Faculty Bibliography

People with HIV have higher risk for rejection after kidney transplantation but the mechanism is poorly understood. As HIV latency promotes immune dysregulation and chronic inflammation, we evaluated whether the size of the HIV latent viral reservoir (LVR) at baseline and through 52-weeks is associated with rejection in kidney transplant recipients with HIV from donors with and without HIV. Using the intact proviral DNA assay, we found no differences in the LVR between those who experienced rejection (n=14) versus those who did not (N=55) regardless of donor HIV status. These data support the feasibility of HIV+ to HIV+ organ transplantation. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03500315.

BACKGROUND:Transplanting kidneys from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV has become standard clinical practice. However, donors with HIV may have higher prevalence of viral and bacterial infections and autoimmunity that could increase allograft rejection in recipients. METHODS:We included deceased kidney donors (60 with HIV and 41 without HIV) who participated in a multicenter prospective study of HIV kidney transplantation between April 2018-September 2021. Using Phage ImmunoPrecipitation Sequencing, we compared the human antibody repertoire (allergens, autoantibodies, viruses and bacterial toxins) between donors with and without HIV, and evaluated their association with recipient allograft rejection. Moderated t-tests were used to assess reactivity and a multivariate logistic regression model adjusted for donor sex and KDPI assessed the association between donor adenovirus reactivity and recipient allograft rejection. RESULTS:Compared to donors without HIV, donors with HIV had lower BMI and were more likely to be African American. The median number of positive autoantibodies was marginally higher among donors with HIV (499 [IQR = 357, 579]) compared to donors without HIV (395 [IQR = 256, 538] (P = 0.058). Donors with HIV additionally had significantly higher antibody reactivity to Epstein-Barr virus and cytomegalovirus (q < 0.05). Among all donors with and without HIV, antibodies to adenovirus were significantly associated with increased rejection among recipients, including after adjusting for false discovery (q < 0.05) and also adjusting for demographic factors using multivariable logistic regression (odds ratio = 4.97, 95% CI = 1.89-13.61). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The presence of antibodies to adenovirus infection in kidney donors with HIV may be associated with allograft rejection. CLINICALTRIALS/RESULTS:gov NCT03500315. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:US National Institute of Health.

BACKGROUND:Kidney transplantation (KT) from donors with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV-1) to recipients with HIV (HIV D+/R+) is noninferior to KT from donors without HIV (HIV D-/R+) with regard to safety. However, there may be differences in posttransplant infections. METHODS:We performed a secondary analysis of the HOPE in Action KT Study (NCT02602262) comparing the time to first clinically relevant infection within 24 months posttransplantation in 99 HIV D+/R+ versus 99 HIV D-/R+. Secondary outcomes included incidence rates, infection-related death, and timing of clinically relevant infection, each stratified by donor HIV status. RESULTS:The cumulative incidence of a clinically relevant infection at 24 months posttransplantation was 73.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.1%-81.2%) for HIV D+/R+ versus 64.7% (95% CI: 53.0%-73.4%) for HIV D-/R+. Comparing time to first clinically relevant infection in HIV D+/R+ versus HIV D-/R+, the adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) was 1.44 (95% CI: 1.01-2.04) at 24 months posttransplantation; for infections associated with hospitalization, the aHR was not significantly higher (1.21 [95% CI: .78-1.86). There were no significant differences in the number of infections, death from infection, duration, or site of infection between HIV D+/R+ versus HIV D-/R+, though viral infections were numerically more common in HIV D+/R+ (40% vs 35%). CONCLUSIONS:Although there was a statistically significant association between receipt of a kidney from a donor with HIV and time to first clinically relevant infection in the 24 months posttransplantation, there were no differences in infections associated with hospitalization. These data are overall reassuring as this emerging practice expands into clinical care. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT02602262.

BACKGROUND:Porcine genome editing has revolutionized xenotransplantation, recently enabling the first pig-to-human heart xenotransplants. However, the xeno-immune response in heart xenografts remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to precisely characterize the xeno-immune response and injury in two heart xenografts, transplanted from 10-gene-edited pigs into brain-dead human recipients. METHODS:We analyzed xenograft biopsies at 66-hour post-reperfusion using a multimodal phenotyping approach combining: morphological evaluation, immunophenotyping, ultrastructural assessment, automated quantification of multiplex immunofluorescence staining and gene expression profiling. Xenografts before implantation and wild-type pig hearts with and without ischemia reperfusion injury and brain death were used as controls. RESULTS:Both xenografts showed evidence of endothelial activation and mild microvascular inflammation without capillary C4d deposition. Immune infiltrates were mainly composed of CD15+ and CD68+ innate immune cells. Ultrastructural assessment showed endothelial swelling with occasional intravascular leucocytes. Deep-learning based automated multiplex immunofluorescence analysis confirmed that microvascular inflammation was primarily associated with CD15+ and CD68+ innate immune cells. Both xenografts showed increased expression of genes and pathways associated with monocyte/macrophage activation, neutrophil activation, interferon-gamma response, natural killer cell burden, endothelial activation, apoptosis and injury repair. This phenotype was absent in all control pig hearts, independently from ischemia reperfusion injury and brain death. CONCLUSIONS:Multimodal phenotyping of pig-to-human heart xenografts revealed early signs of xeno-immune response, characterized by mild innate microvascular inflammation, endothelial activation, and molecular signature characteristic of antibody-mediated rejection. Developing such precision diagnostic system could improve graft monitoring in future clinical settings.

