Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Severe obesity and its association with advanced knee osteoarthritis are established risk factors for surgical complications and associated costs of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This clinical trial examines the functional knee outcomes of severely obese patients who have severe knee osteoarthritis undergoing bariatric surgery versus immediate TKA and examines the impact of surgical weight loss on the pursuit of TKA. METHODS:The SWIFT Trial (Surgical Weight-loss to improve Functional status Trajectories) following total knee arthroplasty was a multicenter, prospective trial examining outcomes of weight loss surgery and TKA in patients who have severe obesity (body mass index ≥ 40 or greater than 35 who have comorbidities) and symptomatic Kellgren-Lawrence grades 3 or 4 radiographic knee osteoarthritis. Study patients were recruited prospectively from November 2015, to October 2024 and divided into two groups: the bariatric arm (patients undergoing bariatric surgery) and the TKA arm (patients undergoing TKA). Each study arm underwent a comprehensive battery of knee functional assessments at baseline, six, 12, and 24 months, as well as re-evaluations in the bariatric surgery arm to assess the need for delaying or proceeding with TKA at 12 and 24 months. There were 232 study subjects who completed surgery and knee evaluation (n = 159: immediate TKA versus n = 73: bariatric surgery). The study groups had comparable degrees of knee disability at study initiation. RESULTS:Longitudinal functional analysis demonstrated major improvement extending to two years in patient-reported outcomes and performance-based functional assessments in both study arms, with a slight superiority in the TKA arm. Total weight loss % was higher in bariatric surgery patients (28.7%, P < 0.0001). Bariatric surgery resulted in 45 and 36% delays in TKA at 12 and 24 months, respectively, due to improved knee status. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Knee function and mobility improved significantly in both study arms, with superiority in the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores in the TKA group. Improved knee function with surgical weight loss can be associated with up to a two-year delay in the need for TKA.

OBJECTIVE:We compared health care spending and utilization associated with semaglutide relative to bariatric surgery in patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D). METHODS:Using MarketScan insurance claims of patients with BMI ≥ 35 and T2D from 2016 to 2021, we examined associations between choice of semaglutide, sleeve gastrectomy, or gastric bypass; 3-year health care spending (out-of-pocket [OOP] and total); and clinical outcomes (ED visits, hospital admissions, and major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE]). Analyses were adjusted using generalized linear models, inverse probability weighting, and instrumental variables. RESULTS:Among 6748 patients (2797 semaglutide, 2300 sleeve gastrectomy, 1651 gastric bypass), bariatric surgery patients had higher BMI and more comorbidities. In IPTW-adjusted analysis, semaglutide was associated with the highest 3-year OOP costs ($7752 vs. $5980 [sleeve gastrectomy] vs. $6591 [gastric bypass], p < 0.001), but total spending was not statistically different across the groups. Relative to semaglutide, the gastric bypass group showed higher observed ED visits (hazard ratio relative to semaglutide [95% CI]: 1.36 [1.28-1.45]) and inpatient admissions (1.25 [1.13-1.37]) and fewer MACE (0.71 [0.59-0.88]). Sleeve gastrectomy was associated with fewer long-term admissions (0.79 [0.72-0.86]) and MACE (0.79 [0.66-0.93]). CONCLUSIONS:For patients with T2D and obesity, compared with semaglutide, bariatric surgery is associated with lower OOP spending and similar total spending at 3 years, as well as lower long-term MACE rates.

