Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:Advances in pancreatic cancer surgery involve hepatotoxic chemotherapies and hepatic vasculature resections, increasing the risk of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury. The study aimed to analyze the incidence and impact of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury after pancreatectomy with hepatic vessel resection. METHODS:In this single-institutional study, patients undergoing pancreatectomy with resection of hepatic vessels (portal vein/superior mesenteric vein, celiac axis, and hepatic arteries) were analyzed. Arterial lactate, total bilirubin, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, international normalized ratio, and Doppler ultrasound-derived resistive index were assessed postoperatively. Postoperative outcomes were assessed through 90 days. Clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury was defined as American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases-defined liver failure and/or need for invasive treatment of liver complications. RESULTS:Among 116 patients (67% portal vein/superior mesenteric vein resection alone, 7% celiac axis/hepatic arteries alone, 26% portal vein/superior mesenteric vein + celiac axis/hepatic artery resection), 15 (13%) developed clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury. Mortality was significantly higher in the clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury group (47% vs 3%; P < .001). The proper hepatic artery resistive index was lower in the clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury group (0.52 vs 0.65; P = .034), whereas the following 48-hour-peak blood tests were significantly higher in this group: Lac, bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase, and alanine aminotransferase (all P < .01). Combined portal vein/superior mesenteric vein + celiac axis/hepatic arteries and elevated alanine aminotransferase 48-hour peak above 1680 U/L remained significantly associated with the occurrence of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury in multivariable analyses. Forty percent of clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury occurred in the absence of vascular complications. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury is associated with significant mortality. Low resistive index and markedly elevated biochemical markers within the first 48 hours correlate with clinically relevant postpancreatectomy liver injury and may be used to trigger earlier intervention. Given the associated morbidity and mortality, defining, preventing, and mitigating clinically significant postpancreatectomy liver injury is of the utmost importance.

BACKGROUND:Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD) is increasingly performed in the United States. Understanding factors associated with safe adoption of RPD is critical to reducing perioperative mortality during the learning curve. METHODS:Using the Epic Cosmos database, the study identified adult patients (age ≥18 years) who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) between 2019 and 2025. Modified Poisson regression was used to assess factors associated with 30-day mortality using adjustment for age, sex, race, ethnicity, insurance, marital status, rural/urban residence, socioeconomic status, and diagnosis. Among surgeons performing two or more RPDs, mortality trends were analyzed across case-number thresholds. Mortality risk was assessed by cumulative RPD and open PD (OPD) experience, with adjustment for age and diagnosis. RESULTS:Among 23,995 patients with a median age of 69 years (interquartile range [IQR], 62-75 years), 1578 (6.6 %) underwent RPD. Use of RPD increased from 4% of PD in 2019 to 10% in 2025. The 30-day mortality was higher for RPD than for OPD (2.7 % vs 2.0 %; adjusted relative risks [aRR], 1.43 (IQR, 1.02-1.95; p = 0.029). In RPD, mortality decreased with increasing surgeon prior experience: 3.9 % (Q1: 0-1 cases), 3.9 % (Q2: 2-4 cases), 2.22 % (Q3: 5-8 cases), 2.67 % (Q4: 9-18 cases), 0.92 % (Q5: 19-71 cases). Increased RPD experience was associated with decreased mortality (per doubling RPD experience: aRR, 0.78 (95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.96; p = 0.02). The patients who underwent PD between 2023 and 2025 showed no adjusted increase in mortality with robotic technique (aRR, 1.04; 95 % CI, 0.61-1.65; p = 0.85). CONCLUSIONS:Nationwide, adoption of RPD is associated with increased 30-day mortality, which decreases substantially with increasing surgeon RPD experience. These findings suggest that structured, competency-based training pathways are needed to ensure safe dissemination of novel technology, including RPD.

BACKGROUND:Most branch duct intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (BD-IPMNs) are indolent, but distinguishing those harboring high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer remains difficult. This analysis focuses not on incidental small BD-IPMNs but on the subset whose cyst characteristics bring surgery into the decision-making discussion. Surgery prevents malignant progression but carries morbidity; surveillance avoids overtreatment but risks delayed cancer detection. Current guidelines rely on fixed thresholds that may not reflect individual variation. Our study compared immediate surgery and initial surveillance in patients with BD-IPMNs, using a decision-analytic model that incorporates patient-specific risk factors. METHODS:A Markov decision model compared immediate surgery with initial surveillance, incorporating age, comorbidities, and cyst location. Health states reflected progression from low-grade to high-grade dysplasia and invasive cancer, postoperative complications, recurrence, and quality-of-life decrements. Transition probabilities were derived from published studies and American College of Surgeons (ACS)-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data. The primary outcome was quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). RESULTS:For a 60-year-old patient with mild comorbidities and a pancreatic head BD-IPMN, immediate surgery provided 16.8 QALYs versus 16.3 with surveillance (incremental gain, 0.5 QALYs). Lifetime cancer probability was lower with surgery (24.5% vs 33.5%), as was cancer-related mortality (9.3% vs 20.3%), though surgery resulted in more resections for low-grade dysplasia (55.0% vs 15.3%). Age, baseline cancer probability, and perioperative mortality were the strongest determinants of the preferred strategy. CONCLUSIONS:Among patients with BD-IPMNs being considered for surgery, immediate resection offers a modest benefit for younger, healthier individuals, whereas surveillance remains appropriate for older or comorbid patients. These findings support individualized, risk-based management rather than universal application of guideline thresholds.

BACKGROUND:Management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) requires choosing between surgical resection and active surveillance, yet current diagnostic tools cannot reliably distinguish which lesions harbor high-grade dysplasia or invasive cancer. As a result, many patients undergo major pancreatic surgery for low-grade disease, while others are observed until progression emerges. This uncertainty contributes to substantial variation in surgeon risk estimates, intervention thresholds, and treatment recommendations. Patients likewise differ in their tolerance for cancer risk, views on surgical morbidity, perceived burden of ongoing surveillance, and desired role in decision-making, making IPMN a distinctly preference-sensitive clinical scenario. Although recent international guidelines acknowledge the importance of incorporating patient values into management decisions, practical frameworks for doing so remain underdeveloped. METHODS:We performed a narrative review of the literature examining sources of uncertainty in IPMN management, variation in surgeon and patient risk perception, and existing approaches to shared decision-making (SDM) in preference-sensitive surgical decisions. We also evaluated communication strategies and decision-support tools relevant to improving decision quality in the setting of uncertain malignant potential. RESULTS:Evidence demonstrates substantial heterogeneity in both clinician and patient interpretation of malignancy risk, operative morbidity, and acceptable thresholds for surgical intervention. Surgeons and patients often weigh competing risks diff erently, contributing to variation in management recommendations even when clinical characteristics are similar. SDM provides a structured approach to integrating individualized malignancy risk estimates, discussion of treatment trade-off s, and elicitation of patient values. Conceptual frameworks and emerging decision-support tools suggest that SDM may improve calibration of risk perception, reduce unwarranted variation in care, and enhance alignment between treatment decisions and patient preferences. CONCLUSIONS:IPMN management represents a high-stakes clinical decision made under conditions of incomplete information. SDM off ers a pragmatic strategy to integrate clinical evidence with patient values when choosing between resection and surveillance. Incorporating SDM into routine IPMN care may improve decision quality, promote transparency in risk communication, and support more patient-centered recommendations while preserving clinical judgment.