Faculty Bibliography

The scarcity of transplantable organs represents a worldwide public health crisis, and as a result, thousands of people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) die waiting for a transplant each year. Xenotransplantation involves transplanting organs from an animal source into humans, offering a potential solution to this significant unmet need. Indeed, if there is a limitless supply of organs, many more patients who do not meet the current criteria for transplant eligibility could also be considered candidates. While there are examples of attempts to transplant animal tissues or organs into humans dating back over 300 years, none were successful due to cross-species immunologic incompatibility. Even so, significant advances in genetic engineering and the emergence of novel immunosuppressive agents have spurred impressive improvements in xenograft survival in preclinical studies involving nonhuman primates. Furthermore, recent reports of genetically modified pig kidney and heart xenotransplants in human decedents and living recipients on a compassionate use basis have provided impetus to advancing the field towards first-in-human trials. However, studies in nonhuman primates and humans thus far have described adaptive as well as innate immune-mediated xenograft injury. Understanding the mechanistic aspects of these responses at the cellular and molecular levels is critical to the development of targeted genetic modifications and innovative therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing rejection and inducing tolerance. Moreover, the physiological components of the bidirectional communication between the human host and pig xenograft must also be understood and manipulated. Here, we review the breakthroughs in renal xenotransplantation in the past few decades and highlight the immunologic hurdles that have yet to be overcome.

Radial artery occlusion (RAO), a complication of transradial access, has an incidence of 4.0% to 9.1% in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and may preclude its use creation of arteriovenous fistula. Distal transradial access (dTRA) has lower rates of RAO compared with TRA, but prior studies excluded patients with advanced CKD. This was a single center study of patients with advanced CKD who underwent coronary procedures with dTRA from January 1, 2019 to May 12, 2022 who were retrospectively evaluated for radial artery patency in follow-up with reverse Barbeau testing or repeat access of the artery. Of 71 patients, 66% were on hemodialysis and the remainder had CKD 3 to 5. Access was ultrasound-guided, and all received adequate spasmolytic therapy and patent hemostasis. Proximal radial arteries were patent in 100% of the patients at follow-up. Our data suggest that dTRA is safe for patients with advanced CKD and preserves radial artery patency.

BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVE:Hepatitis C virus (HCV) positive-to-negative kidney transplants (KT) require direct acting antiviral therapy, but the optimal timing and duration remain unclear. We hypothesized that 14-day prophylactic course of glecaprevir/pibrentasvir 300/120 mg (GLE/PIB) would be safe and effective at treating donor-derived HCV viremia. METHODS:This was a prospective, single-center, single-arm, open-label pilot study. 20 adult HCV negative recipients of HCV nucleic acid amplification test positive deceased-donor kidneys (HCV positive-to-negative) received a 14-day course of GLE/PIB, with the first dose pre-transplant. HCV RNA viral loads (VL) were monitored on post-operative days (POD) 1, 3, 7, and 13. If VL was undetectable on POD 13, GLE/PIB was stopped, and if detectable, GLE/PIB was continued to complete an 8-week course. Surveillance monitoring continued after treatment to ensure sustained viral response (SVR). The primary outcome was efficacy of 14-day prophylactic GLE/PIB. Secondary outcomes included patient and allograft survival, the incidence, timing, and clearance of HCV viremia, and safety events. RESULTS:7/20 subjects (35%) never developed detectable HCV viremia. Only one subject had a detectable, but nonquantifiable, VL on POD 13 and completed an 8-week course. All subjects achieved SVR 12 weeks post-treatment with no relapses through 1-year follow-up. Mean time to undetectable HCV RNA VL was 10.5 (±4.7) days and mean peak VL was 371 (±715) copies/mL. 6-month and 1-year patient and allograft survival were 100% and 95%. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:A 14-day course of prophylactic GLE/PIB is safe and effective for HCV positive-to-negative KT and may prevent HCV transmission or significantly reduce the VL for those with detectable transmission allowing for rapid clearance within 2 weeks.