BACKGROUND:Extended-course enoxaparin is increasingly used after bariatric surgery to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE), the leading cause of death after bariatric surgery. Direct oral anticoagulants are widely used for extended thromboprophylaxis outside of bariatric surgery and offered to patients in our program who cannot tolerate or obtain enoxaparin. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily relative to a weight-based dose of enoxaparin 40 mg or 60 mg twice daily for 30 days after discharge following sleeve gastrectomy. METHODS:Patients aged ≥18 years who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy from 2019 to 2024 at a single high-volume urban academic center were included. Bleeding and thrombosis outcomes within 30 days were compared between patients receiving enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily or apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily. Weighted modified Poisson analyses were used to obtain covariate balance and assess differences in bleeding and thrombosis events. RESULTS:A total of 5921 patients were included for analysis (5274 enoxaparin 40 mg twice daily, 486 enoxaparin 60 mg twice daily, and 161 apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily). The 30-day thrombosis rate was significantly lower with enoxaparin versus apixaban (.1% versus 1.9%, P < .001). The composite outcome (VTE, portomesenteric venous thrombosis, and major/minor bleeding) was also significantly lower with enoxaparin versus apixaban (1.7% versus 5.6%, P < .01). In adjusted analyses, apixaban was associated with a relative risk of 12.09 for thrombosis (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.71-31.18), 1.93 for bleeding (95% CI, 1.27-3.00), and 2.59 (95% CI, 2.06-3.27) for any adverse outcome relative to enoxaparin. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Enoxaparin is associated with both lower thrombosis and bleeding rates compared with apixaban for extended thromboprophylaxis after sleeve gastrectomy.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:In January 2023, the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) made major changes to reimbursement policy for abdominal wall hernia repairs, including removal of postoperative global periods. Similar changes have been proposed for other common surgical procedures (eg, colectomy). The role of this policy reform in spending remains unclear. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To evaluate the association between the 2023 CMS ventral hernia repair reimbursement policy reform and changes in ventral hernia episode spending. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective cohort study used US national insurance claims data (Merative MarketScan) between January 1, 2022, and October 1, 2023. Data were analyzed from July to October 2025. Participants included commercially insured adult patients who underwent ventral or inguinal hernia repair. EXPOSURE/UNASSIGNED:January 2023 CMS ventral hernia repair reimbursement policy reform. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary outcome was total episode spending per surgical episode, broken down into professional and facility components as well as payer and patient sources. Utilization of billable postoperative care and component separation were also evaluated. A difference-in-differences approach was used to evaluate changes in spending associated with the January 2023 policy change, with inguinal hernia repair as the unaffected comparison group. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 58 069 surgical episodes (34 110 ventral, 23 959 inguinal; median patient age, 52 [IQR, 43-59] years; 28% female; 90% outpatients) per-episode spending for ventral hernia decreased following policy reform by -$492 (95% CI, -$496 to -$470) (7% relative reduction) compared with inguinal hernia. Professional reimbursements decreased by -$198 (95% CI, -$200 to -$197) (20% relative reduction). Facility reimbursements increased by $84 (1.4% relative increase) in absolute terms but decreased by -$260 (95% CI, -$263 to -$239) compared with inguinal hernia (4.6% relative decrease). Patient out-of-pocket costs decreased by -$83 (95% CI, -$87 to -$82) (10% relative decrease) compared with inguinal hernia repair. Of 7561 ventral hernia repair cases (52.3%) had 1 or more related postoperative visits in the 90 days after surgery, with the mean (SD) number of visits being 1.06 (2.7). There was no significant increase in component separation procedures. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this study, following the January 2023 CMS ventral hernia repair reimbursement policy reform, episode spending decreased, with the largest component of the decrease arising from professional fees. With CMS decreasing reimbursement for numerous surgical procedures, the outcomes for surgeon practices and patient costs warrant careful consideration.

