Faculty Bibliography

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:While combined treatment of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injections plus panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is a common approach for treating proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) in the clinical practice setting, large randomized clinical trials typically use monotherapy. Subsequently, information is limited as to whether the order of treatment when combining PRP and anti-VEGF injections for PDR affects outcomes. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To compare outcomes of patients with PDR treated with PRP and subsequent anti-VEGF injections with outcomes of matched patients treated with anti-VEGF injections and subsequent PRP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This retrospective cohort study used data from January 2003 to January 2024 in the TriNetX aggregated electronic health records network, with data analysis performed in January 2024. Patients with PDR treated with PRP and anti-VEGF injections were eligible for inclusion. EXPOSURES/UNASSIGNED:Patients with new PDR diagnoses stratified by therapy with PRP and subsequent anti-VEGF injections or anti-VEGF injections and subsequent PRP. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary outcome was the need for pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), defined by Current Procedural Terminology codes 67040 or 67113. The secondary outcome included incidence of PPV, vitreous hemorrhage (VH), or tractional retinal detachment (TRD). Relative risk ratios, relative risk differences, and 95% CIs were all calculated for univariate comparison of the cohorts and the development of primary outcomes after matching. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Before propensity score matching (PSM), which controlled for baseline demographic characteristics and medical comorbidities, 2167 patients with PDR treated with PRP first and subsequent anti-VEGF injections and 1549 patients with PDR treated with anti-VEGF injections and subsequent PRP were included. Post-PSM, mean (SD) participant age was 63.0 (13.1) years in cohort 1 (PRP and subsequent anti-VEGF injection) and 63.0 (12.4) years in cohort 2 (anti-VEGF injection and subsequent PRP). Of 1377 total participants in each cohort, 641 patients (46.6%) and 663 patients (48.1%) in cohorts 1 and 2 were female, respectively. Treatment with PRP first and subsequent anti-VEGF injection was associated with higher rates of PPV at 5 years compared with patients treated with anti-VEGF injection and subsequent PRP (relative risk [RR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.55-2.27; risk difference [RD], 8.93%; 95% CI, 6.31%-11.55%; P < .001), with similar associations at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years. Treatment with PRP and subsequent anti-VEGF injection was associated with higher rates of VH at 5 years (RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.09-1.80; RD, 6.47%; 95% CI, 1.66%-11.29%; P < .001) and TRD at 5 years (RR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.35-2.53; RD, 4.31%; 95% CI, 2.10%-6.52%; P < .001), with similar findings at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years compared with patients treated with anti-VEGF injection and subsequent PRP. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:In this retrospective cohort study, findings suggest that patients with PDR treated with PRP first then subsequent anti-VEGF injection are more likely to undergo PPV for VH and TRD compared with matched patients treated with anti-VEGF agents first, then PRP. These findings support the need for further investigations to determine if the order of PRP and anti-VEGF injections should be considered when treating patients with PDR.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine whether dropless, injection-based cataract surgery prophylaxis with intracameral antibiotic and subconjunctival steroid may reduce healthcare system costs and patient out-of-pocket costs compared to topical medication regimens. SETTING/METHODS:United States national medical expenditures database. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cost analysis. METHODS:Costs were analyzed for topical ophthalmics from the 2020 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) and for dropless medications from pharmaceutical invoices/catalogs. Main outcomes included system costs, from insurance and patient payments, and out-of-pocket costs for cataract surgery topical and dropless, injection-based prophylactic medication regimens, per eye and nationally. System costs for individual topical medications and same-class dropless, injection-based medications were compared using two-sided, one-sample t-tests. RESULTS:There were 583 prophylactic topical ophthalmic purchases in MEPS. Mean system costs per eye were $76.20 ± SD 39.07 for the lowest cost topical steroid (prednisolone) compared to $4.01 for the lowest cost subconjunctival steroid (triamcinolone acetonide) (p < 0.001). Per eye, the lowest cost dropless, injection-based regimen, at $15.91, results in an $87.99 (84.7%) reduction in overall healthcare costs and a $43.64 (100%) reduction in patient out-of-pocket costs relative to the lowest cost topical regimen ($103.90 ± 43.14 mean system cost and $43.64 ± 37.32 mean out-of-pocket cost per eye). Use of intracameral moxifloxacin and subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide can reduce annual national healthcare system and out-of-pocket costs up to $450,000,000 and $225,000,000, respectively. CONCLUSIONS:An evidence-based cataract surgery prophylactic medication regimen of intracameral moxifloxacin and subconjunctival triamcinolone acetonide can reduce healthcare system and patient out-of-pocket costs in comparison to various topical regimens.