Faculty Bibliography

BACKGROUND:GBC is an aggressive biliary tract malignancy with limited survival. Although actionable genomic alterations (AGAs) are increasingly recognized in GBC, their prognostic association in real-world practice remains incompletely defined because genomic status is often confounded by stage at presentation and treatment selection. We evaluated the association between documented AGA status and overall survival (OS) using a tiered matching strategy to account for major clinical confounders. METHODS:, and a comparison cohort with no documented AGA (representing a real-world population of untested and wild-type patients). Two 1:1 propensity score-matched models were constructed: Model 1 matched for age, sex, and race/ethnicity; Model 2 additionally matched for metastatic disease, surgical resection, and chemotherapy history. Outcomes were evaluated using risk analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival methods. RESULTS:subgroup was limited by small sample size. CONCLUSIONS:In this real-world matched analysis, the presence of documented AGAs in GBC were associated with higher mortality even after matching for major demographic, stage-related, and treatment-related variables. These findings support the prognostic relevance of genomic status in GBC and underscore the need to address disparities in access to genomic documentation and testing.