Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Glioblastoma intramedullary spinal cord metastasis (GISCM) is a rare sequela of high-grade astrocytoma and glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Discrete intramedullary spinal cord metastases are less common than spinal leptomeningeal spread and may follow a more indolent course. Once identified as GISCM, palliative maximal safe resection of the tumor may be considered to alleviate neurological symptoms. Reports describing the surgical management of these rare lesions, including the use of emerging technologies that may aid in maximal safe resection, are sparse. A further understanding is also required regarding the course of disease and factors contributing to mortality in GISCM. METHODS:We reviewed the intraoperative management and clinical course of three patients treated for GISCM at our institution between 2015 and 2024. We additionally conducted a PRISMA-guided systematic literature review of PubMed Central, MEDLINE, and Bookshelf databases through May 26th, 2025, including original patient reports of GISCM from cranial astrocytoma or GBM. The disease course, management strategies, and causes of mortality in previously reported cases were analyzed. RESULTS:Our institutional cohort had a mean time to spinal metastasis of 26.2 months from diagnosis of cranial disease (range 17.5-40.5 months), with a mean survival of 9.2 months following maximal safe resection of extramedullary components (range 7-12 months). In two cases, intraoperative Stimulated Raman Histology (SRH) was employed to facilitate the rapid identification of metastatic GBM, thereby influencing surgical strategy. In one case, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) was used to differentiate between tumor and spinal cord parenchyma, facilitating maximal safe debulking without neurological injury. Literature review identified 38 prior reported cases of GISCM, with a median time to spinal diagnosis of 11.0 months and a median survival of 3.5 months thereafter. The cause of death in the review cohort often involved multiple factors, and when analyzed for contributing factors to death, 38.7% involved cranial progression, 38.7% involved progression of spinal disease, and 29.0% involved medical complications. Gait ataxia at presentation was associated with shorter survival in review patients, potentially reflecting advanced disease with extramedullary cord compression. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:GISCM represents an entity distinct from leptomeningeal disease and may be managed in conjunction with recurrent cranial disease. Surgical debulking is a technically feasible strategy that can be safely facilitated using tools employed in the management of intracranial GBM, facilitating maximal safe resection without compromising survival.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:Histopathological grading of IDH-mutant astrocytomas demonstrates limited prognostic accuracy. However, DNA methylation subclassification has demonstrated improved prognostication beyond histological grading. This study aimed to investigate the associations between imaging features, tumor volumetric data, and DNA methylation grade in IDH-mutant astrocytomas. METHODS:We analyzed imaging features and volumetric data for 72 patients diagnosed with IDH-mutant astrocytomas, who underwent preoperative MRI and DNA methylation profiling. VASARI features and multicompartmental volumetrics were evaluated. Logistic regression was used to identify imaging predictors of methylation subclass, WHO histologic grade, copy number variation (CNV), and CDKN2A/B homozygous deletion. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were also developed to assess these variables' influence on overall survival and progression-free survival. RESULTS:Patients were classified into 27 methylation high-grade (A_IDH_HG) and 45 methylation low-grade (A_IDH_LG) tumors. Tumor volumes and proportions varied by methylation grade, CNV status, and WHO histologic grade, but not by CDKN2A/B status. Imaging features distinguished methylation subclasses with 75% accuracy (AUC = 0.77). Methylation high-grade subclass was associated with imaging features such as midline crossing, ependymal extension, and poorly defined enhancing margins. Predictive performance for WHO histologic grade, CNV status, and CDKN2A/B deletion was moderate (AUC = 0.67, 0.69, and 0.65, respectively). Methylation grade, CDKN2A/B status, VASARI features, and proportions of edema and non-contrast enhancing tumor were significantly associated with survival. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:MRI-derived imaging features facilitate noninvasive prediction of DNA methylation subclass in IDH-mutant astrocytomas.

BACKGROUND:Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are the most common intracranial neuroendocrine tumors. PitNETs can be challenging to classify, and current recommendations include a large immunohistochemical panel to differentiate among 14 WHO-recognized categories. METHODS:In this study, we analyzed clinical, immunohistochemical and DNA methylation data of 118 PitNETs to develop a clinico-molecular approach to classifying PitNETs and identify epigenetic classes. RESULTS:CNS DNA methylation classifier has an excellent performance in recognizing PitNETs and distinguishing the three lineages when the calibrated score is ≥0.3. Unsupervised DNA methylation analysis separated PitNETs into two major clusters. The first was composed of silent gonadotrophs, which form a biologically distinct group of PitNETs characterized by clinical silencing, weak hormonal expression on immunohistochemistry, and simple copy number profile. The second major cluster was composed of corticotrophs and Pit1 lineage PitNETs, which could be further classified using DNA methylation into distinct subclusters that corresponded to clinically functioning and silent tumors and are consistent with transcription factor expression. Analysis of promoter methylation patterns correlated with lineage for corticotrophs and Pit1 lineage subtypes. However, the gonadotrophic genes did not show a distinct promoter methylation pattern in gonadotroph tumors compared to other lineages. Promoter of the NR5A1 gene, which encodes SF1, was hypermethylated across all PitNETs clinical and molecular subtypes including gonadotrophs with strong SF1 protein expression indicating alternative epigenetic regulation. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Our findings suggest that classification of PitNETs may benefit from DNA methylation for clinicopathological stratification.