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:The Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol S suggested that vitrectomy for vitreous hemorrhage (VH) or tractional retinal detachment (TRD) was more common among eyes assigned initially to panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) vs anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) for proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). These clinical implications warrant further evaluation in the clinical practice setting. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To explore outcomes of PDR treated with PRP monotherapy compared with matched patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:Retrospective cohort study using an aggregated electronic health records research network. Patients with PDR who received PRP or anti-VEGF monotherapy between January and September 2023 were included before propensity score matching. Patients were excluded with 6 or fewer months' follow-up after monotherapy or with a combination of PRP and anti-VEGF. Data were analyzed in September 2023. EXPOSURES/UNASSIGNED:Patients with new PDR diagnoses stratified by monotherapy with PRP or anti-VEGF agents using Current Procedural Terminology code. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Incidence of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), VH, or TRD. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 6020 patients (PRP cohort: mean [SD] age, 64.8 [13.4]; 6424 [50.88%] female; 3562 [28.21%] Black, 6180 [48.95%] White, and 2716 [21.51%] unknown race; anti-VEGF cohort: mean [SD] age, 66.1 [13.2]; 5399 [50.52%] male; 2859 [26.75%] Black, 5377 [50.31%] White, and 2382 [22.29%] unknown race) who received treatment, PRP monotherapy was associated with higher rates of PPV when compared with patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy at 5 years (RR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.05-1.36; RD, 1.37%; 95% CI, 0.39%-2.37%; P < .001), with similar associations at 1 and 3 years. PRP monotherapy was associated with higher rates of VH at 5 years (relative risk [RR], 1.72; 95% CI, 1.52-1.95; risk difference [RD], 7.05; 95% CI, 5.41%-8.69%; P < .001) and higher rates of TRD at 5 years (RR, 2.76; 95% CI, 2.26-3.37; RD, 4.25%; 95% CI, 3.45%-5.05%; P < .001), with similar magnitudes of associations at 6 months, 1 year, and 3 years, when compared with patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:These findings support the hypothesis that patients with PDR treated with PRP monotherapy are more likely to develop VH, TRD, and undergo PPV when compared with matched patients treated with anti-VEGF monotherapy. However, given the wide range in relative risk, confounding factors may account for some of the association between PRP vs anti-VEGF monotherapy and outcomes evaluated.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To determine how often ChatGPT is able to provide accurate and comprehensive information regarding clinical vitreoretinal scenarios. To assess the types of sources ChatGPT primarily utilizes and to determine if they are hallucinated. METHODS:A retrospective cross-sectional study. We designed 40 open-ended clinical scenarios across 4 main topics in vitreoretinal disease. Responses were graded on correctness and comprehensiveness by two blinded retina specialists. The primary outcome was the number of clinical scenarios that ChatGPT answered correctly and comprehensively. Secondary outcomes included: theoretical harm to patients, the distribution of the type of references utilized by the chatbot, and the frequency of hallucinated references. RESULTS:In June 2023, ChatGPT answered 83% (33/40) of clinical scenarios correctly but provided a comprehensive answer in only 52.5% (21/40) of cases. Subgroup analysis demonstrated an average correct score of 86.7% in nAMD, 100% in DR, 76.7% in retinal vascular disease and 70% in the surgical domain. There were 6 incorrect responses with 1 (16.7%) case of no harm, 3 (50%) cases of possible harm and 2 (33.3%) cases of definitive harm. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:ChatGPT correctly answered more than 80% of complex open-ended vitreoretinal clinical scenarios, with a reduced capability to provide a comprehensive response.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To examine the effects of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1) agonists compared to SGLT-2 inhibitors on diabetic retinopathy. