Faculty Bibliography

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:In a phase 2 randomized clinical trial, high-dose vitamin D3 added to standard treatment improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with standard-dose vitamin D3 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To determine if high-dose vitamin D3 added to standard chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with previously untreated mCRC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:Double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolling 455 patients with previously untreated mCRC, conducted in the US through the National Clinical Trials Network from October 2019 to December 2022 (database freeze: July 15, 2024). INTERVENTIONS/UNASSIGNED:mFOLFOX6 (modified FOLFOX6 [5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin]) or FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab every 2 weeks with either high-dose vitamin D3 (8000 IU daily × 14 days as loading dose followed by 4000 IU daily) or standard-dose vitamin D3 (400 IU daily) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary end point was PFS assessed by the unstratified log-rank test. Secondary end points included objective response rate, overall survival, and toxicity. Prespecified subgroup analyses of PFS were performed according to known prognostic factors. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among 455 randomized patients (median age, 59 years; 181 [40%] female) with median follow-up 20 months, the median PFS for high-dose vitamin D3 (n = 228) was 11.8 months (95% CI, 10.3-13.3) vs 10.3 months (95% CI, 9.4-12.2) for standard-dose vitamin D3 (n = 227) (1-sided log-rank P = .25). There were no significant differences in objective response rate between high-dose and standard-dose vitamin D3 (51% [95% CI, 44%-58%] vs 44% [95% CI, 37%-50%], respectively; P = .12), or in overall survival (median, 25.6 vs 27.0 months; 1-sided log-rank P = .66). There were no clinically meaningful differences in the most common grade 3 or greater adverse events between the high- and standard-dose groups, including neutropenia (n = 67 [32%] vs n = 62 [30%]) and hypertension (n = 42 [20%] vs n = 49 [23%]) or in incidence of vitamin D-associated toxicities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:Among patients with previously untreated mCRC, addition of high-dose vitamin D3, vs standard-dose vitamin D3, to standard chemotherapy plus bevacizumab did not improve PFS. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04094688.

Scans constitute an important role in cancer management. "Scanxiety", or scan-associated anxiety, is commonly experienced by patients undergoing cancer-related scans. Although more patients are turning to the internet and social media platforms such as YouTube for health information, few studies have evaluated the scanxiety content presented in these online resources. This study aims to evaluate YouTube videos and webpages available to patients relating to scanxiety. YouTube was searched using pre-defined scanxiety search terms and a Google search analysis for the term scanxiety was carried out and results from the first two pages were collected in August 2024. YouTube videos and webpages were evaluated using the validated DISCERN quality criteria for consumer health information and the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT). To assess accessibility of reading content, the Flesch-Kincaid reading level was determined for each webpage. Three independent reviewers performed video and webpage analysis. There were 82 videos and 18 webpages included in the analysis. Videos had a mean independent-reviewer rated quality DISCERN score of 1.8 out of 5, which was between low and moderate quality. Websites showed a higher mean quality DISCERN score of 2.7 out of 5. Despite better quality of information, websites were written at a higher reading level than that of the general population, limiting accessibility. Both videos and webpages had low actionability as patient education materials. Efforts are needed to improve scanxiety-related patient education as the number of patients living with cancer and requiring cancer-related scans has significantly increased.

Advanced gastrointestinal cancers remain a major global health challenge, with rising incidence especially among younger populations. Systemic chemotherapy continues to be the mainstay of care for most patients, but balancing treatment benefit with tolerability is an ongoing concern. Many patients, especially older adults and those with significant medical comorbidities, may struggle with standard dosing due to side effects, yet they are often underrepresented in clinical trials. As a result, real-world practice often relies on adjusting drug doses and schedules to reduce toxicity without compromising outcomes. Personalizing systemic therapy based on patient factors like age, fitness, and individual response can help improve tolerability and maintain quality of life. Emerging evidence supports the use of modified dosing and frequency, but prospective data remain limited. In this review, we discuss current approaches to optimizing systemic therapy for advanced gastrointestinal cancers and the need for practical, patient-centered care pathways.