The CSF-BAM assay, developed by Pearlman, Wang, and colleagues, integrates the detection of somatic mutations, genome aneuploidy, and B- and T-cell receptor clonality from a single cerebrospinal fluid DNA library to increase the sensitivity of cerebrospinal fluid to diagnosis and track brain tumors. See related article by Pearlman et al., p. 2002.

TARGET POPULATION/METHODS:Adult patients with suspected or histologically proven WHO Grade II diffuse glioma. QUESTION 1: In adult patients with suspected or histologically proven WHO Grade II diffuse glioma, do advanced MRI techniques using magnetic resonance spectroscopy, perfusion weighted imaging or diffusion weighted imaging provide superior assessment of tumor grade, margins, progression, treatment-related effects, and prognosis compared to standard neuroimaging? RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSIONS:Level II: The use of diffusion imaging and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC), dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) sequences are suggested to differentiate WHO Grade II diffuse glioma from higher grade gliomas when this is not accomplished by T2 weighted and pre- and post-gadolinium contrast enhanced T1 weighted imaging. LEVEL III/METHODS:The use of diffusion and perfusion is suggested for obtaining information in genomics, prognosis, and post treatment monitoring when this information would be of value to the clinician and is not obtained through other methods. LEVEL III/METHODS:The use of MR Spectroscopy is suggested to differentiate WHO Grade II diffuse glioma from higher grade gliomas when this is not accomplished by standard MRI, perfusion and diffusion techniques and when such information would be of value to the clinician. QUESTION 2: In adult patients with suspected or histologically proven WHO Grade II diffuse glioma, does molecular imaging using amino acid PET tracers provide superior assessment of tumor grade, margins, progression, treatment-related effects, and prognosis compared to standard neuroimaging? RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSIONS:Level III: If not already evident by MRI studies, the addition of amino acid PET with FET and FDOPA as a tracer is suggested to help determine if a brain lesion is a low grade glioma or high grade glioma. LEVEL III/METHODS:If the standard clinical prognostic parameters are unclear and novel PET tracers are available, the clinician may consider FET to assist in determination of prognosis in an individual with grade II diffuse glioma. LEVEL III/METHODS:Clinicians may use FDOPA PET in addition to MRI if additional information is required for detection of tumor progression.

BACKGROUND:Accurate intraoperative diagnosis is crucial for differentiating between primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL) and other CNS entities, guiding surgical decision-making, but represents significant challenges due to overlapping histomorphological features, time constraints, and differing treatment strategies. We combined stimulated Raman histology (SRH) with deep learning to address this challenge. METHODS:We imaged unprocessed, label-free tissue samples intraoperatively using a portable Raman scattering microscope, generating virtual H&E-like images within less than three minutes. We developed a deep learning pipeline called RapidLymphoma based on a self-supervised learning strategy to (1) detect PCNSL, (2) differentiate from other CNS entities, and (3) test the diagnostic performance in a prospective international multicenter cohort and two additional independent test cohorts. We trained on 54,000 SRH patch images sourced from surgical resections and stereotactic-guided biopsies, including various CNS neoplastic/non-neoplastic lesions. Training and test data were collected from four tertiary international medical centers. The final histopathological diagnosis served as ground-truth. RESULTS:In the prospective test cohort of PCNSL and non-PCNSL entities (n=160), RapidLymphoma achieved an overall balanced accuracy of 97.81% ±0.91, non-inferior to frozen section analysis in detecting PCNSL (100% vs. 77.77%). The additional test cohorts (n=420, n=59) reached balanced accuracy rates of 95.44% ±0.74 and 95.57% ±2.47 in differentiating IDH-wildtype diffuse gliomas and various brain metastasis from PCNSL. Visual heatmaps revealed RapidLymphoma's capabilities to detect class-specific histomorphological key features. CONCLUSIONS:RapidLymphoma proves reliable and valid for intraoperative PCNSL detection and differentiation from other CNS entities. It provides visual feedback within three minutes, enabling fast clinical decision-making and subsequent treatment strategy planning.