Optimizing immunologic compatibility in organ transplantation extends beyond the conventional approach of Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) antigen matching, which exhibits significant limitations. A broader comprehension of the roles of classical and non-classical HLA genes in transplantation is imperative for enhancing long-term graft survival. High-resolution molecular HLA genotyping, despite its inherent challenges, has emerged as the cornerstone for precise patient-donor compatibility assessment. Leveraging understanding of eplet biology and indirect immune activation, eplet mismatch calculators and the PIRCHE-II algorithm surpass traditional methods in predicting allograft rejection. Understanding minor histocompatibility antigens may also present an opportunity to personalize the compatibility process. While the application of molecular matching in deceased donor organ allocation presents multiple technical, logistical, and conceptual barriers, rendering it premature for mainstream use, several other areas of donor-recipient matching and post-transplant management are ready to incorporate molecular matching. Provision of molecular mismatch scores to physicians during potential organ offer evaluations could potentially amplify long-term outcomes. The implementation of molecular matching in living organ donation and kidney paired exchange programs is similarly viable. This article will explore the current understanding of immunologic matching in transplantation and the potential applications of epitope and non-epitope molecular biology and genetics in clinical transplantation.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:We designed this study to test whether clazakizumab, a direct interleukin-6 inhibitor, benefits patients hospitalized with severe or critical COVID-19 disease accompanied by hyperinflammation. DESIGN/METHODS:Multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, seamless phase II/III trial. SETTING/METHODS:Five U.S. medical centers. PATIENTS/METHODS:Adults inpatients with severe COVID-19 disease and hyperinflammation. INTERVENTIONS/METHODS:Eighty-one patients enrolled in phase II, randomized 1:1:1 to low-dose (12.5 mg) or high-dose (25 mg) clazakizumab or placebo. Ninety-seven patients enrolled in phase III, randomized 1:1 to high-dose clazakizumab or placebo. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS/RESULTS:The primary outcome was 28-day ventilator-free survival. Secondary outcomes included overall survival ,frequency and duration of intubation, and frequency and duration of ICU admission. Per Data Safety and Monitoring Board recommendations, additional secondary outcomes describing clinical status and status changes, as measured by an ordinal scale, were added. Bayesian cumulative proportional odds, logistic, and Poisson regression models were used. The low-dose arm was dropped when the phase II study suggested superiority of the high-dose arm. We report on 152 patients, 74 randomized to placebo and 78 to high-dose clazakizumab. Patients receiving clazakizumab had greater odds of 28-day ventilator-free survival (odds ratio [OR] = 3.84; p [OR > 1] 99.9%), as well as overall survival at 28 and 60 days (OR = 1.75; p [OR > 1] 86.5% and OR = 2.53; p [OR > 1] 97.7%). Clazakizumab was associated with lower odds of intubation (OR = 0.2; p [OR] < 1; 99.9%) and ICU admission (OR = 0.26; p [OR < 1] 99.6%); shorter durations of ventilation and ICU stay (risk ratio [RR] < 0.75; p [RR < 1] > 99% for both); and greater odds of improved clinical status at 14, 28, and 60 days (OR = 2.32, p [OR > 1] 98.1%; OR = 3.36, p [OR > 1] 99.6%; and OR = 3.52, p [OR > 1] 99.8%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS:Clazakizumab significantly improved 28-day ventilator-free survival, 28- and 60-day overall survival, as well as clinical outcomes in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and hyperinflammation.

Despite utilization of hepatitis C viremic organs for hepatitis C naïve recipients (HCV D+/R-) in other solid organ transplants, HCV viremic pancreata remain an unexplored source of donor organs. This study reports the first series of HCV D+/R- pancreas transplants. HCV D+/R- had shorter wait list times compared to HCV D-/R-, waiting a mean of 16 days from listing for HCV positive organs. HCV D+/R- had a lower match allocation sequence than HCV D-/R-, and this correlated to receipt of organs with a lower Pancreas Donor Risk Index (PDRI) score. All HCV D+R- had excellent graft function with a mean follow up of 438 days and had undetectable HCV RNA levels by a mean of 23 days after initiation of HCV-directed therapy. The rates of infectious complications, re-operation, readmission, rejection, and length of stay were not impacted by donor HCV status. A national review of potential ideal pancreas donors found that 37% of ideal HCV negative pancreas allografts were transplanted, compared to only 5% of ideal HCV positive pancreas allografts. The results of the current study demonstrate the safety of accepting HCV positive pancreata for HCV naïve recipients and advocates for increased utilization of ideal HCV positive pancreas allografts.

BACKGROUND Patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies might be more susceptible to COVID-19. Conversely, an exaggerated inflammatory response to the SARS-CoV-2 infection might be blunted by certain forms of immunosuppression, which could be protective. Indeed, there are data from animal models demonstrating that complement may be a part of the pathophysiology of coronavirus infections. There is also evidence from an autopsy series demonstrating complement deposition in the lungs of patients with COVID-19. This raises the question of whether patients on anti-complement therapy could be protected from COVID-19. CASE REPORT Case 1 is a 39-year-old woman with an approximately 20-year history of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH), who had recently been switched from treatment with eculizumab to ravulizumab prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Case 2 is a 54-year-old woman with a cadaveric renal transplant for lupus nephritis, complicated by thrombotic microangiopathy, who was maintained on eculizumab, which she started several months before she developed the SARS-CoV-2 infection. Case 3 is a 60-year-old woman with a 14-year history of PNH, who had been treated with eculizumab since 2012, and was diagnosed with COVID-19 at the time of her scheduled infusion. All 3 patients had a relatively mild course of COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS We see no evidence of increased susceptibility to SARS-CoV-2 in these patients on anti-complement therapy, which might actually have accounted for the mild course of infection. The effect of anti-complement therapy on COVID-19 disease needs to be determined in clinical trials.