BACKGROUND:Bariatric surgery has long been established as an effective treatment option for obesity and diabetes [Kalainov et al. in J Am Acad Orthop Surg [32(10):427-438, 2025] and Ogden et al. in JAMA 311(8):806-806, 2025. 10.1001/jama.2014.732]. Recently, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists' (GLP-1RAs) use has expanded as an alternative therapy for weight loss and diabetes management. While GLP1RAs are known to be safe and effective, few have compared long term outcomes of GLP-1RAs versus the "gold standard" of bariatric surgery among Medicare/Medicaid patients, who make up the largest payer group in the U.S. [Kalainov et al. in J Am Acad Orthop Surg [32(10):427-438, 2025]. METHODS:This was a retrospective, multicenter study of obese, type-2 diabetic patients (T2D) ≥ 18 years old, who initiated weekly injectable semaglutide or tirzepatide or underwent bariatric surgery between January 1st, 2018 to July 31st, 2024. Patients with a baseline BMI ≤ 35, those with prior GLP1-RA use, or any prior bariatric procedure were excluded from analysis. The primary outcome of interest was % total body weight loss 3 months to 3 years post intervention among bariatrics surgery patients vs. GLP1-RA patients (any GLP1-RA prescription and 12 months continuous GLP1-RA prescription). RESULTS:7667 patients were included for analysis (7200 GLP1-RA, 467 bariatric surgery). Bariatric surgery patients were younger (median (IQR): 43 (34, 53) vs. 65 (54, 72); p < 0.001) and more likely to be female (67.5% vs. 60.8%; p < 0.01) and Hispanic (58.7% vs. 19.4%; p < 0.001) while GLP1-RA users were more likely to be white (58.5% vs. 10.7%; p < 0.001). In models adjusting for demographic and clinical characteristics, bariatric surgery was associated with a 22.9% total weight loss 3 years following surgery compared to 2.3% for patients with any GLP1-RA use, and 15.9% vs 2.4% for patients with 12 months consecutive GLP1-RA use (22.9 [21.0-24.8] vs 2.3 [0.5-4.1], 15.9 [6.9-24.9] vs. 2.4 [6.7-11.5]. CONCLUSIONS:Among obese, T2D, publicly insured patients, bariatric surgery was associated with greater weight loss than GLP1-RAs at all measured periods from 3 months to 3 years post op.

BACKGROUND:Early postoperative small bowel obstruction (ESBO) following roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is a feared complication, generally estimated to occur in 1-2% of cases. Most surgeons advocate for prompt surgical exploration for ESBO after RYGB. There is currently a paucity of literature regarding conservative management approaches to ESBO after RYGB. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:To determine the safety and efficacy of non-operative management of early small bowel obstruction following RYGB. SETTING/METHODS:Academic-affiliated municipal hospital. METHODS:We performed a retrospective review of all patients at a single institution who underwent RYGB between July 1, 2020 and April 30, 2024 and were readmitted within 30 days of the procedure due to a small bowel obstruction. Mesenteric defects were closed with permanent suture in 100% of cases. RESULTS:2430 RYGBs were performed, 54 patients (2.2%) developed ESBO. The average interval from time of surgery to diagnosis of ESBO was 7.3 days [range 2-26 days]. The vast majority of patients (n = 43; 80%) were successfully managed conservatively including nasogastric decompression (n = 20; 47%). Most (73%) of the patients requiring reoperation were found to have kinking at the anastomosis or dense adhesions from the cut end of the staple line. CONCLUSIONS:This study demonstrates that non-operative management may be a safe and effective treatment option for the majority of RYGB patients who develop ESBO. Clinical judgement is required to identify those who would benefit from early exploration.

BACKGROUND:Bariatric surgery (BS) is associated with improved cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in individuals with obesity. One proposed mechanism is reduced inflammation. S100A9, a pro-inflammatory cytokine, is elevated in obesity. S100A9, particularly expression in platelets, has been associated with CV risk. The impact of BS on circulating and platelet S100A9 in obesity is unknown. METHODS:We studied serum, plasma, and platelet supernatants from subjects with obesity pre- and post-BS (n = 23) and lean volunteers (n = 8). S100A9 levels were quantified using an S100A9 immunoassay. Wilcoxon, Mann-Whitney, and t-tests were performed to assess changes in S100A9 levels pre- and post-operatively and compare levels across sample and subject types. Spearman tests were used to assess correlations between S100A9 levels in different sample types and neutrophil/platelet counts. RESULTS:Serum and plasma S100A9 concentrations were elevated in individuals with obesity relative to lean individuals. Levels decreased to lean subject levels at 1-year post-BS, despite subjects with obesity remaining overweight. Circulating neutrophil counts also decreased post-BS, and post-BS differences in serum S100A9 were eliminated when calculated per-neutrophil. Platelet supernatant S100A9 levels were lower than in serum and plasma and did not change post-BS. Platelet supernatant S100A9 correlated with plasma, but not serum, levels. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:We found that S100A9 concentrations differ substantially between blood components, are elevated in obesity, and normalize post-BS. Reductions in circulating S100A9 may contribute to reduced inflammation and be largely driven by resolution of obesity-associated neutrophilia. Our data suggest minimal platelet contribution to circulating (or systemic) S100A9, but a local level inflammatory impact cannot be excluded.

