Faculty Bibliography

STUDY OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Clinical demands in the emergency department (ED) may contribute to decision and attention fatigue as clinician time-on-shift increases, impacting patient care. Emergency department pharmacists review orders and intervene to correct problems related to safety and appropriateness. This study's objective was to evaluate and characterize the rate of pharmacist interventions on ED medication orders. We hypothesized that pharmacist interventions would increase with clinician time-on-shift. METHODS:We performed a retrospective study of 2 EDs within a single health system between January 2022 and November 2023. Medication and pharmacy intervention details were extracted and linked to clinician schedules, pharmacist schedules, and ED crowding scores. Mixed-effects logistic regression modeling identified factors associated with pharmacist interventions. RESULTS:Pharmacists intervened on 9,054 (1.5%) of 622,171 medication orders placed by 308 clinicians. Pharmacy intervention rate increased with clinician time-on-shift (odds ratio 1.04 for each hour; 95% confidence interval 1.03 to 1.05), with meaningful variation in this effect between individual clinicians. Stratified by clinician type (attendings, residents, or physician assistants) and shift timing (overnight versus daytime shifts), the association between time-on-shift and pharmacy intervention rate remained positive. Stratified by site (A versus B), the association was positive at site A but not at site B. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:The likelihood of orders requiring pharmacist interventions increased as ED clinicians' time-on-shift increased. This association was consistently observed across differing clinician types and shift timing, but variable across the 2 sites of the study. Clinical staffing models and quality of care could be improved by addressing stressors and fatigue accumulation informed by this analytical model.

OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Fentanyl test strips (FTS) have the potential to moderate drug use behavior amidst an unregulated drug supply, yet are underutilized in medical settings. We aimed to describe emergency department (ED) FTS distribution across a large NYC health system and examine characteristics associated with clinicians' ordering FTS compared with the current standard-of-care, take-home naloxone (THN), to identify opportunities to optimize FTS distribution. METHODS:We conducted a retrospective review of THN and FTS provision across a large urban health system in its first year of FTS distribution. We evaluated the demographic and clinical characteristics of visits in which clinicians ordered FTS, compared with THN only. RESULTS:From July 20, 2022 to July 20, 2023, 237 (of 423) clinicians ordered THN for 1279 unique individuals in 1376 eligible visits (436 with FTS, 940 without). In pairwise analysis, FTS receipt was associated with being male, younger, non-White, lacking commercial insurance; substance-related or overdose-related visit chief complaint or diagnosis, attending physician, and patient-directed discharge ( P <0.05 for each). In multivariable regression, higher odds of FTS receipt were associated with male gender (OR=2.4; 95% CI=1.8-3.5), a substance-related chief complaint (OR=2.0; 95% CI=1.2-3.2) or visit diagnosis (OR=5.5; 95% CI=3.8-8.0), and overdose visit diagnosis (OR=1.7; 95% CI=1.1-2.8). Lower odds of FTS receipt were associated with older age (OR=0.98; 95% CI=0.97-0.99), noncommunity hospital sites (OR=0.71; 95% CI=0.60-0.83), and non-attending clinicians (OR=0.83; 95% CI=0.69-0.98). CONCLUSIONS:Integrating FTS into an existing ED THN program was feasible without disrupting clinical workflow. ED encounters where FTS were dispensed differed significantly from THN-only, revealing opportunities to optimize FTS ordering.

