET was , 4%. Statistical relationships between proportions were evaluated by Fisher's exact test and continuous variables were compared using t-tests. Box plots were used to graphically represent the spread of data.
Result(s): Pathologic GERD was found in 30 patients (31.3%) of which the majority (64.7%) recorded their lowest AET on their low acid diet day (Table). Despite this, only 13.3% of patients with pathologic GERD achieved normal acid reflux on their low acid diet day. The highest AET occurred on the high acid diet day for all 30 patients (100%) with pathologic GERD and 36 (54.55%) of the 66 patients without pathologic GERD. In comparison to the high acid diet day, the low acid diet day reduced mean AET from 13% to 6.9% in those with pathologic GERD (Figure) and from 4.2% to 1.8% in patients negative for pathologic GERD. Average body mass index (BMI) was higher in patients with pathologic GERD, while age, sex, and number of the most common reflux symptom did not differ between each group.
Conclusion(s): Acid reflux is reduced overall with a low acid diet in patients with and without pathologic GERD. The majority of patients with pathologic GERD experience their lowest amount of acid reflux during a day of a low acid diet, but only a small minority normalize their acid reflux on that day

It is well established that there is an increased risk of esophageal malignancy associated with achalasia, with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma being the most common histologic subtype thought to be secondary to the detrimental effects of food and saliva stasis resulting from poor esophageal emptying. Esophageal adenocarcinoma has also been found in this population with majority of these cases occurring after achalasia treatment, presumably as a result of iatrogenic reflux. Nevertheless, the benefits of cancer screening in this population remains an area of controversy. We reviewed the literature examining the pathogenesis of malignancy among patients with achalasia and the current data examining the potential strategies for long-term surveillance in this patient population.

Functional chest pain, functional heartburn, and reflux hypersensitivity are 3 functional esophageal disorders defined by the Rome IV criteria. Specific criteria, combining symptoms and the results of objective testing, allow for an accurate diagnosis of these conditions. Management may include medications targeted at optimizing acid suppression or neuromodulation, as well as a host of complementary or alternative treatment options. Psychological and behavioral interventions, such as cognitive behavioral therapy and hypnotherapy, have displayed substantial benefits in the treatment of functional chest pain and functional heartburn. Acid suppression and focused neuromodulation are key evidence-based treatment options for reflux hypersensitivity.