INTRODUCTION/BACKGROUND:GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP1-RAs) are increasingly prescribed as an alternative to bariatric surgery for weight loss, and may pose as an alternative to conversion Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass (cRYGB) in patients with insufficient weight loss or weight recurrence after sleeve gastrectomy [A C, N C, A I. Postoperative morbidity and weight loss after revisional bariatric surgery for primary failed restrictive procedure: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. International Journal of Surgery; 2022;Jensen et al. in Obes Surg 33:1017-1025, 2023; Jamal et al. in Obes Surg 34:1324-1332, 2024; Lautenbach A, Wernecke M, Stoll FD, Meyhöfer SM, Meyhöfer S, Aberel J. 1422-P: The potential of semaglutide once-weekly in patients without Type 2 Diabetes with weight regain or insufficient weight loss after bariatric surgery. Diabetes 2022; 71(Supplement_1);]. METHODS AND PROCEDURES/METHODS:Adult patients ≥ 18 years old, who previously underwent a sleeve gastrectomy and were subsequently treated with weekly injectable Semaglutide or Tirzepatide, or treated with conversion from sleeve gastrectomy were included for analysis. Patients converted for GERD, GLP1-RA use with BMI ≤ 35, or pre operative GLP1-RA use were excluded. Post operative weights and Hgb A1C were assessed from 3 months to 3 years post intervention (start of GLP1-RA or surgery). T-test, ANOVA, and chi-squared analysis were used to compare groups, while multivariable linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery on %TBWL at 3 years post intervention when adjusting for baseline characteristics. RESULTS:4901 patients were included for analysis (3004 cRYGB, 1897 GLP1-RA). There was no difference in pre-intervention weight (242.8 ± 44.4 GLP1-RA vs 242.3 ± 57.8 cRYGB, p = .993). cRYGB patients had a higher baseline Hgba1c (6.19 ± 1.4 vs 5.85 ± 1.2, p < 0.001). cRYGB was associated with significantly greater weight loss at all post operative time points up to 3 years post intervention, (26.1 vs 13.7%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in Hgba1c control between treatments at all post intervention time points (all p > 0.05). In the multivariate linear regression analysis, when adjusting for sex, baseline BMI, baseline age, and non-white race, cRYGB was associated with an 11% greater %TBWL compared to those who were treated with a GLP1-RA. CONCLUSIONS:For patients who have had insufficient weight loss or weight recurrence following sleeve gastrectomy, conversion to RYGB offers greater, long-term weight loss compared to GLP1-RAs.

OBJECTIVE:This study examined racial and ethnic differences in percent total weight loss (%TWL) and glycemic improvement following sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and explored the role of socioeconomic and psychosocial factors in postsurgical outcomes. METHODS:This longitudinal study included patients who underwent SG between 2017 and 2020, with follow-up visits over 24 months. RESULTS:Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) participants had lower %TWL at 3, 12, and 24 months compared with Hispanic (H) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) participants. Fat mass index was initially lower in NHB, with smaller reductions over time and significant group differences persisting at 24 months. NHB participants had higher baseline fat-free mass index values; by 24 months, fat-free mass index values were lower in H participants. Hemoglobin A1c decreased across all groups but remained consistently higher in NHB and H compared with NHW at 24 months. NHB participants reported higher perceived discrimination, sleep disturbance, and perceived stress than H and NHW participants at all time points. Employment status predicted %TWL at 12 months. There was a significant interaction between race and ethnicity and employment status observed at 12 and 24 months, suggesting that employment-related disparities could impact surgical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS:NHB participants experienced less favorable outcomes following SG, emphasizing the need for tailored interventions addressing socioeconomic and psychosocial disparities.