Xenotransplantation of genetically-modified pig kidneys offers a solution to the scarcity of organs for end-stage renal disease patients.¹ We performed a 61-day alpha-Gal knock-out pig kidney and thymic autograft transplant into a nephrectomized brain-dead human using clinically approved immunosuppression, without CD40 blockade or additional genetic modification. Hemodynamic and electrolyte stability and dialysis independence were achieved. Post-operative day (POD) 10 biopsies revealed glomerular IgM and IgA deposition, activation of early complement components and mesangiolysis with stable renal function without proteinuria, a phenotype not seen in allotransplantation. On POD 33, an abrupt increase in serum creatinine was associated with antibody-mediated rejection and increased donor-specific IgG. Plasma exchange, C3/C3b inhibition and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG), completely reversed xenograft rejection. Pre-existing donor-reactive T cell clones expanded progressively in the circulation post-transplant, acquired an effector transcriptional profile and were detected in the POD 33 rejecting xenograft prior to rATG treatment. This study provides the first long-term physiologic, immunologic, and infectious disease monitoring of a pig-to-human kidney xenotransplant and indicates that pre-existing xenoreactive T cells and induced antibodies to unknown epitope(s) present a major challenge, despite significant immunosuppression. It also demonstrates that a minimally gene-edited pig kidney can support long-term life-sustaining physiologic functions in a human.

The scarcity of transplantable organs represents a worldwide public health crisis, and as a result, thousands of people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) die waiting for a transplant each year. Xenotransplantation involves transplanting organs from an animal source into humans, offering a potential solution to this significant unmet need. Indeed, if there is a limitless supply of organs, many more patients who do not meet the current criteria for transplant eligibility could also be considered candidates. While there are examples of attempts to transplant animal tissues or organs into humans dating back over 300 years, none were successful due to cross-species immunologic incompatibility. Even so, significant advances in genetic engineering and the emergence of novel immunosuppressive agents have spurred impressive improvements in xenograft survival in preclinical studies involving nonhuman primates. Furthermore, recent reports of genetically modified pig kidney and heart xenotransplants in human decedents and living recipients on a compassionate use basis have provided impetus to advancing the field towards first-in-human trials. However, studies in nonhuman primates and humans thus far have described adaptive as well as innate immune-mediated xenograft injury. Understanding the mechanistic aspects of these responses at the cellular and molecular levels is critical to the development of targeted genetic modifications and innovative therapeutic strategies aimed at preventing rejection and inducing tolerance. Moreover, the physiological components of the bidirectional communication between the human host and pig xenograft must also be understood and manipulated. Here, we review the breakthroughs in renal xenotransplantation in the past few decades and highlight the immunologic hurdles that have yet to be overcome.

Historically, liver transplant (LT) candidates with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) have experienced high waitlist mortality. Since the HIV Organ Policy Equity (HOPE) Act expands access to organs from donors with HIV, we assessed the impact of HOPE on LT rate and wait time for this population. We linked data from a multicenter HOPE in Action study to Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (February 21, 2019 to June 1, 2024) and used Poisson regression to compare transplant rates among 99 candidates willing to accept HOPE donors (HOPE candidates) to 13 495 candidates with or without HIV not listed as willing to accept HOPE donors (non-HOPE candidates) matched on transplant center. The median time to any deceased donor liver transplant (DDLT) was 2.3 months for HOPE and 1.1 years for non-HOPE candidates. Within 2 years of listing, 90.9% of HOPE versus 58.5% of non-HOPE candidates received a DDLT (P < .001). HOPE was associated with an overall 3.11-fold higher DDLT incident rate ratio (95% CI 2.48-3.88, P < .001). Stratified by model for end-stage liver disease score categories 6 to 14, 15 to 24, 25 to 34, and 35 to 40/status 1; HOPE candidates had 10.12-fold, 5.31-fold, 1.41-fold and 2.90-fold higher DDLT rates, respectively. Willingness to accept livers from donors with HIV improves access to liver transplantation for candidates with HIV.

Transplantation of kidneys from donors with HIV to recipients with HIV (HIV D+/R+) has been shown to be safe and effective, but there is a unique risk of donor-derived HIV-superinfection (HIV-SI) in these recipients. Recipients from a multicenter observational HIV D+/R+ study were examined for HIV-SI using site-directed next-generation sequencing (Illumina). Eighteen HIV D+/R+ kidney transplant recipients had both baseline and follow-up samples that successfully amplified. One recipient was confirmed to have experienced donor-derived HIV-SI at week 26, but did not experience any clinically significant changes. HIV-SI in HIV D+/R+ transplant recipients is rare, and the clinical ramifications appear negligible.