OBJECTIVE:Mass casualty incidents (MCIs) continue to pose significant operational challenges for health care facilities, particularly when compounded by electronic health record (EHR) downtime or cyberattacks. Despite advancements in technology, providers may consider using simple, paper-based patient triage and tracking methods during an MCI. This study describes the implementation of a paper-based triage and patient tracking tool, integrated into a broader MCI Toolkit, to support operational continuity. METHODS:Developed by NYU Langone Hospital-Brooklyn Emergency Department in collaboration with Emergency Management, the tool was deployed in 6 full-scale exercises (2021-2025) and 2 real-world MCIs across trauma and non-trauma ED settings. The tool follows a 3-step process: rapid triage using Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START), documentation of acuity and location, and post-triage identity reconciliation. The MCI Toolkit includes operational resources such as contact lists, patient placement maps, and job action sheets. After each event, feedback was gathered from clinical staff and senior leadership. RESULTS:In the feedback sessions, the tool was noted to be intuitive and required minimal training. It enabled rapid triage, patient placement, and real-time situational awareness for Incident Command. During a downtime simulation, it supported a seamless transition from electronic to manual processes. Across incidents, it improved patient throughput, ensured appropriate team assignment, and supported role flexibility when leadership was unavailable. CONCLUSIONS:Our experience using the paper-based Triage Tracker showed it reliably maintained patient tracking without electronic systems. Its ease of use and integrated resources supported coordination, patient flow, and operational continuity during MCIs and EHR disruptions.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:Emergency departments (EDs) serve patients at high risk for overdose. There is increasing interest in peer-delivered ED interventions for substance use but little rigorous research on their effectiveness. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To examine the effectiveness of an initiative (Relay) operated by the New York City Health Department that dispatches trained peer wellness advocates (WAs) to support ED patients after a nonfatal opioid overdose. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:This randomized clinical trial compared Relay and site-directed care (SDC) at 4 EDs in New York, New York. Adult patients presenting after opioid-involved overdose were enrolled from October 6, 2020, to June 30, 2022, with 12 months of outcome follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed from November 4, 2024, to May 6, 2025. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:ED workers (generally physicians) called the Relay hotline for patients presenting after a suspected opioid-involved overdose. WAs met patients in the ED to provide peer support and brief overdose risk reduction education. WAs attempted to contact patients for 90 days to provide ongoing support, education, and referrals using a harm reduction framework. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:Opioid-related adverse events (any opioid-involved overdose [fatal or nonfatal] or any other substance use-related ED visit) in the 12 months after enrollment were identified using health care administrative data plus self-report. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:Among a total of 253 participants randomized, 127 were randomized to the Relay arm and 126 to the SDC arm. A total of 247 participants, 125 in the Relay arm and 122 in the SDC arm (190 [76.9%] men; 80 [32.4%] Black, 126 [51.0%] Hispanic or Latinx, 76 [30.8%] White, and 91 other race [36.8%]), were included in the intention-to-treat analyses. No statistically significant differences between arms were observed for the primary outcome (mean [SD] opioid-related adverse events, 3.29 [4.52] in the Relay arm and 4.10 [9.36] in the SDC arm; rate ratio, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.72-1.45; P = .90). By 12 months after enrollment, 24 participants (9.7%) had died (17 [70.8%] due to overdose). Relay participants reported high satisfaction with the ED intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:This randomized clinical trial examining the impact of an ED peer navigator intervention on subsequent opioid-related adverse events did not find significant outcome differences for Relay vs SDC participants. These findings highlight the importance of intervening to save lives in this high-risk population and suggest potential refinements to future ED peer intervention research. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04317053.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:Assessment of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) has pressured rapid diagnostic evaluation through point of care troponins (POCT-Tns). However, POCT-Tns have demonstrated inconsistent accuracy compared to laboratory (LABT)-Tn. A POCT-Tn used inappropriately to "rule-out" ACS can lead to premature diagnostic closure. We aimed to minimize indiscriminate POCT-Tn testing, while balancing test turnaround time (TAT), institutional cost, and impact on patient time to disposition (TTD). METHODS:A quality improvement (QI) initiative from 2018 to 2022 included educational interventions and electronic health record (EHR) adaptations. We evaluated test characteristics, trended test frequency, TATs, cost, and TTD. We used statistical process control charts to evaluate changes in test frequency over time. We used the Mann-Whitney U and Wilcoxon Signed-Rank Sum test to analyze changes in TAT, TTD, and cost. RESULTS:POCT-Tn had high discordance with LAB-Tn (9.7%) and low sensitivity (52.5%). SPCs showed a significant decrease in POCT-Tn tests performed over time. LABT-Tn TATs were longer than POCT-Tn (54 vs 21 min; P < .001). Total Tn testing costs decreased by $668 827.83 annually. Compared to pre-initiative, arrival to disposition was 20 min longer for patients receiving a LABT-Tn (P < .001) and 37 min shorter for patients receiving a POCT with reflex to LABT-Tn (P < .001). CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:POCT-Tn test characteristics may place patients at risk for missed ACS. A combined approach using education and EHR adaptations decreased use of indiscriminate POCT-Tn tests, decreased health care costs, and resulted in clinically appropriate changes in disposition times for this large cohort of ED patients.

BACKGROUND:Despite fall-related injuries accounting for over two-thirds of older adult trauma injuries, fall-related injuries are more likely to be under-triaged. The Score for Trauma Triage in the Geriatric and Middle-Aged (STTGMA) is an injury risk-triage tool. This study aims to validate STTGMA's accuracy in predicting fall-related mortality among older adult trauma patients and compare its predictive accuracy with the Geriatric Trauma Outcome Score (GTOS) and the Revised Trauma Score (RTS). METHODS:Using a retrospective cohort design, we selected 6,458 older adult trauma patients (aged 65 years and older) from a single institutional trauma database (2017-2023). The primary outcome variable was in-hospital death, measured as a binary variable. The primary predictor variable was the STTGMA score, measured as a continuous variable and a four-level categorical variable. The secondary predictor variables were the GTOS and the RTS. We compared the predictive accuracy (95% confidence interval (CI)) of the STTGMA, GTOS, and RTS. We further assessed the relationships between the STTGMA risk categories and time-to-death and hospital length of stay using multivariable time-varying Cox proportional hazard analysis and multivariable quantile regression analysis, respectively. RESULTS:A total of 130 patients (2.0%) died during admission, and the median hospital length of stay was 2 days. STTGMA exhibited 84% (95% CI: 77.3-89.8) accuracy in predicting in-hospital fall-related mortality, while the GTOS and RTS both exhibited 71% diagnostic accuracies. Compared to the minimal risk category, older adult trauma patients classified as low, moderate, and high risks each had significantly longer hospital stays and adjusted mortality risks, in a dose-response pattern. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:STTGMA can accurately predict in-hospital mortality and risk-stratify the length of stay and the time to death among older adult trauma patients with fall-related injuries.