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly used for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); yet most patients only achieve partial response. Pathological treatment response grading focuses on assessing residual tumor burden, often overlooking changes in tumor microenvironment (TME). To address this gap, we compared tumor cells and TME of 13 NAT-naïve and 23 post-NAT PDACs using integrated spatial pathomics and transcriptomics, with validation in an independent single-cell spatial dataset. NAT significantly reduced tumor burden (14.7%-6.2%, p = 0.004), but systemic comparison of 13 cytomorphometric features of tumor cells alone did not reliably distinguish between naïve and NAT cases. In contrast, NAT profoundly remodeled TME by increasing cancer-associated fibroblast (CAF) and CD8⁺ T cell densities, promoting CD8⁺ T cell-tumor cell proximity and fibrosis, reducing tumor-associated neutrophils, and redistributing tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs). Spatial transcriptomics shows NAT induced apoptosis, DNA-damage response, and AGC-kinase (S_TK_X) signaling in tumor cells, and upregulated complement pathway, p53 signaling, and cellular senescence program in TME. Cross-platform single-cell spatial analysis revealed decreased regulatory T cells (Treg) and a shift from myofibroblastic (mCAF) to inflammatory CAF (iCAF). Importantly, post-NAT patients with more fibrosis had longer overall survival (p = 0.02), and higher B-cell density showed a favorable trend (p = 0.06). Together, these results suggest that beyond tumor debulking, NAT induces a coordinated TME remodeling characterized by fibroblast reprogramming, matrix fibrosis, and immune spatial reorganization. Incorporating assessment of NAT-induced stromal and immune changes into TRG may improve prognostication and guide more precise therapy in post-NAT PDAC.

Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly being used for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This study investigates how NAT differentially impacts PDAC's carcinoma cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME). Spatial transcriptomics was used to compare gene expression profiles in carcinoma cells and the TME of 23 NAT-treated versus 13 NAT-naïve PDACs. Findings were validated by single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) analysis. NAT induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation of carcinoma cells and coordinately upregulates multiple complement genes (C1R, C1S, C3, C4B and C7) within the TME. Higher TME complement expression following NAT is associated with increased immunomodulatory and neurotrophic cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs); more CD4⁺ T cells; reduced immune exhaustion gene expression, and improved overall survival. snRNA-seq analysis demonstrates C3 complement is mainly upregulated in CAFs. These findings suggest that local complement dynamics could serve as a novel biomarker for prognosis, evaluating treatment response, and guiding therapeutic strategies in NAT-treated PDAC patients.

BACKGROUND:5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) is a major component of gastrointestinal cancer treatments. In multidrug regimens such as FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX, 5-FU is commonly administered as a bolus followed by an infusion. However, the pharmacologic rationale for incorporating the 5-FU bolus in these regimens is unclear, and there are other effective regimens for gastrointestinal cancers that do not include the bolus. The purpose of this study was to determine whether omission of the 5-FU bolus was associated with a difference in survival and toxicity. METHODS:A real-world database from Flatiron Health was queried for patients with advanced colorectal, gastroesophageal, and pancreatic cancers who received first-line FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX regimens. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to compare survival outcomes between patients who received the 5-FU bolus and those who did not. Inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) analysis was performed to adjust for treatment selection bias. RESULTS:This study included 11,765 patients with advanced colorectal (n=8,670), gastroesophageal (n=1,481), and pancreatic (n=1,614) cancers. Among all first-line 5-FU multidrug regimens, 10,148 (86.3%) patients received a 5-FU bolus and 1,617 (13.7%) did not. After IPTW analysis, we found that omitting the bolus was not associated with a decrease in overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.07; P=.74). However, omitting the bolus was associated with reductions in neutropenia (10.7% vs 22.7%; P<.01), thrombocytopenia (11.2% vs 16.1%; P<.01), and use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors after treatment (19.6% vs 29.1%; P<.01). CONCLUSIONS:After adjusting for baseline clinical factors, we found that omission of the 5-FU bolus from FOLFOX, FOLFIRI, and FOLFIRINOX regimens was not associated with decreased survival, but resulted in decreased toxicity and possible health care savings.