Active nematic liquid crystals are the main structural phase of gliomas, promoting collective migration and aggression. We establish the existence of nematic order and topological defect lines and loops in 3D in vivo mouse and human glioma brain tumors. As predicted by theory, sections through the disclination lines in 3D appear as ±1/2 topological defects in 2D. In 3D, these defects either persist along disclination lines or twist as they interconvert from -1/2 to +1/2. Cell alignment exhibits quasi-long-range order, spreading throughout the tumor over distances between 300-3000 μm. In vitro -1/2 and +1/2 defects display changes in apoptosis levels, suggesting topological defects regulate glioma cell density. The large scale order of gliomas correlates with tumors' aggressive behavior. The organization of gliomas as active nematic liquid crystals provides a novel physical foundation of complex solid tumors; their deconstruction signposts potential treatments for deadly cancers.

UNLABELLED:QUESTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE PRIOR VERSION OF THESE GUIDELINES WITHOUT CHANGE: TARGET POPULATION: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who have suspected low-grade diffuse glioma. QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:What are the optimal neuropathological techniques to diagnose low-grade diffuse glioma in the adult? RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSIONS:Level I Histopathological analysis of a representative surgical sample of the lesion should be used to provide the diagnosis of low-grade diffuse glioma. Level III Both frozen section and cytopathologic/smear evaluation should be used to aid the intra-operative assessment of low-grade diffuse glioma diagnosis. A resection specimen is preferred over a biopsy specimen, to minimize the potential for sampling error issues. TARGET POPULATION/METHODS:Patients with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:In adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is testing for IDH1 mutation (R132H and/or others) warranted? If so, is there a preferred method? RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSIONS:Level II IDH gene mutation assessment, via IDH1 R132H antibody and/or IDH1/2 mutation hotspot sequencing, is highly-specific for low-grade diffuse glioma, and is recommended as an additional test for classification and prognosis. TARGET POPULATION/METHODS:Patients with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:In adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is testing for 1p/19q loss warranted? If so, is there a preferred method? RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSIONS:Level III 1p/19q loss-of-heterozygosity testing, by FISH, array-CGH or PCR, is recommended as an additional test in oligodendroglial cases for prognosis and potential treatment planning. TARGET POPULATION/METHODS:Patients with histologically proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:In adult patients (age > 18 years) with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is methyl-guanine methyl-transferase (MGMT) promoter methylation testing warranted? If so, is there a preferred method? RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSIONS:There is insufficient evidence to recommend MGMT promoter methylation testing as a routine for low-grade diffuse gliomas. It is recommended that patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials to assess the value of this and related markers for this target population. TARGET POPULATION/METHODS:Patients with histologically-proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma. QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:In adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) with histologically proven WHO grade II diffuse glioma, is Ki-67/MIB1 immunohistochemistry warranted? If so, is there a preferred method to quantitate results? RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSIONS:Level III Ki67/MIB1 immunohistochemistry is recommended as an option for prognostic assessment. NEW RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSIONS:TARGET POPULATION: Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who have suspected WHO grade II diffuse glioma. QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:Is testing for ATRX mutations helpful for predicting survival and making treatment recommendations? RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSIONS:There is insufficient evidence to recommend ATRX mutation testing as a means of predicting survival or making treatment recommendations. TARGET POPULATION/METHODS:Adult patients (age ≥ 18 years) who have suspected WHO grade II diffuse glioma. QUESTION/OBJECTIVE:Does the addition of intraoperative optical histologic methods provide accuracy beyond the use of conventional histologic methods in diagnosis and management? RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSIONS:There is insufficient evidence at this time to suggest that intraoperative optical histologic methods offer increased diagnostic accuracy when compared to conventional techniques.

BACKGROUND:The diagnosis and treatment of tumors often depend on molecular-genetic data. However, rapid and iterative access to molecular data is not currently feasible during surgery, complicating intraoperative diagnosis and precluding measurement of tumor cell burdens at surgical margins to guide resections. METHODS:Here, we introduce Ultra-Rapid droplet digital PCR (UR-ddPCR), a technology that achieves the fastest measurement, to date, of mutation burdens in tissue samples, from tissue to result in 15 min. Our workflow substantially reduces the time from tissue biopsy to molecular diagnosis and provides a highly accurate means of quantifying residual tumor infiltration at surgical margins. FINDINGS/RESULTS: = 0.995). CONCLUSIONS:The technology and workflow developed here enable intraoperative molecular-genetic assays with unprecedented speed and sensitivity. We anticipate that our method will facilitate novel point-of-care diagnostics and molecularly guided surgeries that improve clinical outcomes. FUNDING/BACKGROUND:This study was funded by the National Institutes of Health and NYU Grossman School of Medicine institutional funds. Reagents and instruments were provided in kind by Bio-Rad.