BACKGROUND:Pre-injury frailty among older adults with trauma injuries is a predictor of increased morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES/OBJECTIVE:We sought to determine the relationship between frailty status and the care trajectories of older adult patients who underwent frailty screening in the emergency department (ED). METHODS:Using a retrospective cohort design, we pooled trauma data from a single institutional trauma database from August 2020 to June 2023. We limited the data to adults 65 years and older, who had trauma injuries and frailty screening at ED presentation (N = 2,862). The predictor variable was frailty status, measured as either robust (score 0), pre-frail (score 1-2), or frail (score 3-5) using the FRAIL index. The outcome variables were measures of clinical care trajectory: trauma team activation, inpatient admission, ED discharge, length of hospital stay, in-hospital death, home discharge, and discharge to rehabilitation. We controlled for age, sex, race/ethnicity, health insurance type, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index, injury type and severity, and Glasgow Coma Scale score. We performed multivariable logistic and quantile regressions to measure the influence of frailty on post-trauma care trajectories. RESULTS:The mean (SD) age of the study population was 80 (8.9) years, and the population was predominantly female (64%) and non-Hispanic White (60%). Compared to those classified as robust, those categorized as frail had 2.5 (95% CI: 1.86-3.23), 3.1 (95% CI: 2.28-4.12), and 0.3 (95% CI: 0.23-0.42) times the adjusted odds of trauma team activation, inpatient admission, and ED discharge, respectively. Also, those classified as frail had significantly longer lengths of hospital stay as well as 3.7 (1.07-12.62), 0.4 (0.28-0.47), and 2.2 (95% CI: 1.71-2.91) times the odds of in-hospital death, home discharge, and discharge to rehabilitation, respectively. CONCLUSION/CONCLUSIONS:Pre-injury frailty is a predictor of clinical care trajectories for older adults with trauma injuries.

IMPORTANCE/UNASSIGNED:The emergency department (ED) offers an opportunity to initiate palliative care for older adults with serious, life-limiting illness. OBJECTIVE/UNASSIGNED:To assess the effect of a multicomponent intervention to initiate palliative care in the ED on hospital admission, subsequent health care use, and survival in older adults with serious, life-limiting illness. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS/UNASSIGNED:Cluster randomized, stepped-wedge, clinical trial including patients aged 66 years or older who visited 1 of 29 EDs across the US between May 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, had 12 months of prior Medicare enrollment, and a Gagne comorbidity score greater than 6, representing a risk of short-term mortality greater than 30%. Nursing home patients were excluded. INTERVENTION/UNASSIGNED:A multicomponent intervention (the Primary Palliative Care for Emergency Medicine intervention) included (1) evidence-based multidisciplinary education; (2) simulation-based workshops on serious illness communication; (3) clinical decision support; and (4) audit and feedback for ED clinical staff. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES/UNASSIGNED:The primary outcome was hospital admission. The secondary outcomes included subsequent health care use and survival at 6 months. RESULTS/UNASSIGNED:There were 98 922 initial ED visits during the study period (median age, 77 years [IQR, 71-84 years]; 50% were female; 13% were Black and 78% were White; and the median Gagne comorbidity score was 8 [IQR, 7-10]). The rate of hospital admission was 64.4% during the preintervention period vs 61.3% during the postintervention period (absolute difference, -3.1% [95% CI, -3.7% to -2.5%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.03 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.14]). There was no difference in the secondary outcomes before vs after the intervention. The rate of admission to an intensive care unit was 7.8% during the preintervention period vs 6.7% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.15]). The rate of at least 1 revisit to the ED was 34.2% during the preintervention period vs 32.2% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.91 to 1.09]). The rate of hospice use was 17.7% during the preintervention period vs 17.2% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.93 to 1.16]). The rate of home health use was 42.0% during the preintervention period vs 38.1% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.10]). The rate of at least 1 hospital readmission was 41.0% during the preintervention period vs 36.6% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.01 [95% CI, 0.92 to 1.10]). The rate of death was 28.1% during the preintervention period vs 28.7% during the postintervention period (adjusted OR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.98 to 1.18]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE/UNASSIGNED:This multicomponent intervention to initiate palliative care in the ED did not have an effect on hospital admission, subsequent health care use, or short-term mortality in older adults with serious, life-limiting illness. TRIAL REGISTRATION/UNASSIGNED:ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03424109.