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective clinical cohort study using TriNetX, a federated electronic health records network comprising multiple healthcare organizations. METHODS:Patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) code of nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) and monotherapy treatment, excluding insulin, with GLP-1 agonists or SGLT-2 inhibitors. Patients with a history of PDR prior to initiation of treatment were excluded. The rate of progression to PDR and rate of development of diabetic macular edema (DME) were compared between patients on GLP-1 agonists compared to those on SGLT-2 inhibitors. The groups were propensity score matched for age, gender, ethnicity, race, type of diabetes, and severity of PDR. Main outcomes included rate and relative risk (RR) of progression to PDR and risk of DME in the GLP-1 agonist group versus the SGLT-2 inhibitor group. RESULTS:A total of 6481 patients were identified in the GLP-1 cohort and the SGLT-2 inhibitor cohort after propensity score matching. At 1 and 3 years after initiation of therapy, a higher rate of progression of PDR was noted (RR: 1.26, CI 1.04-1.51, P = .017 at 1 year, RR: 1.284, CI 1.1-1.499, P = .002 at 3 years) in the GLP-1 agonist cohort compared to the SGLT-2 inhibitor cohort. There was a higher rate of DME noted at 3 months (RR: 1.192, CI 1.059-1.276, P = .002), 6 months (RR: 1.22, CI 1.13-1.32, P < .001), 1 year (RR: 1.24, CI 1.15-1.33, P < .001), and at 3 years (RR: 1.29, CI 1.21-1.38, P < .001) in the GLP-1 agonist cohort compared to the SGLT-2 inhibitor cohort. CONCLUSIONS:A higher rate of progression of PDR and risk of new-onset DME was observed in patients on monotherapy with GLP-1 agonists compared to those on SGLT-2 inhibitors. It is important for clinicians to be aware of these potential effects and to consider the current retinopathy status when initiating treatment with newer hypoglycemic agents to ensure these patients are appropriately monitored for developing potential vision-threatening complications.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To analyze ophthalmology workforce supply and demand projections from 2020 to 2035. DESIGN/METHODS:Observational cohort study using data from the National Center for Health Workforce Analysis (NCHWA). METHODS:Data accessed from the Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) website were compiled to analyze the workforce supply and demand projections for ophthalmologists from 2020 to 2035. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES/METHODS:Projected workforce adequacy over time. RESULTS:From 2020 to 2035, the total ophthalmology supply is projected to decrease by 2650 full-time equivalent (FTE) ophthalmologists (12% decline) and total demand is projected to increase by 5150 FTE ophthalmologists (24% increase), representing a supply and demand mismatch of 30% workforce inadequacy. The level of projected adequacy was markedly different based on rurality by year 2035 with 77% workforce adequacy versus 29% workforce adequacy in metro and nonmetro geographies, respectively. By year 2035, ophthalmology is projected to have the second worst rate of workforce adequacy (70%) of 38 medical and surgical specialties studied. CONCLUSIONS:The HRSA's Health Workforce Simulation Model forecasts a sizeable shortage of ophthalmology supply relative to demand by the year 2035, with substantial geographic disparities. Ophthalmology is one of the medical specialties with the lowest rate of projected workforce adequacy by 2035. Further dedicated workforce supply and demand research for ophthalmology and allied professionals is needed to validate these projections, which may have significant future implications for patients and providers. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)/BACKGROUND:Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE:To examine rates of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and death in patients after retinal vein occlusion (RVO) compared to controls. DESIGN/METHODS:Retrospective cohort study. METHODS:An aggregated electronic health records research network, TriNetX, was used to identify patients with diagnosis of RVO and a control group of patients with cataract. Patients were excluded if they had history of stroke, MI, DVT, or PE within 2 years of diagnosis of RVO or cataract. Propensity score matching was performed to control for baseline demographics and medical comorbidities. Main outcomes included relative risk (RR) of death, stroke, MI, DVT, and PE after RVO compared to those in matched controls. RESULTS:A total of 45,304 patients were included in each cohort. There was elevated risk of death in the RVO cohort compared to the control cohort at 1 year (RR = 1.30, P < .01), 5 years (RR = 1.22, P < .01), and 10 years (RR = 1.08, P < .01). There was elevated risk of stroke at 1 year (RR = 1.61, P < .01), 5 years (RR = 1.31, P < .01), and 10 years (RR = 1.18, P < .01). There was elevated risk of MI at 1 year (RR = 1.26, P < .01) and 5 years (RR = 1.13, P < .01), but not at 10 years (RR = 1.06, P = .12). There was mildly elevated risk of DVT at 1 year (RR = 1.65, P < .01) but not at 5 years (RR = 0.94, P = .94) or 10 years (RR = 1.05, P = .37). There was no elevated risk of PE at 1 year (RR = 0.98, P = 0.80), 5 years (RR = 0.95, P = .42), or 10 years (RR = 0.85, P =.40). CONCLUSIONS:There is an increased rate of death, stroke, and MI after RVO compared to those in matched controls. We emphasize the need for long-term systemic evaluation after RVO.