BACKGROUND/UNASSIGNED:Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) is increasingly being used for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment. However, its specific effects on carcinoma cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) are not fully understood. This study aims to investigate how NAT differentially impacts PDAC's carcinoma cells and TME. METHODS/UNASSIGNED:Spatial transcriptomics was used to compare gene expression profiles in carcinoma cells and the TME between 23 NAT-treated and 13 NAT-naïve PDAC patients, correlating with their clinicopathologic features. Analysis of an online single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snRNA-seq) dataset was performed for validation of the specific cell types responsible for NAT-induced gene expression alterations. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:T cells, monocytes, and mast cells; and reduced immune exhaustion gene expression. snRNA-seq analysis demonstrates C3 complement was specifically upregulated in CAFs but not in other stroma cell types. CONCLUSIONS/UNASSIGNED:NAT can enhance complement production and signaling within the TME, which is associated with reduced immunosuppression in PDAC. These findings suggest that local complement dynamics could serve as a novel biomarker for prognosis, evaluating treatment response and resistance, and guiding therapeutic strategies in NAT-treated PDAC patients.

Sarcomatoid urothelial carcinoma (SUC) is a rare subtype of urothelial carcinoma (UC) that typically presents at an advanced stage compared to more common variants of UC. Locally advanced and metastatic UC have a poor long-term survival following progression on first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Antibodies directed against the programmed cell death 1 protein (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) are now approved to be used in these scenarios. The need for reliable biomarkers for treatment stratification is still under research. Here, we present a novel case report of the first Imaging Mass Cytometry (IMC) analysis done in SUC to investigate the immune cell repertoire and PD-L1 expression in a patient who presented with metastatic SUC and experienced a prolonged response to the anti-PD1 immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab after progression on first-line chemotherapy. This case report provides an important platform for translating these findings to a larger cohort of UC and UC variants.

BACKGROUND:Non-Hispanic blacks (NHB) with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are more likely to have papillary RCC (pRCC) than non-Hispanic whites (NHW). Data on histologic subtypes in RCC in Hispanics (H) are also sparse. Previous studies have shown that pRCC is more prevalent in NHB than in NHW, but they analyzed predominantly NHW populations. The Montefiore-Einstein Center for Cancer Care (MECC) serves a predominantly NHB and H population in the Bronx, NY. We investigated histologic subtype specific associations with established RCC risk factors in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS:The MECC tumor registry was used to identify patients ≥ 18 years of age treated with partial or radical nephrectomy between January 2000 and December 2015. An institutional software program and individual chart review were used to obtain demographic data (including self-reported race, age, and sex), pathology data, and RCC risk factors (hypertension, diabetes, renal function, weight). Data were modeled by multinomial logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS:A total of 1010 RCC cases were identified. Of these, 232 (23.0%) occurred in NHW, 383 (37.9%) NHB, 181 (17.9%) H, and 214 (21.2%) other. A total of 530 cases (52.5%) were clear cell (ccRCC) histology, 257 (25.4%) pRCC, 100 (9.9%) chromophobe (cRCC), and 123 (12.2%) other. Individuals with pRCC compared to ccRCC were more likely to be NHB than NHW (OR, 4.41; 95% CI, 2.81-6.93) but were less likely to be female (OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.35-0.72). Individuals with pRCC were also less likely to be H than NHW (OR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.27-0.99). Patients with cRCC were also more likely to be NHB than NHW (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.06-4.67). CONCLUSION:In the MECC data set, histology of RCC varies by race, confirming earlier reports that non-ccRCC is more common in NHB than NHW. We also report that pRCC is less common in H than NHW.

PURPOSE:SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a systemic infection. Patients with cancer are immunocompromised and may be vulnerable to COVID-related morbidity and mortality. The objectives of this study were to determine if patients with cancer have worse outcomes compared with patients without cancer and to identify demographic and clinical predictors of morbidity and mortality among patients with cancer. METHODS:We used data from adult patients who tested positive for COVID-19 and were admitted to two New York-Presbyterian hospitals between March 3 and May 15, 2020. Patients with cancer were matched 1:4 to controls without cancer in terms of age, sex, and number of comorbidities. Using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, we compared morbidity (intensive care unit admission and intubation) and mortality outcomes between patients with cancer and controls. Among those with cancer, we identified demographic and clinical predictors of worse outcomes using Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS:= .894) between patients with and without cancer. CONCLUSION:We observed that patients with COVID-19 and cancer had similar outcomes compared with matched patients without cancer. This finding suggests that a diagnosis of active cancer alone and recent anticancer therapy do not predict worse COVID-19 outcomes and therefore, recommendations to limit cancer-directed therapy must be considered carefully in relation to cancer-specific outcomes and death.